THE ROYAL PARASITES HAVE DESIGNED THE BEST WAY OF CRUISING THROUGH LIFE AT EVERYBODY ELSE'S
EXPENSE. NON-STOP PARTYING, WINING AND DINING ACROSS THE GLOBE PAID BY THE TAXPAYERS AND
EVERY OTHER COUNTRY THAT TOLERATE HER FREE FOREIGN TRIPS, AND HER MASONIC SPOKESMEN HAVE THE
CHEEK TO CALL IT WORK. SHAKING A FEW HANDS IS NOT WORK.
BBC Prince Andrew interview - the best (WORST) bits VIDEO
Exposes how the royals have access to vast arsenals(shooting weekends) while they have stripped the peasants
of any means to defend themselves from their utter tyranny. Property theft went through the roof
after the Dunblane massacre was used to disarm the population and then the mass house theft followed.
Hypocrite royals fake tears over their domestic abuse tactics
Harmsworth's VILE royalist scumbag rag gives them front page headlines
CROCODILE TEARS but NONE for Princess Diana
Camilla began speaking out against domestic abuse after hearing survivors' stories at a SafeLives event in 2016
This is the fucking hypocritical bullshit that comes from the royal parasites
claims of helping protect all these wee downtrodden women against all us bad men.
No mention of the torment she put Princess Diana through while shagging Charlie
behind her back and the enormity of dealing with a brutal bunch of parasites
who use black arts to get rid of anyone who gets in their way. Diana didn't survive long
after being kicked out and exposing the real truth about how they operate.
The royals, their freemason godfather henchman the creepy Dukey Kent and their judicial henchmen deeply embroiled
in using DV claims to frame and smear divorcing men before stealing their assets, homes and children and their future inheritance.
All of it is a massive facade that sees £billions being stolen by the crown for and
on behalf of the lackeys that act on their behalf and why they are the richest
despots on the planet propped up by stitching men up with their obscene laws that
allow their own Randy Andy to remain living an opulent lifestyle despite allegations
of underage rape while divorcing men lose EVERYTHING for arguing with their wives.
While they remain ALL powerful thanks to their ruthless masonic godfather the Dukey Kent
doing their bidding we are ALL losers
Two of the most despicable royalist rags on the planet promote two of the most despicable cretins on the planet
Sick bucket required for the utter propaganda and royalist bullshit
Meanwhile the impoverished peasants are smeared by these fucking evil rags as scroungers
while they prop up a ruthless fascist royalist regime and the royal mafia quitters are raking it in
selling their souls to the banking mafia.
Prince Andrew's Royal Cop Story Censored By The BBC - Paul Page VIDEO
Andy and Epstein ‘pimp’ Ghislaine Maxwell have pact to save each others arses from jail
Left: Laura Goldman
Freemasons running British cops and the met are being dictated to by the masonic godfather the Dukey Kent to
avoid arresting, interviewing and charging Randy Andy ensuring the royals are ABOVE THE LAW.
PRINCE Andrew and Ghislaine Maxwell have a 'mutual protection pact', according to a pal of Jeffrey Epstein's madam who still speaks to her in hiding.
The Brit socialite, accused of procuring underage girls for billionaire paedophile Epstein, is said to have confided in her friend that she has an agreement with the Queen's favourite son that they won't spill the dirt on each other.
The news comes a day after Prince Andrew was publicly shamed by US law chief Geoffrey Berman over the Jeffrey Epstein scandal for providing 'zero co-operation' with attempts to interview him.
This is despite the Duke of York, 59, insisting in a statement last year that he was 'willing to help' in the investigation into his former pal who killed himself last year while awaiting trial for alleged sex trafficking.
But Laura Goldman, a friend of Ghislaine Maxwell and her sister Isabel, told Sun Online: 'Prince Andrew will never testify. The Duke of York and Ghislaine have a mutual protection pact. She told me herself after his doomed BBC Newsnight interview last year.
'When he said that he would agree to be interviewed by the FBI at the time, Ghislaine said afterwards that the palace didn't want Andrew to testify as it would cheapen the British monarchy.
'She said that it would take away the royal family's sense of mystery if Andrew faces a court hearing like any ordinary person would.
'Ghislaine says that Andrew doesn't know anything about the case against Epstein anyway. She feels it would just be a stunt to satisfy the media if he was asked to testify.
'But this all comes back to the fact that both Prince Andrew and Ghislaine would protect each other, no matter what they face.
'It looks to me like Ghislaine might be becoming even more of a target in this case now than she ever was before. Otherwise why would they want to talk to Andrew now anyway? It must be because they want to quiz him on Ghislaine as she's his closest link to all this.'
The family friend says that Ghislaine is exercising and reading to keep herself busy while she remains hidden from the public spotlight, where she's said to be 'doing OK and maintaining her 'wisecracking' sense of humour.
Ghislaine has always denied being a pimp for Epstein.
Laura added: 'Ghislaine is doing OK. She spends her time exercising and reading. She's handling everything as well as could be expected.
'Of course she isn't enjoying high society partying like she once did, but she's in much better spirits than you might think. And she still has her sense of humour so that keeps her going.
'I remember her joking, 'don't you know I'm going to a ball tonight?' So she can still laugh and make wise cracks like she always did.'
Laura has continued to maintain contact with Ghislaine and her sister Isabel, despite no confirmed public sightings of Ghislaine since last August.
The daughter of the disgraced late media mogul Robert Maxwell had allegedly been seen for the last time outside a Los Angeles burger restaurant last summer but the authenticity of photographs taken of her there have been disputed ever since.
However, Ghislaine's sister Isabel remains 'upset' with the Maxwell family's continued fall from grace thanks to Ghislaine's connection to Jeffrey Epstein.
Laura continued: 'Isabel says that she's glad that the FBI are at least investigating the case now as the truth will come out and her sister's name will eventually be cleared. She calls Epstein 'evil Epstein'. She literally says, 'the truth will out'.
'However, she remains upset that the family name is still being dragged through the mud. Normally they would all be celebrating with the stars during the Hollywood awards season. But as things stand they're still having to remain in hiding until Ghislaine can resurface with her reputation restored once again.'
Yesterday US attorney Geoffrey Berman held a dramatic press conference outside Epstein's former Manhattan mansion where he revealed that the FBI have contacted Prince Andrew's attorneys and requested an interview but 'to date, Prince Andrew has provided zero co-operation.'
The briefing sparked fury from representatives of Epstein's sex abuse victims, including Virginia Roberts Giuffre, 36, who claims she was forced to have sex with Andrew three times as a teenager after being trafficked to him by Epstein.
The royal has vehemently denied her claims.
Sigrid McCawley, who represents Virginia Roberts Giuffre, said: "Prince Andrew should take most seriously the deeply held belief in this country that no one is above the law.
"Prince Andrew's continued refusal to cooperate with the authorities after freely acknowledging that he would be prepared to answer enquiries raises even more questions about the role he played in the international sex trafficking ring Jeffrey Epstein and others operated."
Jack Scarola, another lawyer representing the mum-of three, told The Sun last night: “It is obvious that Prince Andrew is persisting in a pattern of non-cooperation which has now been going on for years.
“I would certainly believe that he should recognise his moral obligation to participate in the search for the truth.
“With all that the victims of Jeffrey Epstein have been through – over so many years – I would say that they expected nothing different."
Prince Andrew and Prince Charles' representatives have been approached by Sun Online but have declined to comment.
Ghislaine Maxwell's legal representatives have been approached but have also declined to comment.
Just two days ago, Prince Andrew's former protection officer Paul Page told how Ghislaine Maxwell visited Prince Andrew up to four times a day at Buckingham Palace and enjoyed picnics with him in the grounds.
Mr Page said that he was first made aware of Ghislaine Maxwell and Prince Andrew's friendship in 2001.
Corpses Jimmy Savile And Prince Charles - Ex Royal Cop Paul Page VIDEO
Even UK's far right wing royalist rags finally see writing on the wall
Prince Andrew And Royal Privilege - Sonia Poulton VIDEO
While Harmsworth's vile rag still promotes the royals sprogs
They will do anything to sell their murky brand
Royal parasite in Jerusalem preaching to the world about Auschwitz while ignoring Israel's murderous warmongering in Gaza and Palestine VIDEO
THE EVIL MINDSET OF ZIONISTS ALWAYS PORTRAYING THEMSELVES AS VICTIMS
Ruling Elite flit from Davos to Israel.
When you have to rely on a long past historical issue to justify your position and to try and silence those who
expose zionist Israel's hypocrisy no matter how many world leaders dance to their corrupt tune. They are all there only through corruption
and blackmail. See Mossad's top paedo procurer of the elite Jeffrey Epstein for ongoing proof and how jewish thugs
like Weinstein operate.
Ghislaine Maxwell's Family History And Mossad Part 6 VIDEO
Sanctimonious royals and their pathological obsession with haughty titles
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex will lose their HRH titles under the conditions of the 'Megxit' agreement just as Princess Diana did 24 years ago when she divorced Prince Charles.
The couple will now be known as Harry, Duke of Sussex and Meghan, Duchess of Sussex.
It mirrors the title given to his mother when she was stripped of her HRH, becoming Diana, Princess of Wales in 1996 - one year before she died.
She had originally been known as Lady Diana Spencer, often affectionately called Lady Di, when she began courting Prince Charles until the pair married in 1981 and she gained the royal title.
Gutter rags try to put a spin on the broken royals VIDEO
Prince Andrew's Epstein Scandal Ruins Royal Christmas VIDEO
Karma has a funny way of working and these EVIL bastards head the onslaught against heterosexual men in Britain
and across the globe where they embed their freemasons via their loyal lord lieutenant the Dukey Kunt into every area of the law especially
family courts and where men have suffered decades of brutal persecution usually worse at Christmas when men are blocked
from seeing their kids and many end up taking their lives, broken and penniless.
The brutal royal regime is now being exposed like never before
but Andy's behaviour is the tip of an enormous iceberg rotting below the surface and waiting to be exposed by the
gutter rags who have promoted them for way to long now being forced to publish what has been circulating across the internet
and on our own website for decades. PURE EVIL is the motto of the royal bastards who have been milking men dry in their
crown court hellholes. THEY WILL GET THEIR FUCKING DAY that we have no doubt.
Virginia Roberts Giuffre opens up about Prince Andrew in new interview with BBC VIDEO
Epstein debacle exposes how the royals line their pockets via charities
For the best part of a decade, he had devoted his life to jetting around the globe,
at tax-payers’ expense, glad-handing dignitaries from the wealthy realms of business, politics
, paedophiles and child traffickers like jewish thug Jeffrey Epstein.
THERE IS ONLY ONE CHARITY THEY SUPPORT AND THAT'S THEIR OWN DEEP CORRUPT POCKETS.
What DID the Prince pocket at the Palace? His reputation is in tatters - yet Andrew's Dragons'
Den-style charity Pitch@Palace staggers on. We reveal how it's set up to allow the Duke to profit from it...
in defiance of Buckingham Palace protocol.
When he was sacked as Britain’s roving trade ambassador in 2011, Prince Andrew faced a sticky conundrum.
Following the publication of pictures of him strolling through New York with convicted child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, Prince Andrew’s position had become untenable and the loss of his official role threatened to dent more than his ego.
He was supposed to be representing the interests of UK plc. But, behind the scenes, the contacts Prince Andrew had made on such trips were often personally profitable — particularly from certain corners of the planet.
Two months before stepping down, for example, he’d emailed Kenges Rakishev, a business acquaintance from Kazakhstan, on behalf of a Greek water company called EYDAP and the Swiss finance house Aras Capital. The companies, which Andrew described as ‘we’ in messages later leaked to the Mail, were bidding for a £385 million contract to build sewerage networks in two of the corrupt country’s largest cities — one of which had Rakishev’s father-in-law as mayor.
If the deal went ahead following his introduction, Andrew stood to pocket a commission of £3.85 million.
Such lucrative opportunities were, perhaps, a natural perk of the job for a Royal who had controversially spent extended periods of his trade ambassadorship in parts of Central Asia, North Africa and the Middle East where democracy and human rights are alien concepts and where there’s a culture of paying ‘fixers’ to grease the wheels of commerce.
By depriving Andrew of his official role, it would, on paper, derail this gravy train. Without publicly funded trade trips, it was harder and more expensive to add to his official income (estimated at £250,000 a year) by leveraging links to the Rakishevs and Gaddafis of this world.
But a solution soon appeared. After letting the dust settle from the Epstein mess, Andrew and his advisers devised a new venture that would, in theory, allow the Prince to restart hobnobbing with cash-rich plutocrats
It was called Pitch@Palace and revolved around a simple premise: using both his contacts book and royal pizzazz, Andrew would arrange Dragons’ Den-style events at which entrepreneurs would attempt to woo successful business people.
Entrants for each event (12 would typically take part) would attend reality TV-style ‘boot camps’ to be mentored by a panel of advisers. Then they would ‘pitch’ their ideas in a three-minute speech to an audience of experts at a networking bash.
Winners chosen by attendees might typically walk away with a £40,000 package, including office space, investment and tech support. Hopefully, success would follow.
It was launched at St James’s Palace in 2014, at an event at which Andrew shared the first ever royal ‘selfie’ from the stage. It quickly morphed into a well-known brand, trademarked by the Prince and boasting a host of blue-chip sponsors.
Soon its 15 full-time employees were organising regular events in at least 17 countries, some of which had questionable records regarding corruption and human rights, including Bahrain, Mexico, Malaysia, China, Qatar and communist Vietnam.
As A result of Pitch@ Palace’s international success, the Prince was once more able to begin living up to his ‘Air Miles Andy’ nickname, taking at least 30 foreign trips thanks to the organisation. Pitch footed most bills, though taxpayers still coughed up £250,000 for the security that accompanied him.
Doubtless, Andrew made many helpful and deep-pocketed contacts in the process.
On the PR front, the venture was enthusiastically promoted by Andrew’s aides. This year, Pitch@Palace announced that it had helped 1,042 entrepreneurs from 64 countries, having created 6,323 jobs and generated more than £1.3 billion in ‘economic activity’.
Those figures are somewhat misleading: they appear to have been arrived at by combining the entire turnover and workforce of every firm ever to have taken part in any Pitch@Palace event (many of which would have prospered without Pitch’s help).
Yet to Prince Andrew, who once described himself as a ‘serial entrepreneur’ whose staff ‘get really fed up with all the good ideas that I come up with’, they were nonetheless a source of immense pride.
Until very recently, he regarded running the venture, from an ever-expanding suite of rooms at Buckingham Palace, as not just his main occupation but his vocation.
‘Pitch@Palace started life as a small furry animal that sat neatly on my hand,’ was how he put it. ‘It was a nice cuddly little toy. Today, it is a man-eating lion that sits in the corner of my office.’
That was then. Now, that lion has been thoroughly de-clawed.
Not only has the Pitch organisation been unceremoniously dropped by many corporate sponsors that keep it solvent — from Barclays and Standard Chartered to KPMG and the tech giant Inmarsat — it’s being booted out of Buckingham Palace, meaning it may be forced to drop the word ‘Palace’ from its name.
There’s even talk that Andrew may have to resign his role leading the organisation. According to at least one source with knowledge of its affairs, his involvement is no longer ‘tenable’ because credible business figures are likely to be scared off.
These issues are compounded by the close attention the public are paying to the day-to-day running of Pitch@Palace along with Andrew’s wider array of ventures.
It turns out that, as with so many areas of the Prince’s life and commercial activities, the brighter the spotlight, the murkier it looks.
For example, with regard to the sponsors officially described as ‘partners’ by Pitch@Palace, it has emerged that insurance giant AON had never been involved with Pitch. It demanded its name be removed from the organisation’s website. Soon, names of every alleged ‘partner’, mostly little-known Asian tech firms, disappeared too.
Days later, questions were asked about another ‘partner’ whose cash Pitch had taken. This was the Chinese company iFLYTEK whose chairman Liu Qingfeng is on Pitch’s China committee.
The firm makes sinister-sounding ‘voice recognition’ equipment, said to have been used to persecute China’s minority Muslim community, and has been barred from buying U.S.-made technology products. Human rights campaigners called its involvement with Andrew’s organisation ‘outrageous’.
Then there was Pitch@Palace’s alleged commercial exploitation of start-up companies it supposedly exists to help.
Though it has consistently been portrayed by the Palace as a purely philanthropic venture, the small print on the application form for participating entrepreneurs obliges them to give a 2 per cent equity stake in their businesses to Pitch@Palace should they successfully raise cash from investors in the three years after taking part.
The clause was described as ‘scandalous’ by Rich Wilson, a hedge fund boss. ‘There is no reason to pay to pitch to investors, it’s simply predatory on the part of the organisers. Anyone operating in this way should be named and shamed,’ he said.
Buckingham Palace says: ‘The clause was never exercised and has since been deleted.’ Yet it didn’t explain why such a clause had been written in the first place.
If Pitch@Palace was a purely charitable venture, profiting from its activities in this manner might be vaguely defensible, since money raised could be ploughed back into helping other small businesses to take off. However, its corporate structure is far more complex — and controversial.
According to Companies House, there are two separate entities controlled by Prince Andrew which run Pitch events.
One, Pitch@Palace CIC, was incorporated in 2015 and has two directors: Andrew’s aide Amanda Thirsk and Hanadi Jabado, a director of Cambridge University’s Judge Business School. A third director, German business consultant David Stern, resigned this month.
As a CIC, or ‘community interest company’, this firm was set up to operate as the commercial arm of The Prince Andrew Charitable Trust, which runs the Prince’s non-profit ventures.
According to its Charities Commission filings, the trust expects the CIC to ‘generate substantial profits in future years’. For now, the Trust generates £1,377,621 in ‘trading income’ annually, but spends £1,306,188 on ‘income generation’.
Only £40,000, or around 3 per cent of its income, goes to ‘charitable activities’. Meanwhile, two of its staff earn between £90,000 and £100,000.
As for the second corporate entity behind Pitch, this company, Pitch@Palace Global Ltd, was founded as a fully-fledged commercial business, whose eight directors include colourful billionaire Johan Eliasch, who has hosted Andrew on his yacht. (A ninth director, marketing impresario Mark Eaves, resigned this month.) The company’s ‘ultimate controlling party’ is the Prince.
Though its annual turnover is unclear, the firm has £300,000 in the bank and is entitled to pay dividends to shareholders.
In theory, this means that Pitch@Palace Global was specifically designed so profits could end up in the Prince’s pocket.
This fact, at odds with the way Pitch has previously been portrayed, is interesting considering its registered office is Buckingham Palace, which, according to royal protocol, must never be used to run such commercial ventures.
‘There has always been a whiff about Pitch@Palace,’ is how one royal source puts it. ‘Andrew was visiting dodgy parts of the world but there have long been rumours he was also trying to make money from its activities.’
Should the organisation collapse, some experts believe that Andrew might find a significant hole in his day-to-day finances.
Compared with the trouble emanating from his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, soon to be the subject of a BBC TV Panorama documentary, that may sound like a side issue. But for a Royal who loves the company of very wealthy men, financial strife would perhaps represent a final indignity.
Former palace insider reveals how the Royals are dealing with Prince Andrew VIDEO
Prince Andrew could end up as a 'prince in exile' VIDEO
Royal school abuse investigation
Epstein's Lapdancer Reveals All About Prince Andrew VIDEO
In 2014 secrecy laws were passed to hide paedo ring connection to Royal Family
Editor’s note: With the elite pedophile ring now being exposed in the UK, all roads are leading to the British Royal Family. This law was passed to keep this connection hidden, but as we now know Prince Charles‘ best friend was Jimmy Savile who is the biggest pedophile and necrophiliac in all of human history.
The Royal Family is to be granted absolute protection from public scrutiny in a controversial legal reform designed to draw a veil of secrecy over the affairs of the Queen, Prince Charles and Prince William.
Letters, emails and documents relating to the monarch, her heir and the second in line to the throne will no longer be disclosed even if they are in the public interest.
Sweeping changes to the Freedom of Information Act will reverse advances which had briefly shone a light on the royal finances – including an attempt by the Queen to use a state poverty fund to heat Buckingham Palace – and which had threatened to force the disclosure of the Prince of Wales’s prolific correspondence with ministers.
Lobbying and correspondence from junior staff working for the Royal Household and Prince Charles will now be held back from disclosure. Buckingham Palace confirmed that it had consulted with the Coalition Government over the change in the law. The Government buried the plan for “added protection” for the Royal Family in the small print of plans called “opening up public bodies to public scrutiny”.
Maurice Frankel, head of the Campaign for Freedom of Information, said that since the change referred to communications written on behalf of the Queen and Prince Charles it might be possible for “park keepers working in the royal parks” to be spared public scrutiny of their letters written to local authorities.
The decision to push through the changes also raises questions about the sincerity of the Liberal Democrats’ commitment to government transparency. In opposition, senior Liberal Democrats frequently lined up to champion the Freedom of Information Act after it came into force in 2005.
Ian Davidson, a former member of Parliament’s Public Accounts Committee (PAC), told The Independent: “I’m astonished that the Government should find time to seek to cover up royal finances. When I was on the PAC what we wanted was more disclosure not less.
“Every time we examined royal finances we found extravagance and indulgence as well as abuse of expenses by junior royals.
“Everywhere we looked, there were savings to be made for the Government. This sends the wrong message about public disclosure and accountability.”
Paul Flynn, another member of the committee, described the special protection for the Royals as “indefensible”. He said: “I don’t think it serves the interests of the public or the Royal Family very well.”
Mr Frankel said he believed that Prince Charles was the driving force behind the new law.
“The heir to the throne has written letters to government departments in an attempt to influence policy,” he said.
“He clearly does not want these to get into the public domain.”
Later this month, lawyers for the Cabinet Office, backed by Prince Charles, will go to court to continue to resist Freedom of Information requests of ministers to publish letters written to them by the Prince of Wales.
A spokesman for Buckingham Palace said that the change to the law was necessary because the Freedom of Information Act had failed to protect the constitutional position of the monarch and the heir to the throne. He explained that the sovereign has the right and duty to be consulted, to encourage and warn the government, and by extension, the heir to the throne had the constitutional right and duty to prepare himself for the role of King.
“This constitutional position relies on confidentiality, so that all such correspondence remains confidential,” he said.
But he said that change would also mean that correspondence not covered by the absolute exemption would be made public 10 years earlier than under the current disclosure rules.
The Palace’s position was backed by Professor Vernon Bogdanor, research professor at King’s College London.
He told The Independent: “The essence of constitutional monarchy is that the Queen and other members of the Royal Family remain politically neutral. The Queen meets the Prime Minister once a week, when both are in London, to discuss government policy.
“The heir to the throne has the right, and perhaps the duty, to question ministers on policy so as to prepare himself for the throne. Such discussions are only possible if they remain confidential. Otherwise the neutrality of the Queen and of the Prince of Wales could be undermined.
“When the Queen meets the Prime Minister, no one else is present – not even the Queen’s Private Secretary. For this reason, it is right that the Royal Family should be exempt from FOI.”
The Government claimed that the thrust of the changes announced yesterday would make it “easier for people to use FOI to find and use information about the public bodies they rely on and their taxes pay for”.
The Ministry of Justice intends to increase the number of organisations to which FOI requests can be made, bringing in bodies such as the Association of Chief Police Officers, the Financial Services Ombudsman, and the higher education admissions body UCAS, and also all companies wholly owned by any number of public authorities.
In the public interest? The stories they didn’t want us to know
*In 2004 the Queen asked ministers for a poverty handout to help heat her palaces but was rebuffed because they feared it would be a public relations disaster. Royal aides were told that the £60m worth of energy-saving grants were aimed at families on low incomes and if the money was given to Buckingham Palace instead of housing associations or hospitals it could lead to “adverse publicity” for the Queen and the government.
*A “financial memorandum” formalising the relationship between the sovereign and ministers set out tough terms on how the Queen can spend the £38.2m handed over by Parliament each year to pay for her staff and occupied palaces.
*The Queen requested more public money to pay for the upkeep of her crumbling palaces while allowing minor royals and courtiers to live in rent-free accommodation.
*As early as 2004 Sir Alan Reid, the Keeper of the Privy Purse, had unsuccessfully put the case to the Department for Culture, Media and Sport for a substantial increase in the £15m-a-year grant to maintain royal buildings.
*The Palace planned to go ahead with refurbishing and renting the apartment of Diana, Princess of Wales at Kensington Palace after it had lain empty since her death in 1997.
*A letter exchange revealed a tussle over who has control of £2.5m gained from the sale of Kensington Palace land. Ministers said it belonged to the state, while Buckingham Palace said it belonged to the Queen.
Britain's dirty filthy royalist rags desert the sinking ship
Randy Andy's escapades are only the tip of an enormous deviant murderous iceberg.
We are some of their millions of victims of an evil tyranny and many of our activist friends have paid
a heavy price including losing their lives fighting their incalculable corruption.
Prince Andrew’s excuses ‘don’t wash with ordinary people’ VIDEO
Randy Andy and his masonic minder. Should these creepy Dukes be allowed near children???? VIDEO
The royals loyal lord lieutenant the freemason godfather Dukey Kent and the black arts that operate in secret to remove
any irritant to the royals. But after Epstein's suicide (erm murder) should they be allowed near children?
Even the usual royalist gutter rags think he's as guilty as hell
Prince Andrew's Cringeworthy BBC Epstein Interview Part 1 VIDEO
Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein FULL INTERVIEW - BBC Newsnight VIDEO
Randy Andy breaks silence on Epstein scandal in interview with Emily Maitlis on BBC Newsnight on Saturday VIDEO
No heterosexual man, where women allege underage rape, would get the ear of the feminazi run BBC.
Some critics said today that instead of talking to the BBC, Andrew should be helping the police with their inquiries into Epstein's crimes
How the royalist judeo masonic 'Rule of Law' operates
Associated with a known and convicted child trafficker he is accused of raping under age girls multiple times with accused paedo friend dying a mysterious death while awaiting trial in prison.
Punishment: No police force globally has taken any interest in charging the accused. Instead he remains free to travel the world flying in private jets, wining and dining at taxpayers expense.
Divorcing men framed by the royals handpicked judges for arguing with their wives over money now classed as a crime with the 'coercive behaviour' tag in fact any disagreement between a husband and wife can be categorized as criminal.
Punishment: Men will lose everything, their homes, their children and bank accounts and those vulnerable children are now open to be abused by the royals paedo friends after separation from the protection of their biological fathers.
When the UK's vile gutter rags speak with ONE royalist tongue
Crocodile tears or more like how are they going to get out of this utter mess this time?
Randy Andy sullied the day with his presence
Randy Andy with paedo pal Epstein
FREEMASONRY THE ART OF MURDERING FOR THE ROYALS
Remembrance day another excuse for royalist propaganda who don't give a fuck about the young lives lost in war.
Feigning sympathy for the war dead is just another arm of their propaganda machine suggesting they have empathy.
Claims Royals 'pressured' U.S. network to drop Epstein story VIDEO
As activists we know exactly how the royals and their hired masonic thugs pressure
anyone who dares question their vile regime. Ask any man facing divorce and her
hired judicial mafia pressure those men so much they commit suicide en masse.
There are UK political psychiatric gulags full of victims who dared challenge their massive abuse of power.
Epstein: ABC leak puts heat back on Prince Andrew VIDEO
The Foul Truth About The British Royal Family VIDEO
Yet glorified by the fawning tabloid mafia like millionaires Jonathan Harmsworth (Daily Mail), Rupert Murdoch (Times and Sun),
The Barclay Brothers (Telegraph about to be sold) and Richard Desmond(Express now sold). These few creepy bastards
control most of the British print media and responsible for the vast bulk of the royalist bullshit emblazoned
across every newspaper shop and line streets with their discarded gutter rags.
Gutter rags hid Epstein story while journo's were threatened by the royal parasites VIDEO
Crossing paths with the royals will trigger persecution from their hired freemason thugs and orders from their loyal lord Lieutenant
and the number one global terrorist godfather the Dukey Kent and their thug lawyer mafia lackeys.
Royal Parasite Visits Royal Masonic School in 1955 VIDEO