FOR MEN WHO HAVE BEEN, OR ARE BEING, OR WHO MIGHT IN THE FUTURE
BE F*CKED OVER BY MASONS, ZIONISTS OR THE REST OF THE ILLUMINATI
NEW WORLD ORDER MAFIA WHO ABUSE GOOD MEN FOR PROFIT. MUCH OF IT
AIDED BY THE PRESS BARONS IN THE ZIONIST BACKED COMPLIANT MEDIA.
DANGER ZONES FOR MENS HEALTH AND WEALTH
1. Having large sums of money in ANY bank. (They are all con men see
WE TURN THE HOMELESS INTO MILLIONAIRES FOR THE DAY
The X Factor vision of society blames the poor for their predicament
Campers descend on central Paris to highlight plight of homeless
2. Having any kind of mortgage with a bank. (They are all scams see
3. Marrying and signing a state marriage certificate. (Notice NO small print see
4. Having a child. (Maybe the single most dangerous threat to a mans welfare see
5. Entering ANY court especially NO JURY civil courts.(Mason judges make it up see
6. Hiring a lawyer anywhere across the globe. (ALL part of the Bar associations see
7. Trusting any politician.(They are ALL on the take see
9. Taking out any type of credit especially for a large purchase like a car (see
9. Trusting any journalist who answers to the corporate media (see
10. Trusting any cop who answers to masonic superiors (see
11. Allow social workers, lawyers and judges with a homosexual
agenda to decide
on the future welfare of your children (see HERE)
12. Doing any form of business with a FREEMASON. ( ALL of the above included see
THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THEM AND US
THE MOST IMPORTANT PEOPLE ON THIS PLANET ARE THE LEAST IMPORTANT PEOPLE
OR AT LEAST HOW THE PRESS BARONS AND THEIR SCUMBAG JOURNALISTS PORTRAY THEM
We all strive to better ourselves, in our lives and in our children's lives, but
that should NOT be at the expense of others. The ruling mafia have created an underclass
for a number of reasons and would include letting us all know that if we do not
follow their rules we may end up on the streets. Also their mass media propaganda
machine ensures the poor, disabled, vulnerable and sick can be used as a punch bag and
blamed for ALL the ills of the world and have us believe it is the POOR that are
stopping us from bettering ourselves.
This is maybe the most devious lie created by the press barons who
have ensured the sheeple's venom is vented towards those least able to defend
themselves while distracting attention away from the ruling mafia
who live opulent lifestyles and with riches so VAST no one can truly comprehend
how vast that wealth is.
Fortunately the internet is rewriting history and exposing the myths from
a global propaganda machine that is breaking the despicable cycle of deceit and
where a psychological battle has been waged on our minds to ensure we
remain compliant with the ruling elite's demands. We must all re-learn
to respect those who need our sympathy and understanding, not venom, and we
must also be aware that every man facing injustice will allow, in the end, all
men to face that same injustice .
Without fighting for the weakest in our society, while complying with the
ruling mafia's orders, we condone and perpetuate a well orchestrated master plan
that will allow these evil bastards to hold on to power unless our humanity has
a massive wake up call and remove that ruling elite from power
in one way or another. It is only in the interests of the ultra wealthy that this system
can carry on ad infinitum. Everyone else will continue to suffer, as they have
done throughout history, while the ruling mafia carry on their deceitful and
diabolical plans and all part of their new technological world order.
IF YOU THINK YOUR LIFE IS BAD OR MISERABLE IT IS BECAUSE OF THE RICH NOT THE POOR.
The best index to a person's character is how they treat people who can't do them
any good, and how they treat people who can't fight back.
WE PROMOTE PEOPLE THE CORPORATE MEDIA IGNORE AT THEIR PERIL.
WRITTEN FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF THE HAVE NOTS AS OPPOSED TO THE MASS MEDIA
RUN BY ULTRA-RICH PRESS BARONS LOOKING DOWN AT THE PEASANTS
|COLD RUTHLESS DEVIOUS BASTARDS CONTROL THE EARTH
ONLY FOR THOSE AS YET TO WAKEN UP.
WARNING PSYCHOPATHS IN CHARGE
Super Rich The Greed Game (VIDEO)
Credit crunch? 619,000 millionaires living in Britain rising 17 per cent over the last two years
A third of Britain STILL belongs to the aristocracy
THE CABINET RICH LIST
Pay gap between highest and lowest earners growing faster in Britain than any of the world's richest countries
Do you think the cops are there to protect you from criminals?
Do you think judges are there to give you justice?
Do you think lawyers are there to protect your freedoms?
Do you think legal aid is paid to poor litigants?
Do you think bailiff's act honestly when evicting homeowners?
Do you think social workers are there to protect your children?
Do you think politicians are there to ensure your welfare?
Do you think local authority chiefs are there to provide you with services?
Do you think psychiatrists are there to guard your mental health?
Do you think the banks are there to make YOU prosperous?
Do you think the media are there to enlighten us?
Do you think teachers are there to educate ?
Do you think the armed forces are there to protect your security?
Do you think regulators are there to ensure all of the above stay in line?
If you have been reading and watching the complicit media for most of your life you likely have been brainwashed into believing all of the above, when in fact many are criminals or forced to act in a criminal way for their masters. They only get away with murder to protect the self appointed elite pulling the strings of their satanically controlled duped goons who act ONLY in the interests of the psychopathic madmen and women running the world while living in VAST OPULENCE.
You might also believe that the latest credit crunch is affecting everybody, but look closely at the facts and you will see there is a tier of privileged individuals who NEVER suffer during controlled recessions. In fact they PROSPER while millions struggle to survive the sudden changes of fortune brought about by the few at the top deciding to rein in the pittance they provide in sustenance to the masses primarily to stop any major dissent from their form of enslavement and tyranny . For centuries these few dynastic families have been getting away with absolute murder turning generation upon generation of our forefathers into slaves for the ultra wealthy. Unless we stop them now our children and grandchildren will suffer the same deviant world they claim is some kind of civilized society. They have required a massive propaganda network to get away with this for so long, but by the day that machine is grinding to a halt in the mass exposure of the monstrous evil they have been getting away with.
Do not be fooled by the fancy clothes and ancient traditions, these mobsters have been using subtle and devious tricks of the trade , disguised as some sort of esoteric knowledge, or so they claim, while using thuggery, blackmail, bullying and abuse to persecute anyone who steps outside their masonic bubble. These maniacs and psychopaths have been raping and murdering in endless wars they create to keep us all in fear and in our lowly place.
THEY ONLY HAVE THAT POWER AS LONG AS WE LET 'EM.
|COMMENTS FROM OUR READERS THAT ARE GREATLY APPRECIATED
Your passionate way with words is a daily source of energy to me and, I would expect, lots of others subscribers---keep it up!!...john
There are hundreds of websites, probably thousands, devoted to men’s issues and combating
feminism. Something for everyone. We are glad the topic is under discussion from every angle.
But if you really want to understand the New World Order conspiracy, one site stands
above the rest because it has the correct New World Order worldview (or close to it):
International Men’s Organisation.
From a review by the
NWO University Forum
Brilliant website matey I read it often and it blows my mind how much information
you have gathered over the years well done dude. Sullers
I have been reading stuff on your website for some time and can relate to everything
that is being exposed. Glad there is a website out there which is really showing up
and exposing it all. Kind regards DR
Hi! Great site! Telling it like it is. Keep it up!
Love the site, you have a done an awesome job
I am an avid reader of International Mens Organisation. JB
We love intmensorg.info!
I really appreciate your collection of resources on the intmensorg.info website.
Thank you for your wonderful resources.
I just checked your website and I am blown away!! Its so cool to be in contact with you!!
I have been reading your site for some time now and gaining a deep insight into the
workings of this so called democratic western world we live in. I would like to show
my appreciation and gratitude. Thank you very much. Just as a good mate of mine
always says: Ignorance is the worst sin.
Therefore the revealing of knowledge and understanding must be the greatest virtue.
Thanks again Rory UK
Amazing info on the site keep up the fab work.
Dear Sirs ,
I just want to say how much I love your site. I've been an avid truth seeker
for many years and would be a big time follower of the Jeff Rense program, but I really
think your site is one of the best, well laid out and most interesting alternative media site.
I've only known of its existence over the last week, but I'm already hooked on it.
Keep up the fantastic articles and pressure on the NWO scum.
Name and email supplied
I just suddenly found your site on the internet, and WOW - it really is packed with useful
information about the inhuman beasts who are planning the NWO. Their activities are far
advanced in my country Sweden, but England is leading with regard to public camera watching.
Unfortunately your multimillion population seems to be as sleeping as our 9 million sheeple.
Good luck and keep holding up the torch of Knowledge!
Best regards , Name and email supplied from Sweden
PLEASE SEND US YOUR FEEDBACK ON ANYTHING TO
We try and ensure most of what is published is important and highly relevant to men
globally and especially those men made homeless and penniless by the evil misuse
of the law and courts that have a feminist / homopaedo / masonic /zionist / law society
We reproduce important articles under 'fair use' and in the 'public interest'
with due credit to our sources.
DUE TO MANY ATTACKS ON OUR WEBSITE WE REQUIRE THREE DOMAINS THAT CAN BE ACCESSED
LATEST NEWS UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY EVERY SECOND OF EVERY DAY
EXPOSING WHAT THE MASS MEDIA REFUSE TO EXPOSE (THANKS TO THEIR MEDIA LAWYER CENSORS)
BY REMAINING ON THIS SITE YOU ACCEPT WHATEVER COOKIES ARE REQUIRED FOR THE WEBSITE TO FUNCTION
|IMO VIDEO CHANNELS STATS COMPARISON AT AUGUST 2016
|TOP BILLIONAIRE GIT'S OF THE YEAR
|GLOBAL POPULATION UNDER ATTACK
|Deep State Isolating Trump from We the People VIDEO
|Steve Bannon "Mainstream Media Better Understand Something! ALL His Promises WILL Be Fulfilled!" VIDEO
|Israeli jet and the judeo masonic scorpion on its tail
|British media provides platform for America's transgender propaganda VIDEO
ODN is ITV online
|CNN's Cuomo : Naked transgender men in Girl's Locker Room with 12-Year-Olds Should Be Allowed VIDEO
| Inside the International Space Station VIDEO
|Family court judge commits suicide exposing the dementia he was suffering from while deciding changes to divorce laws
Disturbing when such a powerful position was being filled with someone with serious
mental health problems and with extreme views on what men are left with after his plans have been instigated
FULL ARTICLE HERE
Former top family judge, 71, commits suicide after being diagnosed with dementia
A former top family judge killed himself after being diagnosed with dementia following 'years of suffering', his family has said.
Sir Nicholas Wall, who retired on health grounds in 2012, died last week at the age of 71 after battling serious illness for the past five years.
In a death notice published today, his family said the judge - who was President of the Family Division for two years from 2010 - had 'died by his own hand'.
They added that Sir Nicholas, who was married and had four children and two grandchildren, had suffered for 'several years' with a rare dementia of the fronto-temporal lobe, but it had only recently been diagnosed. He also suffered with depression.
The notice in the Times read: 'Wall, Sir Nicholas Peter Rathbone, past President of the Family Division died by his own hand on 17th of February 2017, aged 71.
'After years of suffering he was recently diagnosed with a rare dementia of the fronto-temporal lobe.'
The tribute also included a verse from Tennyson's poem Tithonus, which reads: 'The woods decay, the woods decay and fall/ The vapours weep their burthen to the ground/ Man comes and tills the field and lies beneath/ And after many a summer dies the swan.'
Sir Nicholas was found dead in Sevenoaks, Kent, on Friday. Kent Police were called to the scene and asked the Met Police to inform his wife Margaret, to whom he was married for more than 40 years.
He also leaves behind his children Imogen, 41, Emma, 39, Rosalind, 36, and Simon. He also had two grandsons, Joshua and Arthur.
Today, the family did not want to speak at their terraced home in Clapham, south west London.
But they released a statement, describing how the 'highly-respected' judge had only recently received a diagnosis to explain his ill-health.
'We are sad to confirm the death of Sir Nicholas Wall, who was not only a highly-respected former President of the Family Division but also a much-loved husband, father and grandfather,' it read.
'Sir Nicholas took his own life having suffered for several years from a rare neurological disease called fronto-temporal lobe dementia that had only recently been diagnosed.'
It is understood that Sir Nicholas's death was not connected to Dignitas or any other assisted dying campaign.
A graduate of Trinity College, Cambridge, Sir Nicholas was called to the Bar in 1969, before being appointed a High Court Judge in the Family Division in 1993 and the Court of Appeal and Privy Council in 2004.
He was also a judge of the Employment Appeal Tribunal from 2001 to 2003 and a member of the Lord Chancellor’s Advisory Board on Family Law from 1997 to 2001.
Sir Nicholas became president of the Family Division and head of family justice for England and Wales in April 2010.
When he was put forward by the appointments panel, then-Justice Secretary Jack Straw attempted to block the promotion, perhaps due to his reputation as a forthright critic of social services, local council, social workers and politicians.
In 2009, Sir Nicholas urged his colleagues to 'come off the bench' and speak out about the 'parlous state of family law'.
In one memorable case, he said social workers were 'perceived as the arrogant and enthusiastic removers of children', who 'trample on the rights of parents and children in the process'.
The following year, he publicly called for a law to hand legal rights and duties to unmarried couples, saying a ‘live-in lovers’ law would protect women in long-term relationships from losing their home and their income in a break-up with their partner.
He was also outspoken in his condemnation of proposed cuts to legal aid.
On Saturday, the Family Law Bar Association announced the judge's death, describing him as a 'compassionate judge who thought and cared deeply about the outcome of his cases'.
Tributes have also poured in for him. Family law barrister James Roberts said he was 'a most humane Judge who always strived for the best outcome'.
Richard Cheesley wrote: 'RIP always had my respect, loved working him'.
Barrister Alan Bates added: 'A noble last gift by the wonderful Sir Nicholas Wall to justice and law reform to let it be known that he took own life. RIP'.
He told MailOnline: 'I think it's quite poignant in highlighting some of the problems around assisted dying and suicide.
'I can well see why someone who was known for his huge intellectual power and who felt such compassion for people would find the thought of losing their mental faculties so hard to bear.
'A lot of these discussions talks about pain and suffering, but this case highlights there different kind of pains. There's the kind of pain where you are suffering physically, but then there's the emotional pain of the thought of losing your intellectual ability.
'That's something that no pain relief can address and that's why his death is particularly poignant.'
Fronto-temporal dementia, also known as Pick's disease, affects the parts of the brain that control behaviour, emotions and language.
It is the same condition as Colin Baddiel, the father of comedian David Baddiel, who recently made a documentary about his father's battle with the disease.
In the film, called 'The Trouble with Dad', Baddiel explains the condition involves 'uncontrolled swearing, inappropriate behaviour, irritation, mood swings, apathy, and extreme impatience'.
Sir Nicholas's family asked for donations to be made to the Dementia Research Centre at the National Hospital for Neurology & Neurosurgery in London.
A Kent Police spokesman said: 'At 2.15am on Friday 17 February 2017 Kent Police received a report stating that a 71-year-old man had died suddenly at an address in Sevenoaks.
'There are no suspicious circumstances and officers are preparing a report for the coroner.'
Fronto-temporal dementia, also known as Pick's disease, affects the parts of the brain that control behaviour, emotions and language.
The symptoms - including impulsivity, loss of inhibitions and irrationality - usually develop gradually and get increasingly worse over a number of years.
The early symptoms can vary between different people with the condition, depending on which part of the brain is affected. Many people will initially have either behavioural or language problems.
As the condition progresses, most people experience problems in both of these areas, as well as additional physical problems and thinking difficulties. Eventually, the condition spreads to affect most brain functions.
Pick's disease is a significant cause of dementia in younger people, mainly between the age of 45 and 65.
|BEST PIZZAGATE VIDEO EVER ! 100% GUILTY, NOW RESCUE THE CHILDREN VIDEO
| Flybe flight crashes after wheel collapse at Amsterdam's Schiphol airport
| Milo Yiannopoulos Resigns from Breitbart, Tells Story of Past Sexual Abuse VIDEO
| Israel Interferes In Our Politics All The Time, And It’s Never a Scandal
FULL ARTICLE HERE
Trump with zionist backer Adelson and Clinton with her zionist backer Haim Saban
Trump and Clinton both kiss Netanyahu's arse
By Philip Weiss
I completely believe that Donald Trump was in bed with the Russians before the election and the campaign may well have intrigued with Vladimir Putin with respect to Wikileaks and that helped defeat Hillary Clinton. I believe that because that’s how the world works; because a lot of very smart people in the liberal establishment believe it; and because the New York Times and Washington Post are documenting some of it, with the fervor of Watergate.
Maybe it will bring the liar in chief down some day and end this short national nightmare. I certainly hope so.
But there are two large exceptions to the Russian conspiracy. The first is that it is good policy for the United States to be talking to Russia. If Clinton were president today, there might be dogfights over Damascus. Her gang was all for regime change in Syria, and for confrontation over the Ukraine. That’s bad policy. I’m glad they’re not running the show– though they are certainly running this story. Before you get too upset about Russia winking at the sanctions, the scandal that brought down Michael Flynn, please recall that in 2012, President Obama sent secret signals to Iran to ignore congressional sanctions, we’ll be talking to you once I’m reelected. Obama got reelected; and his deal with Iran is one of the greatest achievements of a very good presidency. Again, this is how the world works.
Which brings up the second exception. Israel tried to interfere in that 2012 election, as Chris Matthews sensibly reminded his audience recently: Benjamin Netanyahu tried to help Mitt Romney beat Obama. Sheldon Adelson held a fundraiser in Jerusalem for Romney.
Netanyahu didn’t stop there. After Romney lost, Netanyahu came to Congress to tell the Congress to reject President Obama’s nuclear deal. That was an unprecedented interference of a foreign leader in our policy-making, enabled by the Israel lobby; but there were never any investigations about that. Subsequently Chuck Schumer said he was torn between a Jewish interest and the American interest, before voting against the president, and he paid no political/reputational price for it; while President Obama said that it would be an “abrogation” of his constitutional duty if he considered Israel’s interest ahead of the U.S.; for which Obama was called an anti-semite.
Throughout those negotiations, Obama could never address the fact that Israel has nukes. This lie is honored by the press, in a way that it would never honor Trump’s lies. And the manner in which Israel got nukes, including thefts from an American company with the complicity of the White House, is only investigated by peripheral figures.
The Israeli interference in our politics is the conspiracy in plain sight that no one in the media talks about because they’re
too implicated themselves. The two top executives at the largest media company, Comcast, are pro-Israel; one of them, David Cohen,
raised money for the Israeli army. Netanyahu’s speeches to Congress were written by Gary Ginsberg, an executive at another media
company, Time Warner, but hey, that’s not an issue. Four New York Times reporters have had children serve in the Israeli army.
One of them is columnist David Brooks, who says that he gets gooey-eyed when he visits Israel. He is one of several Zionists with
columns at the Times. Tom Friedman justified the Iraq War because suicide bombers were going into Tel Aviv pizza parlors. (Huh?)
Yesterday Martin Indyk said on National Public Radio that Jared Kushner’s strong Jewish background was an asset for his being
a Middle East mediator, a job that Aaron David Miller, who also has a strong Jewish background, defined as being Israel’s lawyer.
Indyk, himself a mediator, started a pro-Israel thinktank with Haim Saban, an Israeli-American who was Clinton’s biggest funder
and who lately smeared Keith Ellison at a giant gathering at Brookings, which he also helps fund, as “clearly an anti-semite”
and “anti-Israel;” and Jake Tapper of CNN moved on to the next question, presumably because smearing a public official in that
manner is not news.
Saban is also chummy with Jeffrey Goldberg, one of whose qualifications for being the best journalist in his generation, according to the Atlantic’s publisher, is that he served in the Israeli Defense Forces, because he felt that America was unsafe for Jews. One of Goldberg’s first hires as editor at the Atlantic is Julia Ioffe, who hates Russia, and who told a synagogue audience last year after she was attacked as a Jew by Trump supporters: “Personally I was kind of glad to see the outpouring of antisemitism” because people had forgotten that Jews and Israel are the “underdog.” At another NY synagogue,
believing that he was speaking off the record, Dennis Ross, the longtime White House “mediator” of the peace process, said that American Jews must be “advocates” for Israel, not for Palestinians. Again, not a scandal. But when Rashid Khalidi, who wrote a book about the U.S. being imbalanced in the peace process, warned that neoconservatives would “infest” the Trump administration, he was smeared up and down as an anti-semite.
| Hypocrite Jolie on 'First They Killed my Father' like she is doing with Brad VIDEO
Malicious lies to destroy Brad's rights as a father
|Scotland's mason mafia disguised as cops get away with touching up children under 'Stop and Search' guise
Anyone who has had regular contact with these scum wont be surprised as they regularly help the legal mafia seize
children from the protection of their biological fathers during divorce
FULL ARTICLE HERE
|No immigration issues when the British Empire was being built
FULL ARTICLE HERE
It is laughable that one of the biggest issues over Britain remaining in the EU was the problem of immigration. Centuries ago when Britain was invading countries across the globe the British establishment could be regarded as immigrants as well as the poor peasants they dragged half way around the world to colonise places like Australia for that British Empire.
The locals couldn't use the 'immigrants not allowed' because it was only after they took over countries that artificial lines were drawn on maps showing the extent of the rape and plunder of the world by the utter scum that dominated Britain for thousands of years. The gangsters then and to this day who reside in the Houses of Parliament and who have the same mindset are using those lines to stop migration while their forefathers tore up the land rights of the peasants of countries across the globe they exploited for their own financial gain.
Throughout history humans have crossed the globe to escape famines, earthquakes, storms and persecution and those
lines cannot continue to contain man's struggle to preserve life. Catastrophes whether natural or man made will not stop humans spilling over into other lands that artificial barriers have tried to contain the natural order of how man survived the rigors of living on a dangerous planet. Much of that danger instigated by the scum and filth that masquerade as agents for a vile murderous British crown. The freemason mafia have been pushing their victims around the globe for centuries with hardly a mention of immigration concerns yet they use that argument when it doesn't suit their agenda.
|Lawyer Obama triggered SOFT coup 17 days before leaving White House VIDEO
Obama will go down in history being behind the biggest expansion of Big Brother in history.
Like the Clintons, the Obama's are Law Society plants who gather information on everyone
and use it to destroy anyone who gets in the way of their master plan.
|THE GREAT BIG BREXIT CONSPIRACY VIDEO
|Homelessness the face of a selfish society
FULL ARTICLE HERE
MUCH MORE ON HOMELESSNESS HERE
The tragedy is that for every homeless citizen there are a 100, 1000, 100,000 or even 1,000,000 individuals who do not care or recognise the plight of the homeless. In Britain a country showing serious signs of a police state and draconian laws and austerity cuts, millions still vote for a government with a history of mass murder. It is not only the political scum that are to blame for the monstrous homeless figures but anyone who turns a blind eye and votes for the very party that does more to massively increase homelessness come election time.
Britain is a sick society devoid of the care and consideration required to be taken towards those least able to defend themselves who have been thrown in the gutter while millions of uncaring feet trample on their faces failing to realize, or deliberately avoiding the fact, they may become a homeless statistic like the homeless they ignore at their peril. Homelessness can happen to anyone, absolutely anyone, and individuals with the most distinct hatred of the homeless have found that ill health can very quickly lead them to spiral downwards towards an epidemic that they cannot stand themselves.
You may have a neighbour, friend, work mate or family member who shows the same traits of loathing towards the less fortunate and openly condoned by a media controlled by wealthy press barons with more money than sense who encourage the sheeple to vent their anger onto individuals with the least influence on their lives, as if the homeless are responsible for their own mishaps through life.
But what percentage of a country's population will it take for people to rise up over the most horrific of crimes against humanity? Only victims who have tasted homelessness know that real TERROR is a much more horrifying experience than the pseudo terror threats promoted by the compliant media. Or will it be just to late by then as more and more are targeted and pushed into homelessness due to the ever increasing greed of the super rich and the government legal and political thugs who do their bidding? Stealing property is the biggest money spinner in history and a small clique are vastly improving their bank balances
as more and more of their victims are pushed into homelessness. Only a political party with homelessness at the very top of their agenda
are worthy of your vote.
|Iranian Foreign Minister " Trump Himself Says ISIS Was A Creation Of The United States!" VIDEO
| ‘We won but we lost anyway’: Kim Dotcom eligible for extradition to US - High Court of NZ VIDEO
| MILO Confronts the Panel on transgender and homosexual disorder VIDEO
|Sir Edward Heath WAS a homopaedo and his vile crimes were 'covered up by the Establishment'
FULL ARTICLE HERE
Compliant media now only stating what we have known for decades a former Prime Minister of Great Britain
abused young boys and the British establishment(including the media) helped him cover up the criminality.
But like Savile he dies before the evidence properly surfaces despite them trying to keep the lid on his
*More than 30 people have come forward with claims about the former PM
*And they are said to have given 'strikingly similar' accounts to Wiltshire Police
*The county's chief constable has said that the allegations are 'totally convincing'
*Pictures have emerged of Heath driving - despite it being claimed he didn't have a car
The police chief investigating claims that Sir Edward Heath was a paedophile is convinced the allegations are ‘120 per cent’ genuine, The Mail on Sunday can reveal.
More than 30 people have come forward with claims of sexual abuse by the former Conservative Prime Minister, according to well-placed sources.
And they are said to have given ‘strikingly similar’ accounts of incidents to Wiltshire Police – even though the individuals are not known to each other.
Wiltshire Chief Constable Mike Veale regards the allegations as ‘totally convincing’, and plans to publish a report in June.
Detectives have established that, contrary to claims that Sir Edward could not have committed the crimes as he ‘never drove a car’ and ‘always’ had a police driver with him, he did drive – and did have a car.
They have photographic evidence that shows he is a driver, and have established that he had a driving licence. He also bought a Rover 2000 after being deposed as Tory leader by Margaret Thatcher in 1975, when he was 58.
Astonishingly, Mr Veale is also understood to support claims that Sir Edward’s alleged crimes were reported to police years ago but covered up by the Establishment.
Some of those who said Sir Edward abused them are believed to have told police they went on to commit sexual abuse crimes themselves as a result.
The investigation into Sir Edward, called Operation Conifer, was set up in 2015 in the wake of the Jimmy Savile scandal.
Mr Veale came under pressure to abandon the inquiry last year after separate claims of a paedophile ring at Westminster involving former Home Secretary, the late Lord Brittan, and former Defence chief, Lord Bramall, were found to be groundless.
Allegations that Sir Edward was involved in satanic orgies have been dismissed as fantasy by an expert asked to review the case.
However, The Mail on Sunday has been told that Mr Veale believes the paedophile allegations are genuine. A source said: ‘Mr Veale believes in them 120 per cent and thinks they are totally convincing.
‘There are very close similarities in the accounts given by those who have come forward. The same names used for him, the same places and same type of incidents keep coming up.
‘What stands out is that the people giving these accounts are not connected but the stories and the details dovetail.
‘It contains disturbing stuff. Investigators have been shocked by what they have learned.’
Another source said: ‘The police were initially sceptical about the allegations, but now believe them. And they have come round to the view that they were covered up in the past because of who Heath was.
DO THESE PHOTOS UNDERMINE EX PM'S DEFENCE?
These are the photographs that appear to disprove the notion that the allegations against Sir Edward cannot be true because he ‘never drove a car’ and was always accompanied by police.
Both were taken in October 1975. In the main picture on the right, Heath is standing by the driver’s door of the Rover 2000 he bought after Margaret Thatcher ousted him as Tory leader in February that year. In the picture on the left, he is seen arriving at the Tory Party conference in Blackpool – in the driver’s seat.
Wiltshire Police has also obtained photographic evidence of him driving.
The issue was first raised by former Cabinet Secretary Lord Armstrong, who worked with Sir Edward in No 10. Lord Armstrong said Sir Edward – whom he described as ‘asexual’ – had a 24-hour police guard and driver from the day he became PM in 1970 to his death in 2005, and did not have his own car.
‘When he was at home he had two policemen on the gate, he had the personal protection officer from Scotland Yard in the house, he never drove a car himself, he always had an official driver,’ said Lord Armstrong. ‘It seems highly unlikely he could have escaped all that to do the kind of thing that is described.’
Sir Edward bought the Rover after losing the chauffeur-driven car he was entitled to as Prime Minister, then Opposition leader.
A confidant of the former PM said: ‘He definitely could and did drive, though was a notoriously bad one. When he went to music concerts in Salzburg and hired a car, he was meant to drive it because his British police guards weren’t officially allowed to.
‘But they insisted as they were frightened he was going to crash.’
‘They will not be deflected by the rich and powerful trying to do the same now. Mike Veale is doing a great job and should be congratulated for his courage.’
The disclosures come after several senior politicians dismissed the allegations against Heath as absurd and unfounded. Former Tory Foreign Secretary Sir Malcolm Rifkind complained Heath’s reputation was being ‘besmirched’. Heath’s sexuality has been the source of much speculation over the years. Some believed he was gay, others said he was ‘asexual.’ At one point, he was being investigated by no fewer than five police forces – the Met, Wiltshire, Hampshire, Kent and Jersey.
The claims, some of which have been proved false, include alleged links to a convicted brothel keeper known as Madame Ling-Ling. A paedophile dossier compiled by Labour peer Baroness Castle said he offered young boys trips on his yacht, and in a separate incident one man claimed Sir Edward picked him up hitchhiking in Kent as a 12-year-old in the 1960s and lured him to his Mayfair flat.
Labour MP Tom Watson also said he had received allegations about Sir Edward. However the claims Mr Veale is investigating, which date from the 1960s to 1990s, are not linked to the discredited evidence of the man known as ‘Nick’, who alleged a high-level paedophile ring.
One of the key counter-claims made when the allegations first surfaced came from former Cabinet Secretary Lord Armstrong, who worked with Heath when he was Prime Minister. He said Heath ‘never drove a car’ and always had at least one policeman with him from 1970 until his death in 2005.
The fact that Sir Edward could drive was confirmed last night by a friend, who said the former Prime Minister bought a car in 1975, although Sir Edward was later given a chauffeur-driven car and police guard after IRA death threats.
Asked if Mr Veale believed the allegations against Sir Edward were ‘totally convincing’, a police spokesman said the Chief Constable was determined to ‘ensure the investigation is proportionate, measured and legal’ and that the job of the police was to ‘impartially investigate allegations without fear or favour and go where the evidence takes us. It is not the role of the police to judge the guilt or innocence of people in our criminal justice system.’
Further asked if Mr Veale had ‘120 per cent’ faith in the allegations, the spokesman declined to comment.
Police refuse to call off the dogs after VIP child sex ring fiasco
Launched in 2015 to investigate allegations against Sir Edward Heath, Operation Conifer has been dogged by claims that it traduces the reputation of a Prime Minister who died more than a decade ago and could not be put on trial.
The operation, which has a staff of 17 and has run up a bill approaching £1 million, did not get off to a good start when Wiltshire Chief Constable Mike Veale had to apologise for launching it in front of cameras outside Sir Edward’s former house, Arundells, in Salisbury.
Demands to call it off grew last November when Scotland Yard was forced to abandon its Operation Midland investigation into similar claims of a VIP paedophile ring in Westminster.
After a flurry of false accusations, Commissioner Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe apologised to former Defence chief Lord Bramall, ex-Tory MP Harvey Proctor, DJ Paul Gambaccini and Lady Brittan, widow of the late Lord Brittan.
Pressure on Operation Conifer mounted after this newspaper revealed how an expert, brought in by police to assess claims that Heath was linked to paedophiles who held satanic orgies, dismissed them as fantasy.
Days after the report, Mr Veale came out fighting and insisted Operation Conifer was not a ‘witch-hunt’.
In a surprise statement released on December 2, he said he refused to ‘buckle’ to demands to abandon the inquiry, and stressed his officers had not spoken to ‘Nick’, the man at the root of Operation Midland.
The Heath investigation was not a ‘fishing trip’, he said, adding that he was ‘duty-bound’ to go ahead with it ‘without fear or favour and go where the evidence takes us’.
He accused his critics of ignorance, and rebuked them for using ‘inappropriate and unacceptable pressure’ in an attempt to halt the inquiry.
Mr Veale said a ‘significant number of individuals’ had alleged abuse, but refused to say how many or give details of the only two people to be arrested.
He even said the findings of the investigation may never be made public, stating: ‘A confidential closing report will be written… and at that time I will take advice as to what I can legally put in the public domain.’
Police were ‘testing, checking and challenging the evidence and ensuring our approach is proportionate and justified’, he said.
Mr Veale argues that although Sir Edward died in 2005, other offenders may still be alive and victims could require support.
‘If the force had received allegations of non-recent child abuse against a former Prime Minister and done nothing, what would the reaction have been?’
Lincoln Seligman, Sir Edward’s godson, responded to Mr Veale’s December statement by saying: ‘If they have uncovered no evidence after 18 months they should say so.
And if Conifer is wound up, [Sir Edward] deserves to be exonerated as publicly as he was initially smeared. Shuffling the inquiry’s findings off into the night is not acceptable.’
Other aspects of Operation Conifer have also come under fire. Wiltshire Police interviewed key figures at Private Eye because the satirical magazine joked about unmarried Sir Edward’s sexuality 40 years ago.
They wanted to know if its nickname for him, ‘Sailor Ted’, in his days as PM from 1970 to 1974, was a reference to rumours that he was gay.
Police even asked current editor Ian Hislop what he knew about Heath, despite Hislop being a teenager during the period under investigation.
Officers have also tracked down former Downing Street staff to ask them if young men were ever sneaked into No 10.
Times writer and ex-Tory MP Matthew Parris dismissed the allegations, saying: ‘If Heath was a child abuser, I’m an aardvark.’
| Glam Gay Festival's debauchery spills out onto the streets of Rio de Janeiro VIDEO
|Feminist psychopath tory May and her rabid DV claims of concern
FULL ARTICLE HERE
Domestic violence: Theresa May to oversee new law (Mass murderers pointing the finger away from their own murderous criminality)
Ken Loach: Tory government 'callous, brutal and disgraceful' and 'must be removed'
Remember those killed by Tory austerity when you cast your vote on Thursday
MASS MURDER ON THE GRANDEST OF SCALES BY THE TORY ASSASSINS THE DWP, ATOS AND MAXIMUS HERE
Unbelievable domestic violence bullshit from rabid feminist Theresa May now running a government with a long track record of
the mass murder of the poor, vulnerable, sick, disabled and the elderly, many of them female. She wants to create NEW
laws alongside the existing laws under the guise they are worried about the poor wee wimmin suffering under bad men.
No understanding, as psychopaths would do, that they themselves are responsible for draconian cuts that have seen thousands
dying rather than face austerity, homelessness and penniless thanks to their vile abuse in psychologically torturing the
vulnerable and mentally ill into an early grave by pointing the finger away from themselves.
We are now being ruled over by the most vile, sick and disturbed mass murderers under the guise that they are some sort of government who, on the one hand claim to be worried about the peasants well being while on the other using ruthless measures to cull those deemed not worthy of anything but the gutter and death.
|The law's an ass when judeo/freemasons are writing it
World leaders endlessly chant without the 'RULE OF LAW' we would all end up in the jungle. Well after decades of listing vast injustices that are emanating from every court in the UK and replicated in courts globally, that have members of the legal mafia's bar association who are all answerable to the Inns of Court in London, we can say we would take our chance in the jungle long before those vile courts.
FULL ARTICLE HERE
MASONIC JUDICIAL CROOKS HERE
MASONIC LEGAL CROOKS HERE
MASONIC COP CROOKS HERE
Laws that are being imposed on the peasants, while the self appointed elite rob us blind with impunity are NOT laws that should be adhered to. Laws that allow a bunch of perverted paedo's to steal our children for their abuse network are NOT laws that should be adhered to. The very murdering bastards manufacturing those laws are the very bastards who do not abide by them and their lodge buddies embedded in the legal system and cop mafia make sure they are NEVER charged for their abhorrent crimes against the long suffering public.
We can say with certainty the law society has the most ruthless bunch of scum dishing out judgments that make Mugabe look like an angel. Families destroyed by their version of what is law and what is to many decent citizens repugnant and where evil masquerades as good law. It is taking time for all of this to filter through to the masses as yet to face that tyranny and the monstrous evil that passes off as law enforcement.
They require to heavily enforce those laws that are so inhumane their victims die on a regular basis when pushed over the edge and when they realise what they are facing, pure evil and the more they thieve the stronger their network of twisted laws become with their own lodge buddies controlling the whole ugly operation.
BUT NOT IF WE CAN HELP IT!!!!!!!!
| 10 NEW DRONE Inventions VIDEO
| "Lefties: Angry Wimmin" BBC documentary on Radical Feminism
The BBC and socialist movement taken over by this lot
| The Icicle Works - As The Dragonfly Flies VIDEO
| Hoverbike tested in Moscow VIDEO
|The tory's murderous trail of the dead goes on and on
|UFO Fleet Creeps By International Space Station VIDEO
|Where you are most likely to see men suffering from PTSD
When the media publish articles on Post Traumatic Stress Disorder they usually associate them with soldiers,
people living in war zones, major accidents and various extreme events that lead to traumatization of the victims of such events.
FULL ARTICLE HERE
MORE FAMILY COURT HORRORS HERE
However we can say with absolute certainty there are more men suffering from PTSD globally who have had PTSD DELIBERATELY
triggered by the freemason madmen embedded in the judicial, legal and police mafia's and who are intent on destroying men's lives for profit who rely on
stolen children to feed a network of satanic blackmail techniques that keeps their dimwitted goons in line.
Some of the symptoms PTSD triggers in victims are
Being easily startled
Feeling tense or “on edge”
Having difficulty sleeping
Having angry outbursts
Some factors that increase risk for PTSD include:
Living through dangerous events and traumas
Seeing another person hurt, or seeing a dead body
Feeling horror, helplessness, or extreme fear
Having little or no social support after the event
Dealing with extra stress after the event, such as loss of a loved one, pain and injury, or loss of a job or home
Having a history of mental illness or substance abuse
Not only are men facing the divorce industrial complex suffering serious PTSD symptoms but their children, seeing their father belittled and ripped from their lives, will have lifelong PTSD symptoms and may be part of the master plan to make it easier for those wishing to control to make them jump when demanded to by the state destroyers and with a fathers biological protection with little influence.
Never mind the appalling financial mess men are being left in but PTSD is driving men to their own suicidal thoughts by an evil satanic cult that uses psychological techniques to better their own wallets through leaving men unable to function. Their lives are driven out of control by the maniacs and psychopaths determined, despite growing evidence, to continue to take advantage of the failures of any oversight that ensures the few controlling the many are getting away with murder.
There are women who may also suffer and have likely been formerly married to a freemason and will endure the same harrowing experiences
as men when faced with judges who are hand picked freemasons there to protect their lodge buddies financial position. BUT NOT IF WE CAN HELP IT!!!!!!!!!!!
| Ashton Kutcher Shocks Congress On Human Rights and Slavery VIDEO
|Daisy Clark - Hopelessly Devoted To You VIDEO
| Israel's global standing continues to sink VIDEO
| Pentagon paedo's still haven't been rounded up VIDEO
|Even Trump admits he was the best thing that could ever happen to Israel VIDEO
| Trump to kiss zionist Netanyahu's arse at the White House VIDEO
It's now payback time for all the zionist $millions they spent on his Presidential election campaign
| Ten Sneaky Ways Cities Control Your Behaviour VIDEO
|Global Law Society the biggest gang stalker on the planet
Recent reports that a lawyer was being paid millions in legal aid to attack former soldiers fighting in Iraq, who reports claim, made their lives a misery show the unaccountable power and lengths lawyers will go to persecute, NOT only soldiers, but anyone involved in a court case in the UK but all areas of the world the law society's tentacles reach out to.
FULL ARTICLE HERE
Plague of lawyers greed, self-importance and lack of scruples of UK’s last unreformed vested interest group
Disgraced lawyer agreed to pay ‘sweeteners’ to a fixer to bring murder claims against British troops
(Lawyers right across Britain pay legal aid 'sweeteners' to doctors, social workers, teachers, psychiatrists and a myriad
of dodgy expert witness's to destroy divorcing men with claims of domestic violence and with a mass media that fails to expose them)
Lawyer struck off because of reckless campaign of false and exaggerated allegations against soldiers
(Every day the same false and exaggerated allegations are used against divorcing men by the evil bastards who
have been getting away with murder funded by the state with legal aid)
Kick out hospital blood suckers, demands NHS Boss: Lawyers who tout for business in hospitals cost £440m a year - enough for 15,000 nurses
(A tiny fraction compared with the blood sucking of divorcing men these evil bastards have been getting away with)
Britain's legal mafia are screwing the country (heterosexual males) dry
How lawyers control the corporate rags (Just write it the way the lawyers want it written FAKE news)(VIDEO)
Scandal of the £millions spent on lawyers in inquiries while child abuse victims wait decades for LITTLE justice or recompense
'The Law Society is worse than a pit full of vipers'
Memorandum of Understanding between cops and law societies
Lawyer helped mastermind mortgage scams with their victims having to move out of their family homes after bailiffs knocked on their doors over the unpaid debts
The United Grand Lodge of England plays a major part in creating the laws and orders to the many masonic lawyers embedded in Britain's legal system and who operate from the Inns of Courts in London with a network of bar associations globally that are all part of their sinister network.
There is no easier way to destroy a person than to forcibly drag them into a court process either criminal or civil and use every dirty legal trick in the book to psychologically and financially destroy those hand picked for their form of gang stalking. The powers of the judiciary, police and bailiffs used to cause untold damage in the most barbaric way and where men are regularly found dead due to the extreme mental torture these evil bastards have been accustomed to getting away with.
The complicit media ALL have a media lawyer at the head of their editorial and why they have managed to block exposure of the biggest gang stalkers on the planet for so long. Only the concerted long term efforts of their victims has opened the doors to expose what will turn out to be the biggest murderous agenda in history with trillions being stolen to line the pockets of those using gang stalking as a mass murder tool.
| How General Flynn Is Vulnerable To Russian Blackmail VIDEO
|Ken Loach: Tory government 'callous, brutal and disgraceful' and 'must be removed'
Accepting the award for best British film at the Bafta awards in London, the veteran director says politicians speak for corporations – and film-makers must stand with the poor and vulnerable
FULL ARTICLE HERE
Ken Loach has launched an uncompromising attack on the UK government at the 70th British Academy Film Awards.
Speaking as he picked up his award for outstanding British film for I, Daniel Blake, which is conceived as a critique of the current state of the benefits system, Loach touched on accusations by some that his film failed to reflect reality.
Loach thanked his cast and crew, the people of Newcastle and the academy for “endorsing the truth of what this film says, which is that hundreds of thousands of people – the vulnerable and the poorest people – are treated by the this government with a callousness and brutality that is disgraceful.”
Loach continued by making reference to the Tory government’s apparent U-turn on its promise to accept thousands of unaccompanied children fleeing danger in Syria and elsewhere.
“It’s a brutality,” he said, “that extends to keeping out refugee children we promised to help.”
“In the real world,” added Loach, “it’s getting darker. And in the struggle that’s coming between the rich and the powerful, the corporations and the politicians that speak for them, and the rest of us on the other side, the film-makers know which side they’re on.”
Speaking at the press conference afterwards, Loach went further, saying that the government “have to be removed”. He hoped that voters would see his film, but there was little point politicians doing so as “the people actually implementing these decisions know what they’re doing. It’s conscious.”
Their welfare policies, he said, harked back to the Victorian workhouse ethos of telling people that poverty was their fault. “They know what they’re doing. We have to change them; they have to be removed.”
His words were echoed by screenwriter Paul Laverty, who sought to draw attention to the UN’s ruling on the UK’s treatment of the disabled. “They found systematic and gross violations,” he said, before saying the Tories had “denied, spun and tried to discredit” the findings.
“They don’t give a toss,” said Laverty, that “scurvy and rickets” had returned to the country, or that “16,000 people were admitted to hospital last year with malnutrition. We have a moral obligation to do one thing, and that’s get rid of them.”
Meanwhile producer Rebecca O’Brien spoke up for those employees of the Ritzy cinema not being paid the living wage. “We think that’s completely wrong in this day and age.”
Dave Johns, who stars in the film, added he felt I, Daniel Blake “gives the working class a voice back. People haven’t listened to them for 40 years.”
|Is the Agenda a New Civil War? VIDEO
| #PizzaGate #PedoGate Smoking Gun Evidence VIDEO
|Putin to send Edward Snowden to America as ‘gift’ to Donald Trump
Putin is planning to send whistle-blower Edward Snowden back to America as a ‘gift’ to Donald Trump.
FULL ARTICLE HERE
Before taking office, the President called the former National Security Agency worker a ‘spy’ and a ‘traitor’ that deserves to be executed.
Reports from American intelligence, seen by NBC News, suggest that Russian authorities want to ‘curry favour’ with the Trump administration.
Other intelligence papers seen by the news organisation indicate the Kremlin has been discussing the possibility of Snowden’s repatriation since Trump’s inauguration.
Snowden leaked classified documents from his job at the NSA in 2013 and fled to Russia in June of that year.
Trump had previously written on Twitter: ‘Snowden has given serious information to China and Russia-anyone who thinks otherwise is a dope! He is a traitor who fled – he knew the crime!’
During the campaign Trump said of the former-NSA employee: ‘I think he’s a total traitor and I would deal with him harshly. And if I were president, Putin would give him over’.
While the White House has not yet commented on the report, the Justice Department said it would welcome the return of Snowden who was charged under the Espionage Act of 1917.
The leaker could expect a minimum of 30 years in prison.
Head of the CIA, Mike Pompeo, agreed with Trump.
He said: ‘The proper outcome would be that he would be given a death sentence’.
Putin’s apparent offer has been received with caution in Washington. Juan Zarate, a former national security adviser, said: ‘For Russia, this would be a win-win.
‘They’ve already extracted what they needed from Edward Snowden in terms of information and they’ve certainly used him to beat the United States over the head in terms of its surveillance and cyber activity.
‘It would signal warmer relations and some desire for greater cooperation with the new administration, but it would also no doubt stoke controversies and cases in the US around the role of surveillance, the role of the US intelligence community, and the future of privacy and civil liberties in an American context.
‘All of that would perhaps be music to the ears of Putin’.
Snowden has recently had Russian residency extended until 2020, by which point he would be able to apply for citizenship.
The dissident said in response to the latest reports: ‘Finally: irrefutable evidence that I never cooperated with Russian intel. No country trades away spies, as the rest would fear they’re next.’
While it appears he has welcomed the reports as proof of innocence, Snowden’s lawyer tried to pour cold water on the reports.
American Civil Liberties Union lawyer Ben Wizner said: ‘Team Snowden has received no such signals and has no new reason for concern’.
Putin’s spokesperson, Dmitry Peskov, called the reports ‘nonsense’.
Before President Trump left office he commuted Chelsea Manning’s sentence, who leaked sensitive military documents to Wikileaks, but refused to take action against Snowden.
Snowden called the choice between Secretary Clinton and Trump a ‘tragedy of our times’ and has since deleted a tweet saying it was ‘a choice between Donald Trump and Goldman Sachs.’
After the surprise victory of Trump, the whistle-blower said he was ‘just the President. It’s an important position but it is one of many.’
His Russian lawyer, Anatoly Kucherena, has previously said that Snowden should be able to return to America without fear of arrest.
He said: ‘We hope very much that the new U.S. president would show some weighted approach to the issue and make the one and only correct decision: to stop prosecution against Edward Snowden.’
|Raging Waters - Al Jarreau RIP VIDEO
|Plague of lawyers greed, self-importance and lack of scruples of UK’s last unreformed vested interest group
Compliant media finally get round to exposing what we have been exposing for decades.
Judges are just glorified lawyers who have stealthily replaced juries making decisions
they have never had any authority to make as they are supposed to be arbiters.
FULL ARTICLE HERE
The loudest laugh in any Shakespeare play is often provoked by the line in Henry VI, Part II: ‘The first thing we do, let’s kill all the lawyers.’ Indeed, over the centuries a lot of rude things have been said about representatives of the legal profession.
But however much lawyers may have been ridiculed in the past, I doubt they have ever been held in such low esteem as they are now.
A recent poll in America found that people ranked them lower than any other profession — below business executives, journalists and artists.
Yet lawyers are an increasingly dominant force in this country, not least because Britain now boasts more of them per head of population than almost any other nation.
They are supposed to defend and uphold the law, yet more and more they are renowned for being consumed by a desire to make barrow-loads money in order to feather their own nests.
Sometimes, their fees can run into the millions of pounds for a single trial. Their fondness for money is matched, not infrequently, by their sense of self-importance.
Only yesterday an official report revealed that the majority of judges think they are under-appreciated and underpaid.
Of 33 Court of Appeal judges who took part, each of whom earns more than £200,000 a year, two-thirds said their pay is not reasonable. They can say that again!
In short, the legal profession comprises what may be the last unreformed vested interest group — conducting themselves according to their own sometimes opaque rules, which often seem to operate more obviously for their own benefit than the public’s.
Consider the extraordinary case of Phil Shiner, a high-profile solicitor who was struck off eight days ago having had 12 charges of misconduct proved against him, and was the subject of yesterday’s devastating House of Commons report on ambulance-chasing lawyers bringing thousands of ‘spurious’ cases against our troops.
It was Phil Shiner of course who laboured so relentlessly to ruin the reputations of those troops.
But the story of his corruption and eventual downfall does not simply concern one rotten apple. The legal profession as a whole is implicated.
For while he and his firm pursued those specious claims against hundreds of British servicemen, this dishonest man was lauded by many of his colleagues.
In 2007, he was named solicitor of the year by the Law Society, the professional body in England and Wales that represents solicitors.
The number of solicitors for which this organisation speaks, by the way, has trebled from 44,000 in 1980 to 133,000 today as we become an increasingly litigious, lawyer-driven society — with lawyers naturally being the main beneficiaries.
There are deeply disturbing questions about Shiner’s integrity and motives, he was being praised by solicitors’ official publication, the Law Society Gazette.
As recently as June 2014, it referred to ‘media manufactured vilification’ and ‘malign hysteria’. Will the Gazette now apologise? Don’t hold your breath.
And will Rabinder Singh QC — now an exalted High Court judge, one of only 102 — express regret for having lavished public praise on Shiner, with whom he worked on several occasions while still a barrister? I don’t expect so.
In 2007, Singh said: ‘My honest view about lawyers is that we should be modest about what we contribute to justice . . . but Phil Shiner is an exception to that rule.
If there were no Phil Shiners in the country, then the sort of legal issues arising out of the Iraq war I don’t think would have surfaced.’
If only there were no Phil Shiners! This is a man who has finally admitted nine allegations of acting without integrity, which included making unsolicited approaches to potential clients.
Among his misdemeanours was the payment of ‘sweeteners’ to a fixer to persuade him to change his evidence in the Al-Sweady inquiry into allegations of mistreatment of Iraqi prisoners by British soldiers.
This collapsed, after £30 million of public money had been wasted investigating what proved to be false and dishonest allegations made by Shiner.
There could hardly be a graver charge against any lawyer since his falsehoods might have resulted in the wrongful imprisonment of British soldiers who had risked their lives for Queen and country.
Journalists have rightly been held to account over phone-hacking, and a handful were convicted.
But can anyone maintain that the sins of the most reckless phone hacker compared in seriousness with what Shiner did?
But then the degree to which lawyers police themselves in secret can be breath-taking. When Ben Emmerson QC was accused last year of sexually assaulting a woman in a lift at the offices of the Independent Inquiry into Child Sex Abuse, Matrix Chambers (for which he works) asked former High Court judge Sir David Calvert-Smith to investigate.
After Sir David had interviewed Emmerson, he concluded ‘without hesitation’ that the lawyer was innocent of any sexual impropriety.
It is no slur against either man to suggest that this secretive inquiry does not exactly inspire public confidence.
Few lawyers can, of course, rival the likes of Phil Shiner in deceit. But that a number of them are slippery to the point of dishonesty can scarcely be doubted. In 1990, ‘no-win, no-fee’ agreements were unfortunately introduced in the dog days of the Thatcher government in the belief that would provide greater access to the law for the poor.
Also described as ‘conditional fee agreements’, their effect has been a huge increase in the number of civil disputes as so-called ambulance-chasing lawyers have induced people to mount or fight cases they would not otherwise have accepted.
Such ‘no-win, no-fee’ arrangements encourage lawyers to rack up costs that can run into the millions, in the knowledge that the person they’re suing will pick up the bill if they win.
Thus a well-intentioned measure designed to help those who would otherwise be unable to afford justice was ruthessly exploited by avaricious lawyers.
A 1979 Royal Commission had warned: ‘The fact that the lawyer has a direct personal involvement in the outcome of the case may lead to undesirable practices including the construction of evidence, the improper coaching of witnesses [and] groundless arguments designed to lead courts into error and competitive touting.’
Prophetic words! If only someone had listened.
In 2012, the Commons Transport Select Committee noted a 70 per cent rise in motor injury claims during the previous six years, despite a 23 per cent drop in the number of casualties caused by road accidents. Bogus claims encouraged by lawyers (especially for hard-to-prove ‘whiplash’ injuries) provide much of the explanation.
Although it has since then become illegal for lawyers to pay insurance companies for the names of accident victims, there still appears to be a lucrative trade in this data.
We are all of us paying significantly more for our car insurance than we should, largely thanks to unscrupulous lawyers touting for business.
Isn’t this absolutely incredible? Before the War, my father briefly practised as a solicitor before becoming a clergyman. He would be utterly aghast if he knew that the honourable profession of which he was once a member had been disfigured by money-grubbing chancers.
These days there are lawyers everywhere, and it is no surprise at all that we have become one of the most litigious nations in the world.
Reforming no-win, no-fee agreements would be an important start in curbing burgeoning litigation, but history tells us than once lawyers have been given a benefit they are loath to surrender it. Might this be because an amazing one-fifth of 650 MPs in the Commons have a legal background, and unsurprisingly are quick to defend lawyers’ interests?
I don’t, of course, want to suggest that most lawyers are crooks like Mr Shiner. I am sure that there are many high-minded solicitors and barristers who above all want to serve the cause of justice. But while I accept there are some modestly remunerated lawyers, the desire to make as much money as possible as quickly as possible appears to have taken hold of large parts of the profession.
And yet while an elaborate judicial inquiry was set up to look into ‘the ethics of the Press’ — under a senior judge, needless to say, in the shape of Lord Justice Leveson — no one has suggested it might be a good idea to hold an inquiry into the ethics of lawyers.
On the subject of Leveson, it subsequently emerged that one of the inquiry’s lawyers — an attractive married lady — was having an affair with a bouffant-haired barrister acting for Hugh Grant, the press-hating actor.
Goodness knows what cooings between the two took place while the inquiry progressed, but a later probe by the Bar Standards Board — surprise, surprise! —cleared the pair of misconduct.
While junior barristers bump along on relatively low pay, fat-cat QCs can make grotesque amounts. Last March, David Pannick QC charged £407,250 for a defence involving a two-day trial he didn’t attend.
Pannick also appeared for Gina Miller in the recent Supreme Court case, arguing that Parliament should be consulted before Article 50 (setting in motion our withdrawal from the EU) is triggered. What absurd amount did he trouser this time?
Jonathan Sumption, now a Supreme Court judge, earned almost £8 million over a period of ten months defending the owner of Chelsea football club, Roman Abramovich. That worked out at about £40,000 a day in court.
You may say that if Abramovich was prepared to pay a lawyer such a ridiculous sum of money, that’s his business. But is this a really a free market? Or is it a well-defended fortress of privilege in which a handful of clever but not necessarily outstandingly brainy barristers have scooped up most of the cream?
The law is in many respects another country with its own sometimes impenetrable legal language, strange habits, arcane conventions, and, occasionally, unimaginable rewards. It is a world in which the leading lights — senior judges and highly paid QCs — take themselves very seriously indeed, sometimes complimenting one another on their allegedly enormous intellects in a self-regarding way, and assuming an easy, though hardly merited, sense of superiority over the rest of humanity.
This truism was perfectly illustrated when 1,000 top lawyers, no less, wrote a letter last year insisting that the EU referendum result was merely ‘advisory’ and not legally binding, and that only Parliament should decide whether Brexit should happen at all! I don’t doubt that many lawyers and judges are conscientious and decent people. One particularly admirable member of the judiciary was Sir Paul Coleridge, whose experience of the break-up of families led him to speak out in favour of marriage.
But such commonsensical views are rarely expressed by an increasingly progressive, politically correct judiciary. How interesting that Sir Paul was reprimanded by the Lord Chancellor and Lord Chief Justice, and found guilty of ‘judicial misconduct’. Shortly afterwards he retired.
Whatever the merits of individual judges — and the commendable efforts of the senior family law judge Sir James Munby to open the country’s most secretive courts to greater public scrutiny also spring to mind — it can scarcely be denied that the senior judiciary is increasingly throwing its weight around.
Such ‘judicial activism’ was encouraged by the establishment of the 1998 Human Rights Act, which allowed our judges to ‘interpret’ such loosely phrased ‘rights’ as privacy. Since then, they have gradually shaped a new restrictive privacy law. Yet if we are to have a privacy law, shouldn’t it be debated and passed by Parliament? (The Act incidentally, was seized upon by a group of Left-wing lawyers, including Cherie Blair, who formed the Matrix Chambers, and enriched themselves considerably through the pursuit of ‘human rights’ cases.)
It’s hard not to conclude that the introduction of the Human Rights Act has increasingly emboldened the judiciary to interpret the law as it sees fit.
There was of course an almighty hullaballoo recently when the High Court, subsequently endorsed by a majority in the Supreme Court, ruled that Parliament must be consulted before Article 50 was triggered. Some senior legal figures were apparently stunned by criticism in this and other newspapers.
But if judges make rulings that have dramatic political consequences, they can’t reasonably expect to be immune from comment in the Press — which is what politicians experience daily.
And yet despite the rise of judicial activism (according to the American academic Ran Hirschl we now live in a ‘juristocracy’ rather than a democracy) senior judges in Britain continue to maintain that they are purely impartial and somehow above the political process, in which they nonetheless interfere.
But surely no human being can be utterly impartial or neutral. Values and moral judgments are inevitably shaped by experience.
It was illuminating, for example, to learn that several members of Britain’s Supreme Court have strong links to Europe or the EU. Lord Neuberger, who I accept is a very great man, is married to Lady Neuberger. A week before the EU referendum she declared online that ‘referenda [are] mad and bad’, and dismissed Ukip and Brexit as ‘just a protest vote’. Lord Neuberger’s sister-in-law, meanwhile, announced she has decided to apply for a German passport due to her shame over the referendum result, and criticised the ‘anti-immigrant’ nature of the Leave campaign.
While I entirely acknowledge Lord Neuberger’s neutrality, we surely have a right to know that his nearest and dearest hold such strong views.
In the United States, where the constitutional role of the Supreme Court has long been recognised, it is accepted that the most senior judges have political predilections. Indeed, judges in the U.S. Supreme Court are appointed by Presidents largely on the basis of their known political leanings.
In Britain we do things differently, and I would argue in this instance less well. We have a rising juristocracy — and since 2009 our own Supreme Court with its own grand building — and unaccountable judges, appointed in conditions of utmost secrecy, who like to maintain the illusion of impartiality.
Oddly, most politicians seem remarkably relaxed about the slow ebbing of power towards the higher judiciary. Indeed, whenever a problem arises, their first instinct is often to summon a judge.
The outcome is often unsatisfactory. In 2003, a wrong-headed inquiry — led by the solidly establishment figure Lord Hutton — into the unexplained death of government weapons expert Dr David Kelly exonerated Tony Blair and his side-kick Alastair Campbell. It’s findings left many sensible people gasping in incredulity.
Lord Saville’s investigation into the death of 13 civilians in ‘Bloody Sunday’ took 12 years, and cost £195 million. Lord Justice Leveson’s 2,000-page examination of the Press devoted just 12 pages to the internet.
Yet despite all the shortcomings I’ve mentioned, Shakespeare’s idea of bumping off the lawyers, although undeniably tempting, is hardly practicable. The rule of law is immeasurably precious, and can’t be preserved without an independent judiciary prepared to stand up to everyone, including overmighty politicians —which is not the same as shaping policy.
I’m even prepared to admit that lawyers are a vital element of a healthy and fair-minded society, though I’ve always avoided consulting them as far as possible, and strongly recommend everyone to do the same in the cause of a quiet and happy life.
But if lawyers are too little regulated and too often avaricious, and if judges are a condescending and out-of-touch cadre gradually aggrandising their powers, the rest of us cannot be expected to sit obediently and say nothing.
A thorough inquiry into the legal profession would, in fact, be an excellent idea. The only trouble is that in modern Britain it would be headed by a judge.
|Doctor made $millions from falsely diagnosing patients with cancer VIDEO
|Stop Millions of Western Immigrants!
Tens of millions of European and North American immigrants, legal and illegal, have been flooding both the cities and countryside in Asia, Latin America, and even Africa.
FULL ARTICLE HERE
Western migrants are charging like bulls and the ground is shaking under their feet; they are fleeing Europe and North America in hordes. Deep down they cannot stand their own lifestyle, their own societies, but you would hardly hear them pronounce it. They are too proud and too arrogant! But, after recognizing innumerable areas of the world as suitable for their personal needs - as safe, attractive and cheap – they simply pack and go!
We are told that some few hundred thousand African and Asian exiles are now causing a great “refugee crises” all over Europe! Governments and media are spreading panic, borders are being re-erected and armed forces are interrupting the free movement of people. But the number of foreigners illegally entering Europe is incomparably smaller than the number of Western migrants that are inundating, often illegally, virtually all corners of the world.
No “secret paradise” can be hidden any longer and no country can maintain its reasonable price structure. Potential European, North American and Australian immigrants are determined to enrich themselves by any means, at the expense of local populations. They are constantly searching for bargains: monitoring prices everywhere, ready to move at the spur of the moment, as long as the place offers some great bargains, has lax immigration laws, and a weak legal framework.
Everything pure and untapped gets corrupted. With lightning speed, Western immigrants are snatching reasonably priced real estate and land. Then, they impose their lifestyle on all those “newly conquered territories”. As a result, entire cultures are collapsing or changing beyond recognition.
Overall, Western immigrants are arrogant and stubborn; they feel no pity for the countries they are inundating. What surrounds them is only some colorful background to their precious lives. They are unable and unwilling to “adopt” local customs, because they are used to the fact that theirs is the “leading culture” - the culture that controls the world.
They come, they demand, and they take whatever they can - often by force. If unchecked, they take everything. After, when there is almost nothing left to loot, they simply move on. After them, “no grass can grow”; everything is burned, ruined and corrupted. Like Bali, Phuket, Southern Sri Lanka, great parts of the Caribbean, Mexico and East African coast, just to name a few places.
Who represents the greater “menace”: some 300,000 “illegal” refugees escaping from the countries destabilized or outright destroyed by the West, or those millions of Westerners who are annually fleeing their depressing lifestyles and selfishly over-imposing themselves on so many economically weaker and therefore more vulnerable parts of the world?
I believe the answer is obvious.
People from devastated countries are often left with no choice: many are coming to their tormentors, forced by circumstances to accept totally unreasonable conditions, humiliation and marginalization. They have to work extremely hard. They have to accept jobs Westerners think themselves “too good for”, and they are expected, even ordered, to “adapt” culturally. They go through horrific screenings and interviews, and almost all of them have to degrade themselves just in order to survive and feed their children. Only a minority is allowed to stay. Those who do stay greatly contribute to local economies.
Of course, this is a part of the dirty trick: the West needs foreigners; it cannot survive without immigrants, without their cheap labor. But it would never admit it openly. Before “accepting them”, it has to first humiliate and break even those whom it desperately needs. It has to further demean those whose nations were already robbed of everything, and even thrown into war by the West’s imperialist foreign policy and by corporate terrorism.
The West’s migrants are encountering totally different treatment in most of the countries they are inundating.
To begin with, Western immigrants do not even need visas to enter most countries. Decades ago, the Empire opened by force almost all “developing states”. Westerners are treated preferentially, and generally promoted as a “source of income” by local regimes.
It is mainly the Western multi-nationals that are dividing the loot from Asian, African and the Middle Eastern countries, but some part of booty always ends up in the pockets of those ordinary European and North American citizens, mainly in the form of retirement plans or other social benefits. Then, annually, tens of millions of Westerners, armed with funds that have been stolen from the “developing world” are hitting the road, trying to make their money go further in those places where their funds actually originated!
It is no secret that Western migrants are taking advantage of poverty, low prices, and corrupts legal systems. Their arrival raises prices for housing and land. It leaves millions of local people literally homeless, and it raises the prices of food and basic services for the local population.
In a way, people in many poor countries get robbed twice: by Western corporations, and then again, by Western migrants.
But damaged countries are not sending coast guard ships to intercept Western migrants. And there are hardly any deportations. Only those who dare to criticize the system get expelled.
I saw entire islands being eaten alive by Western immigrants. Almost no coastal areas are left for local people on the Indonesian islands of Lombok and Bali. The Scandinavian mafias, the Central European mafias, Australian mafias... The theft had reached unimaginable proportions. Even when it is illegal to purchase land, the Europeans and the North Americans are teaming up with local gangs, or forging schemes that include marriages to local women. Western migrants are tremendously canny! There is always some way how to get around the laws and screw poor people in the most miserable countries on earth.
The Italian “takeover” of the Kenyan coast... the child prostitution there.
Thailand’s islands are all gone. No culture remains, almost no houses belonging to the local people... almost no coastal stretch is left untouched. There is just some banal, horrid tourist infrastructure, and millions of Western migrants baking on the sun, all year round, with their pot bellies exposed, wearing flip-flops, downing beer, hand in hand with their culturally uprooted Thai companions. What did these people bring to Thailand? Freedom? Prosperity? High culture? Seriously! Or honestly, isn’t it just a moral corruption and total cultural ruin?
There are literally millions - maybe even tens of millions - of Western (mainly European) migrants living all over Southeast Asia. Exact numbers are unknown; there are no reliable studies and statistics. Many Western immigrants in Southeast Asia are actually “illegal”. Some are “semi-legal”, with their constant “visa runs”, false marriages and shady investments.
Cambodia is one of the places that has been attracting the most depraved migrants from the West. Their sex sprees and “2 dollars per ‘shag’ bargains” have been described in detail in several colorful books.
I encountered many “expats” and “migrants” when I was first investigating and then helping to close down one of the most notorious child-prostitution centers on earth, so-called “Kilometer 11”, located just outside the capital city of Phnom Penh. There, thousands of kidnapped girls, many of them minors, were forced to serve predominantly European clientele. Some of them were kidnapped and gang-raped on the way by traffickers; dragged here from all over Cambodia and neighboring Vietnam. The girls lived in captivity, guarded by vicious gangsters. And all over the place, flashing their proverbial beer bellies, were cheerful middle-aged European migrants, who just moved here, as I was told, “shagging a minor is much cheaper than downing a pint of shitty beer”.
A local Reuters correspondent and I managed to interview several 14-years old girls, some of them clearly dying from AIDS. Later on, when we began photographing the scene from the car, the entire crowd of men began charging, beer bottles in their hands, shorts falling off from their backsides, ready to kill. A great gain for the country of Cambodia, those European migrants!
I fought with all my might those venomous German immigrants at Colonia Dignidad in Southern Chile. There, many European Christian religious fanatics set up their entire state inside the Chilean state, closely collaborating with the US-backed Pinochet’ dictatorship. At one point, Bormann was there, as well as other prominent Nazis. After settling in their “new fatherland”, the German immigrants went busily to “work”, raping children, performing medical experiments on local orphans, and mercilessly torturing opponents of the fascist dictatorship. Of course, they did not immigrate only to Chile; there were millions of European fascist émigrés pouring into all corners of South America. The most prominent of them were shipped there with care by US and British intelligence services.
While Western propaganda keeps talking about illegal immigrants crossing into the US from Mexico, there is very little talk about those tens of millions of people who are continuously immigrating to Latin America from all over Europe, settling in Paraguay, Brazil, Argentina, Chile, Venezuela and elsewhere. Before the latest wave of Latin American revolutions finally guaranteed equality and respect for the indigenous people of the continent, most European immigrants managed to implant deep racial and social segregation. In some places like Peru and Bolivia, the situation closely resembled that of South African apartheid. Until recently, European immigrants had been pushing the native population to extreme margins, stealing their land and making their cultures irrelevant. It was done all over Latin America and is still done in many other parts of the world.
So, “what are we going to do with those millions of Western immigrants?”
Can we really afford having them in our countries? Can we accommodate them? Can we pay for their needs, for their aggressiveness and their wild and violent cultural and behavioral patterns? Can we allow them to take everything from those who have very little left?
|Strong wind sends truck toppling onto patrol car in America VIDEO
|Legal parasites poisonous lies exposed but only for soldiers
| Amazon and Washington Post's Fake News run by Jeff Bezos SPIES on you! VIDEO
|If Putin's A Killer-America's A Butcher VIDEO
|Iran has NOT invaded anyone
|Ehang 184 one man drone VIDEO
|How to Survive an Encounter with the Police VIDEO
|Trump hints at new security measures VIDEO
| CNN: Calling Us "Fake News" Is Like Using "N-Word" VIDEO
|Vault 7 seeds or more? VIDEO
|Trump exposes fake news pumped out by the zionist media VIDEO
|"UNIMAGINABLE" Fukushima Nuclear Meltdown Being Covered Up! VIDEO
| Canada's Dark Secret VIDEO
|Assad claims the EU supported terrorists in Syria from the very beginning VIDEO
|Frank and Lisa homeless in Santa Monica VIDEO
|Cap range update after Trump win
|Bush wins the laziest President award
| Giant Meteor over Wisconsin VIDEO
|Trump enjoys first meal at the White House
|BBC reporter Jill Dando killer on cop list of suspects
|Scotland rejects leaving the European Union
| Looney feminist Hillary Clinton? 'The future is female'(and they claim Trump is bad?) VIDEO
|The tory scumbag trying to ban Trump
|Australian senator unveils Trump doormat VIDEO
| George Soros helped Nazi's plunder his jewish neighbours VIDEO
| Chomsky - Israel Is On The Road To Self Destruction VIDEO
|Mars 2017, Curiosity Rover VIDEO
| THE REASON MILITARY BASES WERE SET UP IN ANTARCTICA VIDEO
|Florida sinkhole swallows 215 million gallons of radioactive water VIDEO
|Beckham another celebrity desperate to kiss the royal arse
| SCIENTIST: "I Have Proof Aliens Landed On Earth" VIDEO
|Trump's latest commercial VIDEO
| Trump Impersonator John Di Domenico on Australia's Sunrise Live VIDEO
|Freemason caught in homopaedo sex sting
FULL ARTICLE HERE
Freemason Grand Master facing ten years in jail after being caught in sting by police as he waited to meet 14-year-old boy
Freemasons top terror leader the Dukey Kent at UGLE ceremony
The utter scum and filth hiding inside secret society cult's walls
A FORMER Freemason faces jail after he was caught by a police internet sting trying to incite a child into sex.
Alan Wright, 75, was once a Grand Master in the secretive organisation and would have been present at meetings attended by Prince Michael of Kent.
He resigned when the details of his activities came to light.
Now he could face jail when he appears at Ipswich Crown Court for sentence next month. The maximum term for incitement
is 10 years. Suffolk Police set up the sting after gathering intelligence on Wright’s private life, with specialist
officers pretending to be a child online.
Wright thought he was communicating with a 14-year-old boy and sent him pictures of his private parts over the internet. Through gay dating app Grindr he arranged to meet the “boy” at Bury St Edmunds railway station, Suffolk, last November.
However, when Wright arrived he was met by officers who took him to a local police station for questioning. A former Grand Master of the Grand Council of Royal and Select Masters, he was also Grand Master of the Provincial Grand Lodge of Mark Master Masons of Essex.
Wright regularly attended meetings at a Freemasons hall in St James Street, London, and has been described as a “significant” figure in the organisation. Sources say that he would have attended some meetings with Prince Michael, who is a popular Freemason, but the men were not friends.
A spokesman for the United Grand Lodge of England said: “We were made aware of an allegation against a Freemason on December 1, 2016, who immediately resigned from the organisation.
“Having learned of the situation we have no further information currently, and fully believe that this is a one-off, isolated incident.
“We can confirm that we will fully assist the police and relevant authorities if we are approached or if we know of any way that we can voluntarily do so. No such request has been made.
“United Grand Lodge of England places great importance on total transparency in its dealings with members and we have a robust disciplinary system to deal with members who break the law, break our rules or conduct themselves in a way which would bring Freemasonry into disrepute.
“Criminal activity is completely unacceptable within the organisation and totally alien to our values.”
Wright was not at his home in Little Downham, near Ely, Cambridgeshire, to comment.
| How Trump Filled The Swamp VIDEO
| Trump's New World Order VIDEO
| Trump: 'You think our country's so innocent?' VIDEO
| Trump ignores the biggest threat to world peace zionist Israel VIDEO
|Iran 'On Notice': Will Trump Pull The Trigger? VIDEO
|Stomach churning lunacy at the top of a Hong Kong tower block VIDEO
| Nuclear disarmament or nuclear hypocrisy? VIDEO
| Nighty Night the comedy series the feminists hated VIDEO
|Who is really behind London street protests? VIDEO
| 'No to Trump!': Thousands hit streets of London to protest US travel ban and May's invite to Trump VIDEO
|Trump at loggerheads with an unelected judicial mafia VIDEO
|Washington State Attorney General's Lawsuit Halts President Trump's Executive Order Travel Ban VIDEO
|Royal parasite's homopaedo bishop 'friend' freed from prison early despite horrific sex offences
FULL ARTICLE HERE
The 'monster' Bishop of Lewes and Gloucester said he thought of Charles as a 'loyal friend'
The deviant friends of the royal mafia
A predatory bishop who had links to Prince Charles has been freed from prison halfway through his sentence for sex offences.
Peter Ball, described as a ‘monster’ by his victims, served only 16 months for grooming and molesting aspiring novice monks. One victim committed suicide while others have suffered long-lasting trauma.
Survivors condemned the early release of the 84-year-old former Bishop of Lewes and Gloucester.
He was jailed for 32 months in 2015 for offences against 18 teenagers and young men between 1977 and 1992, but was allowed out on licence at the halfway point of his sentence.
Richard Scorer, an abuse lawyer at Slater and Gordon who represented some of Ball’s victims, said his early release after ‘a gross and systematic abuse of trust spanning decades’ was ‘an affront to justice’.
Ball was first investigated in 1992 but escaped with a caution. It emerged later that an unnamed royal was among Establishment figures who had written in support of Ball at the time.
After his caution, Ball was provided with a Duchy of Cornwall home by Prince Charles. Ball counted Charles as a ‘loyal friend’.
In 2012 police reopened their investigation after new allegations against Ball.
After his jailing, a spokesman for Charles denied that the prince had intervened in the judicial process on his behalf in 1992 but failed to deny there had been a letter in support of Ball.
Under the Criminal Justice Act 2003, most prisoners can be released at the halfway point of their sentence.
|British homopaedo lawyer accused of child abuse had been charged in killing of teen
FULL ARTICLE HERE
Homopaedo lawyer linked to Archbishop of Canterbury
John Smyth QC is alleged to have carried out a series of brutal assaults
on young men in the 1970s
was linked to The Archbishop of Canterbury
No one, who has not been a victim, knows the depths this goes on within the legal mafia
A British barrister who allegedly abused boys at his Christian summer camps was later charged in connection with the killing of a teenage boy in Zimbabwe.
John Smyth QC left the UK after details of his alleged physical abuse of public schoolboys who attended the camps emerged in 1982.
Neither the Iwerne Trust, which ran the Christian camps, the Church of England nor Winchester College, whose pupils were among the alleged victims, reported the case to police.
Instead, Smyth was warned away from Winchester College by the headmaster and left for Zimbabwe, where he set up the Zambesi Mission and ran similar summer camps attended by boys from top public schools in the country.
Channel 4 News reported on Friday that Smyth faced charges in relation to the mysterious death of a 16-year-old boy at one of the camps in Ruzawi. The boy, Guide Nyachuru, was found in 1992 at the bottom of a swimming pool in the grounds of Ruzawi school, where the Zambesi camps were held.
In 1997 Smyth was charged in connection with the killing and with the alleged abuse of five boys. The barrister was also accused of swimming naked with Zimbabwean teenagers, showering with them in the nude and encouraging them to talk about masturbation.
One alleged victim told the broadcaster that Smyth administered savage beatings with wooden bats, in a chilling echo of the allegations made against him in Britain.
But Smyth, a former friend of the Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, who has said he had no knowledge of any abuse claims, had the case against him dismissed a year later in Zimbabwe.
Court documents from the time reported by the broadcaster state: “The particular allegations are that [Smyth] made the complainants walk naked to the swimming pool at night; that he took showers with them in the nude; that he talked to them about masturbation and told them to be proud of their ‘dicks’ as Jesus Christ had one; and that he assaulted them on their ‘rear bare buttocks’ with a table tennis bat.”
Nyachuru’s sister, Edith, told the broadcaster that if the church authorities had reported Smyth to the police in Britain in 1982, “my brother wouldn’t meet the fate he met”.
Smyth left Zimbabwe in 2002 to move to South Africa, where he became a religious campaigner against gay rights. He has not responded to requests for a comment.
Hampshire police are now investigating the allegations of abuse in the UK. Smyth has not been arrested. It has emerged that police initially refused to mount an inquiry because the allegations were non-recent and there was a difficult issue of potential extradition of the suspect.
The Church of England told the Guardian it first reported the allegations to Cambridgeshire police in 2013, when an alleged victim came forward in the diocese of Ely. The report was given to the police liaison officer from the Cambridgeshire force. When nothing happened the diocese again reported the matter to the police in February 2014, the Church of England said. The church was told that there would be no investigation because the allegations were non-recent and there were difficulties regarding extradition of the suspect.
In 2014 a separate police report was made to Hampshire police – the area in which the alleged abuse by Smyth took place. Hampshire said at the time the case could not be pursued because the party who reported the allegations would not provide more details of victims or other information.
It was not until last month that Hampshire police reactivated the inquiry and is now carrying out an investigation into the alleged abuse of several teenage boys who attended the Iwerne Trust camps in the 1970s and 1980s.
Winchester College has defended its decision not to report the allegations to police when they first emerged in 1982.
A spokeswoman said this week no report was made to the police at the time, not least because parents of the victims felt their sons should be spared more trauma. The college had never sought to conceal “these dreadful events”, it said in a statement.
The school had acted as best it could “in accordance with the standards of the time”, but said that the allegations of further abuse “reveals the inadequacy of those standards”.
An inquiry carried out for the Iwerne Trust in 1982 by Mark Ruston, a Church of England vicar, described the “horrific” abuse suffered by the alleged victims. But neither the Iwerne Trust nor Ruston reported the case to the police.
According to the 1982 report, the boys were given beatings of 100 strokes as punishment for masturbation and 400 for exhibiting the sin of pride. One was said to have received a beating of 800 lashes for an unspecified sin.
The report says that eight of the boys received a total of 14,000 lashes, with two sharing 8,000 strokes over a three-year period.
One boy told Ruston, the document’s author: “I could feel the blood spattering on my legs.”
| 9/11 - Here is Something Few People Have Seen VIDEO
|Sex Pistols - "The BBC's 'God Save The Queen' Conspiracy" (Documentary) VIDEO
|Lawyer made SOLDIERS life a misery (but what about divorcing men?)
Media only interested when those who kill for the crown are affected
| John Pilger: The Hijacking of Feminism VIDEO
| Obama in 1995 discusses his book "Dreams from My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance" VIDEO
|White House statement on Israel is significant VIDEO
| Putin's Air Force One VIDEO
| White women march in Washington D.C. to advocate the genocidal murder of blacks VIDEO
Full article here
When you see hundreds of thousands of white women marching around with vagina hats on their heads, celebrating the legacy of an organization founded to exterminate blacks, you know racism is alive and well in America… and it’s found squarely on the Left.
Planned Parenthood was founded as a genocidal “black extermination” organization by a black-hating eugenicist who referred to black people as “human weeds.” The legacy of Margaret Sanger continues to this day with the placement of Planned Parenthood abortion mills in mostly black inner city locations, where the promise of offering “prenatal services” is a cruel lie and a deceptive cover story to keep government money flowing while black babies are murdered en masse.
In my most recent uncensored podcast, I reveal the shocking, gruesome truth about Planned Parenthood, its genocidal war on blacks and how the political Left runs a modern-day “economic slave plantation” that deliberately traps African-Americans in a cycle of dependence and ignorance while exploiting them for their votes. (RELATED: Follow more abortion news at Abortions.news)
I also explain why the most terrifying idea to the Left is an informed, successful and self-determined black man who casts off the shackles of social engineering, disproving the Left’s false grievance narratives. Armed black men who invoke their Second Amendment rights are even more terrifying to the Left, which is why the KKK was founded and run by Democrats who pushed gun control to make sure blacks couldn’t shoot back while Democrats strung them up with rope.
The false racism narratives of the Left have been so successful that to this very day, almost no one remembers that Abraham Lincoln, famed for “freeing the slaves,” was a Republican. Recently, A&E was caught rigging “theatrical racism” for a supposed documentary mini-series, where they brought all the racist props to the set and paid white people to scream “Ni@@er” on camera for cash.
Under Obama, the federal government was so “pro genocide” against blacks that Obama’s CDC deliberately covered up evidence of vaccines causing huge spikes in autism among young African-American males.
|UC Berkeley Protests againgst breitbart editor milo anti trump protest VIDEO
|EXPOSING THE NEW WORLD ORDER
EXPOSING CORRUPT GOVERNMENTS WHILE DEMANDING LEGAL,JUDICIAL AND POLITICAL REFORM TO ENSURE
PROPER ACCOUNTABLE DEMOCRACIES. A GROWING
RESISTANCE TO THE SATANIC CONTROL OF THE WORLD BY THE ILLUMINATI, SKULL AND BONES, MASONS, BILDERBERGS, SPECULATIVE SOCIETY,KNIGHTS TEMPLAR AND ALL OTHER SECRET SOCIETIES ACTING
AS SHADOW GOVERNMENTS FOR WESTERN SO CALLED DEMOCRACIES.
THE NEW WORLD ORDER MOBSTERS WILL NOT GET AWAY
WITH THEIR PLANS TO ENSLAVE GOOD MEN WITH THEIR EVIL SATANIC NETWORK OF CONTROL,
A WORLDWIDE ZIONIST CABAL AND EVERY SINGLE PROMOTER OF ITS EVIL EMPIRE.
MASONIC RUN COMPANIES PROMOTING HIGH TECH STATE MONITORING SYSTEMS THEY ARE TRYING
TO FORCE ON ALL FREE MEN.
The majority of the mass media has a hidden agenda and none of it
includes fair reporting of men's issues.
Please send comments and articles to EDITORIAL.
World NEWS the government and judicial controlled mass media wont EXPOSE.
|LATEST GLOBAL NEWS UPDATE
ABOUT US JOIN
TERRORISM IS SOCIAL ENGINEERING ON A GLOBAL SCALE