1. Having large sums of money in ANY bank. (They are all con men see
HERE)
2. Having any kind of mortgage with a bank. (They are all scams see
HERE)
3. Marrying and signing a state marriage certificate. (Notice NO small print see
HERE)
4. Having a child. (Maybe the single most dangerous threat to a mans welfare see
HERE)
5. Entering ANY court especially NO JURY civil courts.(Mason judges make it up see
HERE)
6. Hiring a lawyer anywhere across the globe. (ALL part of the Bar associations see
HERE)
7. Trusting any politician.(They are ALL on the take see
HERE)
9. Taking out any type of credit especially for a large purchase like a car (see
HERE)
9. Trusting any journalist who answers to the corporate media (see
HERE)
10. Trusting any cop who answers to masonic superiors (see
HERE)
11. Allow social workers,lawyers and judges with a homosexual or radical feminist agenda to decide
on the future welfare of your children (see HERE)
12. Doing any form of business with a FREEMASON. ( ALL of the above included see
HERE)
Trust your instincts our group have done some or all of the above and have the mental
scars to prove these are ALL a danger to a mans health, welfare but especially their
finances . There are sinister interacting groups working for the same secret societies who
are embedded in the legal, political, judicial, banking and police mafia's that threaten the
very existence of any man not part of their creepy network of power.
There are men presently across the globe being brutalized psychologically by forces that
all of the above create when they work together to asset strip you and leave you broke and
homeless. We do not underestimate how serious these matters are to men who
unsuspectingly fall for the institutions that are interacting across the globe for the self
appointed elite money men who pull the strings behind the scenes. That we aim to
EXPOSE and ensure no other men are caught out by these scams creating multi-billion
dollar rackets for the evil scumbags running these scams dressed in all their finery.
BEWARE THEY ARE ALL CROOKS AND AIM TO DESTROY YOUR FAMILY
AND YOU.
WHY DO ALL THE AMERICAN PRESIDENTS KOW-TOW TO THE HEAD OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER
HERE
WE HAVE THE PRIVILEGE OF BEING THE MOST ATTACKED WEBSITE ON THE INTERNET
DUE TO ENDLESS ATTACKS ON OUR WEBSITES WE REQUIRE TO USE TWO DOMAINS TO ENSURE OUR
REGULAR VISITORS HAVE ALTERNATIVE MEANS TO ACCESS INFORMATION THAT EXPOSES THE
LEGAL, POLITICAL, BANKING AND COP MAFIA THUGS AND BULLYBOY'S
ABUSING MEN FOR PROFIT
http://www.internationalmensorganisation.info
http://www.intmensorg.info
TRANSLATING CORPORATE MEDIA LIES
WHERE TRUTH AND HONESTY IS A VERY RARE COMMODITY
LATEST STATS
THOSE WITHOUT GUNS TO DEFEND THEMSELVES WILL, IN TIME, DIE FROM THOSE WHO HAVE THEM . HISTORY IS LITTERED WITH MANY EXAMPLES.
We have been many years ahead of the man hating corporate mass media in EXPOSING the evil that
breaks good men by the scumbags that have taken over the legal and political systems of
Western society. We have a huge contact list ensuring we get access to information long before
that corporate media. Male victims no longer trust the establishment media to warn the public of
the torture and abuse meted out to any man targeted by the persecution squads operating to
stop any form of dissent when men and their families lives are being destroyed by the political
and legal mafia across the globe. Read our news archives from as far back as 2000 and compare
with what is only now being reported in the NWO's corporate rags.
COMMENTS FROM OUR READERS
Many Thanks.. Greatest Conspiracy Website on Earth
Hello Intl. Men's Org.
We're Your #1 Fans/Supporters here in West USA. We keep up with You 24/7.
Thanks for Great Work and Edits
Best Wishes in eternal gratitude;
Ricky Ray/TheRR9
-------------------
Dear Sirs
I just want to say how much I love your site. I've been an avid truth seeker
for many years and would be a big time follower of the Jeff Rense program, but I really
think your site is one of the best, well laid out and most interesting alternative media site.
I've only known of its existence over the last week, but I'm already hooked on it.
Keep up the fantastic articles and pressure on the NWO scum.
Name and email supplied
---------------------
I just suddenly found your site on the internet, and WOW - it really is packed with useful
information about the inhuman beasts who are planning the NWO. Their activities are far
advanced in my country Sweden, but England is leading with regard to public camera watching.
Unfortunately your multimillion population seems to be as sleeping as our 9 million sheeple.
I also have found other interesting sites like your on the internet, such as
www.henrymakow.ca , www.rense.com , www.realjewnews.org , www.eaec.org , www.nkusa.org
, www.jewsnotzionists.org , www.hermes.press.org , and also sites run by the antizionist
jews Gilad Atzmon in London and Israel Shamir in Israel , just to name a few of all who
understand the enormous risk for our future if the Cabal will gain full power.
Good luck and keep holding up the torch of Knowledge!
Best regards
Name and email supplied from Sweden
ENGLISH FREEMEN - COUNCIL TAX HEARING - THE TAKEDOWN BEGINS VIDEO
THIS ARTICLE WOULD BE LAUGHABLE IF NOT SO SERIOUS WRITTEN BY THE HEAD OF LAWYERS IN BRITAIN WHO
HAVE MORE THAN ANY OTHER GROUP BEEN RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ENORMOUS HARM TO FATHERS AND THEIR
CHILDREN INCLUDING THEIR FUTURE INHERITANCE THANKS TO THE FLEECING OF MEN BY THE LEGAL MAFIA.
Legislation has effectively dismissed the contribution of half the population to the upbringing of the next generation, says Ruth Deech, the chairman of the Bar Standards Board.
There is a wealth of research showing that children need fathers
Over the last half a century there has been a sea change in society’s attitude towards same-sex relationships, marriage and the family. Homosexuality has moved from criminal status to legalisation, from legalisation to acceptance and the same respectfulness as heterosexual relationships. We have now reached the stage where, in the event of an election victory, the Conservative leader has promised that civil partners will benefit from extended paternity and maternity leave (in the case of adoption or artificial insemination babies). David Cameron has also promised that proposals to extend flexible working and married couples’ tax breaks would be granted as well. He has stated that the party is no longer hostile to same sex couples.
While changes to the law which have given homosexual couples the same rights and responsibilities as heterosexual couples are welcome, there are two issues involving modern society’s attitude towards children which give me unease.
One is the new possibility of birth certificates for children born to couples of the same sex, which name two persons of the same sex as their parents. This is logical following on the extension of rights to same sex couples, but there is an issue of principle here, which is the truth. Sections of the 2008 Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act (HFEA) even allow a dead woman, never known to the baby and not related, to be named with her previous consent on the birth certificate by the choice of the birth mother, while preventing the child from having a father. Birth registration is about genetic inheritance (albeit that sometimes the truth is not told) and about the welfare of the child, not about the relationship, legal or otherwise, between the adults whose will gave rise to it. The birth certificate that names two female parents will disclose to anyone perusing it that the child was necessarily born from donor sperm or a donor embryo or a surrogate mother. It could even result in deception to exclude the natural father where the mother conceived naturally but uses this provision to cut him out of the child’s life.
There are other ways for two adults of the same sex to gain parental responsibility over a baby, and it should not have to be through the birth certificate. It puts the demands of the adults ahead of the rights of children to know and benefit from both sides of their genetic makeup. It sits uneasily with the ending of donor anonymity in reproduction generally, and for the call for mothers to name fathers on birth certificates. This is not a moral issue; it is about disguising true facts, and it is about confusing biological parenthood with legal and social parenthood. Civil partnerships do still differ from marriage a little, and this is an area where the difference ought to be preserved with justification.
The other area of regret for me is the removal from the law of the provision in the 2000 HFEA that when a doctor is considering whether or not to give infertility treatment to a woman, he or she had to consider the welfare of the potential baby, “including the child’s need for a father.” It was removed on the ground that it was discriminatory against single mothers and lesbians, and replaced by the need to check for “supportive parenting”, whatever that may mean. Reproductive services are in fact quite readily available to single women, and it is thought that about 25 per cent of lesbian couples have children. I regret the downgrading of the father as a person of importance – the legislative dismissal of the contribution of half the population to the upbringing of the next generation. The removal of the requirement to consider the need for a father is to make a fresh statement that the child does not need a father, no matter how liberally the old law’s requirement was interpreted. It sends a message to men, at a time when many of them feel undermined as providers and parents, contrary to government policy in this field.
Government policy is that men should take financial responsibility for their children and stay in touch with them after separation; that they should take paternity leave and be involved. There is a wealth of research showing that children need fathers, not just two parents. Children need to see complementary roles, the relationship between the sexes, a microcosm of society, as they grow up. Recent reports have placed Britain at the bottom of international league tables for the welfare of children and we know that boys without fathers do worse at school and turn to worse role models. Research shows that their presence gives girls as well as boys advantages in educational and social development. The limit to same sex relationships is that they cannot be a reproductive unit in a way that is best for the welfare of the child if they cut out all contact with members of the other sex or falsify the birth registration. Tolerance of both types of parenting has to be ensured.
Baroness Deech is the chairman of the Bar Standards Board.
FATHER COMMITS SUICIDE BLAMED FOR DEATH OF DAUGHTER BUT CAUSED BY DOCTOR
A father committed suicide after a hate mob wrongly blamed the parents of a baby girl who was killed by an incorrectly prescribed dose of medicine.
Neil Jones and Maxine Winfield were driven from their home as neighbours suspected they were responsible for the death of four-month-old Abbie.
The house was trashed and all the dead baby's clothes, toys, jewellery and teddy bears were stolen, even the bootees she was wearing when she died.
Weeks later, Mr Jones took an overdose and died.
Today a coroner cleared Miss Winfield and her late partner of any blame over the death of daughter Abbie four years ago.
The inquest heard that Abbie, a Down's child, died after a series of errors by a doctor's surgery and a pharmacist resulted in her being given ten times the correct dose of medicine.
Abbie, who had a hole-in-the-heart which needed an operation, was prescribed Furosemide at four weeks after she had problems with breathing and keeping her feed down.
She was initially prescribed the special paediatric medication in twice daily doses of 5 mls but on March 10, 2006 this was changed by staff at the surgery to a mixture ten times stronger when Miss Winfield complained the baby was struggling to accept the fluid.
The concentrated version was supposed to be given to the baby in smaller amounts of 0.5 mls twice a day but nobody passed this information on to the mother.
The labels were correct for the first two prescriptions for the 'concentrated' medicine. For the final prescription, the two large bottles were wrongly labelled and so ten times overdoses were given.
Sheffield Coroner Chris Dorries is writing to the Chief Medical Officer, the Chief Pharmaceutical Officer and a company which provides computer software for GPs surgeries following the hearing into Abbie Jones' death.
The inquest heard staff at the surgery in Barnsley, South Yorkshire, made out an incorrect prescription for the drug Frusemide after Miss Winfield telephoned and asked for more of the medicine.
Receptionist Julia Dransfield overode a computer safety warning which flagged up if too much medicine was being prescribed.
The error was not spotted by GP Dr Dean Wawrocz, although Miss Dransfield told the doctor to check saying 'it's only a baby.'
Pharmacist Jeremy Power, who dispensed the wrongly labelled bottles, told the hearing he overheard his technician querying the strength of the dosage over the telephone with the surgery treating the baby, but admitted he did not check to see if the technician had spoken with a doctor.
Mr Power, of the former T and I White's chemists in Barnsley said: 'With hindsight I wish I had. I accept that a stronger intervention should have been made.'
Mother-of-four Miss Winfield, 30, unwittingly gave Abbie at least two doses of the diuretic medicine from a wrongly labelled bottle and the infant received another two doses in hospital before the mistake was realised by a consultant who called in the coroner.
Little Abbie was admitted to Sheffield Children's Hospital with dehydration and septic shock on May 1, 2006 but died on June 3.
Former forensic pathologist Professor Christopher Milroy told the hearing the incorrect dose could have caused the baby's death and certainly contributed to it.
Eight South Yorkshire Police officers spent ten months investigating the tragedy and a file was sent to the Crown Prosecution Service but no action was taken.
The practice manager Sandra Nicholson, Mrs Dransfield, Dr Dean Wawrocz and Mr Power were all interviewed under caution but no charges were brought.
Detective Sergeant Paul Wilcockson, of South Yorkshire Police, said: 'The CPS had the file for 18 months and decided there was insufficent evidence to justify bringing any charges against individuals or organisations.'
Recording a narrative verdict the coroner said Abbie died as a '[direct consequence of an overdose of prescribed Frusemide medication.'
He said: 'The prescription was wrongly generated on the surgery computer as a result of established or recognised procedures not being followed within the practice.'
He said there were 'insufficient safeguards' to prevent an unauthorised prescription being generated on the surgery computer system.
Afterward the inquest Miss Winfield's solicitor Siobhan Kelly said: 'She's very satisfied with the coroner's verdict. It is a relief to her.'
FIONA PILKINGTON TRAGEDY: 10 COPS FACE INVESTIGATION OVER FAILURES
THE MASONIC THUGS THAT CONTROL THE BRITISH COP MAFIA ARE LONG OVERDUE BEING JAILED FOR
THEIR UTTER FAILURE TO PROTECT THE PUBLIC.
The Independent Police Complaints Commission have served disciplinary notices on the officers, who rank from constable to inspector, while inquiries into their conduct continue.
Leicestershire Police were contacted 33 times in 10 years about bullies harassing Miss Pilkington and her 18-year-old daughter, Francecca Hardwick, in the street where they lived in Barwell.
An inquest last September found that, despite the repeated pleas for help, the family received only eight visits from police officers.
After enduring a decade of violence, vandalism and taunts, Miss Pilkington, 38, killed herself and her daughter in October 2007.
A jury at the inquest into the deaths ruled police officers and council officials failed to properly share information.
The police also failed to offer Miss Pilkington and her daughter sufficient protection. These failings contributed to their deaths, the jury ruled.
Following the hearing, Chris Eyre, then temporary Chief Constable of the force, offered his "unreserved apologies" to Miss Pilkington's family.
The IPCC launched an inquiry into the way police had dealt with the family's complaints in the years before their deaths.
In an update on the investigation, the watchdog said: "We have now served advisory notices on a total of 10 Leicestershire Police officers and this situation is being kept under review.
"Such notices are not judgmental in any way, but are required under police misconduct regulations, and served on officers to advise that their conduct is under investigation."
The officers under investigation have not been suspended and remain on duty. It is understood that at this stage the investigations remain at a disciplinary level rather than potentially criminal.
An IPCC spokesman added: "We are progressing this rigorous investigation as swiftly as possible and will make our findings public in due course."
The IPCC is also investigating officers from the same police station over the case of Joanne Butler. The 38-year-old mentally ill woman was bludgeoned to death by an alcoholic neighbour at her home in Earl Shilton after police failed to respond to several 999 calls.
Although Zionism typically represents itself as the solution to anti-Semitism, the truth is less flattering. In fact, hostility toward Jews is indispensable to the cause of Jewish nationalism. If anti-Semitism didn't exist, Zionists would have to invent it. And in many cases that is precisely what they have done.
Contrary to the widespread perception that Zionism opposes anti-Semitism, its adherents have occasionally revealed a more ambivalent attitude to Jew-hatred. In 1895, Theodor Herzl, the founder of modern Zionism, prophetically wrote in his Diaries, "Anti-Semites will become our surest friends, anti-Semitic countries our allies." Even the suffering inflicted on European Jewry by the Nazi holocaust doesn't seem to have unduly tempered such cynicism. In 1995, Jay Lefkowitz, an American government official, told the New York Times Magazine, "Deep down, I believe that a little anti-Semitism is a good thing for the Jews- reminds them who they are."
If Zionist extremists can't provoke the desired level of anti-Semitism to advance their goals, they are even prepared to fake it. A 1952 article in Davar, the official organ of Mapai, the party of the then Israeli Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion, suggested sending a team of saboteurs "to help redeem Jews" from the countries where they are "absorbed in sinful self-satisfaction."
"The task of these young men," the article explained, "would be to disguise themselves as non-Jews, and, acting upon the brutal Zionism, plague these Jews with anti-Semitic slogans, such as 'Bloody Jew,' 'Jews go to Palestine,' and similar 'intimacies.'"
Lest anyone doubt that the Israeli government would ever contemplate carrying out such a cynical plot to encourage Jews to move to Israel, the "rescue" of about 125,000 Iraqi Jews in the early 1950s involved far worse acts. "In attempts to portray the Iraqis as anti-American and to terrorize the Jews," wrote former CIA officer Wilbur Eveland in Ropes of Sand, "the Zionists planted bombs in the U.S. Information Service library and in synagogues. Soon leaflets began to appear urging Jews to flee to Israel."
Whatever about posing as "Arab anti-Semites," one might think that Zionists would draw the line at a post-Holocaust sponsorship of Nazism. Yet this is exactly what a leading Canadian Zionist organization has been accused of. "In the 1960s, the Canadian Jewish Congress (CJC) paid John Garrity, a small-time mercenary, to build up the fledgling Canadian Nazi Party," reveals Ezra Levant in Shakedown. When the embarrassing truth emerged, it was justified by the CJC as an attempt to learn more about neo-Nazism. However, the real purpose, according to the Jewish Canadian writer, was to provide "a pretext for the addition of 'hate' laws to the criminal code."
While "hate" sounds like something that all decent people would condemn, one man's hate may be another man's righteous indignation. Zionists, for example, tend to conflate anti-Zionism with anti-Semitism, and, therefore, as something that could be considered a "hate crime."
But are Professors Mearsheimer and Walt engaged in hate propaganda by documenting the harmful influence of the Israel lobby over US foreign policy? Or is former US President Jimmy Carter a "bigot" for comparing the Israeli occupation of Palestine to apartheid South Africa? Are the survivors of the USS Liberty who refuse to remain silent about Israel's deliberate attack on their ship merely motivated by hatred of Jews? Is Professor Norman Finkelstein a "self-hating Jew" for exposing the Holocaust Industry's corruption of history and memory in the service of an extortion racket? And is UN special rapporteur Richard Falk also "self-hating" for likening Israel's actions against the besieged Gazans to what the Nazis did to Jews in the Warsaw Ghetto?
In each of these cases, by no means an exhaustive list, the charge of anti-Semitism, rather than serving to protect Jewish people from defamation, has been used to obscure Zionist crimes.
However, as Zionist criminality becomes increasingly transparent, there will most likely be a sharp rise in anti-Semitism worldwide. No doubt much of it will be the result of genuine, albeit misdirected, anger as the extent of Zionist crimes against humanity becomes more widely known. But considering Zionism's history of faking attacks on Jews, we can expect at least some of this "hate" to be the work of Jewish extremists who disingenuously claim to be fighting anti-Semitism.
Perhaps it's time for those who are genuinely concerned about combating hatred in the world to heed the words of Israel Shahak. As the great Israeli humanist concluded in his classic Jewish History, Jewish Religion, "Although the struggle against antisemitism (and of all other forms of racism) should never cease, the struggle against Jewish chauvinism and exclusivism … is now of equal or greater importance."
* Maidhc Ó Cathail is a widely published writer based in Japan.
TWO FAMILIES HELD UP AS MORAL COMPASS BY THE CORPORATE MEDIA
There is something quite extraordinary going on with the mass media and highlights a perfect
example of how both America and Britain are being utterly corrupted by the dreadful programming
that sees the likes of Jordan(Katie Price) and Sharon Osbourne's families given extensive
time on national TV in the UK and USA.
What apparent talent have these two not so glamorous( without the make up on) wenches got?
Let's see now, Jordan? Apart from a very false pair of boobs NOTHING but a dysfunctional lifestyle
who can't remain married or with any one guy for to long.
How about Sharon Osbourne? Well apart from having a gangster of a father who made money from screwing
bands he managed and Sharon following in his footsteps with satan worshipper Ozzie of Black Sabbath
she like Jordan has a very dysfunctional lifestyle.
One thing they do have in common is they are both jewish and anyone who has been investigating
how much of the corporate media is owned and controlled by Zionists should not be surprised that
talentless nonenTITies should be filling the archives of TV schedules promoting Jewish run
families who are neither role models or moral compasses for the many women who BELIEVE the utter hype
and tripe purveyed by TV companies that also promote, in vast quantities, homosexual presenters
and performers as if that is the NORM.
One jewish nonentity who has made a massive killing on both sides of the atlantic is Simon Cowell,
NOT because he
has talent but because he happens to have the right Zionist connections and who
makes money from screwing musicians that sign dodgy contracts to the few record labels
run almost entirely by Zionist money and control.
Cowell has also been seen regularly in the Caribbean speeding around on a jetski with MASONIC
markings and is another arm of the Zionist control they have over many aspects of our lives.
One reason why they are also trying to control the internet.
The sudden fall from grace of homosexual Steven Purcell as Chief Executive of Glasgow city council
has been well documented
here and in various national newspaper that are really only the tip of a very big corrupt iceberg.
Here are a few dots we have joined
Purcell and Paul McManus applied in 2003 for a licence for a pub in London the Adam and Eve.
This is subject to CCTV being installed that allows the police and council officers at Southwark
to have access to the footage anytime up to 31 days after ANY event
SEE HERE
Paul McManus becomes head of the BECTU Union that is supposed to be in conflict with a group
privatised by Glasgow City Council called the Culture and Sport Glasgow , a charity Purcell helped
set up while part of Glasgow city council who acts as one of its directors alongside The First Minister at that time Jack McConnell's
wife Bridget who is their Chief Executive.
SEE HERE
At a board meeting of the Culture and Sport Glasgow on the 25th Nov 2009 the following was
decided
(b) in terms of Article 43.2 of the Company's Articles of Association,
Councillor Steven Purcell was removed from office by written
notice to this effect.
SEE HERE
Bridget McConnell is promoted on Jack McConnell's Wiki site as
"Personal life
He is married to Bridget McConnell, and has two adopted children from that marriage,
Hannah and Mark. Bridget is Chief Executive of Culture and Sport Glasgow, the UK's
largest and most comprehensive cultural and sports charitable company. Hannah lives
in London working for the British Council. Mark is a graduate of the University of
Dundee, and is currently working as a teacher at Broxburn Academy teaching English."
SEE HERE
A quite an extraordinary scenario that all the museums , sport centres and
other cultural places of interest in Glasgow have been removed from Glasgow city control
in a meeting where the majority of the Labour councillors voted for this change including
Purcell, who then becomes a director of the NEW private charity.
That is before his removal which
was NOT discussed during the Board meeting as to the reasons. A serious conflict of
interest and to the enormous disadvantage of Glasgow council tax payers.
As well as Mrs McConnell being praised for her Chief Executive position she is also part of
another sinister organisation the British Council that we have written about in detail and
a search on our site will show the rather dubious dodgy scams they get up to on behalf of Britain's royal
family who are their patrons.
Paul McManus while suggesting he is in dispute with this private charity on behalf of his members
interests meantime has been running a business with the Chief Executive Purcell of Glasgow City
Council and a director of the Culture and Sport Glasgow board shows a very peculiar conflict
of interest and the way Glasgow councillors have been deviously removing council control into
the hands of an unelected charitable quango with financial interests and salaries that greatly
remove the wealth created by these cultural features that have belonged to the Glasgow public
for so long.
MANCHESTER RADIO ON LINE TONIGHT SUNDAY 14 MARCH 2010 BETWEEN
8PM AND 10PM GMT WITH THE FANTASTIC ALTERNATIVE RADIO PRESENTER TONY LEGEND.
HE HAS DONE AN EXCELLENT JOB OF EXPOSING THE HOLLIE GREIG CASE AND THE SINISTER FORCES
OPERATING WITHIN THE UK AND EMANATING ACROSS THE GLOBE.
PRIVATE EDUCATION PRODUCES MORE THAN HALF OF UK'S TOP JOURNALISTS
NO WONDER THE ABSURD DISTORTIONS IN THE NEWS ARE ALWAYS BENT IN FAVOUR OF THE ARISTOCRACY
AND NOT THE LOWER ORDERS
Toffs at the top
A report has revealed that more than half of the UK's top 100 news and current affairs journalists were privately educated.
According to a survey by the Sutton Trust, 54 per cent of leading national newspaper editors, columnists, broadcast editors and news presenters went to school in the private sector. Private school pupils account for just 7 per cent of the school population.
The report also reveals that 33 per cent of the top 100 went to grammar schools, and 14 per cent attended comprehensive schools. Comprehensive schools currently educate almost 90 per cent of children.
The Trust claims journalism has become more private school-dominated over the past 20 years with the number of top journalists coming from the sector increasing by 5 per cent. In 1986, 49 per cent of the top 100 journalists were privately educated, while 44 per cent attended grammar schools and 6 per cent went to comprehensives.
The report says: "Without exception every journalist we spoke to agreed that news and current affairs is increasingly becoming a preserve for those from more privileged backgrounds — more often than not those educated in private schools. In particular there is perceived to be a systematic bias at the beginning of careers towards those who are well off and from the London area."
It claims the perception was based on the belief that privately educated journalists were more likely to:
1. Survive the low pay and insecurity that are endemic at junior levels in news journalism;
2. Afford the costs of living in London and postgraduate journalism courses;
3. Have family contacts within the industry.
The survey also reveals that of the 81 per cent of the leading journalists in 2006 who had been to university, more than half were educated at Oxbridge, including a third who went to Oxford. Among the 1986 sample, 78 per cent were university graduates, 67 per cent of whom had been to Oxbridge, including two-fifths to Oxford.
Among Oxbridge-educated national editors are Roger Alton, of The Observer, Lionel Barber, of the Financial Times, John Bryant, at the Daily Telegraph, Alan Rusbridger of The Guardian and Peter Wright of the Mail on Sunday.
But the survey also shows that some national editors made it to the top without a university education. They include Robert Thomson of The Times, Richard Wallace at the Daily Mirror, Dawn Neesom at the Daily Star and the News of the World's Andy Coulson.
Oxbridge educated broadcasters include Adam Boulton of Sky News, Channel 4's Krishnan Guru-Murthy and the BBC's David Dimbleby and Matt Frei. The BBC's John Humphrys and ITV's James Mates and Trevor McDonald did not go to university.
A section in the report about nepotism says: "Family ties remain a powerful force in the newsroom.
There are countless examples of sons and daughters, brothers and sisters, partners and former partners who have followed in the footsteps of relatives in pursuing successful careers in journalism."
The report further reveals that the proportion of women among the top 100 news journalists increased from 10 per cent in 1986 to 18 per cent in 2006.
Lee Elliott Major, news editor of the Times Higher Education Supplement, who led the research, said: "What the research does not suggest is that editors routinely favour those from privileged educational backgrounds. But it does point to a systematic bias towards the better off at the crucial entry level into national news organisations."
NUJ national newspapers officer Barry Fitzpatrick told Press Gazette: "Clearly we are concerned about anything that would appear to restrict or limit entry into the profession. We're very concerned with the current situation where entry into the industry is quite an expensive career choice.
Because of low pay and the cost of people's degrees and qualifications it means that people from poorer backgrounds and families simply don't have journalism as an option.
"Again the report does highlight that position.
We would agree with that as one of the conclusions it makes."
Sutton Trust chairman Sir Peter Lampl, who set up the Trust in 1997 to promote social mobility by providing educational opportunities to young people from non-privileged backgrounds, said: "It cannot be healthy for our media leaders to come mostly from backgrounds that are so different from the vast majority of the population. The newspaper and broadcasting industries are not attracting a rich diversity of recruits and should look urgently at their recruitment processes."
The Sutton Trust is an educational charity that has previously researched the educational backgrounds of the UK's top lawyers and MPs.
"Whoever says Scottish politics is dull might want to take a look at last week’s unravelling
saga around Labour controlled Glasgow City Council.
Who would have thought when Gordon
sat next to him on the Thursday before last that within a week one of Scotland’s up
and coming politicians would have attempted suicide, that a police investigation would
link the same man, Glasgow’s most senior politician, to major organised drug criminals
and an 18-year-old Labour activist would be end up dead outside the city’s Council Chambers."
'SOURCE'
Steven Purcell was talked about as the saviour of the Scottish Labour Party, its brightest young star, he was tipped as a future First Minister.... Yet he was in with the wrong crowd and in May last year some of Scotland’s top coppers visited Purcell in his council offices as his name had repeatedly cropped up in investigations. There was reason to believe that someone was attempting to blackmail Purcell with mobile phone footage of him.
Fast forward to last week and as Gordon Brown was leaving Glasgow, Purcell was going into meltdown. Vodafone blocked his number after he abused call centre staff and he was found in tears talking nonsense at his desk. He ended up in the Castle Craig rehab centre. Although Purcell was earning fifty grand as council leader, you must wonder how much of this went up his nose and therefore who was paying for the rehab stay and for retaining of lawyers and crisis managers? Either way Purcell went missing from the rehab centre on Sunday night. Some have suggested he attempted to kill himself in open water as he was found soaked.
By now the story had started to emerge in the press and by Monday the internet was rife with rumours about Purcell stepping down because of cocaine rather than the “stress” cited in the official statement. We now know that Council staff wanted to blow the whistle but were stopped by Purcell’s mysteriously funded lawyers. As the week progressed the story unravelled more, Purcell’s vain attempts at crisis management were no match for overwhelming evidence. The final straw was the collapse and subsequent death of a admirer of Mr Purcell’s, a young Labour Party activist named Danus McKinlay who “worshipped” Purcell and “would do anything for him” . Guido understands that McKinlay was diabetic and there has been reason to believe that he had stopped taking his medication resulting in his subsequent collapse. Witnesses said they thought he was drunk – an easy mistake to make of someone who desperately needs insulin.
That was the final straw, within two hours Purcell had resigned as a councillor and has fled Scotland to an unknown sunny destination. Through all of this Gordon has remained silent. The ally he was once so keen to be photographed with, campaign for, tip for future greatness and fund-raise for, was left to the scrap-heap. What did Gordon know and when? "
SOURCE
Rumors are now circulating that the real scandal was the relationship that Purcell had, with the now dead young man. Even the Scottish media can't cover this one up. Diabetics don't just "drop dead" in public. Normally, a bracelet will alert medical staff, or they carry a diabetic bag with insulin and needles on them at all times. In the bag are usually glucose tablets for low blood sugar.
If the rumors are true that this young man (reportedly 18 years old) was having a homo-sexual relationship with Purcell than it is very likely that this is what was caught on video, and the source of the real blackmail here.
But, don't expect a murder investigation here. We have learned from the Holly Greig Case that Politicians and Pedophiles in Scotland prefer to sleep in the same bed. The murderers can climb in too, there is plenty of room...
Unless you are a law-abiding citizen, in which case, you can sleep on the floor.
Any man will be aware of the extreme distortions and selective news reporting of the man hating BBC.
No surprise then a woman with a radical feminist agenda is at the head of the newsgathering.
FRAN UNSWORTH
THIS VIDEO REQUIRES TO BE VIEWED BY EVERY DECENT AMERICAN CITIZEN WHO HAS HAD A RUTHLESS
GOVERNMENT SYSTEM FORCED ON THEM BY THE MOST EVIL SCUMBAGS WHO CONTROL AMERICAN WEALTH AND POWER.
AMERICA AND ITS POPULATION HAVE BEEN BRAINWASHED BY A COMPLICIT MEDIA WHO PROVIDE THE PLATFORMS,
PROMOTION AND PROPAGANDA FOR MAJOR POLITICAL PARTIES WITH HIDDEN AGENDA'S AND WORK FOR THE LIKES
OF THEIR MASONIC BACKERS THE ROTHSCHILDS TO DO THEIR BIDDING AND NOT FOR THE AMERICAN
PEOPLE. AMERICANS WHO HAVE TOLERATED MASSIVE INJUSTICE WHILE VAST ARMIES OF THEIR CITIZENS ARE INCARCERATED
UNDER FALSE PRETENCES .
THE LAND OF THE SUPPOSED FREE JAILS MORE OF ITS PEOPLE THAN ANY OTHER COUNTRY IN
THE WORLD SO IT IS FAR FROM FREE WHEN IT IS RAPING AND PILLAGING THE WORLD FOR THE GREED OF
A SMALL SELF APPOINTED ELITE WHO THE AMERICAN PRESS DESCRIBE IS SOME SORT OF DEMOCRATIC PROCESS.
IT IS NOTHING OF THE KIND BUT A DICTATORSHIP THAT ENSLAVES AMERICANS AND THE WORLD FOR VAST PROFIT.
GOD BLESS THE AMERICAN PUBLIC WHO HAVE BEEN FORCED TO TOLERATE THE LEGAL AND POLITICAL MAFIA THAT HAVE
BROUGHT THEM TO THEIR KNEES AND CRIPPLED THE WORLD FOR THE GREED OF A FEW ULTRA-RICH SCUMBAGS.
EXPOSING CORRUPT GOVERNMENTS WHILE DEMANDING LEGAL,JUDICIAL AND POLITICAL REFORM TO ENSURE
PROPER ACCOUNTABLE DEMOCRACIES. A GROWING
RESISTANCE TO THE SATANIC CONTROL OF THE WORLD BY THE ILLUMINATI, SKULL AND BONES, MASONS, BILDERBERGS, SPECULATIVE SOCIETY,KNIGHTS TEMPLAR AND ALL OTHER SECRET SOCIETIES ACTING
AS SHADOW GOVERNMENTS FOR WESTERN SO CALLED DEMOCRACIES.
THE NEW WORLD ORDER MOBSTERS WILL NOT GET AWAY
WITH THEIR PLANS TO ENSLAVE GOOD MEN WITH THEIR EVIL SATANIC NETWORK OF CONTROL.
EXPOSING A WORLDWIDE
MASONIC AGENDA AND EVERY SINGLE PROMOTER OF ITS EVIL EMPIRE.
MASONIC RUN COMPANIES PROMOTING HIGH TECH STATE MONITORING SYSTEMS THEY ARE TRYING
TO FORCE ON ALL FREE MEN.
Join HERE.
The majority of the mass media has a hidden agenda and none of it
includes fair reporting of men's issues.
Please send comments and articles to EDITORIAL.
World NEWS the government and judicial controlled mass media wont EXPOSE.
