|Reaching Out to the Homeless
More details to follow on our funding of a homeless campaign which will include a documentary and assistance to the homeless.
----- Original Message -----
From: INCODA Management
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 7:30 PM
We humbly thank you and your Organization for the generous contribution to our Reaching Out to the Homeless campaign. We are honored to help our homeless throughout the communities and in the nation by doing our part at improving and enriching their lives.
We will keep everyone posted with updates throughout. May our Heavenly Father continue to bless and protect your Organization and it's members as you share information and empower our people with knowledge.
Thank you again for your generous support towards helping us help our homeless.
|TURNING THE HOMELESS INTO MULTI-MILLIONAIRES FOR THE DAY
We have just obtained a large bundle of 500 million dollar notes that we will be circulating
to homeless people giving them a chance to feel wealthy for a day at least. The forgotten in
our eyes are NEVER forgotten and must be helped in every and any way possible and we hope
this small gesture will at least bring a smile to the faces of victims of corrupt governments
that allow our poor to rot on the streets of our once proud land.
Kevin, Nicolas, Gerry and James are some of the London homeless who enjoyed having a $500m
note in their pockets two others wanted to remain completely anonymous.
|TURNING THE HOMELESS INTO TRILLIONAIRES
WE HAVE STARTED TO HAND OUT GENUINE 100 AND 10 TRILLION DOLLAR NOTES TO THE HOMELESS ON THE STREETS.
THIS MAY NOT BRING IMMEDIATE CHANGE TO THEIR CIRCUMSTANCES BUT TO SEE THEIR EYES LIGHT UP
AT EFFECTIVELY BECOMING TRILLIONAIRES FOR A DAY AT LEAST MAYBE IS ENOUGH FOR THEM TO HOPE THEY
CAN IMPROVE THEIR ALL. THEY CANNOT BUY ALCOHOL OR DRUGS WITH THESE NOTES SO HOPEFULLY SOME WILL
HANG ONTO THEM AND MAYBE IN TIME THEIR LIFE WILL IMPROVE FOR THE BETTER.
IT MAY NOT BE THE IDEAL WAY TO HELP THE HOMELESS BUT WE CAN BUT TRY TO IMPROVE THEIR LIVES IN
ANY AND EVERY WAY POSSIBLE.
Today 7 November 2008 we made our first collection and distribution of a large amount of food
to the homeless across central London. The reaction from those poor souls who have no home
but who now have quite a few fresh meals to keep them going was excellent.
The politeness,humility and coyness in being offered help clearly shows the respect
homeless people have to being offered a little assistance to get them through the cold
winter nights in one of the richest cities across the globe.
It is shameful that the political windbags fail time and again to come to their assistance
and despite the credit crunch the massive number of london billionaires and millionaires
makes that level of poverty even more despicable.
|A MAJOR LEGAL VICTORY FOR THIS GROUP
MacAskill paves the way in parliament for Tesco law
A shakeup of the legal system which could lead to supermarkets and banks offering legal services moved forward yesterday with the start of a debate in the Scottish Parliament.
Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill said that legislation, dubbed Tesco Law, will be introduced in parliament to establish alternative business structures in the legal profession as soon as possible.
The move follows pressure from the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) amid concerns that restrictions on working practices, including barring partnerships with non-legal firms, did not benefit customers.
Scottish lawyers last month backed the changes which have long been called for by the Scottish Consumer Council.
There have been worries about regulation of legal services however, with politicians raising fears during an earlier discussion last year.
Speaking in parliament yesterday Mr MacAskill told MSPs: "I am fully aware that members expressed concerns during the November debate that effective regulation was key to safeguarding consumers and the profession alike.
"This is not about Tesco law', as some have defined it. It is about allowing the profession to grow and compete, while maintaining quality of service to the public and the core values of the profession."
Both the Law Society of Scotland and the Faculty of Advocates have consulted their members and produced policy papers outlining their vision for the future.
Mr MacAskill stressed that there was still work required to "iron out the detail" of many of the issues to devise solutions for the Scottish market place. "Although there are differences of approach between the law society and the faculty, I am delighted that we have taken the first steps towards reform," he added.
He said that Scottish firms will continue to serve local communities, but he added: "Some firms can compete internationally and, I think, globally. The success of our accounting and financial services sector demonstrates this is possible. There is no reason why law cannot do likewise."
The OFT called for a review following a so-called super-complaint by consumer group Which? that the current set-up hinders market innovation.
At present, lawyers cannot go into partnership with non-lawyers or be employed by non-legal firms to give advice direct to the public. The changes could lead to external ownership or capital for law firms, and partnerships between solicitors and non solicitors.
Welcoming the move, Sarah O'Neill, legal officer of the Scottish Consumer Council, said: "We have been arguing for this for a long time. We think it is in the interests of the consumer in terms of increasing choice and reducing prices."
Richard Henderson, president of the Law Society of Scotland, was more cautious. He said: "It's a very complex issue and there has been a great deal of thought and discussion surrounding alternative business structures. It's clear from the profession's response that there is appetite for change."
Similar legislation is being introduced in England and Wales.
Our group played a major part in EXPOSING the appalling manner our legal system presently operates .
We instigated the initial complaints to the Office of Fair Trading prior to the WHICH supercomplaint.
We provided both oral and written evidence in the Legal Profession and Legal Aid bill at
ALL DELIBERATELY PULLED FROM THE SCOTTISH PARLIAMENT WEBSITE AFTER THE SNP GOT ELECTED
that has brought in a new body the Scottish Legal Complaints Commission
We have yet to see the impact on this new body and a complaint has been made to the Office of the Commissioner for Public Appointments in Scotland for the filling of the posts with people supposedly "LAY" persons when in fact they are mostly all connected in one way or another with the legal CLUB of Scotland.
Many Scots unaware that if they enter a Scottish court at present before all these changes take place they are likely to be fleeced of their homes,business's ,assets and children.It is only US the victims and our group alone have lost millions in Scottish courts ,that have campaigned for many years to EXPOSE the utter corruption that is disguised as a form of legal system.
Scotland legal parasites have been getting away with absolute murder destroying thousands upon thousands of lives using their illegal MONOPOLY and a master policy that ensures virtually NO ONE can get recompense never mind representation when a legal parasite fleeces you of your lifes work.
This is only the start of the urgent and major changes required to redress the enormous imbalance in how scottish courts operate.
Only a JUST court system can we create a real democracy to challenge our government .This is NOT possible as the system presently stands.
Try getting a lawyer to sue another lawyer or a government department ,you will quickly come up against a brick wall and may face a persecution network were you are maliciously dragged through the courts to TEACH you a lesson about NOT complaining about legal parasites trying to destroy your life.
PULLED FROM THE HERALD
|SUBMISSION TO JUSTICE 1 COMMITTEE FAMILY LAW
SUBMISSION TO Justice 1 Committee Family Law (Scotland) BILL
For and on behalf of the International Mens Organisation
The following is our submission to this inquiry.Due to the manner in which the Scottish Parliament take little effort to inform the public it was only while browsing the justice 1 website we found this call for evidence.That was today the last day for providing evidence 8th April 2005.
Due to such short notice and lack of time to provide an expansive list We will raise only a couple of major points .
Presently our organisations have absolute proof the Law Society of Scotland and its membership are using family law to abuse children and their fathers through the civil legal process to obtain assets with long term funding via legal aid.Particularly those who cant get representation due to the Law Society of Scotlands CLOSED SHOP.
All lawyers presently are using flawed insurance via Marsh UK, I provide the writ served on Marsh International by Elliot Spitzer.This is highly relevant as the bulk of the Law Society are using legal aid and able to BULLY families using family law to undermine the fathers authority in the family home while they plunder the families assets and childrens future inheritance .Presently we are seeking substantial information via the Information commissioner to PROVE this is all fact.
The recent withdrawal of the table of fees by the Law Society of Scotland shows an illegal system in operation.
It will be shown that massive property theft is being made by collusion between the Scottish Legal Aid board and members of the Law Society of Scotland ,a sinister network of abuse ultimately to provide maximum financial advantage to lawyers at the expense of the family and children.It is outrageous for any member of the legal profession to suggest the long term litigation instigated by this malice is good for children while massive profits are being made by lawyers involvement who undermine a families human rights
It is outrageous that the civil legal system in Scotland has been allowed to PLUNDER massive amounts of land ,business and property under the guise of family law when so much of a families assets are frittered away by lawyers abusing the system.Few if any regulated by a system which has been proven in the Legal Profession Inquiry to be utterly corrupt.
SORT OUT THE CORRUPTION IN FAMILY LAW AND THEN FAMILY LAW MAY LEAD TO A MORE AMIABLE WAY OF RESOLVING SEPARATING COUPLES ISSUES THAT END UP IN COURT.
The International Mens Organisation
|MEN STOP WORKING FOR THE CRIMINALS CONTROLLING OUR COURTS
AN INTERNATIONAL PLEA TO MEN TO STOP WORKING FOR THE CRIMINALS CONTROLLING OUR COURTS
AN INTERNATIONAL STRIKE AGAINST LAWYERS ,JUDGES AND THEIR FOOTSOLDIERS
Our organisations are now asking all tradesmen worldwide to stop or block services to anyone connected with the legal systems around the world.
We request every MAN who is providing services to lawyers and judges REFUSE forewith to take their instructions in support of all men worldwide who have been destroyed by the evil family court systems.
WE SEEK TO HAVE ALL RESIDENTIAL AND BUSINESS PROPERTIES WERE LAWYERS OR JUDGES RESIDE, BOYCOTTED AND THAT WORKMEN INTERNATIONALLY REFUSE TO CARRY OUT MAINTENANCE AND PROVIDE SERVICES TO SUCH PROPERTIES AND LIMIT AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE THEIR ABILITY TO FUNCTION.
If MEN worldwide can unite and stop the tyranny being perpetrated on us all then they would no longer be able to function and would be the strongest message POSSIBLE that MEN will no longer tolerate the theft of our children ,homes and assets by the crooks running our legal systems.
FROM today let ALL men bring the crooks to a halt .
PLEASE FORWARD TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW THAT HAS BEEN DAMAGED BY THIS BRUTAL SYSTEM AND ASK YOUR FRIENDS AND RELATIVES WORLDWIDE TO JOIN OUR CRUSADE TO BRING TO THESE PEOPLE THE SAME NIGHTMARE THEY HAVE BEEN IMPOSING ON OUR GOOD MEN FOR FAR TO LONG .MEN BLIGHTED BY BRUTAL JUDICIAL PROCESS'S THAT NO LONGER PROVIDE US AND OUR FAMILIES WITH JUSTICE .
|PUBLIC PETITIONS HEARINGS
LETTER TO STANDARDS COMMITTEE
We enclose both our letter to Convener of the Public Petitions and also his response.
We ask that this is addressed formally by the standards committee into the areas of
concern raised within the letter to Mr McMahon.
His response leaves much still unanswered in light of the fact this relates to child and adult
deaths caused due to sinister forces operating presently within the legal systems of Scotland
and which is being investigated by the Office of Fair Trading and the Scottish consumer
council on behalf of our organisations.
It is that appalling monopoly position which is allowing the misuse and abuse of powers
ONLY possible due to despicable practices occuring under that monopoly.
One of our members being forcibly injected with anti psychotic drugs due to major
failures in his due process of law .We require to provide additional evidence to
this initial request at any possible future hearings regarding this matter .
For and on behalf of the International Mens Organisation.
Subj: URGENT ATTENTION OF PUBLIC PETITIONS CONVENER
Dear Mr Mc Mahon
We write further to our recent correspondence that we wish to raise the manner the
Public Petition meeting was heard on Wed 29th October 2003 and the manner in which
petitions we raised were handled prior to that hearing.We ask the following for
your response as advised by the standards committee prior to taking this matter
further and that you address the following issues.
1.Why was it ,that despite raising this with your Clerk,were some of our petitions
published in an entirely different manner than they were submitted?
Anyone reading those petitions from your main web site would be misled as to the
actually content of what each petition related to. No mention was made at any
time of the judiciary despite at least three petitions relating to that process
and the effect it had on male discrimination and the repercussions for their children.
2.Why has it taken almost a year from our first submission to the latest one to
be heard ,while a comment was made that despite a large backlog of petitions due
to elections and recess you held one of the SHORTEST public petition hearings
were the committee dismissed petitions with evidence of elder and judicial abuse?
I enclose letter from Mr James Duff another petitioner were he supports our
organisations views that you are aiding and abetting the burying of evidence
of corruption within the legal systems of Scotland.
3.Why as convener did you
fail to ensure that in light of our petitions addressing male discrimination
did members of your committee not declare an interest in their membership
of the cross party group on women?
The committee is made up of 9 members 5 who are women.Helen Eadie,
Linda Fabiani, Carolyn Leckie and Sandra White are all members
of the cross party group on womenand Sandra White is also a member of cross party
group on mens violence against women and children.It is clear to our organisations
in light of those female members having allegiance to these cross party groups that
it would be like having the KLU KLUX KLAN sitting on a hearing on racism.
None of your committee are members of any cross party group associated with men
and therefore we expected you as convener to have taken steps to address this
inbalance prior to that meeting in light of the serious issues on child deaths
which we provided clear proof of.You as convener allowed those MSP's who have
allegiances to cross party groups on women to cross question us which we
believe undermined the efforts to address male discrimination and the male
suicides caused by the extreme psychological pressures induced through male
discrimination in Scottish civil courts.
Also the children who have died due to being separated from biological
fathers caused by such discrimination in breach of human rights.
4.Also despite stating at least 7 times our wish to address further requests
for additional information and evidence at a later date in writing,
you allowed three female committee members to continue to pursue that
questioning knowing at least two , had allegiances to womens groups
within the Scottish Parliament.One of the main reasons for withdrawing
from taking any further part in the KANGAROO court which in no way could
address the issues we raised .
5. We also raised evidence of secret societies
unduly undermining due process of law.It would have been appropriate
for you as convener to ask any of the committee to state whether they
were or were not members of any such organisations prior to hearing that
evidence .We ask therefore whether you as convener of this committee
have any such connections in light of your failure to do so?
Have you or any member of the petitions committee taken the first degree
entered apprenticeship OATHS?
This requires an answer as you are a tribunal given authority to investigate human
right abuses .We have case law which states clearly any such tribunal has a duty
to ensure that it is wholly impartial your committee make up leaves much to be
desired in the issues we have raised and you as convenor ensuring that impartiality
is assured to our membership.
6.The Scottish Parliament has a positive obligation
to protect the vested rights of Scottish citizens ,that requires individual
and collective responsibility in reporting miscarriages of justice ,criminality
associated with failures in due process of law and human rights abuses which
follow such breaches.The suggestion made by you at the onset of the hearing in
question "I remind the petitioners and members of the committee that the
Parliament is unable to intervene in individual situations".
This statement is in clear breach of ECHR Article 17 - Prohibition of abuse of rights
Nothing in this Convention may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or
person any right toengage in any activity or perform any act aimed at the destruction
of any of the rights and freedoms set forthherein or at their limitation to a
greater extent than is provided for in the Convention.
The failure to ensure you abide by art 17 and act to protect those who's human
rights have been abused should require you to stand down as committee convener
as you are not fit to hear such cases in light of the ease with which you have
been burying evidence since taking charge of the public petitions forum.
7.Your final quotes regarding the 6 petitions we raised were
"The Convener: Committee members and I take our jobs seriously. We want to do
our best to enhance the reputation of the committee and the Parliament, but
we cannot allow petitioners to make unsubstantiated comments then criticise
the committee for not acting when the petitioners have provided no evidence
on which we can base any action. I want to put that on the record, because
I see no value in considering petitions from petitioners who have provided no
evidence but who expect the committee to act purely because they have submitted
a petition that makes allegations and claims that they cannot substantiate.
"This statement you make is quite unbelievable in that despite providing a
catalogue of evidence prior to the hearing and some of it not fully published
on your webpages as was addressed by the clerk. There was also evidence
sent on our behalf by the Citizens Commission on Human rights which addressed
abuse of psychiatry .
We have proof your clerk responded to that in an email to the CCHR. You stated
"when the petitioners have provided no evidence on which we can base any action"
That alone should be sufficient proof that you lied before Parliament ,before the
general public and deliberately undermined and failed to address those issues
that were placed before you.We had a number of witness's in that hearing and
the individual who's human rights abuses were despicably abused and who spoke
to the parliament was also there as evidence of abuses of due process and as
one of our members who has since been released from being forcibly injected
with antipsychotic drugs due to those abuses.
Evidence we had already produced
Quotes from legal profession inquiry letter Christine Grahame, dated 29 April 2003.
Case law evidence of judicial immunity sent from our USA attorneys to support our petition.
Letter from Mrs A Mallaby as proof of due process of law being undermined in Edinburgh
Sheriff court with 6 witnesses to those abuses and some of those witness's who
travelled from afar to give support at the petiton hearing and provide CLEAR
proof of those human right abuses.
You refused to allow them to speak .You also failed to publish that evidence on
the committee webpages as further proof of human rights abuses.This despite
electronic email proof of that as submission evidence as well as by surface
mail.Our member was released from Edinburgh Royal hospital 3 days after the
hearing with a CLEAN bill of health.That despite the appalling mistreatment he
faced while unlawfully incarcerated through flawed court procedures.
Evidence from the herald archives showing comments from Children 1st, Children in
Scotland and the Judges Council in relation to the questioning of children by judges.
Title of petition
Judges questioning of children
No mention of this in the main petition list page.
Evidence from BBC archives and various other national media archives with names of
children who died while separated from their biological father.The second page of
this was not published on the web until an email to the clerk was made to address
this as that evidence was crucial to show the widespread deaths of children.
The frivolous manner in which both you and Carolyn Leckie addressed this was
SHOCKING despite the great lengths that were made to obtain those articles.
Something which has been regularly buried due to the serious nature of children
dying in very extreme circumstances and the failures of both the legal and medical
field to address puerperal psychosis .
We enclose an article on that subject and which would have been provided as
additional evidence but for your flawed impartial committee make up.
Evidence was available to the committee on this petition which would have been
addressed on the day but for our serious concerns about your handling of previous
committee hearings and the manner in which you allowed female members of the
cross party group on women to openly attack our evidence. Your failure to deal
with this correctly while undermining speakers with limited public speaking
experience and in front of cameras is cause for grave concern as to your attitude
towards public petition presenters who are generally amateurs in that process
while your professional highly trained committee use ever trick in the book to
demean those taking a public platform to EXPOSE serious human right abuses.
You did NOTHING to make that easy in fact the restrictions on time to address
6 petitions says it all .
Evidence we provide prior to hearing this petition was a BBC archive article
were Mark Solon a solicitor and witness trainer made serious statements
regarding the funding of expert witness's .
Once again as quote "petitioners
have provided no evidence" is clear proof that you wish to avoid and bury
evidence from individuals with expert knowledge of the failures of the
legal process's operating in UK and Scottish courts.
At least some attempt was made at addressing the issues raised within this petition.
We requested the Scottish Parliament call for audits with regard this submission
before this could be fully addressed as it required audited evidence to fully
address the discrimination issues within this petition.Once again this was
refused without proper cognizance of what was referred to within that petition.
We also had sent a number of articles to your clerk to be added as additional
evidence to various petitions.We ask that these are addressed fully and if
necessary can go through all emails sent to your committee prior to the hearing
29 th October 2003.We request ALL petitions are heard once again before a
proper impartial tribunal as we are not prepared to allow you or any other
member of that committee who is NOT impartial to undermine issues which are and
will continue to cause the deaths of adults and children alike, thanks to the
appalling abuses being enacted within closed and secretive family courts in Scotland presently.
For and on behalf of the International Mens Organisation
Further additional information to follow in more emails
PUBLIC PETITIONS COMMITTEE
EH 99 1SP
10 December 2003
Thank you for your e-mails dated 28 November 2003.
I will address each of your points in turn.In relation to your query as
to why your petition was published 'in an entirely different manner than
they were submitted' it is normal practice that all admissible petitions
are published on the Committee's web page in the same format as they are
The Committee Clerk informs me that you petition was processed in this manner.
You also ask why 'has it taken almost a year from our first submission to
the latest one to be heard'. However, I note your e-mails of 3 and 14 February
to the Committee Clerk requesting that consideration of PE 539 remain
on hold for the time being. The Clerk also informs me that you were sent a
letter on 11 September 2003 asking whether you now wished PE 539 to be
considered by the Committee along with three other petitions which you
lodged on 7 May 2003.
In relation to your questions on Declaration of Interests this is a matter
for individual Members. Paragraph 5.2.12 of the Parliament's Code of Conduct
states that: 'It is the responsibility of the member to judge whether an
interest is sufficiently relevant to particular proceedings to require a
Any Registrable Interests which Members may have should be registered in the
Register of Interests. Interests which Members are required to register are
outlined at Section 4.3 of the Code of Conduct. The Register of Interests
is publicly available on the Parliament's website at:
Paragraph 5.2.6 of the Code of Conduct states that:Under the statutory
requirements, a Member only has a declarable interest where he or she has a
declarable interest which has been registered or for which a statement has
You also refer to evidence which you submitted in support of your petitions
and I can assure you that all such evidence was circulated to Committee Members.
MICHAEL McMAHON MSP
Convener of the Public Petitions Committee
The UK's SUN newspaper has been venomously anti-father .
It promotes DV propaganda on a grand scale which aids the family court system
and the tyrants within its walls .
We have no idea as to this change of editorial as our organisations would NEVER
support such a newspaper.
On this rare occasion they have it right for a change.
Last night the UK's Chan 4 uncovered the rogue judiciary we have operating in
the UK. It was an appalling story of judges continuously getting decisions
woefully wrong .That was only the criminal cases they didnt even touch on
family law the most abhorrent blot on the UK's landscape done behind secretive
closed doors of star chamber torture chambers.
It is an evil sick society that allows this to flourish ,many newspapers like
the SUN have promoted that system .We can inform our organisations that we are
at the forefront of breaking this down .
We have the Office of Fair Trading investigating the monopoly position the
Law Society is operating under.
We have senior members of parliament about to BREAK the news of evidence
tampering of a Legal profession inquiry carried out over two years ago which
was a whitewash and we are also assisting a new breakaway law firm to challenge
the law societies powers.
To all FATHERS who face a christmas distanced from their children .
STAY STRONG YOUR SUFFERING IS NOT IN VAIN WE ARE SLOWLY BUT SURELY WINNING THE
BATTLE TO OVERTURN THAT TYRANNY CAUSING SO MUCH HARM TO OUR CHILDREN.
We have no doubt this system is crumbling as we speak .
ALL THE BEST FROM
the International Mens Organisation
and to all our important contacts worldwide aiding the battle for justice
We need a law for dads
Dad's devotion ... father Bob with daughters Peaches and Pixie
By Sir BOB GELDOF
NOW again itıs Christmas. Weıre all busy spending on our loved ones, our families and, most especially, our children.
In particular this is the childrenıs festival. The time when a kind old man will slip down a chimney or slide down a roof and bring joy to your child FATHER Christmas.
It is the special childıs time because 2,000 years ago, the story tells us, a woman and a man had a baby together and though the man knew perfectly well he was not the childıs father he nonetheless loved him and his wife and raised him to be strong, independent, brave and loving.
Lucky kid, to have Joseph for a dad. Indeed, were Jesus alive today, to have any dad at all to raise him to be a good man.
For those divorced men with children, Christmas is a travesty, a repulsive contradiction of a family holiday, of a loving celebration, of a special childrenıs time.
These are the men who will be forced to be alone without their babies, whowill commit suicide most frequently at this time of year in an age when male suicides are already 300 per cent greater than womenıs.
These are men who, in the eyes of what is sickeningly called Family Law, committed the greatest crime of being divorced.
Men who are guilty of the worst sin of being fathers because dads, tothe great dismay of the secret elite who sit in secret judgment in thesesecret courts are, shockingly, ALL men!
And men, as everyone knows, are monsters, feckless, abusive, aggressive, thuggish, incapable of such a hugely complex task of giving love andpatience, cooking baked beans or giving a bath, doing homework or combing hair and reading stories.
Itıs a miracle any of us got here at all, us all having had dads and
This Christmas Eve we will say goodnight in our homes to our over-excited children, tell them to go to sleep quickly or HE wonıt come, prepare for the morning and have a quiet drink of pleasure before bed.
Yet there will be many fathers forbidden by the savagery of our laws to be with their children, standing broken, as I have, outside their old homes, the keys still in their pockets, weeping and whispering goodnight as they watch each childıs bedroom light switch off before turning away, maddened with grief, to the pointlessness of a lonely Christmas Day.
What have we become? In whose name is this brutality done?
Who are they who do this and why do they not account to us, the people?
What unthinking fools perpetrated these unlawful laws?
How is it in a childıs interest to remove him from his dad and why?
Two people fall from love and one, though having done no wrong, is
semi-criminalised and punished by having his children removed from him forever
(for childhood is never recoverable).
The extremity of Family Law is bewildering, for having your children taken away
from you is only one slight degree better than them taking away your freedom.
And yet you are not a criminal, nor have you done any wrong.
These same people assume that women make better parents that a motherıs love is
better, more important than a fatherıs.
That somehow itıs bearable for a man to be parted from his children but not a woman.
Why? These assumptions and prejudices are not simply outdated but plain wrong,
dangerous and damaging.
You only have to listen to the language that the law uses when it gets
involved in our private lives.
Itıs meant to be neutral but it is cold, deadening and hopeless.
In fact it becomes heartbreaking, hurtful, rage-inducing. I cannot even say the words.
A huge emptiness would well in my stomach, a deep loathing for those who would deign
to tell me they would ALLOW me ACCESS to my children those I loved above all,
those I created, those who gave meaning to everything I did, those who were the
very best of us two and the absolute physical manifestation of our once blinding love.
Who the hell are they that they should use the language of the prison visit to ALLOW
anything between me and that which is mine?
REASONABLE CONTACT when the situation under this law is, by definition, UNreasonable!!!
CONTACT? Is this what we had before in our home or am I now some visiting alien?
An ABSENT parent labelled by those who have forced me to be absent.
A RESIDENT/NON-RESIDENT parent words that reduce the meaning of that which was once
Mum, Dad and home to the sterile language of the state institution.
I cannot begin to describe the pain of being handed a note, sanctioned by your
(still) wife with whom you had made these little things, with whom you had been
present at their birth and previously had felt grow and kick and tumble and turn
and watched the scans and felt intense manly pride.
Wrestled and played with them, walked them to school, picked them up, made tea
with, bathed and dressed, put them to bed, cuddled and lay with in your arms
and sang to sleep.
Felt them and smelt them around you at all times, alert even in sleep to the
slightest shift in their breathing ... a note that will ALLOW you ACCESS to
these things who are the best of you.
ARE you a father denied the chance of seeing your children?
If so, we want to hear your story. Here is how to contact us.
1 Virginia Street
FAX 020 7782 4063
|IMO SPEECH TO SCOTTISH PARLIAMENT
IMO SPEECH TO SCOTTISH PARLIAMENT
Our member George Farquhar was released from his prison hospital(persecution camp) to make a speech to the Scottish Parliament .The doctors have stopped forceably injecting George due to the enormous pressure worldwide and from our petitions.
We have not got Georges own speech to hand but will publish as soon as it is available online from the Scottish Parliament.
We can say he is in good spirit looking well and was interviewed by BBC news outside parliament .
Supporters came from as far as Glastonbury to support George.
The full speech of the petitions below.
Some are extracts from recent articles that have been posted on our news.
PE593,625,633,635 and 672
We thank the committee for hearing these petitions submitted by our organizations over a period of a year. Although to try and compress them all into such a short time scale we believe does not do these very serious issues justice.
However they are all in part interconnected with male discrimination, firstly were Scottish Social Services ,not only having been shown to be incompetent, but we believe are also riddled with widespread fraud,corruption,gender discrimination and a strong illuminati influence, undermining the welfare of vulnerable children.This at its worst during separation and mainly due to the LARGE public moneys the legal aid board are freely allocating to opposing lawyers, which begs the assumption that legal fraudsters assume they are better at protecting children than their own fathers.Any suggestion from sources abusing those moneys that this is being curtailed is a blatant lie.
Fathers do not require money to protect their children it is free at source 24 hours 7 days a week that protection being unlawfully and criminally taken from them at the expense of the biological FATHER.
Until that financial link is severed ,childrens safety will continue to be undermined ,as any separated father knows who has tried to protect his children from the appalling gender fascism being perpetrated by lawyers, sheriffs,police,court officials,legal aid board,social workers ,doctors ,teachers and a myriad of publicly funded hangers on who exert a major drain on public funds and makes the cost of the new Scottish Parliament pale by comparison .This is a multi billion pound fraud the Scottish Executive have failed to put a lid on ,which ultimately has led to many child deaths which have occured due to those extreme prejudices, while more public money is used to promote that prejudice.
Those vast sums that are being consumed by a lawless legal fraternity , supposedly to protect children and while they USE children in family courts, is one of the most shameful experiences men and children have to endure. The persecution of separated fathers being the main daily ritual of incompetent , corrupt and publicly funded legal practitioners .
There are many females on the extended fathers side who also suffer from that loss of contact with their loved ones.
Phillip Yelland director of the Law Society investigations states they have no remit to discipline lawyers for human rights abuses,that is despite his own personal responsibilites under art 17 of those ECHR conventions.
Neither the Legal Profession Inquiry ,the Legal Aid Inquiry or the Council of the Law Society Bill has or will have any effect on this system ,and it may well make matters worse as Scottish children and parents continue to face severe psychological trauma and potentially more deaths until these issues we raise are taken seriously and the Scottish Executive take immediate emergency measures to rectify them before any more tragedies occur .
We have provided evidence of child deaths were fathers had been separated from their children due to a system which compares to the race hatred promoted during apartheid in South Africa.Except in Scotland it is gender apartheid which is largely responsible for the deaths of children who received no protection from incompetent agencies whilst separated from their biological fathers .
In fact our childrens future inheritance is also being robbed by the wheeling and dealing of a corrupt system condoned by the upper echelons of the political and legal establishment ,despite widespread evidence to the contrary in those inquiries.
We demand immediate action to ensure rights under ECHR are being upheld in Scottish civil courts .
Fathers and children face those actions , on many occasions ,without legal representation or funding ,no audio recordings of those hearings,despite equipment in place to do so ,and in many cases the need for jury hearings when large fraudulent land and property transactions are being perpetrated which leads to the bankruptcy of fathers facing the injustices that flow from major failures within this despicable system.
Our organisations can state from evidence gathered worldwide that Scotlands civil legal system is one of the most appalling anywhere in the world and any suggestion from the legal or political fraternity that that is not the case is a blatant lie . It is not more powers family courts need , it is the abuse of those powers that are oppressing and enslaving men and which has reached unprecedented levels were marriage licences can be purchased for very little but there seems to be NO upper limit on the legal costs of its removal.
The failure to cap the new parliament building is exactly the same dilemma men face in uncapped family courts, only the sums are many times greater ,and a major blight on Scottish society .The Legal Aid board is of grave concern as to their impartiality as a tribunal ,the majority are members of the Law Society of Scotland and working sheriffs and with potential links to the Illuminati and wholly responsible for publicly funding large scale male asset stripping while undermining childrens human rights.
That gender inbalance makes men the easy pickings of the criminals operating within that system,when there is NO legal protection due to collusion between the law society and the legal aid board .
Bob Geldofs stated this month
"Family law doesn't work. It is absurd, blunt and outdated.
So many of us are hurting and yet the law will treat the man in court (if my case is typical) with contempt, suspicion,disdain and hostility," adding that the law is "unjustly weighted infavour of women.
On the rare occasions when this situation is reversed it is either bizarrely when a woman was married to a fighter pilot, or has an ex husband who is classed landed gentry or is in the same illuminati lodges as the judge hearing the case .Hence the urgent need for juries in expensive land and property divorce divisions to ensure impartiality required under art 6 of the European conventions is assured and JUSTICE is being seen to be done.
The comparison of a separated man in the Scottish family court system is similar to how a christian must have felt stepping into the colosseum in Rome ,unarmed , outnumbered and waiting to be eaten alive.
Sigmund Freud states
"I cannot think of any need in childhood as strong as the need for a father's protection."
Why is it then we have a devolved Scottish Assembly that is massively publicly funding the exact opposite situation ?
Only because it is financially beneficial to all those who gain from the psychological torture and abuse of children separated from the protection of their biological fathers by the ruthless use of outdated Scottish Civil law which is entirely incompatible with the rights our fathers and children have and demand under European Conventions and being undermined daily in Scottish courts .
Any legal system which harms a father ultimately harms his children and when fathers are robbed their children are robbed of their inheritance.
We have an Auschwitz on our own doorstep ,with appalling human rights abuses of vulnerable children in DUNGAVEL CONCENTRATION CAMP ,how long before the gas chambers are moved in?
We have a society that is being cajoled into accepting human right abuses as the norm . It will NEVER be the norm, and presently one of our members is being forceably injected with psychotic drugs without his due process of law being assured as witnessed by 6 supporters here today .
The legal and political systems in Scotland are acting more like the fascism which eventually led to the holocaust and is totally unacceptable .
The integrity and dignity of a Judiciary is paramount in any society.A Judiciary must be made to serve the interests of the people of Scotland .A flawed Judiciary promotes insecurity , economic instability and ceases to serve the country's citizenry, the magnitude of corruption in the Scottish Legal system now at alarming levels.
Separation of powers has never given the courts arbitrary and unaccountable authority.
That legal system is a corrupt monopoly and needs to be broken up while it is holding this country to ransom.
MSP John Swinney recently commented
"If this is the way that everyone gets treated by the legal complaints system, then there is a need for ENORMOUS change of practice and attitude."
Separation of powers in the Scottish legal system of jurisprudence has never been an excuse for the executive or legislators to ignore their constitutional and conscientious duty.
Finally with regards
There should be proper accountability of the judiciary and all who report to court on child custody issues and accurate audio recordings of all hearings and social work interviews,to curb the widespread discrimination within that system .Also fathers and children should have proper access to legal representation to ensure a childs human rights are not being undermined without representation or funding .
There should be a full inquiry into legal aid funding of expert witness's to ensure corruption is not tainting the evidence being provided to courts.
This was raised by us in an earlier petition PE352 in March 2001 which was ignored and if acted on could have saved lives.
Biological fathers should not be prevented from protecting their children due to bias and discrimination in divorce actions with a legal system acting like a jack boot brigade preventing and causing the deaths of children without that protection.
Judges have an appalling record of dealing with children causing them psychological trauma.My own childen have faced that wrath .Serious steps should be taken to prevent children being traumatised by insensitive and bullying judges who are not FIT to deal with child cases.
The justice 1 committee at the time of the legal profession inquiry are wholly responsible for one of our members due process of law being seriously undermined ,the outcome being the forceable injection of anti-psychotic drugs against his human rights ,by failing to ensure the judiciary are fully accountable in our supposed civilised society.
Can Justice 1 convenor Christine Grahame at the time of the legal profession inquiry tell us if any lawyer or judge was disciplined or struck off or was anyone compensated for the appalling damage done to their lives by a corrupt legal system .
On Wednesday 29 Oct 2003 we present 6 petitions to Scottish Parliament PE672 the most urgent regarding our member George Farquhar being held and forcibly injected with anti-psychotic drugs without any due process of law.
We now have the backing and support of the Citizens Commission on Human Rights (CCHR)
who have provided the Scottish Parliament with further evidence on the appalling use of psychiatry to undermine campaigners such as George in Scotland .
Hitler and South Africas apartheid system made regular use of such persecutive tools now being used in Scotland with a callous disregard for human rights
We believe this is a historic move to expose tyrannical forces ,all of it witnessed in the trial(lynching) in a star chamber court in Edinburgh.
The proceedings can be viewed from committee room 2 on 29 Oct 2003 at 10.00am GMT
Broadcast worldwide on the net from