BBC 1

MASONS AT THE BBC AND GMTV ATTACKING MEN ONCE AGAIN
gmtv bbctrust The high level masonic controllers at the BBC and GMTV are at the insidious attacks on men once again. They reel on the radical feminist men haters with no MEN actually interviewed to give another perspective of the bullying masonic GMTV and BBC bosses who operate subtle and devious propaganda for their partners in crime the masonic and crooked judges and lawyers. They daily use this to steal vast swathes of land, business, property and children of GOOD men castigated by a bully boy network of MASONS.

MASONS who control, the GMTV and BBC journalists and reporters, who should all have been JAILED for the massive phone in scams, were they fleeced millions off the unsuspecting public into making premium rate calls that were for prizes they did not have a hope in hell of winning. How anyone can still believe these ruthless bas_tards and their man hating propaganda is beyond belief .They have NO interest in women but only use the radical feminists to prop up the failing family courts and the masonic controllers of those courts now caught like the BBC and GMTV with their fingers in the till.

They listen to men haters talking about subtle and devious control when in fact it is that very system they use in their own domestic violence propaganda. If they were so sure of what they are spreading why dont they EVER ask men from groups supporting men ,not the pseudo mens groups that are made up of social workers and lawyers who are part of the system.

There is vast evidence from journalists of the bullying from the BBC controllers to warp news to suit an agenda. This group will continue to EXPOSE the dangerous and devious slandering of good men by the bully boy network of masons who control BBC and GMTV output .We will show the connections of the directors when they arrive at their masonic lodges and have secret meeting with the judges and lawyers in these dens of iniquity while giving them the necessary powers to steal vast fortunes from the unsuspecting men who expect to see justice in our courts not the sinister abuse and use of our laws for ALL of their benefit. Masons in TV and law being used to prop up the masonic coffers . Where do you think they get the large houses they buy at knock down prices from ?

THE PROPAGANDA ON GMTV

Early warning signs
http://www.gm.tv/index.cfm?articleid=30308

THE PROPAGANDA ON THE BBC

Increase in domestic violence
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7542250.stm

AND NOW THE REAL TRUTH OF WHAT THESE EVIL MEN HATERS ON GMTV AND THE BBC REALLY DO

'Threatened, undermined, back-stabbed, and terrorised' at the BBC
(QUOTE "Pat accuses the BBC of allowing "an ongoing culture of corporate brutality" )
http://www.nujglasgow.org.uk/bullyingarticles.html

BBC REPORTER EXPOSES HIGH SALARIED BBC MORONS
We have KNOWN for a very long time the BBC is run by MORONS this is confirmed by BBC reporter. Not only are the BBC run by MORONS but many of them are MASONS with an agenda that is protecting devil worshipping cults enslaving the UK. Is this why they released footage of him losing it?
http://www.youtube.com/v/VkOcK3rZHls

BBC REPORTER CAUGHT SCREAMING LIKE A LUNATIC
(Would that be their form of domestic abuse)
http://www.youtube.com/v/hxqR5NPhtLI

PROOF THE BBC USE SAME INSURERS AS BRITISH COURTS ,LAWYERS AND JUDGES
(Marsh the most corrupt insurance brokers are funded with our licence money by the BBC)
HERE

BBC REPORT ON MARSH CORRUPTION
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/3745334.stm

Can We Trust the BBC?
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Can-Trust-BBC-Robin-Aitken/dp/0826494277

BBC fined for Blue Peter phone-in
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/6284014.stm

Will Thompson be toast over the day he bit a BBC colleague?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2005/mar/24/broadcasting.bbc1

Viewers 'lose millions' to GMTV
(The masonic crooks who were stealing £10 million per year who should have been JAILED at GMTV still allowed to produce male hating propaganda)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/6582235.stm

GMTV boss quits over phone-in scandal
http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/news/article.html?in_article_id=422723&in_page_id=2

One newspaper that does tell some of the truth

UK DOMESTIC VIOLENCE LAWS ORCHESTRATED BY CABAL OF FEMINIST EXTREMISTS
http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/55258/Feminist-ministers-take-the-lead-on-domestic-violence

These are the CROOKS being allowed to manufacture propaganda attacking men and the vast theft of their assets through evil secretive star chamber courts. They have been proven to be criminals yet are allowed to continue to produce the illusion while bullying their staff to create men hating propaganda.

BBC STAFF ATTACK EXECUTIVE PAY RISES AS OBSCENE
bbctrust Masons hold the key positions at the BBC and also the grossly inflated salaries for providing government propaganda. Despite the ILLUSION that they give platforms to the mobsters running the country supposedly as investigative interviews when their reporters let them OFF the hook everytime.

The WORST culprit is Richard Dimbleby on Question Time who stifles any dissent from the VETTED audience .One of the biggest charades of all.
BBC'S BULLYING FEMALE MANAGEMENT BEHIND RADICAL FEMINIST NEWS AGENDA
ellis Laura Ellis BBC boss gets new BBC job
Mayer: walked out in June 2002 after a row with Ellis

A senior BBC TV regional manager who was criticised in an unfair dismissal case brought by veteran newsreader Laurie Mayer has left for a new role within the corporation. Laura Ellis is on maternity leave from her job as head of regional and local programmes at BBC South East.She will return in April in a new role as chief assistant to the BBC's controller of English regions, Andy Griffee. Ms Ellis will be replaced in the south-east by Leo Devine, the former regional head of BBC South West, who has been covering for Ms Ellis's maternity leave for the last six months.

Ms Ellis was criticised by an employment tribunal last year after Mayer claimed he was unfairly dismissed. Mayer lost his claim, although the tribunal upheld his complaint about a "culture of bullying" in one of the BBC's newsrooms. Mayer walked out in June 2002 after a row with Ellis, who called him into her office shortly before the evening programme was due to go on air to tell him of the regional news programme's "terrible" viewing figures.

Mayer, whose contract with the BBC was due to come up for renewal in October 2002, had complained to Ms Ellis about an "atmosphere of intimidation" in the newsroom. The tribunal said it was "clearly inappropriate" for Ms Ellis to have raised the issue immediately before Mayer was due to go on air, and said it was understandable for him to have felt aggrieved. However, Mayer lost his claim in the ruling which was made public last October. The BBC accepted the ruling, saying it would have preferred if the case had not gone to court. Ms Ellis was the head of regional and local programmes at BBC South East for four years. She was responsible for designing and launching the South East regional service which became the BBC's 11th English region when it was split from the new cross-platform BBC London service.

  • SOURCE
  • BBC IS THE BIGGEST BULLY SAYS NUJ SURVEY
    bbc

    For anyone who believes the BBC's MEN hating and biased domestic violence propaganda has any truth, the NUJ think the BBC management are the biggest bullies of all. So how can the BIGGEST bullies of all point the fingers at others and call them bullies? We will continue to expose the Bloody Big Con aiding and abetting the other bully boys the UK's judicial crooks who use the BBC to create the propaganda needed to justify the mass fleecing of mens assets but especially the theft of their children and homes in corrupt civil/family courts.

    BBC is biggest bully, says NUJ survey

    Broadcast journalists suffer more bullying than any other sector of the media and the BBC is the worst culprit by far, according to research by the National Union of Journalists. A questionnaire of the NUJ's broadcast members revealed that 87% of respondents who said they had been bullied worked for the corporation. In a report published today the NUJ said almost all those who took part in its survey described the BBC's in-house procedures for dealing with bullying as "totally inadequate".

    The NUJ national broadcasting organiser, Paul McLaughlin, described bullying in the broadcasting industry as "a sad and miserable fact of life for many of our members". Mr McLaughlin called on the BBC to introduce an independent investigation procedure to deal with bullies, a proposal the corporation has so far rejected. "As a public organisation, the BBC should lead by example and agree an independent procedure with the union to restore our members' faith and help to eradicate this scourge in our industry," he said.

    The NUJ survey showed the majority of bullies tend to come from middle management and that more women are bullied than men. It also revealed bullies are almost twice as likely to be men as women.

    Within the BBC, 40% of those who complained of bullying worked in local radio or regional television, where according to one respondent "short term contracts are used as a weapon". The report conceded it was perhaps not surprising the majority of respondents worked for the BBC, since more than half of the NUJ's broadcasting members are employed by the corporation. However, it added that the BBC had "some very serious problems to address".

    However, the corporation rebuffed the claim.

    "The BBC does not tolerate bullying or harassment and has well-established procedures for discouraging and stopping any such behaviour," a BBC spokeswoman said. "When it does occur we believe that the informal approach is often likely to lead to the most satisfactory resolution for all parties. "We do, however, have policies in place for those instances where informal resolution fails or is not an option. These include formal complaints procedures and a whistle-blowing policy and plans are currently being considered to introduce harassment advisers."

    Earlier this year two female employees of the BBC complained about bullying in a film called The Big Conversation, made by director general Greg Dyke to give staff the chance to air their views about the corporation. Kelly Webb-Lamb, a producer in the factual and learning department, complained about programme makers who were obsessed with winning awards to the detriment of their behaviour in the office, whom she dubbed the "Bafta bastards". "I think there is a real problem at the BBC about dealing with people who treat their staff absolutely appallingly and who are known to treat their staff absolutely appallingly," Ms Webb-Lamb said.

    Meanwhile Jane Elledge, a business systems coach in Birmingham, said she knew senior managers across the BBC who "bully staff and their staff feel intimidated". Veteran BBC broadcaster Laurie Mayer is claiming unfair dismissal at an employment tribunal after he complained about the "bullying culture" within the BBC South East newsroom in Tunbridge Wells.

  • SOURCE
  • BBC REPORTER EXPOSES HIGH SALARIED BBC MORONS VIDEO
  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

  • We have KNOWN for a very long time the BBC is run by MORONS this is confirmed by BBC reporter. Not only are the BBC run by MORONS but many of them are MASONS with an agenda that is protecting devil worshipping cults enslaving the UK. Is this why they released footage of him losing it?

    The BBC are nothing more than a propaganda tool for a police state and monarchic rule. Never a day goes past without them wheeling out stories about the mega rich royalty while they bash the poorest sections of society.
    BBC CHILDREN IN NEED A FRAUD FROM 2003
    children in need The BBC 's Hitting Home Domestic Violence LIE isn't the only FRAUD being perpetrated in their public broadcast status. The main reason they have produced hitting home at the same time as CHILDREN IN NEED is to justify funding extreme feminist WOMENS groups and not CHILDREN.

    The BBC children in need fund seldom goes to CHILDREN but helps fund some WOMEN groups many run by lesbians . If the British public knew their money was mainly going to some dubious WOMEN groups they'd be less likely to fund such a sham . We challenge the BBC to justify this misuse of that money which should go directly to children as they suggest it does.Some of those groups already get substantial government funding without the BBC taking away money that was intended to go to children.

    Though the people of the UK have finally realised the utter lies both the BBC news and programs is nothing more than abominable propaganda with hidden agendas subtly distorting how they warp the minds of citizens of this country and protecting those who abuse our vulnerable in particular our children while they viciously attack men with their appalling publicly funded domestic violence PROPAGANDA even WOMEN no longer believe

    BBC Children in Need 2001

    Midlands and East

    HAVEN WOLVERHAMPTON £70,754
    WALSALL STREET TEAMS 66,888
    SHAMA WOMENS CENTRE 62,870
    CENTRE 33 59,202
    870 HOUSE 59,163
    ASHFIELD WOMENS CENTRE 50,674
    WOMENS AID GLOSSOP 49,201
    WOMENS AID NORTH DERBYSHIRE 48,856
    SERVICE SIX 47,240
    WOMENS AID EAST NOTTINGHAM
    SPECIAL NEEDS NETWORK
    BIRKIN AVENUE PATCH IMPROVEMENT ASSN
    NOAHS ARK COMMUNITY CHILDCARE ASSN
    ASIAN WOMENS PROJECT NOTTINGHAM
    BURNTWOOD PATHWAY PROJECT
    CORNERSTONE PROJECT
    OLLERTON & BOUGHTON WOMENS CENTRE
    MULTI AGENCY RESOURCE CENTRE
    FAMILY PROJECT
    NENE VALLEY CHRISTIAN FAMILY REFUGE LTD
    OUT & ABOUT TRUST (ANGLIA)
    FAMILY IN ACTION RUSHDEN
    WOMENS AID SOUTH SHROPS
    CARLTON DIGBY SCHOOL AFTER SCHOOL CLUB
    OSCAR BIRMINGHAM
    MANCROFT ADVICE PROJECT
    LADDERBACKS
    SAFFRON LANE NEIGHBOURHOOD COUNCIL
    YOUTH AWARE
    CARPENTERS ARMS
    GOLDHILL PLAY ASSOC
    FSU LEICESTER
    EAST FAMILY PROJECT
    ACTIVE YOUTH PROJECT
    PETERBOROUGH ASSN FOR DETACHED YOUTH WORK
    WOMENS AID ADVICE CENTRE
    ROLLERCOASTERS
    SANDWELL MUSLIMS ORGANISATION
    SCOPE IPSWICH AND EAST SUFFOLK
    WILLENHALL EDUCATION EMPLOYMENT & TRAINING CENTRE
    NORTH STAFFS SPEC ADVENTURE PLAYGROUND
    AUTISM BEDFORDSHIRE
    WOMENS AID CENTRAL
    WALSALL YOUTH ARTS
    AUSTIN ROAD DAY NURSERY & ASC
    LUTON CHURCHES EDUCATION TRUST
    EDGE PROJECT
    WESTFIELD FOLKHOUSE PRE-SCHOOL
    HOLYHEAD ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY HELP
    WEST MIDLANDS POST ADOPTION SERVICE
    DEBEN FAMILY CENTRE
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY REHABILITATION TEAM
    BENTILEE PRIMARY AFTER SCHOOL CLUB
    PASQUE HOSPICE
    COMMUNITY BUSINESS TRUST VILLAGE PLAYHOUSE
    BREAK
    CHILDREN AT RISK PROJECTS
    GAUNTLET AUTO PROJECT
    NORTHFIELDS PLAY ASSN
    ACES TRINITY AFTERSCHOOL CLUB
    MARTHA TRUST HEREFORD
    DISABILITY CARE ENTERPRISE
    MENCAP CHESTERFIELD
    DEAF FAMILY GROUP
    WOOLVERSTONE PROJECT
    NORTHAMPTONSHIRE SOCIETY FOR AUTISM
    HOPSCOTCH
    STRUT IN THE COMMUNITY
    BIRSTALL PLAYGROUP FOR CHILDREN WITH SPECIAL NEEDS
    FAIRPLAY NORTH DERBYSHIRE
    HEREFORDSHIRE FAMILY MEDIATION
    PLAYSCHEME PARTNERSHIP
    WITHES CLOSE RESIDENTS ASSOC
    BAYLEY HOUSE PLAYGROUP ASSOCIATION
    SNAP
    SPECIAL OLYMPICS WORCESTERSHIRE
    DYSLEXIA ASSOCIATION BIRMINGHAM
    ST MATTHEWS SPECIAL NEEDS COACHING SESSIONS
    MARCHES FAMILY NETWORK
    HOPE CENTRE
    BIRMINGHAM MULTI CARE
    YOUTH ACTION CAMBRIDGE

    LEICESTER LESBIAN, GAY AND BISEXUAL CENTRE 6,433

    NEWLIFE FOUNDATION FOR HANDICAPPED CHILDREN
    COVENTRY CYRENIANS
    SATURDAY CLUBS (AUTISM)
    BIRMINGHAM REPERTORY THEATRE
    ISLE OF ELY YOUTH FORUM
    KIDS BREAK
    GLEBE HOUSE (CHARNWOOD) LTD
    TINDAL ASSN FOR SCHOOL & COMMUNITY
    OPEN DOOR YOUTH COUNSELLING
    NOTTINGHAMSHIRE VIETNAMESE COMMUNITY PROJECT
    PARENTS FIRST
    BRACKEN HILL SCHOOL
    BATH PLACE COMMUNITY VENTURE
    STONEBRIDGE CITY FARM
    LEICESTERSHIRE CONSTABULARY
    VISITING TEACHER SERVICE HEARING IMPAIRED TEAM
    CAMBRIDGE JOINT PLAYSCHEMES
    CLUBS FOR KIDS
    CROSSROADS CARERS STAFFORDSHIRE
    SPECIAL OLYMPICS REDDITCH
    KALEIDOSCOPE BREAKAWAY
    ASHBY YOUTH FOR CHRIST
    GINGERBREAD CANNOCK CHASE DISTRICT
    DISABILITY SPORT ENGLAND - WEST MIDLANDS REGION
    DUDLEY AUTISTIC SUPPORT GROUP
    SUFFOLK WHEELCHAIR TENNIS GROUP
    FRIENDS OF PRIORY SCHOOL
    PETERBOROUGH SPECIAL PLAYSCHEME
    CROSSROADS CARE SE CAMBRIDGESHIRE
    BLACKTHORN PLAYSCHEME
    HOME START SLEAFORD & DISTRICT
    DUDLEY CARIBBEAN & FRIENDS ASSOCIATION
    ASPERGER NORFOLK
    RYECROFT & COALPOOL COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION
    TIPTON MUSLIM COMMUNITY CENTRE
    AMBER VALLEY HOLIDAY ACTIVITY SCHEME
    FLAXLEY PRE SCHOOL GROUP
    KATES HILL ASIAN GIRLS GROUP
    STAGE 2
    BEDWORTH FAMILY SUPPORT CENTRE
    SALVATION ARMY LOWESTOFT SOUTH
    NORTH SHROPSHIRE SPECIAL OLYMPICS
    SOUTH DERBYSHIRE SUMMER/SATURDAY CLUB
    MID SUFFOLK HOLIDAY OPPORTUNITY PLAYSCHEME
    LEAPFROG SUMMER PLAYSCHEME
    HUCKNALL SPECIAL NEEDS PLAYSCHEME
    CASTLEFIELDS ACTION TEAM
    ST PHILIPS PROJECT WEST BROMWICH
    FRIENDSHIP PROJECT FOR CHILDREN
    CROSSROADS DERBYSHIRE NORTHEAST
    DONNA LOUISE TRUST
    BURBURY PARK CHILDMINDERS RESOURCE CENTRE
    HOCKLEY CHURCH SUNDAY SPECIAL
    LEICESTER & COUNTY MENPHYS PLAYGROUP
    KETTERING CENTRE FOR THE UNEMPLOYED
    HUNTINGDONSHIRE HOLIDAYS
    GERRARD STREET SUPPLEMENTARY SCHOOL
    ST JOHNS YOUTH CLUB
    RIDE TO ACHIEVE TRUST
    FLOYD SELF HELP GROUP
    GINGERBREAD FAKENHAM
    CYSTIC FIBROSIS CARING FRIENDS B'HAM
    ROH SOCIAL WORK DEPT
    ORWELL PLAYSCHEME
    FIND
    MENCAP CAMBRIDGE
    COMMUNITY CLOTHING CENTRE
    ASHBOURNE PLAYAWAY
    BEGINAGEN
    DIRECT COMMUNITY LEARNING
    ST SAVIOURS CAMPS
    TALYBONT CAMPS
    ENABLING THROUGH SOUND & MUSIC
    BANGLADESH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
    WALSALL BLACK SISTERS COLLECTIVE
    DYSLEXIA ASSOCIATION NOTTINGHAMSHIRE

  • THE SOURCE BEFORE THE BBC REMOVED IT
  • BBC REPORTER CAUGHT SCREAMING LIKE A LUNATIC VIDEO
  • FULL SCREEN VERSION HERE

  • The BBC have been investigating the Church of Scientology and the BBC reporter got caught SCREAMING LIKE A LUNATIC at one of their people.Unfortunately despite investigating Scientology the BBC have failed during its whole history to investigate the devil worshipping cult that virtually controls BBC output that is FREEMASONRY.

    The high level MASONIC controllers at the BBC have been responsible for the brainwashing and devious propaganda that has allowed many victims of masonic abuses to go unreported and the BBC head the failures to EXPOSE the masonic tyranny that is widespread across the UK .People are at most risk in British courts that are filled with masonic judges instead of juries.Also Britains masonic gun totting police who get away with murder as the BBC fail time and again to expose most of Britains chief constables are members of satanic devil worshipping clubs.Local government is also run behind closed doors by masons. Any town or village that has the senior police officer ,MP,senior judge,bank manager and head of the council in the same devil worshipping club can virtually control a town and the wealth created by that town,multiplied the same way in cities.

    Britain has been living under a fascist dictatorship that produces political parties that are controlled by masons behind the scenes.That means no matter who you vote for the masons are still the shadow government .The BBC know this ,the BBC promote this two party system to ensure Britain remains enslaved by a cult who's main agenda is devil worship.

    The exposure by Bill Schnoebelen a former 90th degree illuminati HERE provides the TRUTH that the BBC time and again have failed to investigate as masons are among the senior staff at the BBC who hide the control they have over most of Britains wealth and INEQUALITY.

    Britains royalty head this sinister system of control that by the day is being fully exposed on the INTERNET something the BBC hate as they continually put warnings about the dangers to society and our children from the internet. But it is the internet that is showing the failures of a supposed public broadcasting network that is part of the SATANISTS controlling Britain and the USA using the most horrendous bullying network that tries to crush anyone that stands up against their evil network of control.Britains wealth is being PLUNDERED in star chamber courts that have created the BEST opportunity for the MASONIC coffers to remain filled with the assets stolen from innocent victims of a ruthless system of Injustice that masons are wholly responsible for having highjacked our legal legislation for their OWN financial ends.

    That the BBC time and again will fail all of Britain. Their scientology investigation pales compared with the lack of attention to the masonic structures the BBC has been part of for way to long.We are being FLEECED of TV licence fees to fund a propaganda machine for MASONIC control of the UK

    Row over Scientology video
    By John Sweeney
    BBC News

    Scientologists want 'the global obliteration' of psychiatrists The battleground is YouTube and Scientology's weapon is a clip of me losing it in the "Mind Control" section of a gruesome exhibition. Scientology has fought many battles to keep its secrets off the web, now they are using it to attack my investigation into them.

    Scientology has prepared an attack video, and they have shown the Scientology v Sweeney shouting match to anyone who would watch it. There is talk of 100,000 copies being released.

    Family 'disconnects'

    Scientology works. That is the message from celebs like John Travolta and Tom Cruise - who is, some say, keen on recruiting new Hollywood arrivals David and Victoria Beckham to what he calls his religion. Others back the Church in various ways: Chief Superintendent Kevin Hurley of the City of London police helped open a new £20 million Scientology centre in London, and the authorities in the City of London have granted it cut-price rates. If you are interested in becoming a TV journalist, it is a fine example of how not to do it. I look like an exploding tomato and shout like a jet engine ... it makes me cringe

    But start asking questions and you see a different face of Scientology. While making our BBC Panorama film "Scientology and Me" I have been shouted at, spied on, had my hotel invaded at midnight, denounced as a "bigot" by star Scientologists, brain-washed - that is how it felt to me - in a mock up of a Nazi-style torture chamber and chased round the streets of Los Angeles by sinister strangers. Back in Britain strangers have called on my neighbours, my mother-in-law's house and someone spied on my wedding and fled the moment he was challenged. I have met mothers who say they have suffered Scientology "disconnects" - meaning that their children have cut them completely out of their life so that they can spend more time with an organisation which a judge in 1984 characterised as "corrupt, sinister and dangerous".

    Psychiatry battle

    Scientology has two faces - nice and smiley, and sinister and dark. If you do not believe me, go and see their exhibition in Los Angeles, Psychiatry: Industry of Death. You enter through a door that is a mock-up of a torture chamber.

    John Sweeney spent many weeks investigating Scientology Scientologists want "the global obliteration" of psychiatrists, who they say were to blame for the rise of Nazi Germany. To prove their point, they showed me hideous images of people having needles stuffed in their eyeballs, of patients undergoing electric shocks and having their brains operated on.

    Sickening, nasty and wholly unconvincing - modern psychiatry, for all its faults, is not Nazi and to press the point in the way that Scientology does devalues the horror of the Holocaust. I felt as though I was being brain-washed - and that if I did not fight it, they would have taken over my mind. Ironically or not, it was in the "Mind Control" section of the exhibition that I lost it.

    'Exploding tomato'

    As often in life, I snapped over something completely different and quite trivial. Top Scientologist Tommy "Don't mention the word cult" Davis had been goading me all week, and on the seventh day I fell into his elephant trap. He shouted at me and I shouted back, louder.

    L Ron Hubbard wrote the founding texts of Scientology If you are interested in becoming a TV journalist, it is a fine example of how not to do it. I look like an exploding tomato and shout like a jet engine and every time I see it makes me cringe. I apologised almost immediately, Tommy carried on as if nothing had happened but meanwhile Scientology had rushed off copies of me losing it to my boss, my boss's boss and my boss's boss's boss, the Director-General of the BBC. I lost my voice, but not my mind.

    This is the context Scientology will not tell you about. I have met too many good people who say Scientology was founded by a liar, L Ron Hubbard; that it attacks its critics without mercy; and the celebrities who endorse it have not the foggiest idea what it is really like. Take "Rosemary", who is an ordinary mum and lives in England. She had two children and one died. Her surviving daughter was also her best friend. Then her daughter joined Scientology and her mother saw less and less of her. Almost two years ago she received a "disconnect" - a letter cutting her mother out of her life totally.

    Rosemary received no Christmas cards, no birthday cards, no Mother's Day cards. Rosemary said Scientology was a cult. It was one of the most moving and shocking interviews I have ever done. Out of the blue, three hours after we left, her daughter came round for the first time in almost two years seeking a reconciliation. The next day she begged her mum not to use the interview. So we won't.

    Pay as you go

    In Florida I met Mike Henderson, who with his wife Donna Shannon, spent $1m over three decades on Scientology's path to superhuman powers. When the couple left, they were disconnected from 20-odd family members left inside Scientology. Mike's father - also disconnected - is dying, but five out of his six children will not speak to him because they are still inside Scientology. After a long day with Mike and Donna we went back to our hotel at midnight, only to find Tommy Davis waiting in the lobby with his own black-clad Scientology cameraman. He harangued me for talking to the heretics. I told him that Scientology had been spying on the BBC and that was creepy.

    In LA, the moment our hire car left the airport we realised we were being followed by two cars. In our hotel a weird stranger spent every breakfast listening to us. In all, we count 13 strangers - private investigators? - who were following us. Scientology denied sending PIs after the BBC. Scientology is a pay-as-you-go religion - which is one of the reasons why the Charity Commission in Britain does not class it as a religion. When you have paid as much as £100,000, you get to Operating Thetan Level Three and learn about "The Incident".

    L Ron wrote that 75 million years ago an intergalactic space alien lord called Xenu kidnapped Thetans to earth, dumped them in volcanoes and blew them up with atomic bombs. Ex-Scientologists have insisted to me that Xenu is part of Scientology. If so, it is a religion that requires its followers not to tell others about its core belief, which is very odd. Critics say that if we all knew about Xenu, then Scientology could not charge people as much as £100,000 to find out about him. Despite all the pressure - the letters from lawyers, the letters from MPs, the strangers knocking up my family and neighbours - if people from "disconnected" families tell me that Scientology is a cult, that will be reported.

    Scientology And Me, Panorama, Monday, 8.30pm, BBC1

  • SOURCE HERE
  • BBC USE PUBLIC MONEYS TO FUND CORRUPT INSURERS
    bbcins NO wonder the BBC didn't want to disclose their insurers.None more so than the utterly corrupt Marsh insurers who insure the corrupt Law Society of Scotland . They have already been proved to be utterly corrupt from a writ served on Marsh International by New York State attorney Elliot Spitzer.We have wondered why all these years the BBC have gone to great lengths to protect the crooks controlling Scotlands lawyers.

    They use the same bloody insurers and the BBC are using licence payers money to fund fraudsters. They should be fully aware the conflict of interest using the same insurers as lawyers. The BBC watchdog program would NEVER investigate the BBC and how they fund crooks using public moneys.

    See attached Freedom of Information Request proving the BBC's insurers. Also the BBC report proving they knew about Marsh . We will be informing all regulatory bodies regarding the BBC's reckless misuse of public moneys.
    =============================
    Corruption probe hits US insurers

    The lawsuit's implications are likely to be felt across the industry US insurers are in the spotlight after New York attorney general Elliot Spitzer sued Marsh & McLennan, the world's largest insurance broker. Mr Spitzer claims that since the late 1990s, Marsh got illegal payments for steering clients to firms such as Ace and American International Group (AIG). On Wall Street on Friday, Marsh shares fell 14%, with AIG down 4%.

    Marsh said it had been unaware of the charges until they were brought, and promised to co-operate. "We are committed to getting all the facts, determining any incidence of improper behaviour, and dealing with appropriately with any wrongdoing," it said in a statement. It added that it had suspended the deals with insurers - known as "placement services agreements" - which Mr Spitzer alleged were used as the vehicles for the payments. "Today's decision was made in light of the serious allegations... that have been raised about this long-standing industry practice," Marsh said.

    Shares tumble

    The other firms named in Mr Spitzer's investigation include Hartford Financial Services Group, Chubb Corp and an arm of Germany's Munich Re. The magnitude and breadth of these events could be significant if bid-rigging is found to be widespread throughout the insurance industry

    Hartford shares fell 3.7%, extending a decline of 6% the day before. Marsh shares had slumped 25% on Thursday, with AIG and Ace each down 10%. Ace said it would continue to cooperate on the matter, while Hartford said that it does not condone illegal activities such as bid rigging. Insurers fell across Europe as well, with the UK's Royal & Sun Alliance and Prudential both feeling the pain, along with Germany's Munich Re.

    "At this early stage, forecasts of the ramifications for the industry are necessarily speculative," wrote analysts at Sandller O'Neil in New York on Friday. "The magnitude and breadth of these events could be significant if bid-rigging is found to be widespread throughout the insurance industry." Three of the firms under the spotlight have family connections.

    This investigation is broad and deep and it is disappointing

    Eliot Spitzer New York attorney general

    AIG, the world's largest insurer by market value, is run by chairman and chief executive Maurice "Hank" Greenberg. One son, Jeffrey, heads Marsh, while a second, Evan, is in charge of Bermuda-based Ace. During a conference call with analysts, Hank Greenberg denied that AIG top executives had been involved with or knew about the activities being investigated. The firm, he said, had started an internal inquiry led by an outside lawyer after receiving subpoenas earlier this year. The inquiry had found problems in its American Home subsidiary, two of whose executives had pleaded guilty to related charges, he said, adding that AIG continued to co-operate.

    On a mission

    Mr Spitzer has earned a reputation as a crusading attorney general and a scourge of corporate wrong-doing. He has made his name taking on some of Wall Street's biggest names, winning settlements more often than not, and forcing them to rethink the way they work. In this case, Mr Spitzer alleges that unsuspecting clients were deliberately steered to firms in return for lucrative payoffs, a move which pushed up prices.

    He also claims that a number of the firms were involved in bid rigging, whereby they fixed quotes, only giving the appearance of competition. "This investigation is broad and deep and it is disappointing," Mr Spitzer said at a press conference. It shows the "disregard for ethics and the law among some of our largest corporations", he added. UK reinsurance firm the Benfield Group said its US subsidiary has been subpoenaed to assist with the investigation, although it stressed it was not subject to formal investigation.

  • SOURCE
  • Terry Wogan is the only celebrity paid for Children In Need

    He has hosted the BBC's Children In Need appeal for 26 years, helping to raise hundreds of millions of pounds for good causes.

    But Sir Terry Wogan is now at the centre of controversy over the fact that he is the only celebrity to be paid for his part in the appeal. Documents released under the Freedom of Information Act disclose that while his co-presenters give their time for free, 68-year-old Sir Terry receives £1,300 an hour to front the charity television extravaganza. Sir Terry has been paid for his efforts since the appeal - described by the BBC as the most important event on its calendar - began in 1980.

    In 2005, the Irishman - who earns £800,000 a year from his Radio 2 show - picked up £9,065 for his seven-hour stint as Children In Need's main presenter. Yet his co-stars Natasha Kaplinsky, Eamonn Holmes and Fearne Cotton do not receive a penny. All the musical acts that appear also waive appearance fees. There is no suggestion that Sir Terry, who owns a mansion near Windsor and a house in France, receives any money intended for charity projects, nor that he has ever claimed to be hosting the show for free.

    In the past, Sir Terry has made a show of donating personal items, such as his tie, to highest bidders. Other presenters and celebrities are thought to be unaware of his deal with the Corporation. Bucks Fizz singer Cheryl Baker, who has helped to present Children In Need and Eurovision Song Contest shows alongside Sir Terry, said last night: "Sir Terry has done amazing work for the charity. I am very surprised to hear he takes money for presenting and I think a lot of his fans will be as well. He is a bit of fool to have taken this money. "You would think someone in his position wouldn't need it."

    Details of his pay emerged after a series of enquiries made under the Freedom of Information Act. The BBC refused to divulge the information but, after an appeal, the Information Commission watchdog ruled it should provide the answers. They revealed that the costs of staging the event in 2005 were more than £1.2million - covering the use of studios, outside broadcast facilities, staff, production and making films used to promote the appeal.

    In a letter, the Corporation said: "The BBC paid Sir Terry a presenter payment of £9,065. Sir Terry Wogan has presented Children In Need every year since 1980. The BBC considered it appropriate to pay Sir Terry a non-commercial fee. "The BBC has made an adjustment to this fee every year to reflect inflation. This fee has never been subject to negotiation. It is paid by the BBC and does not come from the funds of the BBC Children In Need Appeal Charity. "No other BBC presenters or personalities were paid."

    Terry Wogan said: "I've never asked for a fee and would quite happily do it for nothing." And his spokesman said the fee was entirely at the discretion of the BBC, adding: "It has never been open to negotiation." A BBC spokesman said: "When Sir Terry first presented Children In Need in 1980, it was decided as part of his contract to pay him what, compared to the commercial cost of a presenter like him, is a nominal fee.

    "The fee has continued since and has never been negotiated. We regard it as an honorarium to Sir Terry. We are not ashamed to pay him it and see no reason why it should not continue. "If it wasn't for Sir Terry, Children In Need would not be what it is today."

  • FULL ARTICLE HERE
  • Can We Trust the BBC?

    Can We Trust the BBC?

    This book asks a big question: can we trust the BBC?

    The BBC is the most famous media brand in the world and it is growing bigger and more powerful every year. Its reputation depends on honest and accurate journalism. But this book argues that the Corporation's own pervasive left wing political culture imperils its impartiality. It demonstrates how some groups and viewpoints get favourable treatment while others are left out in the cold.

    The book examines the concept of 'public sector broadcasting' and asks if that has come to mean simply radio and television free of commercial bias. It argues that there are other 'hidden persuaders' that we the audience should be alert to. Drawing on the author's twenty five years as a BBC reporter and executive, the books blends analysis and sharp polemic to paint a vivid picture of life inside the news machine from a uniquely privileged point of view.

    It also tells the story of how the BBC responded to a dissident in its own ranks. With the future of the BBC now the subject of a government White Paper, this book will be a timely contribution to the debate about public broadcasting.

    http://www.amazon.co.uk/Can-Trust-BBC-Robin-Aitken/dp/0826494277

    BBC's Children in Need racket



    They also manufacture the same lies and deceit for their domestic abuse propaganda. Boycott all BBC pleas for money.It is not only Wogan that is leeching off a so called donation for children in need.

    Few needy children get money from this scam.We have seen proof that lesbian groups have been getting money from what is supposed to be CHILDREN in need

    WOGAN'S FEE FURY

    VETERAN TV presenter Terry Wogan says he is "offended" at the furore over the fee he takes to host the BBC's Children in Need appeal. Wogan pocketed more than £9000 to host the big night in 2005 - and may have raked in £170,000 since 1979.

    Yesterday he hit out: "If I knew such a ridiculous thing was going to come out of it I wouldn't have taken the money in the first place.

    "It's nonsense."

  • Terry Wogan is the only celebrity paid for Children In Need


  • BBC Bloody Big Con



    BBC BLUE Peter faked premium rate phone-in

    Should this come as a surprise? We could NEVER understand why anyone would call a tv company to increase their profits to fund MORE propaganda.

    The BBC have been on the fiddle for years

    A black mark for Blue Peter

    BLUE Peter has faked a phone-in. What is the world coming to? If the Beeb's squeaky-clean kids' show is getting sucked into the ongoing TV phone-in scandal, nothing is safe. Blue Peter bosses confessed that they roped in a youngster visiting the studio to phone in and win a prize after technical problems prevented real callers from getting through.

    Producers admitted a "serious error of judgment".

    Too right it's serious. Admittedly, calls were raising cash for the Blue Peter charity appeal. But kids were still duped. They thought they had a chance of winning a prize when they didn't. Why couldn't the famously strait-laced show simply tell the truth?

    Why couldn't they say gremlins had wrecked the competition and run it on another day? Blue Peter's phoney phone-in is just the latest in a string of telly contest scandals. On Tuesday, Channel 4 suspended horse-racing phone-ins after viewers continued to be charged after a contest closed. Callers to the same channel's Richard and Judy show have also been conned.

    And last week Channel Five admitted "winning contestants" on its daytime Brainteaser quiz were faked. There were problems with ITV's X Factor while the channel's I'm A Celebrity... Get Me Out Of Here! and BBC's Saturday Kitchen are being probed. And that's before we even get to the dodgy questions on premium rate quiz shows.

    But Blue Peter is the biggest shock of all. And it prompts the question - if they are prepared to break the rules, why would you pick up the phone for any telly contest?

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/6284014.stm

    BBC ignoring public opinion

    What our groups have been saying about the BBC for YEARS.They are the Illuminati propaganda merchants.
    This article still presents a distorted view of what is behind the Bloody Big Con

    BBC 'guilty' of ignoring public opinion says senior executive

    The public service broadcaster has come under fire from one its senior executives for not listening to its audience A senior BBC executive has admitted the politically correct views of the corporation are at odds with most of its viewers. BBC commissioning editor for documentaries Richard Klein admitted the broadcaster was out of touch with the British public, saying it was guilty of "ignoring" mainstream opinion.

    Speaking to a room full of TV viewers and BBC staff, he suggested that if the current situation continued it could affect the organisation's long-term future. Klein said: "By and large, people who work at the BBC think the same and it's not the way the audience thinks. That's not long term sustainable." "We pride ourselves on being 'of the people', and it's pathetic.....Channel 4 tends to laugh at people, the BBC ignores them."

    His comments, reported in the corporation's in-house magazine, come on the back of news earlier this week that a string of BBC executives and journalists have admitted that the corporation is institutionally biased. Details from a recent "impartiality" summit held at the BBC highlighted how some of the corporation's own top staff now believe it is guilty of promoting left-wing views, is biased against Christianity and as an organisation is disproportionately dominated by GAYS and ethnic minorities. It was also claimed the BBC overtly promotes multiculturalism and is anti-American and anti-countryside.

    Klein, who made his views known at an "audience festival" organised by the BBC last week to find out what its viewers think, admitted that the BBC's liberal internal culture did not match that of the wider British public. He said: "Most people at the BBC don't live lives like this, but these are our licence payers. It's our job to reflect and engage." The TV executive, who sponsored a study to find out what issues concerned viewers, even warned other BBC staff about the dangers of ignoring popular opinion. "They may be challenging to us, but don't dismiss them", he said.

    His comments come after repeated claims that the BBC has misjudged the mood of British public. Last month the corporation was deluged with complaints after a Muslim extremist was given 12 minutes of airtime on Radio 4's flagship Today programme. It also came under attack in the summer when it broadcast a "sick" comedy, which showed Tony Blair being assasinated and terrorists crashing a jet into parliament.

    The BBC was also criticised last year after it was revealed that the corporation had cautioned journalists against using the word terrorist - claiming the word was too judgmental. More recently the BBC has agonised over whether news-reader Fiona Bruce should be allowed to wear a necklace with a cross on it. Research conducted by the BBC showed that many viewers felt "gagged and alone" and also believed mainstream views were being driven underground. Ann Davies, who carried out the research for the corporation, openly questioned whether the BBC should change its approach. She asked: "Should we, the BBC, be a pressure valve for that opinion? Should we help break the contraints of the PC police?" Research into audience members views showed that many thought that political correctness had become endemic in Britain. One said: "Politicians know more about how a Muslim lives than they do about what it's like to be me, day in, day out."

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=412572&in_page_id=1770

    WARNING OVER WATCHING TO MUCH BBC PROGRAMMING

    Long term exposure to watching the BBC could leave you believing

    1. That ALL men are prone to wife beating ,child abuse and rape.

    2. UK judges are honest and have probity

    3. The UK has a democracy

    4. That the BBC is unbiased ,honest and has integrity

    5. That the internet is bad for humanity and especially children.

    6. That UK royalty are angelic and above the law

    7. That there is no widespread fraud and corruption in our law enforcement and courts

    8. There is no widespread land and property theft by banks and corrupt thieving lawyers

    9.That it is credit card abuse that is the cause of bankruptcies and nothing to do with litigation instigation by a corrupt UK legal system and huge legal fees imposed on anyone who has their own home even if they dont want involved in that process and against their wishes

    10.The establishment masonic controllers dont have anything to do with BBC news output

    11.That the BBC programs aren't actually BBC programming and propaganda

    12.That the BBC always stands up for the little guy against the state.

    13.The BBC is not the mouthpiece for the Law Societies of Scotland,England ,Wales and Ireland.

    14.That the BBC investigative reporters are never swayed by police and court press releases about criminal hearings in UK courts.The BBC always have journalists in our civil courts when massive land and property fraud is taking place disguised as UK LAW.

    15. The BBC always take the view of the victims and dont SPIN stories and meticulously gather information from victims ensuring a balanced view of incidents are published.

    16.The BBC governors are hand picked from working class backgrounds and council estates throughout the UK

    17.All BBC senior positions are filled with people from deprived backgrounds to ensure the poor and under-privileged are properly respected and protected by the UK's public broadcaster

    18.The BBC never threaten or drag through the courts poor under-privileged families for not paying an illegal tax for a (supposed)public broadcaster.Even if they dont want to watch the programs.

    19.The BBC always shrewdly spend licence payers money on sending their reporters minimum distances to UK courts ensuring they uphold human rights legislation and NEVER send their reporters at huge expense to third world countries to selectively pick on their governments human rights abuses to allow the UK and USA governments to move in and FIX those abuses.

    20. The BBC NEVER bully their staff particularly journalists in their newsrooms to distort the news ensuring the UK public remain permanently bamboozled with lies ,deceit and New World Order propaganda.

    BBC Big Brother Censorship
    THERE ARE LIES ,DAMN LIES AND THE BBC NEWS AND WORLD SERVICE

    BBC DV FRAUDSTER BITES COLLEAGUE

    Press release

    The Bloody Big Con who promote venomous anti male radical feminist domestic abuse programs now exposed as its senior staff caught not only bullying but actually physically harming each other were a director general is reported to have bit a colleague. Those who point the finger at so called abusers now once again shown to be the top abusers and bullies.Men do not need the BBC to continually undermine mens authority in the home by accusing men of the very abuse their own SENIOR STAFF are guilty of. SMG the (Scottish Masonic Group) and owners of STV are another TV company pushing the radical feminist line with their continued anti male output a well worn illuminati ploy to back up the masonic monsters running our judicial system.Protecting and promoting their crooked judicial brothers stealing mens homes ,children and lifes work on the propaganda they continue to feed the populous.

    -----------------

    Will Thompson be toast over the day he bit a BBC colleague?

    Mark Thompson, the BBC's director general, is gaining a reputation as something of a rottweiler as he slashes into the corporation's staffing structure. Yesterday this image took on a physical manifestation when allegations emerged that, when he was editor of the Nine O'Clock News, Mr Thompson sank his teeth into the arm of a colleague. The BBC yesterday played down the incident as "high jinks and horseplay". But Mr Thompson's victim, a junior member of staff who went on to become Kate Adie's producer, has disclosed that he considered making a formal complaint at the time. The story emerged because Jeremy Paxman, the Newsnight presenter, was preparing to interview Mr Thompson for an internal BBC event and emailed the producer to ask if the incident really happened.

    The producer, Anthony Massey, replied: "It was late summer or early autumn of 1988 when he [Thompson] was the newly appointed editor of the Nine O'Clock News, and I was a home news organiser. It was 9.15 in the morning, in the middle of the old sixth floor newsroom. I went up to his desk to talk about some story after the 9.00 meeting ... I was standing next to him on his right, and he was sitting reading his horoscope in the Daily Star (I always remember that detail). "Before I could say a word he suddenly turned, snarled, and sank his teeth into my left upper arm (leaving marks through the shirt, but not drawing blood). It hurt. I pulled my arm out of his jaws, like a stick out of the jaws of a labrador." He told his then boss, Chris Cramer, now a senior CNN executive, that he wanted to "bring the whole BBC disciplinary process" against Mr Thompson, but the incident "lost momentum" when Mr Massey was sent on a month-long assignment abroad.

    In his email reply, Paxman wrote of Mr Thompson: "If any of this came out, he'd be toast." Mr Massey passed the email exchange with Paxman to a friend, who passed it to other BBC colleagues, and it was quickly forwarded to scores of people, and leaked to the Guardian. There is no suggestion Mr Massey or Paxman intended the story to reach the press. Mr Massey and CNN de clined to comment yesterday; Paxman could not be reached. After speaking to Mr Thompson, a BBC spokesman said: "There was an incident 17 years ago ... Mark would have been about 30. There was a pretty robust atmosphere in the newsroom then. There was some high jinks going on and Mark leant forward and did something like a biting gesture. He thought it would be quite funny but clearly it was hugely misinterpreted. "Mark apologised. Our view is that it was a long time ago, there was an apology at the time, and it was high jinks and horseplay."

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,3604,1444507,00.html

    BBC ILLUMINATI PROTECTORS AND SUPPORTERS

    SEARCH ON GOOGLE http://www.google.co.uk/

    ILLUMINATI

    Results 1,330,000 articles for illuminati

    SEARCH ON BBC http://www.bbc.co.uk/

    ILLUMINATI

    result 7 articles for illuminati

    THE ILLUMINATI ARE THE MOST SINISTER EVIL ELITE GROUP OF FASCISTS CONTROLLING MUCH OF WHAT IS PUBLISHED ,THE BANKS AND LEGAL SYSTEMS OF WESTERN SO CALLED DEMOCRACY.THE UK AND USA LEADERS ARE INDOCTRINATED INTO THE ILLUMINATI PRIOR TO BEING PUT UP FOR OFFICE. THEY CONTROL BOTH SIDES OF THE COIN WHICHEVER WAY IT LANDS AND THE BBC ARE THERE BACKING, SUPPORTING AND PUBLISHING THE DESPICABLE EVIL AGENDA THEY HAVE FOR THIS WORLD.

    YET THEY ARE NEVER MENTIONED IN THEIR EDITORIALS SURPRISE SURPRISE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Bullying is rife at the BBC

    Union targets broadcasting bullies

    Bullying is rife at the BBC, according to a union survey.
    In a nation-wide survey of broadcasting journalists 87 per cent of those who had experienced bullying worked for the corporation. The survey was carried out by the NUJ. BBC staff told the union they had endured bullying by managers for periods ranging from four months to an astonishing 15 years. Several said things were so bad they’d had to leave their jobs. Virtually all said the BBC’s procedures for dealing within complaints was totally inadequate. The union is today publishing a 12-page booklet, "NUJ targets the bullies". It is being launched at a special session of the Edinburgh TV Festival. The findings come as the corporation is promoting a new set of values, which include staff trusting and respecting each other.

    But comments from employees paint a different picture. Staff spoke of:
    a culture of bullying from the highest level
    managers covering up for each other
    disciplinary procedures being a sham.

    “I’m unwell with stress-related illness, have had almost a year off work and still have nightmares,” said one employee. “I felt hated,” said another. In the survey, almost half of the respondents came from local radio and regional television, an area where, to quote comments from participants, “short term contracts were used as a weapon to threaten your future,” and “people who lodge complaints are treated as trouble-makers.” Broadcaster Helen Reed, who collated the responses and is a leading light in the anti-bullying campaign, won an employment tribunal for unfair dismissal against the BBC after being bullied out of her job. “This shows my experience is far from unique,” she says. “And it’s just a sample of members who were not too frightened to fill in the form. Multiply it through the BBC and it’s a serious problem.”

    BBC Director-General Greg Dyke announced in May that he is sending hundreds of managers on courses. “Sending bullies on expensive training courses won’t solve the problem," says Helen Reed. "They need to be removed from ‘managing and damaging’ people. It’s not about money but taking real responsibility and wanting to end the culture of fear and intimidation. “Of the bullies identified, 92 per cent were known to be serial bullies – and 94 per cent of respondents said they had no faith in internal procedures.” NUJ National Broadcasting Organiser Paul McLaughlin said: ”Bullying is a serious concern in many workplaces and is prevalent in the media. As a public organisation, the BBC should lead by example and agree an independent procedure with the union to restore our members' faith and help to eradicate this scourge in our industry.”

    The NUJ is launching the results of the survey at the Edinburgh International TV Festival on August 22. There will be a special session on bullying, organised by Sky and the Media Guardian, called "Suffering in Silence", at 4.15pm that day. Helen Reed will be on the discussion panel.


    http://www.nujglasgow.org.uk/bullyingarticles.html

    BBC BULLIES

    The BBC continue to run FALSE domestic violence campaigns highly gender based ridiculing MEN and using devious radical feminist fraudulent statistics to perpetrate their appalling illuminati one world government agenda.

    They continually run stories that portray men as abusers and undermine mens authority in their home by promoting single parent lifestyles that allows the STATE to control our families and particularly our children.Our organisations have known for a very long time how the BBC propaganda is being used to control us ALL like cattle.RECENT revelations of BBC SENIOR management bullying staff in their newsrooms comes as no surprise to our organisations ,as it is generally those who perpetrate abuse that sit behind their false walls and point the fingers at others for the very crimes they themselves carry out .

    THE BBC ,OR AT LEAST THOSE WHO RUN AND CONTROL THE BBC, HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE BULLIES AND WHO USE HORRENDOUS BULLYING TO PROMOTE THEIR PROPAGANDA OF ANTI MALE HATE CAMPAIGNS DESTROYING FAMILIES IN THE NAZI LIKE PLAN THEY HAVE FOR THE UK AND THE WORLD.

    BBC PROGRAMMING IS JUST THAT, ONE WAY TO PROGRAM US ALL INTO A DEVIOUS NEW WORLD ORDER MASTER PLAN THAT CANNOT BE OBTAINED WITHOUT THE COMPLICITY OF ONE OF THE WORLDS BIGGEST PROPAGANDA MACHINES.

    FULL STORY ON BBC BULLYING POLICIES
    http://www.nujglasgow.org.uk/bullyingarticles.html

    BBC NEWS MANAGEMENT BULLY THEIR JOURNALISTS

    HOW THE BBC ENFORCE THEIR ANTI- MALE AGENDA
    BBC NEWS MANAGEMENT BULLY THEIR JOURNALISTS

    Bullying whistleblower loses case

    TV newsreader Laurie Mayer, who lost his job for speaking out against horrendous BBC management bullying, lost his legal case as well, in September.

    As a broadcasting presenter of 25 years’ experience he had been brought in, after presenting for BBC national radio and TV and Sky News, to add weight to the South East regional news, broadcast from revamped studios in Tunbridge Wells in Kent.

    There he found that young journalists were being badly abused by the management team and he decided to speak up for them. In response the managers refused to renew his contract.

    The BBC itself was forced by NUJ pressure to hold an enquiry that found the allegations were justified. But for Laurie Mayer himself there has been no justice.

    Here he tells his story:

    On SEPTEMBER 10 the Employment Appeal Tribunal dismissed my claim against the BBC for unfair/constructive dismissal. This followed my whistleblowing action against the BBC for bullying – an action funded by the NUJ and turned down by a tribunal a year ago. The court found against me on a narrow point of law.

    As at the Employment Tribunal, the BBC again admitted “bad and defective management” which was “highly regrettable”, but denied that it amounted to a breach of trust and confidence between employer and employee. And like the original tribunal, the EAT agreed.

    The finding of the tribunal could not have been clearer. It was outspoken in condemning management’s conduct of a meeting that took place in June 2002: “One of the more disturbing aspects of this case,” it ruled, ”has been the way the BBC has sought, retrospectively, to blacken [my] name. Whilst he was working no criticisms were made of his performance or style of presentation, and it was only on 26 June and after these proceeding started that the BBC have sought to justify their actions by raising criticisms.”

    What had so stung the BBC was my refusal to keep quiet about the bullying and harassment of staff by management in the newsroom at Tunbridge Wells. These complaints, spread over 15 months, were met by constant denial and, in the end, a cover-up at the highest level. The then Director General, Greg Dyke, was asked by the then BBC Chairman Gavyn Davies to look into my allegations. The D-G concluded, after a ten-day “thorough investigation”, that there was “no substance” to my claims.

    But the very next day Richard Ayre, a former BBC head of editorial policy, was commissioned to conduct an independent inquiry, and this came to very different conclusions. Richard Ayre found evidence of “inappropriate management behaviour which could have led to people feeling intimidated” and a staff “drained and demotivated”. His report has never been made public. To this day it has only been read by a handful of senior managers. It wasn’t even shown to the tribunal.

    The report found that I had revealed “ineffective management and a culture of bullying and harassment which caused discontent and suffering amongst the staff” and went on to state: “we have no doubt that the Applicant’s actions on behalf of his colleagues and his whistleblowing was a prime reason for non-renewal of his contract”.

    The BBC admitted as much. An internal email from the Controller of Regions actually referred to my “troublemaking” as the reason for getting rid of me.

    But hang on a minute. The Public Disclosure Interest Act of 1998 is supposed to protect employees who blow the whistle on wrongdoing from unfair dismissal. In my case the disclosures were “protected” in law because they related to the health and safety of staff. So why didn’t I win first time around?

    It was down to a narrow technicality - my claim lodged in September 2002 was ruled out of time. It was a complicated wrangle related to the length of my contract, and we contested it, but it’s important always to beware the three-month time limit on tribunal applications. If you think you’re being subjected to any kind of detriment for whistleblowing, contact the NUJ at once.

    The union’s backing for my case has been rock solid. We may have lost the legal argument but we did score an overwhelming moral victory and chalked up a number of significant successes.

    · We forced the virtually unprecedented independent inquiry into BBC management.
    · The employment tribunal substantiated all the claims of bullying and heavily criticised the corporation for failing to take sufficient steps to rectify the situation.
    · The Head of Region has been removed from her managerial position and the other two managers involved have been redeployed elsewhere.
    ·
    But has the BBC really learned the lesson that abusive management is simply unacceptable? After my tribunal the NUJ wrote to the BBC complaining of the bullying behaviour of their barrister who had reduced one of my witnesses to tears. Another witness was asked whether he was just “another pathetic victim of bullying.” A reporter told me he’d seen murder suspects treated with more consideration and respect. Shamefully, that letter has never been acknowledged.

    Bullying remains rife throughout the BBC regions. An NUJ survey revealed that 40 per cent of staff in regional offices feel bullied but the corporation is still refusing to introduce an independent element to its grievance procedure. The current system is not compatible with the principles of natural justice or the provisions of the Human Rights Act, and the BBC’s Head of Human Resources has said it could take five years to come up with a new one.

    Small wonder that staff have little faith in management’s willingness to tackle the problem. The sheer scale of corporate arrogance and its confidence that it can see off critics with impunity remains breathtaking.

    But it is unsustainable. Post-Hutton the BBC’s doctrine of management infallibility is no longer credible; nor is mere lip service to the mantra that “we own up when we make mistakes”. The corporation has to be honest about its failings and sincere in its attempts to put them right.

    The standard BBC strategy for dealing with claims of bullying and harassment is to ignore critics until they give up, or pay them to shut up and go away. In my case they offered a substantial sum to stop the appeal. I turned it down, but the size of the sum suggested they felt far from blameless or confident of the outcome.

    For my part it would have been wrong to connive at keeping what the tribunal called this “insidious evil” under wraps. Sunlight is the best disinfectant. The deal would have gagged me from speaking my mind, and nothing is worth more than that.

    http://www.nuj.org.uk/inner.php?docid=812&PHPSESSID=ecc3a72f968f45ea92da5e70493c3254

    BBC Radical Feminists Dumb,Dumber and Dumbest Programming

    Former-Director General Slams BBC's 'Terrible Programmes'

    A former BBC Director General has said the corporation produces "terrible" programmes and female executives have not done a "great job of work", it emerged today.

    Alasdair Milne, who headed the BBC from 1982 to 1987, said he had nothing against women but told The Times: "It just seems to me that the television service has largely been run by women for the last four to five years and they don't seem to have done a great job of work."

    A spokesman for the BBC said: "(BBC chairman) Michael Grade and the BBC do not share Mr Milne's views."

    Mr Milne told the newspaper he spoke to Mr Grade over lunch, telling him the BBC's programmes were "terrible" with far too many cookery and gardening programmes.

    "Dumb, dumb, dumb. I think the BBC has to pull its socks up quite considerably," he added.

    http://news.scotsman.com/latest.cfm?id=3597850

    --------------------------------

    Former BBC boss blames women for 'dumb' programming

    A former BBC head blamed women executives for making the television service "dumb, dumb, dumb" and said they had dragged down the public broadcaster's quality, in comments published today in The Times newspaper.

    Alasdair Milne, who ran the BBC as director general from 1982 to 1987, told the daily: "It just seems to me that the television service has largely been run by women for the last four to five years and they don't seem to have done a great job of work."

    He described a discussion over lunch with new BBC chair Michael Grade: "I told him I thought the programs were terrible."

    "There was no innovation; constant make overs and far too many cookery and gardening programs. Dumb, dumb, dumb," he said.

    "I think the BBC has to pull its socks up quite considerably."

    The BBC was quick to disagree with the statement. "Michael Grade and the BBC do not share Mr Milne's views," a spokesman said.

    Milne was described by The Times as one of the most influential heads of the BBC, which is widely considered one of the world's most influential broadcasters.

    He was forced out of his post in 1987 after a round of disputes with the Conservative government.

    The 74-year-old defended his statements to the paper, saying he was not biased against women in general.

    "I have nothing against women, I've worked with them all my life," Milne said.

    The BBC is a MALE HATING MONSTER that needs culling

    Dyke attacks 'depressing' BBC successors

    Greg Dyke, the former director general of the BBC, says he is "unnerved and depressed" by the direction in which his successors are taking the corporation. Eight months after leaving his post at the request of the BBC governors, Mr Dyke has attacked Mark Thompson, the new director general, for allowing rumours of job cuts to circulate and for failing, along with the new chairman, Michael Grade, to capitalise on the findings of the Butler report on Iraq.

    Mr Dyke, 57, left the BBC after Lord Hutton, in his inquiry into events leading up to the death of David Kelly, criticised reporting errors by Andrew Gilligan on the Today programme.

    In a subsequent inquiry into the use of intelligence in the build-up to the war in Iraq, however, Lord Butler upheld Gilligan's report that aspects of the government's dossier on Iraq's banned weapons were flawed. "Butler killed Hutton," said Mr Dyke, who wants to see the corporation reassert itself more aggressively in the wake of the inquiries. "The BBC has stopped defending itself. As a new chairman and a new director general, you'd rather not be involved, wouldn't you? But I don't think that's an option. I think at some stage they've got to come out. The longer they stay quiet the worse it gets."

    In his first big newspaper interview since leaving his job in January amid emotional scenes, Mr Dyke effectively calls on Tony Blair to resign: "Go back to what the prime minister said to Hutton; 'If any of this had been true, I'd have had to resign.' Well, we now know most of it was true, Mr Blair, so why are you still in office?"

    The former BBC chief was once a substantial donor to Labour.

    Mr Dyke criticised Mr Thompson's failure to put an end to rumours of job cuts at the BBC, in the lead-up to charter renewal in 2006. "I'm unnerved about some of the things that have been happening in terms of the staff. I'd hate to think they're going to lose that relationship that we built.

    "I hear them [the management] say, 'Oh, we're going to have to sack loads of people.' The whole place must be unnerved. You don't announce that you might get rid of people, because they all sit there destabilised. I think it's a mistake. That's not a great way of running a place."

    He added: "Isn't it depressing that the way to appeal to a Labour government these days is to say you'll fire loads of people?" Since leaving the BBC, Mr Dyke has written a book and made a television programme about his experiences. He has continued to be critical of the government's conduct in the lead-up to the war. "We went to war on the basis of a set of crappy intelligence reports that someone within government knew was nonsense," he said.

    Mr Dyke blames Alastair Campbell, Tony Blair's former director of communications, for having exercised inappropriate influence over Downing Street and Mr Blair for having listened to him. "It is on Blair's conscience whether he should still be prime minister."

    He cites the poor state of the Conservatives and the strength of the economy as the only things keeping the prime minister in office. "I think the damage to Blair is incalculable. I think he'll win the election, because there's nothing else and Gordon Brown has done a great job on the economy."

    Mr Dyke tells how he expected that the BBC's governors would support him in the aftermath of the Hutton report: "On the day that I left, it had never crossed my mind that these silly bastards would respond in this way. Never crossed my mind."

    He also claims that the governors would have supported him if he had been from a posher background.

    Dyke said he intended to vote tactically for the Liberal Democrats in the next election.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,3604,1308153,00.html

    THE DANGERS OF WATCHING BBC PROGRAMMING

    For the un-initiated watching a so called public broadcast service with supposed world wide influence would make you think you were receiving news and programs made for the people.

    On further inspection the BBC has been providing the UK and the world for to long with an ILLUSION .An illusion only being exposed thanks to the internet and it is no surprise the BBC constantly inform the public about the dangers to society and our children of internet use.

    They are worried ,not because they wish to protect us or our children, but that we will learn the real truth that the BBC have been hiding from us for so long .It has and always will be the UK establishment mouthpiece ensuring the monarchy are promoted in the most favourable way and that the subjects (slaves) are kept in the dark about the true nature of what the BBC was set up for.

    It is the brainwashing of the populace by subtle and devious means to ensure that ILLUSION continues to enslave the UK population while promoting the importance of having the richest people on the planet running every area of industry using draconian measures and the dark forces the Queen mentioned to Dianas butler after her death.

    Those dark forces seldom if ever mentioned by the BBC as all the BBC senior positions are taken by establishment figures and the sinister creepy secret societies that have propped up the elite for so very long in Britain.

    The BBC have a right to be worried about the net ,as its influence in world affairs is rapidly deteriorating as people become more aware of what the BBC actually promote.That includes an agenda which ensures men at every opportunity are castigated as fathers and claims from the BBC editorial that most men and fathers are guilty of all sorts from concocted BBC news reports.

    It is not only the NET the BBC fear they also fear the strength of those men they undermine .As it will be the same MEN who will take on those who promote a sadistic system that we know are jailing vast amounts of men and locking them up in mental wards with enforced chemical lobotomies. One of our own members faced such a treatment with little attention from the BBC .That is something the BBC never tell us about as they are to busy destroying the relationships of men with their children while sending staff ,at british tax payers expense ,half way round the world to warm exotic countries to tell us about human rights abuses while they are on their own doorstep and blatantly ignoring.

    We pay for their brainwashing in BBC imposed licence fees to ensure our poor are continually hounded by agencies employed by the BBC to search out our poorest citizens and drag them through courts for failing to pay for the propaganda they pump out that is ensuring the system will keep those who cant afford a licence forever in poverty.

    The BBC also run charity collections such as "Children in Need " were most of the money collected doesn't go to children, but goes to hard line radical feminist and lesbian groups ,as jobs for the girls, a large percentage of those funds never get to vulnerable children.Most of those groups also connected with the promotion of dysfunctional single mothers rather than secure family units that are best for our children.

    Many of our children are being made vulnerable by the UK's tyrannical legal system which the BBC have been promoting for so very long as the best in the world ,nothing could be further from the truth .They promote it regularly by parading and interviewing key legal figures in the system while ignoring the thousands of individual victims of the UK's corrupt courts. Radical feminists Germaine Greer and Helena Kennedy regularly allowed to spout their venomous anti-male, anti-heterosexual marriage rethoric.
    The BBC news vetted by members of the law society and an appalling conflict of interest when we know people who cannot get their legal cases exposed .
    The BBC often gather information for stories ,but not to publish them ,only as another intelligence gathering agent for MI5 and MI6.

    We have many people contact our organisations telling us how the BBC spent hours collecting information on a victim of the injustices within the UK that NEVER see the light of day .Either the BBC have reporters who have plenty of spare time on their hands or they are being publicly funded to gather evidence for the state .

    The BBC take great pride in promoting themselves as a world leader in broadcasting .Yes they are a world leader ,but only in terms of the enormous amount of subtle brainwashing they have been expertly
    manufacturing to ensure the establishment and their creepy secret societies continue to control and enslave our people and something our organisations intend to continue to expose ,that has been a major blight on the UK for far to long.

    The governors of the BBC will always carry the establishment line as it is those very governors who are hand picked from the same establishment elitist system they take so much time and energy to support .

    THE BBC RIGHTLY SHOULD FEAR THE NET AS IT IS EXPOSING THEIR ENORMOUS LIES

    BIAS BBC

    http://media.guardian.co.uk/iraqandthemedia/story/0,12823,991215,00.html

    A survey of the main broadcasters' coverage of the invasion of Iraq shows the claim that the BBC was anti-war is the opposite of the truth

    Professor Justin Lewis
    Friday July 4, 2003
    The Guardian

    The recent furore about the BBC's coverage of the war in Iraq has generated rather more heat than light. But behind the government's attack on the BBC lies the serious accusation that the corporation's coverage of the conflict was anti-war. This claim goes much further than the much publicised attack on Andrew Gilligan - the BBC's critics in the government have clearly implied that Gilligan's stories are part of a more systematic, institutional bias. So, is it true?

    The answer has little to do with the work of individual reporters - we know from previous research that people are influenced by the general weight of TV coverage rather than by particular reports. For this reason, we have conducted a more comprehensive survey of the way the four main UK broadcasters - the BBC, ITN, Channel 4 and Sky - covered the war. After careful analysis of all the main evening news bulletins during the war, we have been able to build up a fairly clear picture of the coverage on the different channels. Matthew d'Ancona in the Sunday Telegraph described how "in the eyes of exasperated Blairites - the BBC whinged and whined, and did its best to sabotage the war effort".

    But the pattern that emerges from our study is very different. For example, we asked which of the four channels was most likely to use the British government as a source. The answer, it turns out, is the BBC - where the proportion of government sources was twice that of ITN and Channel 4 News. The BBC was also a little more likely to use British military sources in its coverage than the other three channels. When it comes to reporting the other side, on the other hand, the BBC was much more cautious. Sky and Channel 4 were both much more likely than the BBC to quote official Iraqi sources. The BBC was also less likely than the other three channels to use independent sources like the Red Cross - many of whom were critical of the war effort (Channel 4 used such sources three times more often than the BBC, Sky twice as often).

    The government's case for war was based partly on the idea that most Iraqi people wanted liberation and hence supported the invasion. So to what extent did TV news portray the Iraqi people as welcoming US and British troops? This turned out to be a dominant theme of the coverage: across the news as a whole, the Iraqi people were around three times more likely to be portrayed as pro-invasion than anti-invasion. How far this represented actual Iraqi public opinion we have no way of verifying, but it fits happily with the government's version of events.

    This ratio was remarkably consistent across all TV channels - with the exception of Channel 4, where the ratio was a little less than two to one. When it came to reporting the Iraqi casualties - clearly a negative for the government's case - we found fewer reports on the BBC than on the other three channels. Again, it was Channel 4 which was most likely to offer a critical note - 44% of its reports about the Iraqi people were about civilian casualties, compared with 30% on Sky, 24% on ITN, and only 22% on the BBC. The picture that emerges from our data is fairly clear: if there was a TV channel that was more likely to report information damaging to the government's case, it was Channel 4. The BBC, by contrast, was often the channel least likely to engage in "whingeing and whining". So, for example, when Tony Blair accused the Iraqi regime of executing British soldiers - a story Downing Street was later forced to retract - the BBC was the only one of the early evening news bulletins that failed to examine the lack of evidence to support it, or to report the rather embarrassing government retraction the next day. And when it came to the many other stories from military sources that turned out to be false, such as the Basra "uprising" or the launching of Scud missiles into Kuwait, Channel 4 was the only channel - rightly as it turned out - to offer a note of scepticism or caution.

    The BBC, ITN and Sky were, on the whole, much more trusting of US and British military sources. The only finding that does not quite fit this pattern was, interestingly, the coverage given to weapons of mass destruction. The government was clearly keen to emphasise the danger posed by Iraq's alleged chemical or biological weapons, so to what extent did broadcasters report speculation hinting at their likely or possible use? While this turned out to be a much smaller theme during the war than we might have expected beforehand, we found that all four channels were much more likely to report speculation that implied Iraq might use such weapons than to cast doubt on their possible use. But in this case, we found a few more reports on the BBC than elsewhere which allowed doubt to creep in - whether by reporting that such weapons had not been found or by casting doubt on their possible use.

    And yet, even here, the BBC was more than three times more likely to suggest that such weapons might be used than to suggest they might not. And, as it turned out, the BBC and the other broadcasters all placed much too much faith in the plausibility of such rumours. Indeed, far from revealing an anti-war BBC, our findings tend to give credence to those who criticised the BBC for being too sympathetic to the government in its war coverage. Either way, it is clear that the accusation of BBC anti-war bias fails to stand up to any serious or sustained analysis. · Professor Justin Lewis is deputy head of Cardiff University's school of journalism

    comment@guardian.co.uk

    MEDIA CONFIDENCE TRICKSTERS

    The Guardian expose what our organisations have been stating for years, the UK public have little trust in our mass media news reporting.The BBC is one of the worst culprits and proven in research during the Iraq war.

    The Sunday Post,The Big Issue and the Galloway Gazette doing some of the best reporting on criminality within the legal systems of the UK which is the single BIGGEST issue facing our country today and seldom gets the attention it deserves ,thanks to law society members VETTING and INSTRUCTING the national media .
    Our democracy is being undermined through lies and deceit


    Confidence trick

    Who sups with the devil needs a long spoon, says the proverb. But no spoon yet devised is long enough to have preserved the trustworthiness of political leaders in the tabloid era. Yesterday's survey of public attitudes from the committee on standards in public life paints an abject picture of the current collapse of public trust in our politics. But the responsibility for the crisis should not be dumped exclusively on our politicians. At the heart of the lack of confidence in ministers is a devastating dialectic of corrosion in which the media, and not just the politicians, are equally to blame. Only 24% of us generally trust government ministers to tell the truth, the survey finds. That is depressingly in line with previous surveys and a dreadful indictment of our leaders. But this report breaks crucial new ground by helping to explain why things are as bad as they are. The key here is unquestionably the media. If you think the standing of politicians is low, then consider the standing of parts of the media. Only 7% of the general population trust tabloid journalists to tell the truth, and only 10% of the tabloids' own readers do either. Things are better, though hardly qualitatively so, when it comes to the broadsheet press and television news journalists.

    But the killer finding is the extent to which the media set the agenda for the way the public judges politicians. Eighty two per cent of the population say they are influenced by television news, and 63% say that newspapers influence them too. No other factors - not personal experience, or discussions with friends or education - come even close to rivalling these. Consider what this all adds up to: the media, which the public does not believe tell the truth, are notwithstanding the greatest influence in forming the public's views. The public's low opinion of government ministers, in other words, reflects the media's own. Is that the fault of the ministers or of the media? In our view, neither partner is blameless, but what is clear is that the whole system of public trust is poisoned by the interaction between the two.

    It is indisputable that the Iraq war and the Hutton inquiry provided the principal context and backdrop to the grim findings in the new survey. But beware of assuming that they are the decisive reasons why trust is so low. Three out of five people questioned said that external events like Iraq had had no effect on their opinions. The standards committee wants the survey to be a benchmark for similar studies in the future. Perhaps these will show trust recovering as Iraq fades. Let us hope so. But the problem may be more deep-seated and more structural than that. If the real problem lies in the media-political culture, then that is where the real answers lie too.

    It is not, after all, as if the public is unreasonable or unrealistic about the kind of politicians it wants. As the report says, the public is interested in current affairs. It wants politicians who tell the truth, who don't take bribes and who concentrate on trying to spend public money wisely. It thinks standards are actually quite high. It thinks our politicians are less corrupt than elsewhere. It does not think politicians should set an example in their private lives. But it thinks they should tell the truth and accept responsibility when things go wrong - and it simply does not believe they are doing so.

    The government's current shambles cannot be understood except partly through this prism. In that case the obvious answer for ministers is to stop adding poison to an already polluted system with their briefings, leaks and other media tricks. A truth and trust strategy cannot be a media strategy. It has to be, as much as possible, unmediated. If ministers concentrated on parliament rather more, and on the media rather less, they would be a lot better trusted - and even a bit more truthful - than they now are.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/print/0,3858,5011346-103682,00.html

    THE BBC ARE AN AFFRONT TO OUR DEMOCRACY

    IS THIS WHY THE BBC SELDOM PUBLISH ANYTHING BAD ABOUT THE LAW SOCIETY OF SCOTLAND

    For years our members have been shocked at the BBC failing to report crimes committed by the hoodlums running the Law Society of Scotland and its membership.

    Despite national media attention all this week not ONE story was run by the BBC .The only time they do run legal stories is when they interview ,seldom the victims of their corruption ,but the perpetrators and spokespersons for all the corrupt legal institutions that have gotten away with their crimes for years thanks to their BBC editorial pals at our supposed public broadcast network.

    THE BBC ARE AN AFFRONT TO OUR DEMOCRACY .

    Maybe if they didnt have the BBC's main lawyer Rosalind McInnes sitting on the LAW SOCIETY OF SCOTLANDS council while vetting every story provided to the BBC (we know of many people who failed to have the BBC take their story up) .The exposing of the law societies vast corrupt secret society network might eventually get some attention from the BBC.
    However what we have is a web of deceit implicating a national public broadcaster protecting the CROOKS by that connection.

    THIS IS A NATIONAL SCANDAL WHICH MUST BE FULLY EXPOSED

    Members of the law society council
    http://www.lawscot.org.uk/members/inhouse/inhouse_whatis_member.html


    Rosalind McInnes
    BBC Scotland
    Broadcasting House
    Queen Margaret Drive
    GLASGOW
    G12 8DG

    BBC urged to appoint complaints monitor

    NOT BEFORE TIME ,THE LIES AND DECEIT EMANATING FROM THE BBC MAKES THEM LOOK LIKE AN ARM OF THE THIRD REICH

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,3604,1230154,00.html

    BBC urged to appoint complaints monitor

    Matt Wells, media correspondent
    Thursday June 3, 2004
    The Guardian

    John Simpson, the BBC's world affairs editor, has called on the corporation to appoint a news ombudsman to oversee complaints.He said a system similar to the Guardian's would make journalists more vigilant about balance and accuracy in their reports.

    The BBC is considering ways of beefing up its complaints procedures in the wake of the row over the Iraq dossier story. It is likely to appoint a controller of complaints, who would be responsible for the system.

    At the Guardian Ian Mayes, the readers' editor, is independent from the editor, Alan Rusbridger, and his contract can be terminated only by the Scott Trust which owns the paper.

    Speaking at an internal seminar about the future of BBC journalism in the wake of the Hutton report, reported in the in-house magazine Ariel, Simpson said a case could be made for an ombudsman in the news division. "It could be helpful to have an individual who was entirely objective, who looked at everything you damn well said."

    After Hutton was published, the BBC's director general Greg Dyke and the chairman Gavyn Davies resigned. It also led to the departure of Andrew Gilligan, the reporter whose story on the Today programme last May prompted the row.

    In the seminar, Simpson said a Guardian-style corrections facility would encourage journalists to be extra vigilant about balance and accuracy. He confessed to once getting the name wrong of the winner of an election in Lebanon.

    "I expect it would be difficult to do on television, but I can't help thinking it would get lots of viewers," he said. It is understood that one of the options under consideration by the BBC involves a corrections page on the internet where errors would be put right.

    THE SECRET COVENANT OF THE BBC

    If you have ever wondered why you are ,were you are at this point in time .The reason may be found somewhere in the following passages.

    THE SECRET COVENANT OF THE BBC

    An illusion it will be, so large, so vast it will escape their
    perception.

    Those who will see it will be thought of as insane.

    We will create separate fronts to prevent them from seeing the
    connection between us.

    We will behave as if we are not connected to keep the illusion alive.
    Our goal will be accomplished one drop at a time so as to never bring
    suspicion upon ourselves. This will also prevent them from seeing
    the changes as they occur.

    We will always stand above the relative field of their experience
    for we know the secrets of the absolute.

    We will work together always and will remain bound by blood and
    secrecy. Death will come to he who speaks.

    We will keep their lifespan short and their minds weak while
    pretending to do the opposite.

    We will use our knowledge of science and technology in subtle
    ways so they will never see what is happening.

    We will render them docile and weak before us by our power.

    They will grow depressed, slow and obese, and when they
    come to us for help, we will give them more poison.

    We will focus their attention toward money and material goods
    so they many never connect with their inner self. We will distract
    them with fornication, external pleasures and games so they may
    never be one with the oneness of it all.

    Their minds will belong to us and they will do as we say.
    If they refuse we shall find ways to implement mind-altering
    technology into their lives. We will use fear as our weapon.

    We will establish their governments and establish opposites within.
    We will own both sides.

    We will always hide our objective but carry out our plan.

    They will perform the labor for us and we shall prosper from their
    toil.

    Our families will never mix with theirs. Our blood must be pure
    always, for it is the way.

    We will make them kill each other when it suits us.

    We will keep them separated from the oneness by dogma and religion.

    We will control all aspects of their lives and tell them what to
    think and how.

    We will guide them kindly and gently letting them think they are
    guiding themselves.

    We will foment animosity between them through our factions.

    When a light shall shine among them, we shall extinguish it by
    ridicule, or death, whichever suits us best.

    We will make them rip each other's hearts apart and kill their own
    children.

    We will accomplish this by using hate as our ally, anger as our
    friend.

    The hate will blind them totally, and never shall they see that from
    their
    conflicts we emerge as their rulers. They will be busy killing each
    other.

    They will bathe in their own blood and kill their neighbors for as
    long as we see fit.

    We will benefit greatly from this, for they will not see us, for they
    cannot see us.

    We will continue to prosper from their wars and their deaths.

    We shall repeat this over and over until our ultimate goal is
    accomplished.

    We will continue to make them live in fear and anger
    though images and sounds.

    We will use all the tools we have to accomplish this.

    The tools will be provided by their labor.

    We will make them hate themselves and their neighbors.

    We will always hide the divine truth from them, that we are all one.
    This they must never know!

    They must never know that color is an illusion, they must always
    think they are not equal.

    Drop by drop, drop by drop we will advance our goal.

    We will take over their land, resources and wealth to exercise total
    control over them.

    We will deceive them into accepting laws that will steal the little
    freedom they will have.

    We will establish a money system that will imprison them forever,
    keeping them and their children in debt.

    When they shall ban together, we shall accuse them of crimes and
    present a different story to the world for we shall own all the media.
    (domestic violence propaganda the MAJOR way to enslave and bankrupt men )

    We will use our media to control the flow of information and their
    sentiment in our favor.

    When they shall rise up against us we will crush them like insects,
    for they are less than that.

    They will be helpless to do anything for they will have no weapons.

    We will recruit some of their own to carry out our plans, we will
    promise them
    eternal life, but eternal life they will never have for they are not
    of us.

    The recruits will be called "initiates" and will be indoctrinated to
    believe false rites of passage to higher realms. Members of
    these groups will think they are one with us never knowing the truth.
    They must never learn this truth for they will turn against us.

    For their work they will be rewarded with earthly things and great
    titles, but never will they become immortal and join us, never will they
    receive the light and travel the stars.

    They will never reach the higher realms, for the killing of their own
    kind will prevent passage to the realm of enlightenment. This they will
    never know.

    The truth will be hidden in their face, so close they will not be
    able to focus on it until its too late.

    Oh yes, so grand the illusion of freedom will be, that they will
    never know they are our slaves.

    When all is in place, the reality we will have created for them will
    own them. This reality will be their prison. They will live in self-delusion.

    When our goal is accomplished a new era of domination will begin.

    Their minds will be bound by their beliefs, the beliefs we have
    established from time immemorial.

    But if they ever find out they are our equal, we shall perish then.
    THIS THEY MUST NEVER KNOW.

    If they ever find out that together they can vanquish us, they will
    take action.

    They must never, ever find out what we have done, for if they do, we
    shall have no place to run, for it will be easy to see who we are once the veil has fallen. Our actions will have revealed who we are and they will hunt us down and no person shall give us shelter.

    This is the secret covenant by which we shall live the rest of our
    present and future lives, for this reality will transcend many generations and life spans.

    This covenant is sealed by blood, our blood. We, the ones who from
    heaven to earth came.

    This covenant must NEVER, EVER be known to exist. It must NEVER, EVER be written or spoken of for if it is, the consciousness it will spawn will release the fury of the PRIME CREATOR upon us and we shall be cast to the depths from whence we came and remain there until the end time of infinity itself.


    The Bankindex editorial staff thanks you for all your e-mails
    regarding this piece, but we do NOT know who he or she is.

    The piece came in through one of our forms and the Author left an unusable e-
    mail address. Thank you.

    http://www.bankindex.com/read.asp?ID=861

    BBC MALE HATE CAMPAIGNS

    A CHALLENGE TO THE BBC GOVERNORS AND EDITORS

    A challenge to the B.B.C.(Bloody Big Con)

    Why despite the BBC being a public broadcast network do they NEVER have MENS RIGHTS GROUPS making comment on ANY of their despicable family law reports?

    The BBC promote extreme radical feminist groups which do TWO things

    1.Allow the illuminati monsters in secret courts to psychologically abuse our children and

    2.STEAL those childrens future inheritance.

    THE BBC promote

    1. MALE HATE CAMPAIGNS

    2. Promote the theft of children from their biological fathers (some who later die from neglect or maltreatment by those left with the responsibility and care).

    3.They NEVER do stories on the biggest threat to world peace and the undermining of families THE ILLUMINATI.Our organisations have evidence that their foot soldiers are heavily embedded in the western worlds legal, political and mass media outlets INCLUDING the BBC.

    4. They PROMOTE EXTREME FEMINISM and regularly use their false statistics to promote HATE on all BBC networks.This provides massive wealth for the ILLUMINATI coffers via diabolical secret star chamber family courts were they plunder the family assets.

    5.They promote the UK establishment even when they have been involved in persecution (Lady DI's butler ) and the deaths of senior figures who speak out against that elite system.

    6.The BBC editorial is a major threat to the stability of family life in the UK .

    7.The BBC promotes fascism and male discrimination and breach European Conventions on Human Rights regularly with no balance to their propaganda, published using public moneys .

    Our organisations intend early 2004 to EXPOSE and challenge the BBC on their hate campaigning and will seek to have this reviewed via the broadcast complaints process's within the UK and in Europe. We intend to STOP this propaganda machine from airing hate campaigns which emulate the Gestapo tactics used in the last war and destroying our families .
    They make South African apartheid hate propaganda PALE by comparison

    THEY CANNOT AND WILL NOT GET AWAY WITH THIS LIE ANY LONGER

    WE TOLD THE BBC OVER 6 MONTHS AGO

    Kelly death 'changes everything' says Bloody Big Con earlier press release of 20 July 2003Over and above the tragic death of Dr.Kelly our organisations intend to FORCE change on the BBC's biased and prejudiced reporting not only of the Iraq war but also when it undermines and damages the family ,men and children with their radical feminist outrageous programming.

    We will not tolerate a public funded broadcast station running extreme feminist, government funded propaganda on MEN hating and warmongering.The BBC governors and editors are now WARNED they will not get away with brainwashing the British public ANYMORE with their lies and deceit, which is undermining the father as the strength, not the weakness ,in the family .The BBC's subtle ,psychological articles are now being exposed as coming from a radical feminist,lesbian and gay,heterosexual man hating corporation who have done nothing but damage heterosexual family life in the UK, with the BBC being the major contributing supporter of those extremes ,duping the British public with intolerable articles .

    Instead the BBC have been supporting an evil government and judiciary intent on breaking up families and taking children away from the safety and protection of good fathers in that dogma.The UK government and judiciary will NOT get away with kidnapping our children with their evil legal system and police state which the BBC have been condoning and supporting for so very long .The death of Dr. Kelly is tragic ,but doesnt get the BBC off the hook in any way shape or form , but only implicates them in their usual PRO government stance, PRE war ,were they had convinced the trusting British public it was the right decision .

    It is a bit late in the day for the BBC to try and state the opposite, when they had been promoting the WAR right up until the troops went in.Dr Kelly tragically has been a pawn in a subtly staged GAME between two propaganda machines who have been trying to distance themselves from the carnage of IRAQ which they BOTH supported.

    19 July, 2003, 18:3 GMT 19:03 UK Kelly death 'changes everything'

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/3080699.stm

    If one thing is certain in the wake of the tragic death of David Kelly it is that politics in Britain has changed forever. There have been calls for Blair to goIn the short term, this awful event has changed the entire landscape for the already-beleaguered government, and Tony Blair in particular. Governments have fallen and prime ministerial careers have collapsed over less. And, whatever the outcome of the judicial inquiry, this affair will hang over this government for the rest of its life. There have already been demands from his own side for the prime minister to resign. And his Defence Secretary Geoff Hoon and, in particular, his spin doctor Alastair Campbell must also be considering their positions. There will also be some soul searching by those outside parliament, but who regularly engage as players in the political process. At the moment there is a notable lack of willingness by anybody to accept responsibility for this tragedy - or even apologise to Dr Kelly's family. But, in this case, that cannot stand. Public opinion will not allow for there to be no consequences for this.

    Amoral game And, whatever the judicial inquiry finds, those consequences will have to offer some sort of closure to this affair, at the very least for Dr Kelly's family. It is all too easy for those who are close to the political process to see it as a game. A vicious, high stakes and occasionally amoral game, but a game none the less. After this weekend, that must surely change. An innocent man who has spent much of his working life shunning the limelight while quietly serving his country was sucked into that game and paid with his life. David Kelly was not from a world where spin, cynicism and manipulation are the order of the day. David Kelly gave evidence to MPs And it was abundantly clear to anyone who witnessed his performance before the foreign affairs select committee that he wanted nothing to do with such a world. The proceedings of the committee on that day were depressing enough for seasoned politics watchers. They must have been devastating for Dr Kelly who had very likely already been subjected to days of anguish after telling his bosses he feared he may have been the BBC's source. And for voters already deeply sceptical, even cynical, about the political process, this entire episode must have reinforced their worst fears.

    So the long term effects of this tragedy must surely be to force all those who participate in politics to look long and hard at their behaviour. It raises numerous questions about openness, responsibility, trust and even morality. And there can be no more powerful a case for a new compact between the public and those who are elected to serve it. It is unthinkable that, once this horror has passed, we will all simply go back to our old ways.

    The BBC: Licensed at public expense to spread lies

    01/02/2004
    Take Direct Action Against the BBC
    by Paul Burridge
    pb@osiris1.notthisbit.co.uk

    I am appealing to you all for some feedback as to the level ofpossible support for a campaign of civil disobedience against the BBCand their constant dissemination of lies to the British people, thewider world and the License Payer; both of whom deserve far betterthan to be served by the current shower of self-serving liars withtheir own secret agenda to get across.

    The BBC has become abeaurocratic monstrosity; a fat, milch cow run by vested interests fortheir own benefit and with the sole purpose of changing the culturalfabric of this country to suit their own peculiar ideologies.There's a very easy way to starve these crooks out of existence:refuse to pay the Licence Fee. Why should *anyone* in this country inthis age be forced to pay (under threat of imprisonment) for the privilege of having someone else's unpalatable political views forced down their throats?

    It might have been acceptable in Soviet Russia;it might have been the norm in the former Warsaw Pact countries, butit cannot in all reason be permitted to continue this day in Britain.I urge everyone with a spine to exercise civil disobedience in thismatter: stop paying the licence fee forthwith. Cancel those directdebits; don't renew that yearly card that pops through the letterbox.Don't watch any more BBC channels.

    The BBC doesn't maintain a cashpile like many commercial organisations; it's *most* valuable assetsare very hard indeed to liquidate, leaving it heavily dependentday-to-day on the income it gets from *you*. The Corporation could bequickly brought to its knees by the severence of this income. TheBritish People have the power to destroy this monstrosity in months ifonly they wake up and recognise the threat the BBC places us all under.

    It's not fair to be fed a diet of lies... it's less fair stillto be dogmatically demanded to *pay* for it. Stalin would have beenproud of Dyke and his cronies.Note: this is *not* an endorsement of the Government in any way but atotally seperate issue altogether. The Government stinks; they'reequally disingenuous along with the Beeb., but I'm concerned here withtaking on one adversary at a time.Who's up for it?The BBC: Licensed at public expense to spread lies.

    BBC THE WORLDS BIGGEST MIND CONTROL MACHINE

    The illusion created by the establishment mouthpiece the BBC Bloody Big Con wont go away with the blood letting and sacrifice of a few of their governors.The BBC are riddled with establishment lucifer worshipping illuminati/freemasons.From top to bottom the devil worshippers are f*cking with the minds of UK citizens.

    They fail to report the many men incarcerated in mental wards and prisons who tried to EXPOSE the evil state terrorist machine they promote daily as news fodder.The ESTABLISHMENT of the UK are well protected by the multi tier system they have controlling world news were journalists ,editors and governors are promoting secret society messages .

    Never mind the distorted news programs EVERYTHING they promote is touched by an evil force.Music ,the arts even comedy has a subtle subliminal illuminati message.We know who publish this bile are.If the BBC dont rid themselves of that force, as a publicly funded broadcaster, we will continue to EXPOSE the hidden agendas that ensure MEN ,the protectors of our children ,are demeaned in almost every program they produce .

    A subtle devious instrument of the UK police state indoctrinating us with propaganda into thinking all of this is to protect us against terrorism.The only terrorism UK MEN face is the internal terrorists promoted by the BBC ,a corrupt and bigoted law enforcement regime that is only getting away with lawlessness due to the failures of the BBC to report the TRUTH .

    Not the BBC ILLUSION that protects the illuminati crooks controlling the UK via the judiciary ,bankers,lawyers and government agencies gathering information in the most sinister way to exploit and enslave men .We throw down the gauntlet to the BBC that they expose their illuminati staff or we do it for them.This is a warning to all BBC staff .Anyone who is part of those secret society mind games will be named in our world wide contact base and exposed as abusers of families and of children being stolen from fathers in an all out attack by BBC editorial.

    Their days are numbered ,the illusion they spread is falling on its ass, DYKE and his governor cronies are only the start .We intend to EXPOSE the lies the BBC have been spreading to protect the establishment and its legal system while it steals billions from its citizens.Those days are over the truth will out .The BBC will no longer dominate the thinking in its mind control experiments.It has suppressed some of the worlds major talent in the arts by only promoting music and art funded by illuminati bankers and publishers.For those who have already seen through the sham this wont come as a surprise ,for those yet to be enlightened our organisations aim to EXPOSE the real reason behind the BBC and its continued ILLUSION.

    The inquiries and the war are a smokescreen for the real underlying problem that the BBC are being exposed like never before and have been responsible for the internal major crime wave being imposed on us by the illuminati crooks within the establishment of the UK.The BBC lying machine is now outed .Our organisations remain committed to ensure their lies continue to be exposed while they hide the TRUTH of what is going on in a depraved UK police state .