FOR MEN WHO HAVE BEEN, OR ARE BEING, OR WHO MIGHT IN THE FUTURE
BE F*CKED OVER BY MASONS, ZIONISTS OR THE REST OF THE ILLUMINATI
NEW WORLD ORDER MAFIA WHO ARE ABUSING GOOD MEN FOR PROFIT.
1. Having large sums of money in ANY bank. (They are all con men see
HERE)
2. Having any kind of mortgage with a bank. (They are all scams see
HERE)
3. Marrying and signing a state marriage certificate. (Notice NO small print see
HERE)
4. Having a child. (Maybe the single most dangerous threat to a mans welfare see
HERE)
5. Entering ANY court especially NO JURY civil courts.(Mason judges make it up see
HERE)
6. Hiring a lawyer anywhere across the globe. (ALL part of the Bar associations see
HERE)
7. Trusting any politician.(They are ALL on the take see
HERE)
9. Taking out any type of credit especially for a large purchase like a car (see
HERE)
9. Trusting any journalist who answers to the corporate media (see
HERE)
10. Trusting any cop who answers to masonic superiors (see
HERE)
11. Allow social workers,lawyers and judges with a homosexual or radical feminist agenda to decide
on the future welfare of your children (see HERE)
12. Doing any form of business with a FREEMASON. ( ALL of the above included see
HERE)
Trust your instincts our group have done some or all of the above and have the mental
scars to prove these are ALL a danger to a mans health, welfare but especially their
finances . There are sinister interacting groups working for the same secret societies who
are embedded in the legal, political, judicial, banking and cop mafia's that threaten the
very existence of any man not part of their creepy network of power.
There are millions of men presently across the globe being brutalized psychologically by
forces that all of the above create when they work together to asset strip you and leave you
broke and homeless. We do not underestimate how serious these matters are for the men who
unsuspectingly fall for the institutions that are interacting across the globe for the
benefit of the self appointed elite money men who pull the strings behind the scenes.
That we aim to EXPOSE and ensure no other men are caught out by these scams that are
multi-billion dollar rackets primarily for the enrichment of the evil scumbags running
these scams dressed up in all their finery.
BEWARE THEY ARE ALL CROOKS AND AIM TO DESTROY YOUR FAMILY
AND YOU.
DONT BELIEVE ANY OF THEIR PROPAGANDA
The real scroungers are the scumbags at the top of the tree that continually fail to get
EXPOSED by most of the rags that are either owned or controlled by the rich establishment toffs.
The poor are a good punch bag for the wealthy media owners who avoid exposing the
mega-rich royals and their myriad of hangers on who are the real leeches in the UK and across
the globe .
THE POLITICAL PARTIES THEY PROMOTE ARE ALL FUNDED AND CONTROLLED BY THE ULTRA WEALTHY.
WE HAVE THE PRIVILEGE OF BEING THE MOST ATTACKED WEBSITE ON THE INTERNET AND REQUIRE TO
USE TWO DOMAINS ENSURING REGULAR VISITORS HAVE AN ALTERNATIVE MEANS TO ACCESS INFORMATION
EXPOSING THE LEGAL, POLITICAL, BANKING AND COP MAFIA THUGS AND BULLYBOY'S WHO
ABUSE MEN FOR PROFIT. SOMETHING THEIR MASS MEDIA BUDDIES FAIL TO DO . MEANWHILE WE
TRANSLATE THE CORPORATE MEDIA LIES, WHERE TRUTH AND HONESTY IS A VERY RARE COMMODITY,
ESPECIALLY FOR THE MEN THEY ARE F*CKING OVER.
MEN WITHOUT GUNS TO DEFEND THEMSELVES WILL, IN TIME, DIE FROM THE MEN WHO HAVE
THEM . HISTORY IS LITTERED WITH MANY EXAMPLES.
WE ARE NOT HERE TO MAKE FRIENDS BUT TO GET AT THE TRUTH AND EXPOSE THE THUGS RUNNING THE WORLD
FOR THEIR OWN PERSONAL GREED. WE ARE ALSO NOT HERE TO OFFEND BUT SOME MAY TAKE WHAT IS BEING
ARTICULATED THE WRONG WAY. WE APOLOGISE AS THAT IS NOT OUR INTENTION.
http://www.internationalmensorganisation.info
http://www.intmensorg.info
COMMENTS FROM OUR READERS THAT ARE GREATLY APPRECIATED
Amazing info on the site keep up the fab work. http://nikkinitro.co.uk
-----------------------
Hello Intl. Men's Org.
Many Thanks.. Greatest Conspiracy Website on Earth.
We're Your #1 Fans/Supporters here in West USA. We keep up with You 24/7.
Thanks for Great Work and Edits,Best Wishes in eternal gratitude;
Ricky Ray/TheRR9
----------------------
Dear Sirs ,
I just want to say how much I love your site. I've been an avid truth seeker
for many years and would be a big time follower of the Jeff Rense program, but I really
think your site is one of the best, well laid out and most interesting alternative media site.
I've only known of its existence over the last week, but I'm already hooked on it.
Keep up the fantastic articles and pressure on the NWO scum.
Name and email supplied
---------------------
I just suddenly found your site on the internet, and WOW - it really is packed with useful
information about the inhuman beasts who are planning the NWO. Their activities are far
advanced in my country Sweden, but England is leading with regard to public camera watching.
Unfortunately your multimillion population seems to be as sleeping as our 9 million sheeple.
I also have found other interesting sites like your on the internet, such as
www.henrymakow.ca , www.rense.com , www.realjewnews.org , www.eaec.org , www.nkusa.org
, www.jewsnotzionists.org , www.hermes.press.org , and also sites run by the antizionist
jews Gilad Atzmon in London and Israel Shamir in Israel , just to name a few of all who
understand the enormous risk for our future if the Cabal will gain full power.
Good luck and keep holding up the torch of Knowledge!
Best regards , Name and email supplied from Sweden
TORY TOFFS EXPERT AT KILLING THE POOR THROUGH THE BENEFIT SYSTEM
Radical welfare shake-up will cut 50 benefits down to one
Iain Duncan Smith today signalled deeper cuts in benefits as he sought the backing of the Chancellor for a radical shake-up of the welfare state.
The Work and Pensions Secretary published his vision for a major simplification of the system, including possibly reducing more than 50 benefits down to one.
The document, 21st Century Welfare, made clear that millions of people are likely to get lower benefit payments as the Government seeks to encourage them back into work.
“We are going to end the culture of worklessness and dependency that has done so much harm to individuals, families and whole communities,” said Mr Duncan Smith. “Our aim is to change forever a system that has too often undermined work and the aspiration that goes with it.”
Key to the change is stopping people who switch from welfare to work from initially losing much of their extra income as their benefits are cut.
The Government has already announced plans to reduce housing benefit payments.
Mr Duncan Smith's drive to get people off the dole or incapacity benefit is expected to have initial costs of between £3 billion and £7 billion — a bill that Chancellor George Osborne will be reluctant to meet.
Arguing that his reforms would allow the Lib-Con coalition to get a grip on the welfare bill, the Work and Pensions Secretary insisted that the Government as a whole was “committed” to his reforms. Asked if he had made the sums add up, he said: “I believe we have. And the Treasury have discussed this with us.”
Mr Duncan Smith unveiled a series of options for change including the introduction of one single benefit — a universal credit — which would include a range of out-of-work payments, housing benefits and tax credits.
Those entering work would not initially lose any of the universal credit but it would be gradually withdrawn once their income reached a certain level.
HOW MASONIC PROSECUTORS PROTECT THEIR CROOKED PALS AT THE BBC
Toby Grosvenor left as BBC Wales head of operations in 2005.
NOTICE IT HAS BEEN 5 YEARS SINCE THE THEFT WAS REPORTED.
Despite him paying back £315k the crown could not find sufficient evidence
to prosecute. THEY ARE HAVING A LAUGH AREN'T THEY?
A former BBC Wales executive will not face prosecution after an investigation into theft allegations.
Toby Grosvenor left his post as head of operations in Cardiff in 2005.
Since then, he has repaid the BBC a total of £315,000 after legal proceedings were issued against him.
The Crown Prosecution Service said after considering files from a police inquiry there was insufficient evidence to proceed.
Mr Grosvenor was questioned as part of a South Wales Police investigation into allegations of theft from his employer in June 2005.
A CPS spokesperson confirmed that they were no longer pursuing the case.
In a statement, the spokesperson said: "Following a thorough and detailed investigation by South Wales Police, a substantial file of evidence was presented to the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) in relation to allegations against Toby Grosvenor.
Money recovered
"After careful consideration of the evidence on the basis of all reasonable lines of inquiry being followed, the CPS considered that under the code for crown prosecutors, there was insufficient evidence to warrant a reasonable prospect of conviction."
Responding to the decision, a BBC spokesperson said: "We note the CPS's decision not to prosecute Toby Grosvenor.
"Following Toby Grosvenor's resignation in March 2005, the BBC brought legal proceedings against him and has recovered the full amount that we believe he wrongly authorised together with legal costs.
"In total, this has amounted to £315,000. "
Mr Grosvenor was a member of the BBC Wales management board, and responsible for 330 operational staff at the time of his departure in 2005.
PRESS COMPLAINTS COMMISSION FINDS IN FAVOUR OF THE DRUM
The Press Complaints Commission has found in favour of The Drum after an online article about the Crown Office's failure to answer an FOI request for details of legal fees paid by Scotland's Lord Advocate Elish Angiolini was reported to the PCC by law firm Levy and McRae.
Levy & McRae asked the PCC to adjudicate on two specific complaints; firstly that The Drum's original article had in some way suggested that legal proceedings against The Firm magazine had been initiated and then dropped by them and secondly that Levy and McRae had contacted news website UK Column on behalf of a sheriff that it did not and had never had represented.
The Drum strongly denied both allegations during correspondence with the PCC and both complaints were subsequently deemed not to have breached the Editor's Code for Accuracy by the PCC.
Levy and McRae had also complained that the original article had made reference to concerns within the media industry of a conflict of interest in some of the firm's dealings, but this complaint was withdrawn by them prior to adjudication by the PCC.
A letter received by The Drum from the PCC stated: "The Commission has now considered the complaint from Peter Watson of Levy and McRae. The objections were reviewed within the context of the article as a whole, taking into consideration the requirements of the Code of Practice.
"After assessment the Commission has decided that no matters have been raised which show a breach of the Code."
On making its decision the PCC offered the following detailed adjudication:
Commission's decision in the case of Watson vs The Drum
"The article reported that the Crown Office in Scotland had declined to answer a Freedom of Information request made by the magazine in regard to "legal action" undertaken by the Lord Advocate of Scotland, Elish Angiolini. The complainant said that the article was inaccurate and misleading on two points: the claim that "legal action" pursued by the Lord Advocate, his client, had been "dropped"; and the claim that Levy & McRae had written to UK Column "threatening legal action on behalf of a Sheriff who had been named in the Hollie Greig allegations".
"The Commission firstly considered the reference to "legal action" in the article. The article as a whole had referred variously to: "libel action" (in the headline); "legal action"; the Lord Advocate having "threatened to sue"; it being "unusual for a Government appointee to sue the media"; "action against The Firm"; and "action". The complainant had argued that the reference to the "action" being "dropped" suggested that formal legal proceedings had been raised, which was not the case; the magazine had pointed to the fact that the Lord Advocate had instructed the complainant to act on her behalf, had instructed Counsel and had issued legal warnings to the media for "defamatory" allegations.
"The question for the Commission was whether readers would have been misled by these references and, in particular, the statement that the action had been "dropped". It decided that they would not. In its view, the references to "action" were broad, reflecting the magazine's interpretation of what had occurred following the publication of the original article in The Firm. It was not in dispute that the complainant himself, or Counsel, had been instructed following this. In those circumstances - in addition to the fact that the article referred to legal action being "threatened" - the Commission did not consider that the general reader would have been significantly misled. The word "dropped", in addition, did not carry an exclusively legal definition. The Commission did not consider that readers would have taken this to mean that formal legal proceedings had been raised and then not pursued. There was no breach of Clause 1 (Accuracy) of the Editors' Code on this issue.
"The second point for the Commission to consider was the reference to the letter sent by Levy & McRae to UK Column. The article had stated the following: "In February Levy & McRae, wrote to an English-based website - UK Column - in the name of the Lord Advocate - threatening legal action on behalf of a Sheriff who had been named in the Hollie Greig allegations."
"The complainant had confirmed that Levy & McRae did not and had not ever acted on behalf of the Sheriff in question and complained that it was inaccurate and misleading for the magazine to have suggested otherwise. The magazine had argued that the article had not stated that Levy & McRae were acting directly for the Sheriff; rather, it had said that Levy & McRae had written to UK Column in February in the name of the Lord Advocate about the Sheriff.
"In the Commission's view, this point rested on an interpretation of the letter in question, which the magazine had provided to the Commission as part of the correspondence. The letter stated that the firm acted on behalf of the Lord Advocate. This was reflected in the article, which reported that the firm had written in the name of the Lord Advocate. The letter also warned that, unless action was taken, proceedings may be raised for breach of interdict and for harassment. The Commission found that the magazine had been justified in assuming that the firm was threatening legal proceedings on behalf of the Sheriff (in some capacity) in light of the fact that the letter identified only the Sheriff - and not the Lord Advocate - as the individual who had been granted the interdict. The Commission considered that - given the content of the letter from the firm to UK Column and the manner in which the matter had been reported by the magazine - whether or not Levy & McRae acted for the Sheriff was not a significant point which would require the newspaper to publish a clarification.
There was no breach of the Code."
The Drum is continuing to try to establish exactly how much was paid by the Lord Advocate in legal fees and exactly who Levy & McRae was representing in these matters. Both approaches to the Crown Office have been rejected so far and the outcome of an appeal to the FOI Commissioner suggests that he is barred from investigating Crown Office financial matters.
A further appeal has been lodged.
CONMAN RENTED LUXURY HOMES, STOLE THE OWNERS ID AND SOLD THEM FOR A FORTUNE
A conman moved into luxury homes in Britain's most expensive neighbourhood as a tenant, stole the owners' identities and sold their properties to net a fortune, a court heard today.
Steven Rice, 43, used false names to rent two houses worth a combined £5.5m in the heart of Kensington and Chelsea. He adopted the identities of his landlords, sold one of the properties for £1.47m, and obtained a loan for £500,000 on the other.
He was only caught when he tried to transfer the proceeds from the sale to an account in Dubai, and bank staff spotted that he was using a fake driving licence in the name of the 83-year-old owner.
Rice – who owns his own yacht refitting firm based in Majorca and Singapore – now faces jail after admitting a string of fraud and money laundering counts at Southwark Crown Court.
Judge Deborah Taylor remanded him in custody ahead of sentencing on August 26.
Rice, of, Basingstoke, Hants, denied further charges of fraud and possessing an article for use in fraud, and the counts were left to lie on the court file.
TRAFFIC WARDENS CLAMP QATARI ROYALS' £1.5 MILLION CARS OUTSIDE HARRODS
At least paying for the clamps to come off shouldn't be much of a problem for the owners.
These two modest vehicles, parked naughtily outside Harrods, belong to Qatar's ruling Al-Thani family, and they did manage to scrape together £1.5 billion to buy the department store.
Tourists and shoppers gathered to watch as Kensington and Chelsea wardens ticketed and then clamped the two sports cars — a £1.2 million Koenigsegg CCXR, and £350,000 Lamborghini Murcielago LP670-4 SuperVeloce.
The custom-made vehicles belong to the family's fleet of supercars, which includes a one-off Pagani Zonda Uno.
Qatar Holding Group bought Harrods in April from Fulham FC owner Mohamed Fayed. The Qatari royal family controls assets estimated at more than $60 billion (£38.3 billion) with stakes in Credit Suisse and Porsche.
Kensington and Chelsea made more than £30,000 a day from penalty charge notices in 2008/09.
WOMEN'S AID AS EVER ARE NEVER AVAILABLE FOR COMMENT WHEN IT'S A MURDERING MOTHER
A French woman who admitted suffocating eight of her newborns and hiding their corpses in the garden and garage of her home has been charged with manslaughter, a prosecutor said.
Dominique Cottrez, a 46-year-old nurse's aide, said that after a bad experience with her first pregnancy she never again wanted to see a doctor. She admitted delivering the babies herself and placing the corpses in plastic bags.
She buried two of the newborns in the garden and hid the rest of them in the garage, prosecutor Eric Vaillant said.
"She explained that she didn't want any more children and that she didn't want to see a doctor to take contraceptives," Vaillant told a press conference. "She was perfectly conscious of the fact that she was pregnant each time."
Cottrez and her husband, Pierre-Marie Cottrez, were detained on Wednesday after two corpses were discovered by the new owners in plastic bags in the garden of a house that had belonged to the woman's father in the town of Villers-au-Tertre in northern France.
Under questioning, the woman admitted that there were six other corpses and told investigators that they were in plastic bags in the garage of her previous home.
The woman is still in detention and will undergo further psychiatric testing, Vaillant said. Her husband was freed from custody and not charged.
He claimed that he knew nothing about the pregnancies of his wife, who is very large and apparently easily concealed her condition. Earlier, Vaillant said in a statement that the husband could be charged with failure to report a crime and concealment of corpses.
The couple's two grown daughters, who are in their 20s, have been questioned, Vaillant said.
Police sealed the doors, gate and windows of the house where the remains of some of the babies were discovered. DNA tests are being conducted to confirm whether the couple are the parents, while autopsies are being conducted on the corpses to try to determine the cause of death.
DIVORCE HUSBANDS WEALTH CAN STAY SECRET IN LANDMARK RULLING
GOLDDIGGERS AND THEIR CORRUPT LAWYERS HAVE BEEN GETTING AWAY WITH SPYING ON THEIR EX'S FOR
WAY TO LONG.IT IS CRIMINAL AND THEY SHOULD BE JAILED FOR DOING SO.
A millionaire dubbed the “Man from Del Monte” today won a landmark victory in a £350 million divorce battle.
The decision in the Court of Appeal removes protection given to thousands of divorcing couples and has major implications for people fighting over hidden wealth and documents.
Until today a husband or wife who came across information revealing hidden wealth could copy it and put it before the courts. But the Court of Appeal reversed that principle in a case involving Vivian Imerman, 53, who made millions from selling the Del Monte fruit company.
He won an appeal against property tycoons Robert and Vincent Tchenguiz, who took thousands of documents about his wealth to help their sister Lisa — Mr Imerman's wife. Lawyers described the judgment as “ground-breaking”.
The couple, who are in the midst of a divorce, signed a pre-nuptial agreement after their 2001 marriage. She filed for divorce in 2008.
A bitter battle broke out over her demand for £100 million of his fortune because since the pre-nup deal he had made a fortune from selling the spirits company Whyte & Mackay. The two brothers obtained thousands of documents about his wealth from a computer at Mayfair offices Robert Tchenguiz had invited Mr Imerman to share.
They attempted to use information about his multi-million-pound estate at her divorce hearing. Robert Tchenguiz said he was concerned to protect his sister's interests and feared that Mr Imerman would try to hide his assets from her.
In July last year a High Court judge ordered the material to be returned and not disclosed to anyone else.
Today that order was confirmed by the Master of the Rolls Lord Neuberger, sitting with Lord Justices Moses and Munby.
They decided that the “Hildebrand rules” — a long-standing acceptance that divorcing couples can secretly obtain and use otherwise private documents in family court proceedings — have “no legal basis”. They stated: “Nothing in the so-called Hildebrand rules can be relied upon in justification or provide a defence to conduct which would otherwise be criminal or actionable.” Legal experts say today's ruling will lead to a sharp rise in new court action in divorces where husbands or wives suspect each other of concealing assets.
Mr Imerman's solicitor Frances Hughes said he was delighted “to have succeeded in a long battle for the return of his confidential and privileged documents.”
Lisa Tchenguiz said the judges had given her husband every incentive to lie and hide his wealth. The “ace from a sleeve” which wives have been able to play in producing documents to prove the lies has now been ruled inadmissible, she said.
Her solicitor Diana Parker said: “Lisa Tchenguiz is prohibited from saying what her husband claims he is worth, compared with what is in the public domain as to the wealth he created during their marriage.
“But she is not gagged from saying that she finds the Court of Appeal decision a cheats' charter.”
Vivian Imerman said: “I was determined that my private papers could not be stolen and the perpetrators get away with it without any retribution.”
The ruling could have a significant impact on the long-running battle between businessman Scott Young and his estranged wife Michelle.
Just as the gun changed the equilibrium of the masters and servants, the internet and information
sharing will be the death knell of the brutal regimes that have dominated the globe and at the very
top of the tree are the British royals.
How they have managed to brutalize a country, its people and the world for so long providing themselves with the power and wealth to rule with an iron fist, is down to ONE thing. They have been able to control the flow of information, and through their masonic henchmen, the mass media in a way that has created an illusion of grandeur , pomp and ceremony that belongs in the dim and distant past. They clearly hold onto that in the hope this monster they have created will allow them to keep the position of top dog with all its evil tentacles of power.
They have made a fatal mistake however in failing to stem the rise of technology that has leapt ahead and provided the LOWER ORDERS with a means to express history from the perspective of looking up, not as they have done for so long , from looking down. Like the wheel they CANNOT un-invent the technology that can finally get to the truth as to how the most evil despots on this planet have provided themselves these powerful and wealthy positions using the most devious and treacherous use of the law, the courts, corrupt judges, corrupt lawyers, corrupt cops and the myriad of hangers on required to fleece the public using the most draconian and tyrannical forces short of war. By controlling the mass media for so long this has allowed them to get away with absolute murder. No longer can they OPENLY get away with MURDERING enemies and dissidents but they now use more subtle and deadly forms of removing their adversaries using psychological torture and psychiatric gulags. Make no doubt about it the world is being transformed , given a little more time, as the continuing exposures of what the powerful and wealthy have been getting up to for centuries using satanic oaths to get their duped goons to swear allegiance to their now LOST CAUSE.
Those in their ivory towers must be shaking in their boots as to how the masses are being educated and reverse brainwashed from the propaganda that has allowed these evil dynasties to get away with so much for far to long. We may not be able to change their systems so quickly but they will find fewer and fewer people to EXPLOIT when they know how to avoid the devious ploys and pitfalls used to exploit the world and its people for centuries with the same despicable scams.
One look on the Thames at Cleopatra's needle shows the same enslavement system used by the pharaoh's has been allowing LONDON to control the world with its evil masonic tentacles of power.
THAT WE HOPE IN TIME WILL BE SEVERED WHEN THE POPULATION BECOMES MORE ENLIGHTENED AND WAKEN FROM THE SLUMBER AND BY THE FACADES THEY USE
TO REPRESENT THIS EVIL AS SOME SORT OF MARK OF RESPECTABILITY , THAT IS SO FAR FROM THE TRUE POSITION.
GAY MAFIA THREATEN TO SACK STUDENT
Lawsuit Claims College Ordered Student to Alter Religious Views on Homosexuality, Or Be Dismissed
A graduate student in Georgia
is suing her university after she was told she must undergo a remediation program due to her beliefs on homosexuality and transgendered persons.
The student, Jennifer Keeton, 24, has been pursuing a master's degree in school counseling at Augusta State University
since 2009, but school officials have informed her that she'll be dismissed from the program unless she alters her "central religious beliefs on human nature and conduct," according to a civil complaint filed last week.
"[Augusta State University] faculty have promised to expel Miss Keeton from the graduate Counselor Education Program not because of poor academic showing or demonstrated deficiencies in clinical performance, but simply because she has communicated both inside and outside the classroom that she holds to Christian ethical convictions on matters of human sexuality and gender identity," the 43-page lawsuit reads.
Keeton, according to the lawsuit, was informed by school officials in late May that she would be asked to take part in a remediation plan due to faculty concerns regarding her beliefs pertaining to gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender issues.
"The faculty identifies Miss Keeton's views as indicative of her improper professional disposition to persons of such populations," the lawsuit reads.
In a statement to FoxNews.com, Augusta State University officials declined to comment specifically on the litigation, but said the university does not discriminate on the basis of students' moral, religious, political or personal views or beliefs.
"The Counselor Education Program is grounded in the core principles of the American Counseling Association and the American School Counselor Association, which defines the roles and responsibilities of professional counselors in its code of ethics," the statement read. "The code is included in the curriculum of the counseling education program, which states that counselors in training have the same responsibility as professional counselors to understand and follow the ACA Code of Ethics."
The Code of Ethics prohibits counselors from discriminating based on a number of factors, including gender identity and sexual orientation. "Counselors do not discriminate against clients, students, employees, supervisees, or research participants in a manner that has a negative impact on these persons," the code says.
Keeton's lawsuit alleges that the university's remediation plan noted Keeton's "disagreement in several class discussions and in written assignments with the gay and lesbian 'lifestyle,'" as well as Keeton's belief that those "lifestyles" are cases of identity confusion.
If Keeton fails to complete the plan, including additional reading and the writing of papers describing the impact on her beliefs, she will be expelled from the Counselor Education Program, the lawsuit claims.
Keeton has stated that she believes sexual behavior is the "result of accountable personal choice rather than an inevitability deriving from deterministic forces," according to the suit.
"She also has affirmed binary male-female gender, with one or the other being fixed in each person at their creation, and not a social construct or individual choice subject to alteration by the person so created," the lawsuit reads. "Further, she has expressed her view that homosexuality is a 'lifestyle,' not a 'state of being.'"
David French, senior counsel at the Alliance Defense Fund, which filed the lawsuit against Augusta State University on Keeton's behalf, said no university has the right to force a citizen to change their beliefs on any topic.
"The university has told Jennifer Keeton that if she doesn't change her beliefs, she can't stay in the program," he told FoxNews.com. "She won't even have a chance to counsel any students; she won't have a chance to get a counseling degree; she'll be expelled."
Keeton, who is not available for interviews according to French, believes that people have "moral choices" regarding their sexuality, he said.
"A student has a right to express their point of view in and out of class without fear or censorship or expulsion," French said.
British Gas made operating profits of £585m for the first half of 2010, up 98% on the same period last year.
Sam Laidlaw: "This is a much bigger group than we had a year ago"
The company, which supplies gas to more than half of the country's households, won new customers and benefited from the cold winter.
Gas use was 8% above 2009, and the company has added 400,000 more residential customers since then.
However, watchdog Consumer Focus said such a jump in profits would "sound alarm bells".
British Gas, which now supplies almost 16m households, said the almost doubling in profit was thanks to a greater number of customers using more power, alongside an ongoing programme of cost cuts which this year should see another £100m in savings.
Bigger group
British Gas's parent company, Centrica, also saw a big increase in profits, up 65% to £1.56bn.
Its chief executive, Sam Laidlaw, told the BBC: "This is a much bigger group than we had a year ago - a 40% increase in the size of the group as a result of the acquisitions that we did last year."
He said that energy prices had fallen by almost a fifth over the past year after the company cut prices three times.
"Customers' bills, despite the very cold winter, were actually lower this year than they were for the corresponding period last year, and that's because we've reduced our prices three times in the last twelve months by some 17%."
Mr Laidlaw hinted that, near term, price rises were unlikely: "This is a competitive market, so we can't give any signals, but our position has always been to lead the market down and try to delay any price increases as long as we can."
Wholesale energy prices are less than half their peak level reached in 2008, although suppliers have other costs that they have to pay as well as the "raw" energy price.
But the consumer watchdog, Consumer Focus said it was worried that prices would rise further.
Audrey Gallacher, head of energy policy at the organisation, said: "We are concerned that energy firms may actually raise prices this winter. With only small price cuts for customers in the last two years, despite wholesale prices being half what they were at their peak and beginning to fall again, customers will rightly be outraged if this happens."
British Gas's managing director, Phil Bentley, said that prices would have to rise, but over a longer time frame: "Probably unit prices per unit will go up. We're not saying over the next year, but in the long term, it absolutely will."
Future profits
Looking ahead to the full year, the company said the lion's share of the profit had already been made.
Its statement said: "Overall, we expect the full-year results for 2010 to be heavily weighted towards the first half of the year."
It added, though, that its full-year results would be in line with what the market was expecting.
So you think you 'OWN' your home? Or you think you might 'BUY' a home?
These are maybe the two most exaggerated claims made by the masonic thugs who have a complete
monopoly on the 'BUYING' and 'SELLING' of property, land and business.
How can we claim to know it is 'MASONICALLY' run? Well when you finally 'LOSE' that home and there is plenty of 'PROOF' you will eventually, the person charged with providing the papers necessary for your forcible eviction, along with your family, will be a masonic judge. Even if he or she can prove they are NOT masons, the hierarchy of the judiciary across the globe ends with masons running the show at the top.
All world wide bar associations are controlled from the inns of Court in London that is directly controlled by the United Grand Lodge of England a global empire of devious and evil manipulation of the world's markets by a few hand picked lackeys of the British crown. Bankers and lawyers are ALL masonic controlled and the myth that somehow you 'OWN' something is maybe the biggest scam presently operating across the globe, unless you are rich enough to purchase a home outright and the market is pitched to ensure 'FEW' can manage that .
They will go to any lengths to remove you from your 'PURCHASE' and always the easiest way is to have your 'EX' provide the necessary slander via family courts to have the excuse to kick you onto the street. This is the most ruthless and evil bunch of bastards, a mafia that conspires to steal the biggest purchases of your life. Every dirty devious trick in the book will be used in 'ADMIRALTY' run courts were JUDGES not JURIES will decide on your fate and it is NEVER good. A monopoly power over your lifes work will see these satanic scumbags ensure millions of men become homeless through the utter greed and theft of properties that were NEVER owned by the so called buyers, not when the title deeds for those homes remain in the vaults of the banking mafia who conspire with the legal mafia to force you , IN TIME, from what you thought was a purchase .
This is a warning to all those MEN with their heads buried in the sand. This will maybe be the most traumatic event in your life , short of fighting on the battlefield . To face being evicted from your home is truly the most horrific event a man can be forced to deal with and along with that event will come a mountain of other pressures conveniently concocted by these evil bastards to ensure you are broken and driven insane by the psychological torture they inflict while helping themselves to your lifes work. There are men who have survived these storms that can WARN others of what is awaiting them while the MASONIC MORTGAGE SCAMMERS continue to fool ever more men into a spiders web of deceit. The complicit media who share the spoils of property advertising are also implicated in convincing the unsuspecting public that this is all a wonderful step in 'OWNING' property and having your 'OWN' home. You may as well throw a million pounds into the wind, as that supposed investment will forever remain a noose around your neck and enslave you in debt that no other purchase can compare with. YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ONLY A MASS WITHDRAWAL BY MEN FROM THIS RACKET WILL ENSURE ITS DEMISE .
Until all the above areas of concern are dealt with to remove these scams any form of purchase
that includes long term commitment to a 'HUGE' bank loan will ensure more and more men
and their families will end up like so many men already, who have been fleeced of ALL their
worldly possessions in these utter dens of iniquity. MASONIC run courts that are stealing
billions duped into believing they 'OWN' things that is so far from the truth.
HOMOSEXUAL POLITICAL ADVISER ACCUSED OF USING DRUGS TO RAPE MAN
A well known political consultant and lobbyist used the offer of vodka to lure a younger man back to his house before putting a cloth doused in amyl nitrate over his face and raping him, a court heard today.
Andrew Stallard, 41, approached his alleged victim outside a nightclub in Cardiff and invited him back to his house for a drink.
When they got there he put a cloth doused in "poppers" over the younger man’s face before he passed out, a jury at Newport Crown Court was told.
In a video interview conducted by police and shown to jurors today, the younger man said he had been on a night out with friends drinking beer and cocktails and was leaving a nightclub when a man in his 40s or 50s invited him back to his home.
He said: "He offered me to come back to his house for vodka. I went back because I didn’t want to go home on my own. I am quite a sociable person and wanted to talk to somebody. It wasn’t sexual. We went in a taxi and the driver was going really fast and I got out and was sick."
In the video he said he was sick again when he went inside the house and added: "The next thing I remember was this white cloth coming on to my face and then I could not move. I could not speak and everything went black. When I came round I couldn’t move my arms, I was on the bed face down and I could not move."
He said when he tried to fight and wriggle away his attacker tried to put the cloth over his face again.
Opening the case yesterday, Richard Twomlow, prosecuting, told the court that police found a bottle of amyl nitrate in Stallard’s house.
He said: "That was what had been put on the cloth. Mr Stallard admitted they had both inhaled Liquid Gold. He said they met at the bus stop and he invited him back for drinks and fun. He said he was not aware (the younger man) was feeling ill. He said there was mutual oral sex.
"He said he used a flannel on which he had poured the liquid gold and they had inhaled. He said the younger man had done it of his own free will."
The court also heard Stallard, of Llandaff Road, Cardiff, is accused of raping another man.
In another video interview with police shown to the jury today the other alleged victim said he had been drinking in a pub in Cardiff with a group of people he had only just met when his vision became impaired.
He said: "I remember everything started to go very strange, everything was sliding left and right and I knew something was not right. I can recall someone on my right offering to take me home."
He said he did not know who the person was or what he looked like.
"There is a black spot until I remember going up some stairs and I remember I kept asking where I was and who I was with. I remember thinking, 'This does not feel right’."
He said he lost consciousness and added: "Next thing I know I came back into consciousness and he is having sex with me quite roughly."
He said he was frightened and tried to get the man off him. The next day he had dark blue bruises on his forearms and hips, the court heard.
Nicholas Gareth Jones, defending Stallard, suggested the man had not been raped but had instead willingly gone back to Stallard’s home with another man where they had continued drinking and watched porn.
Stallard denies two counts of rape.
The trial was adjourned until 10am tomorrow.
COWELL EMPLOYEES TOP LAWYER AGAINST DISABLED CLAIM FOR COMPENSATION
THIS IS WERE LAW BECOMES A COMPLETE ASS. IF SOME RICH DUDE RUNS YOU OVER IN THEIR CAR
AND YOU CAN'T WALK AGAIN ALL THEY DO IS HIRE A TOP LAWYER, TOP MEANING ANY KNIGHTS TEMPLAR
GOON WHO HAS SWORN HIS SOUL AWAY TO THE DEVIL, AND BECAUSE THE COURTS ARE SO CORRUPT THE RICH
THEN GREATLY LIMIT THE ABILITY OF AN ORDINARY CLAIMANT TO GET ANY DAMAGES. MANY CAN'T AFFORD
THE MOST BASIC OF REPRESENTATION NEVER MIND THE SO CALLED 'TOP' MASONIC CON MEN RUNNING THE LEGAL SYSTEM
IN THE UK AND ACROSS THE GLOBE FOR THEIR OWN FINANCIAL GAIN .
Simon Cowell calls in Matrix silk against Britain's Got Talent claimant
Matrix Chambers has been instructed by both co-respondents in a £2.5m employment tribunal claim brought by a Britain’s Got Talent contestant against Simon Cowell and the show’s production company, FremantleMedia.
Thomas Linden QC is representing Cowell, co-presenter Amanda Holden and his entertainment company Syco in the disability discrimination claim brought by would-be pop star Emma Amelia Pearl Czikai. Linden was instructed by DLA Piper employment partner Alan Chalmers.
Christopher Brown of Matrix is representing Fremantle after being directly instructed by the company.
Czikai is representing herself. She is claiming £300,000 for injury to her feelings, a further £1.25m for loss of earnings and additional compensation totalling £1m.
At a pre-tribunal review, Czikai claimed that any money awarded would be donated to charity.
The claimant brought the proceedings following her appearance on the show last May. She complained to broadcasting watchdog Ofcom, but the complaint was rejected in January.
She claims the programme did not make arrangements for the fact that she suffered from fibromyalgia, resulting in a poor performance and subsequent “humiliation” by the judges.
The pre-tribunal review concluded yesterday, with the judge due to decide whether the case can be brought before a full tribunal in the future.
(CNN) -- Journalists and other observers around the world spent Monday pouring over a vast cache of documents a whistleblower website says are U.S. reports that exhaustively chronicle the twists, turns and horror of the 9-year-old war in Afghanistan.
The whistleblower website WikiLeaks.org published more than 75,000 of the reports on Sunday. The documents date from between 2004 and January 2010, More.. and are divided into more than 100 categories. Tens of thousands of pages of reports document attacks on U.S. troops and their responses, relations between Americans in the field and their Afghan allies, intramural squabbles among Afghan civilians and security forces, and concerns about neighboring Pakistan's ties to the Taliban.
The "direct fire" category accounts for the largest number -- at 16,293 reports -- while "graffiti," "mugging," "narcotics" and "threat" each account for one. And WikiLeaks has another 15,000 documents that it plans to publish after editing out names to protect people, according to the website's founder and editor in chief, Julian Assange.
He told CNN's "Larry King Live" that the first-hand accounts represent "the cut and thrust of the entire war over the past six years," from the military's own raw data -- numbers of casualties, threat reports and notes from meetings between Afghan leaders and U.S. commanders.
"We see the who, the where, the what, the when and the how of each one of these attacks," Assange said. That includes, he said, possible evidence of war crimes by both U.S. troops and the Taliban, the Islamic militia that has been battling U.S. troops since 2001.
Assange said some events listed in the reports are "very suspicious," such as reports of skirmishes in which "a lot of people are killed, but no people taken prisoner and no people left wounded."
"In the end, it will take a court to really look at the full range of evidence to decide if a crime has occurred," he said. But earlier, he noted, "This material does not leave anyone smelling like roses, especially the Taliban."
CNN has not independently confirmed the authenticity of the documents. The White House condemned the release of the documents as "a breach of federal law," but simultaneously dismissed them as old news.
"I don't think that what is being reported hasn't in many ways been publicly discussed -- whether by you or by representatives of the U.S. government -- for quite some time," White House spokesman Robert Gibbs told reporters. But he said an investigation into the source of the leak had begun by last week.
"There is no doubt that this is a concerning development in operational security," he said.
The reports tend to be filled with jargon, like this one that describes a border incident from September 4, 2005:
"The Pakistan LNO [liaison officer] reports that ANA [Afghan National Army] troops are massing and threatening the PAKMIL [Pakistani military] 12km NE of FB Lwara [Firebase Lwara, a U.S. military base] ..."
And that's not even the entire first sentence.
Assange said WikiLeaks withheld some documents that dealt with activity by U.S. Special Forces and the CIA, "and most of the activity of other non-U.S. groups," Assange said. But he said the documents reveal the "squalor" of war, uncovering how a number of small incidents have added up to huge numbers of civilian deaths.
"What we haven't seen previously is all those individual deaths," he said. "We've seen just the number. And like Stalin said, 'One man's death is a tragedy, a million dead is a statistic.' So, we've seen the statistic."
The release of the documents is being called the biggest intelligence leak in history, drawing comparison to the disclosure of the Vietnam-era "Pentagon Papers."
"There hasn't been an unauthorized disclosure of this magnitude in 39 years," said Daniel Ellsberg, the onetime Pentagon official who leaked that multi-volume secret history of the conflict. He said he wished the WikiLeaks documents had come out earlier, but, "Better late than never."
Others disagreed with the comparison. Bruce Riedel, an analyst at the Saban Center for Middle East Policy at
the Brookings Institution, noted that the Pentagon Papers were part of a document prepared for U.S. leaders that analyzed how the United States got into Vietnam, "which assessed successes and failures in a comprehensive way."
"This is really the raw material of the war -- unassessed, raw, fragmentary data that I think in each case, you have to be very careful how much of a larger picture you can conclude from these fragments and snippets," Riedel said.
And CNN Terrorism Analyst Peter Bergen said the Pentagon Papers revealed "a huge disconnect between what the American government was saying officially and internally."
"Here, all sorts of American government officials are saying the war is not going very well. No one is disagreeing with that," Bergen said.
But Ellsberg said the documents, "low-level as they are," raise the question of whether the United States has a winning strategy in Afghanistan and whether it should continue to pursue the war.
"They do give us the sense of the pattern of failure, of stalemate, and why we're stalemated -- civilian casuatlies that recruit or the Taliban for us and raise the question of what we're doing there," he said.
The United States and its allies invaded Afghanistan in 2001 after the September 11, 2001, attacks on New York and Washington. The attacks were carried out by the Islamic terrorist network al Qaeda, which operated from bases in Afghanistan with the approval of the Taliban, the fundamentalist movement that ruled most of the country at the time.
The invasion swiftly toppled the Taliban, but al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden and Taliban leader Mullah Mohammed Omar escaped and remain at large. Meanwhile, the Taliban regrouped along the rugged border between Afghanistan and Pakistan, which is now battling its own Taliban insurgency as well.
Gary Berntsen, who led a CIA commando team in Afghanistan in the hunt for al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden, told CNN's "Rick's List" that the documents "probably are accurate." But Berntsen, now a Republican candidate for a U.S. Senate seat in New York, said the reports are likely to be a propaganda coup for the Taliban and "sap morale in the United States."
"It does paint a bleak picture on this," he said. "But it doesn't mean this fight is less worth fighting and trying to make progress on."
And Paul Rieckhoff, founder of Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America, said the information should be put "in context" and that journalists should avoid publishing anything that could harm U.S. troops in Afghanistan. Assange, he said, "is an anti-war activist who has repeatedly cast a very unfair light on the American military and on the American population in general."
"There are American troops in harm's way getting shot and killed," Rieckhoff said. "If WikiLeaks is endangering them, we need to push back, and the American public needs to push back."
Once the jargon of the report is pierced, the stories can be eye-opening.
In a February 5, 2008, incident, Task Force Helmand reported that an Afghan National Policeman [ANP] was in a public shower smoking hashish when two members of the Afghan National Army walked in.
"ANP felt threatened and a fire fight occurred," the report says. "The ANP fled the scene and was later shot. ANP and ANA commanders held meetings to contain the incident."
An October 15, 2007, incident describes an ANP highway police officer's shooting of another Afghan national police officer in the shoulder and leg, not seriously. "The shooting was not accidental the policeman had been arguing with each other for a few days," the report said.
In a March 19 2005 incident, "FOB [Forward Operating Base] Cobra received a local national boy who had received a gunshot wound to his stomach," another report said.
"He had been shot during a green-on-green [Afghans attacking Afghans] firefight in Jangalak Village. The boy and his older brother had heard shooting outside of their compound and went outside to check it out, at which point the boy was shot in the stomach. Another brother had also been shot and died at the compound. No adult males had accompanied the brothers, and only the older brother of the injured boy could provide information on the incident. The older brother explained that men in the village were having personal disputes with each other and had then began shooting at each ones' compounds."
The New York Times reported Sunday that military field documents on WikiLeaks suggest that Pakistan, an ally of the United States in the war against terror, has been running a "double game" by allowing its powerful Inter-Services Intelligence agency to meet with the Taliban. The talks included "secret strategy sessions to organize networks of militant groups that fight against American soldiers in Afghanistan, and even hatch plots to assassinate Afghan leaders," reported the newspaper, which had prior access to the documents.
Though it is not news that Pakistan has a relationship with the Taliban, "the extent of it, the depth of it, the texture of that relationship is now laid out in copious detail," Riedel said. "We already had a very strained relationship in Pakistan over this issue, for several years. This is going to pressure that relationship even more."
But Pakistan's ambassador to the United States, Husain Haqqani, said the government now in power in Pakistan is committed to battling the Taliban.
"The misgivings of past cannot always easily be overcome," he said. "But what we can change is the future, and that's what we will do," he added.
"This government was voted in on a platform in which we said very clearly, 'We will fight terrorists, and we will defeat them. And as long as this government has the legitimacy and support of parliament, that's exactly what it will do," Haqqani told CNN's "The Situation Room." He blamed the leak on unnamed parties he said are "trying to give Pakistan a bad name," but said raw intelligence reports "cannot be the basis of undermining what is now emerging as a truly meaningful partnership in our region."
"You know that things are getting a lot better, and Pakistan, Afghanistan and the United States are working together right now to essentially defeat the terrorists," he said.
But Afghanistan's government expressed amazement at the documents.
"The Afghan government is shocked with the report that has opened the reality of the Afghan war," said Siamak Herawi, a government spokesman. He said Washington needed to deal with the ISI, which he said had "a direct connection with the terrorists," including al Qaeda.
"These reports show that the U.S. was already aware of the ISI connection with the al Qaeda terrorist network," he said. "The United States is overdue on the ISI issue, and now the United States should answer."
Numerous reports name Gen. Hamid Gul, the former head of Pakistan's intelligence service. But Gul rejected the accusations Monday.
"These reports are absolutely and utterly false," Gul said . "I think they [the United States] are failing and they're looking for scapegoats."
Assange said the documents were "legitimate," but said it was important not to take their contents at face value.
"We publish CIA reports all the time that are legitimate CIA reports. That doesn't mean the CIA is telling the truth," he said.
He declined to tell CNN where he got the documents, and says the identities of his sources are less important than the authenticity of the documents they provide. And he denied that WikiLeaks has put troops in danger, and said the documents' publication will help people make informed decisions about whether to support the war.
Assange, an Australian, said the site is coming under "significant pressure" from authorities, including several recent "surveillance events." But he said that due to the response the latest release has received, "It is not politically feasible to interfere with us at a high level.
THIS VIDEO REQUIRES TO BE VIEWED BY EVERY DECENT AMERICAN CITIZEN WHO HAS HAD A RUTHLESS
GOVERNMENT SYSTEM FORCED ON THEM BY THE MOST EVIL SCUMBAGS WHO CONTROL AMERICAN WEALTH AND POWER.
AMERICA AND ITS POPULATION HAVE BEEN BRAINWASHED BY A COMPLICIT MEDIA WHO PROVIDE THE PLATFORMS,
PROMOTION AND PROPAGANDA FOR MAJOR POLITICAL PARTIES WITH HIDDEN AGENDA'S AND WORK FOR THE LIKES
OF THEIR MASONIC BACKERS THE ROTHSCHILDS TO DO THEIR BIDDING AND NOT FOR THE AMERICAN
PEOPLE. AMERICANS WHO HAVE TOLERATED MASSIVE INJUSTICE WHILE VAST ARMIES OF THEIR CITIZENS ARE INCARCERATED
UNDER FALSE PRETENCES .
THE LAND OF THE SUPPOSED FREE JAILS MORE OF ITS PEOPLE THAN ANY OTHER COUNTRY IN
THE WORLD SO IT IS FAR FROM FREE WHEN IT IS RAPING AND PILLAGING THE WORLD FOR THE GREED OF
A SMALL SELF APPOINTED ELITE WHO THE AMERICAN PRESS DESCRIBE IS SOME SORT OF DEMOCRATIC PROCESS.
IT IS NOTHING OF THE KIND BUT A DICTATORSHIP THAT ENSLAVES AMERICANS AND THE WORLD FOR VAST PROFIT.
GOD BLESS THE AMERICAN PUBLIC WHO HAVE BEEN FORCED TO TOLERATE THE LEGAL AND POLITICAL MAFIA THAT HAVE
BROUGHT THEM TO THEIR KNEES AND CRIPPLED THE WORLD FOR THE GREED OF A FEW ULTRA-RICH SCUMBAGS.
EXPOSING CORRUPT GOVERNMENTS WHILE DEMANDING LEGAL,JUDICIAL AND POLITICAL REFORM TO ENSURE
PROPER ACCOUNTABLE DEMOCRACIES. A GROWING
RESISTANCE TO THE SATANIC CONTROL OF THE WORLD BY THE ILLUMINATI, SKULL AND BONES, MASONS, BILDERBERGS, SPECULATIVE SOCIETY,KNIGHTS TEMPLAR AND ALL OTHER SECRET SOCIETIES ACTING
AS SHADOW GOVERNMENTS FOR WESTERN SO CALLED DEMOCRACIES.
THE NEW WORLD ORDER MOBSTERS WILL NOT GET AWAY
WITH THEIR PLANS TO ENSLAVE GOOD MEN WITH THEIR EVIL SATANIC NETWORK OF CONTROL.
EXPOSING A WORLDWIDE
MASONIC AGENDA AND EVERY SINGLE PROMOTER OF ITS EVIL EMPIRE.
MASONIC RUN COMPANIES PROMOTING HIGH TECH STATE MONITORING SYSTEMS THEY ARE TRYING
TO FORCE ON ALL FREE MEN.
Join HERE.
The majority of the mass media has a hidden agenda and none of it
includes fair reporting of men's issues.
Please send comments and articles to EDITORIAL.
World NEWS the government and judicial controlled mass media wont EXPOSE.
Amazing info on the site keep up the fab work. http://nikkinitro.co.uk
