‘A Mossad assisted campaign to prevent the election of a Labour Government’ claims Labour councillor
Harmsworth rag attacks Corbyn with zionist bullshit
Right wing zionist leaning rags aid Israeli mafia attacking the only party able to resist the extremes of a fascist austerity
ridden tory mafia.
Jewish newspapers that criticised Labour’s position on Antisemitism may be working on behalf of the Israeli secret service, one of the party’s councillors has suggested.
Mary Lockhart has been told such views have no place in the Scottish Labour party after posting a message on Facebook attacking those who have questioned UK leader Jeremy Corbyn’s attitude on the issue.
The UK’s three leading Jewish newspapers this week took the unprecedented step of publishing a joint front page message warning that a Corbyn-led government would pose an “existential threat to Jewish life in this country”.
Ms Lockhart, whose ward is Lochgelly, Cardenden and Benarty, posted about the move: “If the purpose is to generate opposition to anti-semitism, it has backfired spectacularly.
“If it is to get rid of Jeremy Corbyn as Labour Leader, it is unlikely to succeed, and is a shameless piece of cynical opportunism.
“And if it is a Mossad [the Israeli secret service] assisted campaign to prevent the election of a Labour Government pledged to recognise Palestine as a State, it is unacceptable interference in the democracy of Britain.”
She went on to say the Labour Party is neither racist, nor Antisemitic before adding: “Israel is a racist state.”
Paul Spicker, of the Tayside and Fife Jewish Community charity, said some people have used attacks on the actions of the state of Israel as cover for Antisemitic remarks.
He added: “The Labour Party has dropped illustrations of antisemitism which suggest, for example, that Jewish people have more loyalty to Israel than to their own country.
“Mary Lockhart’s comments begin in the same way, suggesting that Jews who dare to object are the agents of Mossad, the Israeli secret service. How dare she?”
Former Dunfermline and West Fife Labour MP Thomas Docherty told The Courier he would be making a formal complaint about his party colleague.
He said: “If you even suggest that British Jews are agents of the Israeli secret service that is an Antisemitic trope and you have no place in the Labour Party.”
Howard Barclay, who complained to the party about an allegedly anti-Semitic post by Dundee Labour councillor George McIrvine in April, added: “I am stunned at this.
“A councillor or any elected official who suggests that the controversy over anti-Semitism in the Labour Party is being organised by Mossad is at best delusional, at worst is anti-Semitic and should resign from office.
“And to suggest Israel is a ‘racist state’ is beyond the pale.
“If the Scottish Labour Party do not act, one can only conclude that Richard Leonard as leader condones this appalling abuse of Jewish people.”
Scottish Conservative MP for East Renfrewshire Paul Masterson said: “For a Scottish Labour councillor to claim that Britain’s leading Jewish newspapers, and by extension the British Jews who work for them, are acting as agents for the Israeli secret service to keep Jeremy Corbyn out of Number 10 is ignorant, offensive and horrifying.
“These comments are totally unacceptable and demonstrate precisely why the Jewish community has lost so much faith in Labour. There can no longer be any complacency within Scottish Labour that their party’s issues with Antisemitism stop at the border.
“There should be no doubt that Ms Lockhart’s remarks are Antisemitic and demonstrate that she is unfit to hold public office.”
Under the headline “United We Stand”, the Jewish Chronicle, Jewish Telegraph and Jewish News described Labour’s refusal to adopt in full the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s (IHRA) definition of anti-Semitism as “sinister”.
They said that “the stain and shame of anti-Semitism has coursed through Her Majesty’s Opposition since Jeremy Corbyn became leader in 2015”.
Labour insisted Mr Corbyn and the party are “fully committed to the support, defence and celebration of the Jewish community and its organisations”.
In 2016 Ms Lockhart apologised for any offence caused by a social media post which appeared to compare some Labour officials to Nazis.
She referred to a famous poem about persecution in the Third Reich when protesting against a decision to ban some Labour members from the UK leadership contest.
Former Dunfermline and West Fife Labour MP Thomas Docherty said: “If you suggest that British Jews are agents of the Israeli secret service that is an anti-Semitic trope and you have no place in the Labour Party.”
Ms Lockhart was unavailable for comment.
It is understood Scottish Labour has not yet received any formal complaint.
The party did not comment.
May's massive £12.6 billion conflict of interest with Lockheed Martin
While May and the tory filth are busy distracting Britain's sheeple with the endless rants about Brexit
this disgusting corruption and warmongering is going on behind the scenes as May will profit through corrupt
contracts with Lockheed Martin receiving £billions from the sale of their cruise missiles and F-35 fighter jets.
Meanwhile austerity is crippling British peasants thanks to draconian measures that are stealing money from them to fund
this massive warmongering corruption.
It is common knowledge that Theresa May’s husband Philip essentially acts as the unofficial advisor to the Prime Minister – a fact proven by the former Conservative MP for Chichester, Andrew Tyrie, who said during a Newsnight profile of the PM’s husband that “Philip is clearly acting as, informally, an advisor to Theresa. Probably much like Denis did to Margaret Thatcher.”
Whilst it is pretty obvious that almost all married couples act as informal advisors to each other in come capacity, Tyrie’s admission that the Prime Minister’s husband has such a great influence over his wife’s decisions is made all the more worrying by the fact that Mr May – who is a Senior Executive at a £1.4Tn investment firm – stands to benefit financially from the decisions his wife, the Prime Minister, makes.
The fact that Philip May is both a Senior Executive of a hugely powerful investment firm, and privy to reams of insider information from the Prime Minister – knowledge which, when it becomes public, hugely affects the share prices of the companies his firm invests in – makes Mr May’s official employment a staggering conflict of interest for the husband of a sitting Prime Minister.
However, aside from the ease at which he is able to glean insider information from his wife about potential decisions which could go on to make huge profits for his firm, there is a far darker conflict of interest that has so far gone undiscussed.
Philip May is a Senior Executive of Capital Group, an Investment Firm who buy shares in all sorts of companies across the globe – including thousands of shares in the world’s biggest Defence Firm, Lockheed Martin.
According to Investopedia, Philip May’s Capital Group owned around 7.09% of Lockheed Martin in March 2018 – a stake said to be worth more than £7Bn at this time. Whilst other sources say Capital Group’s shareholding of Lockheed Martin may actually be closer to 10%.
On the 14th April 2018, the Prime Minister Theresa May sanctioned British military action on Syria in response to an apparent chemical attack on the city of Douma – air strikes that saw the debut of a new type of Cruise Missile, the JASSM, produced exclusively by the Lockheed Martin Corporation.
The debut of this new – and incredibly expensive – weapon was exactly what US President Donald Trump was referring to when he tweeted that the weapons being fired on Syria would be “nice and new and ‘smart!'”
Every single JASSM used in the recent bombing of Syria costs more than $1,000,000, and as a result of their widespread use during the recent bombing of Syria by Western forces, the share price of Lockheed Martin soared.
Consequently, with the air strikes on Syria having hugely boosted Lockheed Martin’s share price when markets reopened on Monday, Philip May’s firm subsequently made a fortune from their investment in the Defence giant.
It is obvious that weapons manufacturers such as Lockheed Martin stand to benefit financially from the sales and subsequent use of their weapons in war – and the dramatic surge in the share prices of defence contractors since the so-called ‘War on Terror’ began in 2001 are a testament to this grotesque fact.
The added fact that Investment Firms such as Capital Group are also profiting from these bloodbaths is also disgusting in itself.
But for the husband of a sitting British Prime Minister to be benefitting financially from the very decisions his wife, the Prime Minister, makes on whether or not to send British troops into combat, should make every single person in the entire country, and especially anybody who is still insistent on voting for the Conservatives, feel physically sick.
The Prime Minister took the decision to bomb Syria – without even so much as consulting Parliament – under the full knowledge that her husband’s investment firm would make a financial killing from the resultant bloodbath.
If this isn’t enough to make you sit up and take notice of just how disgustingly corrupt, and morally bankrupt the British Establishment truly is, then surely nothing will.
Tory scum's new mass murder technique (blame it on a computer glitch)
There needs to be laws to stop vile governments from murdering citizens through welfare withdrawal and sanctioning
and flawed infrastructure that leaves patients dying due to failing health checks. This is the same evil bastards who come up with
dodgy laws that smear men as abusers while they themselves are responsible for deaths on the grandest of scales.
The End Of Our Empire Approaches — History is clear on where we’re headed
Do you have the nagging sense that our empire is in decline?
If so, don’t be embarrassed by it. Historically speaking, we’re in very good company. Far larger and longer-lived empires than
ours have come and gone over the millennia.
The British empire came of age at the perfect time to muscle in and “retrieve” the cultural treasures of many different countries.
Such are the spoils of empire.
Who knows, perhaps one day we’ll see sliced off segments of the Palace of Westminster on display in Cairo’s main square.
History ebbs and it flows. Back and forth. Victors and losers swapping places over and over again.
If the British Museum reveals anything it’s just that. The long sweep of human history shows us that the more things change,
the more things stay the same.
The treasures on display at the British Museum also show us that every race and culture has revered beauty. The most intricate
and delicate and objectively beautiful jewelry and adornments were worn by kings and queens, priestesses, nobles, and warlords alike.
The entire British Museum is packed to the rafters with such expressions. I came away both elated to have gotten back in touch
with these better expressions of humanity, but also saddened because I can’t locate their equivalent in today’s world.
One missing element from today? Reverence for the goddess, for the feminine. I cannot think of a single western homage
paid to the feminine. No temples to the goddesses and no elevation of feminine attributes.
This is important to note, not because we wish to bash the masculine, but because anything out of balance requires rebalancing.
In fact, re-elevating the feminine will actually bring honor and meaning back to the masculine.
Our world is caught up entirely in money, and power, and wars, and force. We revere power over rather than power within.
So the questions I’d like to leave you with are these.
Where do you have beauty in your life? Do you consciously manifest it?
What do you revere?
How honorable are you?
Do you instill a sense of loyalty in those around you? Who would rob your grave and how quickly after you passed?
Who do you honor, and how? Also, why?
How important is it for you to be surrounded by people you can trust, and whose opinions you trust?
Where and how do you respect, honor and encourage the feminine in yourself (whether you are male or female), in others, and especially in nature?
Finally, are you ready for the massive changes that are coming?
Our Empire Of Debt
The British museum is a testament to the fact that empires have been rising and falling for thousands of years. The common elements of every empire include its own appreciation for works of extreme beauty and human craftsmanship, along with strict hierarchy. They all expressed a strong connection to the divine, however they felt it, each with their own mythologies and attendant religions to make sense of it all…and help cement the rulers place(s) at the top, of course.
Each empire had a mythology by which it self-organized and people bought into that belief system. Looking back they seem like such obvious mental traps it’s easy to scoff and wonder how people could have been so blinkered.
Here’s the thing about hierarchical societies in every era…in every single one there were always a very few haves and a whole lot of have nots. How were the masses kept in line? Why did the vast bulk of humanity in every empire live in relative poverty and misery, never lifting a finger in revolt except under very rare circumstances?
The connection to yourself is this; each society has a set of reasons in place that explain to the people on the lower levels why they belong there. In some prior cultures the explanation was that authority was invested the royal blood line. You either had it or you didn’t.
In other societies, the rulers were said to be closer to the gods, if not descended directly from them. To go against the rulers meant you were assaulting or dishonoring the very gods you prayed to and on which you utterly depended.
While the mythologies in place “explaining” the hierarchy differed, the results did not. They always resulted in a few at the top and an expanding pyramid of population and entitlement laid out below them.
The middle management in this story, those that had relative advantage were the necessary keepers of the systems in each culture and each system. They had more to lose than to gain through revolt and so they stayed true to the system through their entire lives.
The people on the very bottom, despite having a vast numerical advantage, had the limiting belief that they had no power. So revolts almost never happened. Systems of hierarchy persisted until the empire had run its course, almost always failing because it ran out of resources to maintain itself and its growing complexity.
The lessons of history are absolute; nothing lasts. Everything changes, especially who’s in charge.
So what are our explanations today that keep us all in line? What keeps us from revolt? To what do we bow our daily collective heads in fealty to?
The answer is Money.
What we call “money” today was a wicked genius invention that popped up right around the same moment in history when humans were working out other keen, life-altering inventions such as clocks, and printing presses.
“None are so hopelessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free.”
A person in debt is a person controlled. But they think it was their own decision. Hence the Goethe quote above. A nation in debt is a nation controlled. The debt trap is especially insidious, and it relies on the illusion of free will combined with the full weight of ‘the law.’
By attaching a stated rate of interest to a loan, a person’s future output was yours if you were the holder of that note. What a stroke of pure (evil) genius! Set the rate high enough and the term long enough and you can get all of your money paid back plus another 100% of that amount or more, every bit of which was actually the future productive output (i.e. time) of the borrower.
Conjure up a promissory note out of thin air and then you get to skim the true productive output of that person, regardless of outcome. Whether they succeeded or failed in the endeavor, you still won. If they paid you back, the win was obvious. If they failed you often had collateral on the back end protecting your “investment.” No matter what, you won.
And even if that wasn’t the case? Well, you lost the amount of effort on your end that it took to draft up the note. In other words, nothing really.
I’ve yet to find this laid out in any museum even though the introduction of debt-based money was arguably the most course-altering invention of the past thousand years. It transformed millions of human slaves kept in check by threat of power and physical coercion (if not death) into billions of humans perfectly willing to hand over their labor to a very few elites at the top who did little to no work themselves.
Before this transformative invention money was always a very concrete thing – you either had a stash of silver or gold or you didn’t. Afterwards money became abstract. You could loan someone something you never had, written on a slip of paper, and the belief invested in that idea was sufficient to enslave that person until that debt was repaid. “Your” money might never be seen or handled by you at all, which is true for most people today. It exists as digits on a statement or computer screen. Yours, but utterly intangible. A powerful force, never actually seen or handled. In other words, a shared idea. A mythology imbued with tremendous power by a culture that served to enforce the current system of hierarchy.
There is a vast empire now spanning the globe but the mystery of it all is that it’s not based on or in any one country. It is an empire of debt. Those issuing the debt are harvesting the output of entire nations, no different in final effect than the Romans enforcing the practice of tithing from extant countries in AD 100.
We now live in a world of, by and for bankers, and other financial elites. Where once it was your royal lineage, or direct connection to the sun god Ra that assured your place at the top, today it’s your proximity to the temples of money.
But what happens when the economic pie is no longer expanding, yet the keepers of the system seem unable to turn off their own desires to grab more, more and yet more from that same pie?
That is where we find ourselves today. The economic oxygen is being sucked from the middle and lower classes and the social and political pressures are building.
Meanwhile more and more claims (currency and debts) are being piled on top of this stagnant economic pie thereby increasing the pressure on a creaking system. Someday that all gives way rather spectacularly and ends very badly. History says it ends with a lot of social anarchy and quite possibly another world war.
Westminster and Holyrood's lying thieving bastards
House of Commons
House of Lords
Holyrood mafia rubbing shoulders with the rotary club
Rotary an executive arm of freemasonry
All of the above serve ONLY this mob via freemasonry and the Dukey Kent
The lying thieving bastards that masquerade as some sort of political entity are the biggest threat to heterosexual men on the planet. NOT Russia NOT chemical weapons NOT terror threats or the myriad of pseudo threats they conjure up and inflicted on a long suffering population to hide the fact these evil bastards are destroying families and especially the fathers shunned with a toxic potion of lies to thieve the family silver and to line the pockets of the crooks that thieve with impunity.
The diversionary tactics have been the motto of Britain for centuries. The justification for psychologically torturing and murdering to seize assets from British citizens just as they did during the empire building where nasty wee freemasons were sent across the world to rape and plunder for the British establishment.
Today their gutter rags are falling over themselves pushing the royalist agenda again as one more sprog is born to the nasty fuckers who head this mob of gangsters via freemasonry. Men should not show one iota of empathy for an evil regime that also masquerades as the goody two shoes when they are behind a massive con trick against citizens like the Windrush victims and the sick and disabled forced to live under a brutal regime called the DWP and its many corporate assassins like ATOS and MAXIMUS.
These monsters who claim political power are the biggest murderous lying fuckers on the face of the earth and absolutely NOTHING they claim is the truth but only fairy stories to distract the population from what they are doing closer to home and in every home touched by the divorce industrial complex in a monstrous web of deceit.
Huge Freemason Network Found To Control British Parliament
A brave journalist has exposed how three Freemason lodges operate within Britain’s Parliament – allowing the unelected secret society to dictate government policy.
Those living in Britain today know this is not a happy land. The question of Brexit is still unresolved and Britons know the British State, the politicians, the bankers, the bosses, compose a jamboree for fat cats and stuffed pockets.
But occasionally we get to peek deeper under the curtain. That’s what happened when the Guardian printed an article that blows wide open the big secret: that Freemasonry Lodges control both the House of Commons and the House of Lords at Westminster!
The article describes THREE lodges that infest the heart of British democracy:
The NEW WELCOME Lodge
This is for MP’s, Peers (members of the House of Lords) and Parliamentary Staff (the elected/selected members of the Houses and their civil service staff.)
This is for members of the Political Press Corp, the journalists and reporters who directly cover parliament.
ALFRED ROBBINS Lodge
For “other journalists” therefore, a network of influence over the city of London and the wider nation.
The guardian also says:
One current member of New Welcome told the Guardian that its members keep Gallery Lodge masons at arm’s length, on the grounds that while they are fellow members of the brotherhood, they are still journalists, and “they wouldn’t want journalists listening to their conversations”.
This article exposes something that has been kept quiet for a long time: exactly how the lodge system stitches up Westminster.
Lords and MP’s are all in it together, shaking hands with rolled up trouser legs no matter their affiliation!
Small wonder Britain struggled for a cigarette paper between the parties from John Major, through New Labour, Blair and Brown, onto Cameron/Clegg and now May.
The legacy of the EU on the UK Parliament is a well cushioned bed of cosiness with corporatism and it’s the people who have been getting a rough deal! The Lodge system looks after its own while wealth inequality in Britain has gone stratospheric the last two decades.
The Guardian also says: “so discreet are the members of Gallery Lodge that few journalists working in the lobby appear to be aware of its existence.”
I bloody bet! Letting it be known that the top political journo’s were in the same lodge, bound together by secret allegiance, to stitch up the reporting of the news. No wonder they keep it quiet!
Next time we look at that man on the lawn with a microphone we need to ask: whose speaking here? The news channel? Or the Gallery/Alfred Robbins Lodge?
The Guardian pushed their investigation to question the United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE).
From this, they reported “UGLE said Gallery Lodge currently has 45 members and Alfred Robbins Lodge – which is named after a former newspaperman and prominent mason – has 18 members.”
Of course, the statements from Masonry want to downplay this revelation. “Oh, nothing to see hear, nothing to worry your little heads about” is just the kind of condescension the British people have endured from the British establishment for centuries.
But it cannot hide the FACT that this secret network with clear power and influence makes its lair in the bowels of the Palace of Westminster.
If Britain is EVER to drain the sewer then it MUST find a way to flush these organisations OUT of politics and the civil service. If a politician or a civil servant is a member of a lodge, they must be made to declare it.
Let Freemasonry be the harmless rotary club doing charity work it prefers to pretend to be, but let us ensure it can NEVER be the SPIDER at the heart of a web of power, subverting democracy and the will of the people, syphoning the country’s wealth away to crony globalist friends!
Oh yes! Reform in Britain is needed alright! And there is nothing else like knowledge to empower.
The story so far: How to keep an evil murderous government in power
FROM MARCH 2017 BUT NOTHING EVER HAPPENS
First create a false flag to blame Russia on something and get the USA and Nato mafia to back that lie.
Associate the OTHER party, that isn't part of the mass murder of the peasants thanks to austerity and sanctioning
of the poorest sections of society, with sympathy for a possible alternative reason for the false flag. Attack the other party for daring to suggest the evil government narrative might not be entirely correct.
If that isn't having a big enough impact use the Israeli mafia to seed dissent and instead of showing sympathy for the Palestine mass murder by zionist warmongers force the other party to bow to the demands of the Israeli lobby admitting that not showing sufficient sympathy for Israel is anti-semitic and Hitler-like for daring to do so.
The OTHER party has already been dismantled by a former warmonger and his place men have been embedded and used to turn a supposed working class party into a second party of the toffs that is no longer funded by the workers but by a small clique of rich zionist backers who ensure they have to support Israel to the hilt.
These are the seeds being sown for the scum and filth to call for another sudden election while their gutter press have done sufficient damage to the other party to ensure the sheeple wont dare to vote for them as they would then be connected with all of the above.
This has been going on for decades in Britain and wont change until a truly representative party of the ordinary voters is found and will stand up to the malicious attacks that see time and again a vicious fascist regime hell bent on doing ANYTHING to stay in power. Only the truly dimwitted could continue to believe the yarns being spun to keep the party in power that only ever bows to their ultra rich backers and the zionist agenda.
Bullying, harassment and intimidation in the House of Commons VIDEO
Two Freemasons' lodges operate secretly inside the Houses of Parliament
How can anyone trust the UK's VILE rags when their journo's are part of the satanic mafia oath swearers club?
Exclusive: Lodges for MPs and journalists are so covert even lobby reporters do not know members
Two Freemasons’ lodges set up for members of parliament and political journalists are continuing to operate secretly at Westminster, the Guardian has learned.
New Welcome Lodge, which recruits MPs, peers and parliamentary staff, and Gallery Lodge, established for members of the political press corps known as the lobby, both remain active, according to Freemasonry records.
A third lodge called the Alfred Robbins Lodge, which was also set up for journalists, also continues to meet regularly in London.
The identities of the members of these three lodges remain unknown outside the world of Freemasonry, however, and so discreet are the members of Gallery Lodge that few journalists working in the lobby appear to be aware of its existence.
One current member of New Welcome told the Guardian that its members keep Gallery Lodge masons at arm’s length, on the grounds that while they are fellow members of the brotherhood, they are still journalists, and “they wouldn’t want journalists listening to their conversations”.
David Staples, the chief executive of the United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE), the governing body for Freemasons in England and Wales, said there was no contradiction between the practice of journalism and membership of Freemasonry.
“Contrary to populist perception, being a Freemason helps those members in roles serving society in the broader sense, including journalists, politicians, policemen and lawyers, to be better in those jobs by encouraging them to act as better people themselves. Their membership is a positive for both them as individuals, and for society at large,” he said.
More Freemasons would declare their membership, he added, if they did not fear prejudice and discrimination: “There should be no conflict between an individual choosing whether to declare their membership or not with that individual’s ability to do their job well. But there is, because some choose to believe otherwise, and some of our detractors are doing so based on nothing other than blind prejudice.”
After three years as the chair of the Police Federation, Steve White said: “I found that there were people who were fundamentally against any kind of change and any kind of progress, and they always happened to be Freemasons.”
The charge brought an angry denial from the UGLE. In a letter to the press, Staples said: “We are quietly proud that throughout history, when people have suffered discrimination both in public and social life, Freemasonry has welcomed them into our lodges as equals.” He added that many Freemasons chose to keep their membership secret in order to avoid being discriminated against.
At Westminster, MPs and peers are not obliged to declare their membership of the Freemasons, although the Commons authorities say they can disclose this information voluntarily on the registers of members’ and Lords’ financial interests. None currently do so.
Nor do any political journalists declare their membership of the Freemasons on the register of journalists’ interests, which is maintained by parliament.
The three lodges each meet four times a year at Freemasons’ Hall, the UGLE’s headquarters in Covent Garden, London.
The UGLE said Gallery Lodge currently has 45 members and Alfred Robbins Lodge – which is named after a former newspaperman and prominent mason – has 18 members.
“None of the members who have joined either of these two lodges since 2000 have their occupation recorded as journalist or anything obviously linked to the newspaper industry,” the spokesman said.
It is unclear how many of their members joined before that year, however, and UGLE will not identify the lodges’ members.
The Guardian understands past members of Gallery Lodge have included former journalists at the Times, the Daily Express, the Scotsman, and several Hansard reporters.
While the New Welcome lodge has about 30 to 40 members, the Guardian understands only about four of the current members are MPs, and that none are peers. Most of the members of the lodge are former MPs, parliamentary staff or police officers who have served at Westminster. MPs who are Freemasons are members of other lodges, however.
Although New Welcome lodge was set up following the 1926 general strike, to admit Labour politicians who had previously been refused entry to Freemasonry, the Guardian understands that none of its current members are Labour MPs.
Many are said to have left the Freemasons in the 1980s, fearing they would lose their seats if they were questioned about membership while reapplying for the Labour party’s nomination in between general elections, which had become a requirement at the start of that decade.
At least one Labour MP is said to have left New Welcome Lodge when facing reselection at this time, and arranged for his membership to be held in abeyance so that he could be quietly readmitted once he knew his parliamentary seat was secure.
When scumbags with ulterior motives are exposed they shout HATE to deflect away from their agenda.
With so many global controllers trying to stifle debate about what they are implicated in there is ONE particular nasty ploy they are using to point the finger by claiming 'HATE' to stifle criticism.
Well we do not mind making some HATE suggestions.
1. HATING any politician who thinks using their military industrial complex to bomb the fuck out of innocents is the correct use of power.
2. HATING a mass media that is pushing feminist and homosexual agenda's while undermining heterosexual men with 'HATE' campaigns that strip men of the right to protect their families from their sinister and SICK satanic agenda.
3. HATING lawyers and judges who, across the world, have been giving themselves power over men's estates by a divorce industry that has destroyed those men's ability to keep a roof over their heads and their families causing massive dysfunctionality for heterosexual men in many cases loss of their lives and mass homelessness for those targeted heterosexual men.
4. HATING freemason controlled cops who are out of control and using unregulated powers to beat the shit out of their victims to the point of death and using deadly force NOT as a last resort but a first resort. Terror false flags being used to arm them to the hilt while they claim taking guns off the streets.
5. HATING zionists who control the West's political scum through bribes and freemasonry that allows Israel to bomb the fuck out of the Middle East and especially Gaza and with huge stock piles of nuclear weapons with America's political mafia only to happy to oblige, meanwhile ranting that other nations in the Middle East are trying to get hold of nukes .
6. HATING paedo's in particular the homopaedo's who hide behind discrimination as an excuse to abuse millions of young boys across the globe with impunity and being covered up by a freemason hierarchy.
HATE is a strong word but throughout history men have been forced to rise up when they experience HATE brought on by the dire circumstances so many of their fellow citizens have been left in thanks to the scum who have taken control of their lives through stealth and manipulation. It is the LOVE for their fellow man that breeds HATRED towards those who provide the chains that enslave humanity.
How many employees get subsidized alcohol during their working hours?
The very bastards charged with manufacturing British laws can drink while they work
, subsidized by the long suffering public who have to work under the regime they create
but DOES NOT affect them and who are getting away with murder. One law for the peasants
and one for those who have legislated themselves ABOVE THE LAW.
British judges get an even better deal with free drinking dens while they pontificate over
what to do with the peasants forced to appear before them.
Jews in Downing Street to protest over visit of Netanyahu
Melanie Shaw a victim of the British crown's torturous powers VIDEO
To MP Chris Leslie
New Hall Governor: Susan Howard
HM Inspectorate of Prisons
We have received shocking information regarding the present conditions Melanie Shaw is being held under in the UK prison system in breach of her human rights . See the following video we have been made aware of that exposes those conditions.
Under a Freedom of Information request please provide ASAP or before 20 working days
1. What information you have personally received regarding those conditions and failings?
2. What steps you have taken as her MP to ensure all her rights are being met under ECHR regulations?
Any attempt to suggest this cannot be provided due to privacy concerns will further exacerbate those torturous conditions she is being held under and will implicate you as her MP in the cover up. Further to this we now put you on notice of these serious issues and now hold you responsible for any future torture that is being meted out to Ms. Shaw while she is being held on trumped up charges within HM prison system.
We seek an urgent response to what could be life threatening conditions within Britain's arcane prison system and any future threats to her life you as her MP are now responsible for. Please also provide a response that you have received and are dealing with that request as soon as possible.
Encryption Ban Retro Rudd Style VIDEO
A nation state VIDEO
UK once again rubber stamping America's march to war
UK government uses national security as excuse to avoid publishing 30 year docs VIDEO
Political pollsters are pushing a pile of bullshit VIDEO
Why do the public eventually HATE every single political leader since Thatcher?
When will the gullible British public every learn? The political scumbags are NOT there to take care of the general population, no matter what they tell you, they only serve the interests of the ruling mafia and why they sign up to the QUEEN first before the country.
When a vast army of freemasons, who swear loyalty ONLY to the British crown, block any hope of the UK getting somebody with the right credentials of decency and compassion it is a very long way from evolving into somewhere worth living . Once you have spent time away from Britain you start to see why the dark forces that protect the royal mafia and their vast army of secret society goons you realise how massive the infestation of twisted and ruthless bastards, with no soul, that are getting hand picked into key positions of power . All of it under the guise that we have elections when we are only allowed to vote for those already on the freemason royalist leaning bandwagon.
Only one British politician refused to stand for the Queen and he was taken out by the Murdoch press and with
the assistance of Scotland's evil judicial mafia who backed his evil rag to the hilt when stitching him up. Until
Britain's sheeple waken up to the reality that they are living in a nightmare scenario that is cruelly punishing
millions of it own citizens for their evil ends Britain will continue to sink into the quagmire of filth
that so many are deluded into believing is the correct way to behave towards their fellow citizens struggling on
the edge of life thanks to a demonic force that has taken over all positions of authority. The LUNATICS really are running the asylum.
Theresa May should resign and stop 'shifting blame' over terror attacks says former Downing Street aide
Steve Hilton - who was David Cameron 's strategy director - launched an extraordinary outburst against the "clearly incompetent" PM over security failings
Theresa May is "shifting blame" for the London and Manchester terror attacks and should resign, a former top Downing Street advisor declared today.
Steve Hilton - who was David Cameron 's strategy director - launched an extraordinary outburst against the Tory Prime Minister over security failings.
Despite his old boss presiding over years of police cuts, Mr Hilton wrote on Twitter: "Theresa May responsible for security failures of London Bridge, Manchester, Westminster Bridge.
"Should be resigning not seeking re-election.
"Theresa May blame-shifting again. Her spin doctors attack MI5, but she was in charge of them for years."
He added: "What's the point of electing someone who is clearly incompetent, however Tory-ish her language may be?"
'Blue-sky thinker' Mr Hilton was David Cameron's strategy director until he left in 2012 and has since become a critic of Tory government policy.
His comments came as the head of Scotland Yard said "of course" it was right to look at police resources in light of the recent attacks.
Labour says the cut in officer numbers, by around 20,000 since the Tories took power, made it harder for community police to nip potential extremism in the bud.
Met Police Commissioner Cressida Dick said: “We’ve now seen these ghastly attacks in London and in Manchester over the last several weeks. During that time we’ve also foiled another five plots.
“So yes of course, I think it’s appropriate for us all to look at the amount of resource that police have, both the counter-terror police but also our neighbourhood officers. The majority of people who responded on Saturday night and are now keeping London safe aren’t counter-terrorist police. They are general police or people with particular specialist skills.
“So of course we must look at that and look right across the strategy and the resourcing in the police and beyond.”
A top Tory was barracked on live TV over the issue as she was told police cuts may have put "civilians' blood" on Theresa May's hands.
Good Morning Britain host Piers Morgan monstered Karen Bradley for claiming it was "simplistic" to want more cops on the streets.
The Culture Secretary repeatedly refused to say more officers would make the public safer, and refused to give a straight answer to whether the number of armed officers had gone up or down.
Told many people would think more police would make the public safer, she responded: "I think that's a very simplistic argument.
"The Met Police Commissioner has been clear, they have the resources they need to deal with counter-terrorism.
"I think it's about how we deploy police officers, I think it's about how we manage the resources we have, I think it's about smart policing, looking at the changing nature of crime, and about the powers.
"If police don’t have the powers, it doesn’t really matter how many of them there are.
"And Jeremy Corbyn has voted against all those powers."
May: The fucking tory bitch who cut cop numbers ending in mass murder on UK streets VIDEO
Tory scum have always use bombings to distract from their EVIL agenda.
Long before the latest attacks in London the IRA were a great scapegoat for Thatcher and
the madmen who run the tory party.
Policies that are pure evil need constant distractions
so they can point the finger at rogue bombers who take the heat away from their own
mass murder and point the rage of the public onto other distractions.
AFTER DUNBLANE THE BRITISH ESTABLISHMENT LEFT UK CITIZENS
UNABLE TO DEFEND THEMSELVES YET MOST OF THE LANDED GENTRY STILL
HAVE GUNS STOCKPILED FOR THEIR OWN
DEFENCE AGAINST THE PEASANTS RISING UP.
Who’s funding Britain's terrorists? ‘Sensitive’ Home Office report may never be published
Saudi Arabian Crown Prince Muhammad bin Nayef welcomes British Prime Minister Theresa May, April 4, 2017.
An investigation commissioned by former Prime Minister David Cameron into the revenue streams behind jihadist groups operating in Britain may never be published, the Home Office has admitted.
The inquiry is thought to focus on British ally Saudi Arabia, which has repeatedly been highlighted by European leaders as a funding source for Islamist extremists, and may prove politically and legally sensitive, the Guardian reports.
The UK has close ties with Saudi Arabia. Prime Minister Theresa May visited the country earlier this year.
In January 2016, a specialist Home Office unit was directed by Downing Street to investigate sources of overseas funding of extremist groups in the UK. The findings were to be shown to Cameron’s then-Home Secretary May.
Eighteen months later, however, the Home Office told the Guardian the report had not been completed and would not necessarily be published, calling the contents “very sensitive.”
A decision on the future of the investigation would be taken “after the election by the next government,” a spokesperson said.
Cameron was urged to launch an investigation in December 2015 as part of a deal with the Liberal Democrats in exchange for the party supporting the extension of British airstrikes against Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS/ISIL) from Iraq into Syria.
According to the Guardian, Tom Brake, the Lib Dem foreign affairs spokesperson, has written to the prime minister asking her to confirm that the investigation will not be shelved.
“As home secretary at the time, your department was one of those reading the report. Eighteen months later, and following two horrific terrorist attacks by British-born citizens, that report still remains incomplete and unpublished,” Brake wrote.
“It is no secret that Saudi Arabia in particular provides funding to hundreds of mosques in the UK, espousing a very hard line Wahhabist interpretation of Islam. It is often in these institutions that British extremism takes root.”
Lib Dem leader Tim Farron said he felt the government had not held up its side of the bargain.
The report must be published when it is completed, he said, even if its contents are sensitive.
“That short-sighted approach needs to change. It is critical that these extreme, hardline views are confronted head on, and that those who fund them are called out publicly.
“If the Conservatives are serious about stopping terrorism on our shores, they must stop stalling and reopen investigation into foreign funding of violent extremism in the UK.”
May's masterclass in dodging journalists' questions VIDEO
British establishments dirty murderous tricks
For decades we have been exposing the endless murder of men facing divorce, the psychological torture of men to fund the ruling mafia.
For decades we have been exposing the endless murder of benefit claimants, hounded into an early grave by psychological torture.
For decades we have been exposing the brutal treatment of the elderly and mentally ill in care? homes and NHS hospitals.
And for decades we have been exposing the children brutally abused in state homes after they have been stolen from fathers many who
end up in an early grave.
The above are only a few examples of how the British establishment treat the peasants LIKE DIRT and does not include the raping and murder in wars across the Middle East that have seen millions bombed into oblivion by ruthless decisions of the British establishment that included every Prime Minister since Thatcher both Labour and Conservative.
Now we get to the Manchester suicide bomber who despite brave individuals bringing his EXTREMISM to the attention of the authorities and police who did NOTHING to stop his plans to murder and the fact his family had been PAID by the British establishment to help destroy Libya taking out Gaddafi there is clear evidence that the same mob did not care if he was planning to murder on the British mainland as it is suiting a very warped agenda of the masonic mafia at the centre of the secret services who are supposed to be responsible for stopping such attacks.
Taking all of the above into account and no matter what they are claiming in their puppet TV and radio the British public are now more than ever at serious risk of harm from the ruling establishment who are doing the same in Britain as they are overseas destroying the infrastructure of Britain even if casualties are part of the plan.
When are the British public going to waken up and realise those claiming to want their vote are the very bastards behind the sinister murderous plans that will see more bombings unless they are stopped and replaced by people that can be trusted with Britain's future safety?
Are the lunatics running the asylum or those who vote for them?
Theresa May has called for another British Election and we have to ask?
Any decent concerned citizen of Britain who has watched the last few general elections must feel disgusted that Eton groomed gangsters, despite a long trail of the dead, keep getting voted back into power.
When psychopath Thatcher was elected questions started to get asked as just who are voting for, what turned out in the end to be, a mad woman who finally got booted out after her deranged policies destroyed much of the infrastructure of Britain and whole communities to this day are still suffering.
The tory scum have whole swathes of England voting them in and says more about British values than the psychopaths that time and again get voted back into power.
Those voters seemingly are prepared to show
No concern for the millions suffering under dodgy austerity while the rich get richer.
No concern for the massive suicide stats triggered by the tory's vile policies.
No concern for the elderly who are forced to work until they drop due to massive tory pension age rises
No concern for the elderly dying in care homes that have a total lack of 'care'.
No concern for the sick and dying as hospitals can no longer cope with patients.
If the tory scum get voted back in it will show the depths some sections of the UK have stooped to that ignore the death and destruction instigated by the tory gangsters, who despite horrific policies that destroy whole chunks of Britain and its people, seem to have a mass of voters happy to see that destruction taking place leaving Britain no hope of leaving behind a fascist style of governance.
Tory illusion that they are meeting people on the streets
This has been going on for years when Tory's wont go on to the streets of Britain but instead
organise employees at workplaces who would face the SACK if they dared step out of line while
being spoken to by the tory scum and filth.
Homo obsessed media especially the BBC continue to attack LibDem leader over homosexuality VIDEO
Strong and stable leadership = A murderous ruthless tory fascist state VIDEO
Only a fellow psychopath could view these evil bastards as worthy of their vote
Tory scum's draconian attack on the poorest sections of society
Why a snap election? Ask the 30 tory scum facing criminal charges...
This is a flap election, not a snap election. It has been called to get the Government out of what might be serious legal trouble. I am amazed this has not attracted more attention.
It is this simple. The Crown Prosecution Service is now looking at the cases of 30, yes 30, Tory MPs and agents, who have been investigated for breaking spending rules at the last General Election.
The allegations have been probed by 14 police forces after claims that the Conservatives’ ‘battlebus’ campaign broke legal spending limits in several key marginal seats.
The Tories have already been in deep trouble over their new election techniques, where busloads of outsiders flood into winnable seats to round up crucial extra votes. This was a way of making up for the Tory party’s severe loss of active members, who used to do this donkey work. But it is sailing very close to the legal wind.
Last month they were hit by the Electoral Commission with a record £70,000 fine – the maximum – for failing to declare their spending. The forces involved are Avon & Somerset, Cumbria, Derbyshire, Devon & Cornwall, Gloucestershire, Greater Manchester, Lincolnshire, Northamptonshire, Nottinghamshire, Staffordshire, West Mercia, West Midlands, West Yorkshire and the Met.
These cases are likely to result in some charges (I have no idea how many) in the next few weeks, probably just before polling day. Trials, assuming these go ahead, will be much later in the year and might not reach verdicts until well into 2018.
If there had been no election, any convictions could have meant MPs found guilty being forced to stand down, and elections being rerun. A General Election makes this much less of a threat, especially if Mrs May manages to increase her meagre majority.
This menace has been worrying the Cabinet for some months, as it has become clear it will not go away. And it is a far better explanation of the Prime Minister’s change of heart than her rather weird and incoherent speech in Downing Street. I happen to think she is a naturally truthful person and meant what she said when she previously declared several times that she was going to stay on till 2020.
But the expenses allegations, which started as a cloud on the horizon no bigger than a man’s hand, have grown and grown. I suspect her advisers have been telling her she cannot risk them coming into the open late in a Parliament when, perhaps, the economy is not doing well, or EU negotiations are going badly or Labour has a new leader.
As a result of this semi-secret crisis, the Tory campaign this time will have to be a good deal more cautious about such things, which may weaken it, especially if the campaign goes wrong – and this is not impossible.
Even now the affair could be highly damaging – but early in a new Parliament, with a secure majority, the Government should be able to weather it far better than if Mrs May had soldiered on. But all elections are risks. It is amazing how often governments lose control of them.
Politics in this country are a good deal less solid and stable than they seem.
Osborne's new job confirms disturbing Tory dominance of the media
From Johnson to Gove, Tories are revelling in their links to papers, and proprietors no longer try to hide their rightwing views
George Osborne. Gone are the days when editors disingenuously claimed to cover news objectively.
After the crop of cynical jokes about George Osborne becoming editor of the London Evening Standard, let’s get serious. However odd the appointment appears, and few journalists will think it anything other than that, is it really fair to suggest that the paper’s owner, Evgeny Lebedev, has taken leave of his senses?
Osborne is not the first person chosen to be a sort of figurehead editor, a man without any experience of newspaper mechanics.
Such people – think the TV newsreader Alastair Burnet at the Daily Express in the 1970s or Peregrine Worsthorne at the Sunday Telegraph in the 1980s – set the editorial tone. While they concern themselves with strategy, they leave deputies to deal with the details of production, design and the gathering of news.
Osborne has not been given the chair at the Standard because he writes clever headlines or knows how a paper is put together. He is unlikely to have learned that during his couple of weeks freelancing on the Daily Telegraph’s Peterborough diary in 1993.
Osborne, a born Conservative, has been a political animal ever since. It must be presumed that Lebedev believes the overt Tory partisanship, which has been the Standard’s long-held default position, will do no harm to his paper.
It is hard to imagine that the 900,000 people who pick it up at stations across London every evening will suddenly turn their backs on it. The product is very unlikely to suffer a boycott.
Some of Lebedev’s liberal-minded celebrity friends may raise their eyebrows. Then again, among his coterie there are those who have, like Osborne, favoured harsher regulation of newspapers following the Leveson inquiry.
However, seen from a wider political perspective, the appointment confirms a trend towards a “big C” Conservative media dominance that has disturbing democratic implications.
High-profile Tory MPs are revelling in their links to newspapers and, for their part, newspaper owners do not seek to conceal the connections. Rightwing proprietors and politicians are out and proud.
So Boris Johnson is the blue-eyed boy at the Daily Telegraph. Michael Gove enjoys working for the Times, doing an interview with Donald Trump while accompanied by Rupert Murdoch.
Evgeny Lebedev: owner of the London Evening Standard: it is hard not to wonder if he displays a political naiveté. Photograph: Dominic Lipinski/PA
Add on the fact that the Daily Mail is acting as a propagandist for the prime minister, Theresa May. And for that matter, Richard Desmond’s Daily Express enthusiastically has been doing the same job for Nigel Farage.
Gone are the days of pretence when editors disingenuously claimed to cover the news objectively. They no longer need the fig leaf because they exist in a safe haven where the opposition offers no threat to Tory hegemony.
Lebedev, who also owns the online-only Independent, has not previously suggested an allegiance to the Conservative party and it is hard not to wonder if he displays a political naiveté in his Osborne appointment.
In making the announcement he referred to Osborne being “socially liberal and economically pragmatic”, which he thought “closely matches” readers’ viewpoints. During his six years as chancellor, most observers would not have perceived Osborne’s social liberalism and economic pragmatism.
In fairness, he was considered to be a friend of the arts, at least according to Patience Wheatcroft in a BBC Radio 4 interview.
But note the difference. When Wheatcroft was ennobled in 2010, and took the Conservative whip, she was editor of the Wall Street Journal’s Europe edition. Her bosses immediately decided she must step down to avoid any suggestion of political bias.
Seven years on, in a changed political and media landscape, there is a renewed confidence about rightwing newspaper owners. Having spent years denying that old canard about forming “the Tory press”, they are no longer attempting to hide the truth.
Tory AUSTERITY henchman Osborne under attack for multiple high flying jobs
Tory HQ accused of “covering their own arses” in election spending scandal
TORIES BUSTED Furious Conservative MPs say they are being thrown under the bus as Theresa May wrestles with her biggest scandal since becoming leader – spending scandal over fleet of election battle buses
The party was slapped with a record £70,000 fine after party chiefs broke spending rules during the 2015 General Election
RAGING Tory MPs told last night how they are being thrown under the bus as Downing Street scrambles to protect Prime Minister Theresa May from the biggest scandal of her leadership.
Inept party chiefs have been found guilty of breaking strict spending rules over the use of special busses during the 2015 Election.
Up to 20 Tory MPs could now face criminal charges over dodgy election spending.
And any police charges could trigger a string of by-elections which – in a doomsday scenario for the party – could slash Mrs May’s tiny majority as she battles to deliver Brexit.
On Wednesday the Conservative Party was slapped with a record £70,000 fine for cheating in General Election and three by-elections in 2014.
A breathtaking judgement from the Electoral Commission pushed this growing scandal to the very top of the governing party – and threw open the possibility of by-elections up and down the UK.
The watchdog concluded there was a “realistic prospect” that Conservative MPs had gained a “financial advantage” by overspending in key marginal seats across the country two years ago.
Strict spending caps are in place for all elections, with all candidates having to report how much they spent at each seat.
Parties then also have to declare their national spending — but last night the Tories were accused of exploiting loopholes in this system on an industrial scale.
Filing an incorrect election spending return is illegal and any MP found guilty of doing so would have to quit — risking Mrs May’s wafer thin parliamentary majority.
Ex-Tory Party Treasurer Simon Day was accused of “knowingly or recklessly” filing dishonest spending returns and faces the prospect of criminal charges — as the party was slammed for trying to “buy British politics”.
But MPs fear they are being hung out to dry because of blunders by “clever dick” party bosses.
Tory MP Karl McCartney — whose Lincoln seat is under investigation by the police — has emailed colleagues blaming Tory HQ for “covering their own arses.”
MAY 7, 2015: Tories sweep to victory in General Election.
Jan 2016: Channel 4’s Michael Crick discovers Tories spent £14,000 at a Ramsgate hotel during the campaign.
Feb 2016: Hundreds of receipts for Tory hotel rooms leaked. Watchdog launches probe into South Thanet — extended to three 2014 by-elections.
April 2016: Tories admit some spending not declared.
March 2017: Police send files to the Crown Prosecution Service on up to 20 MPs. Tories are fined £70,000 by the Electoral Commission.
He wrote: “We didn’t create this mess, the clever dicks at CCHQ did, and I don’t see their professional reputations being trashed in the media much.”
He went on: “The initial cock-ups, ‘strategy’ and ineptitude with regard to this issue that has so negatively impacted our: lives, standing in our communities, standing amongst colleagues, families… were all of CCHQ’s making.”
And a very senior Tory source told The Sun: “The anger felt in the party about how this is being handled was made very, very clear.
“No. 10 are hoping this will all just go away, while the MPs are left hanging.”
Last night Downing Street was on red alert for a by-election in South Thanet where the Commission concluded the Tories had overspent by a huge amount in their desperate bid to bar Nigel Farage from the Commons in 2015.
Farage says he would stand in any by-election triggered by the scandal.
The Sun revealed this week Mackinlay has been questioned under caution by police about his role in the 2015 campaign.
The debacle in South Thanet was by far the most blatant stretching of the rules exposed after a year long probe by the Electoral Commission.
Hotel bills for a crack team of party hands sent to the Kent coast for the last weeks of the tight battle were either missing or incorrectly classed as national spending.
Adding to the PM’s headache, the Commission found the party’s claims that two top aides to Theresa May had only “provided assistance for the Conservative Party’s national team” were misleading.
No10 Chief of Staff Nick Timothy and Political Secretary Stephen Parkinson said they were campaigning against UKIP nationally but the Commission claim they actually “played key roles” getting successful Tory candidate Craig Mackinlay elected.
But the cost of their hotel rooms were not declared locally — leading to “doubt as to the accuracy and completeness of MacKinlay’s election expenses return.”
The seeds of the Conservative’s current chaos can be traced back to David Cameron desire to stamp out Ukip after they topped the ballot in 2014 European Parliament elections and the defection of two Tory MP’s into Mr Farage’s ranks.
Three by-elections that year have been slammed by the Commission for overspending — and the bad habits spread to the General Election the following year.
The by-elections in Rochester, Kent and Clacton, Essex were also where controversial Tory advisor Mark Clarke and ex-Party Chairman Grant Shapps road tested their new secret campaign weapon — the battle bus, then styled RoadTrip2015.
The simple model of shipping in activists, getting them to deliver leaflets and then getting them drunk at a free bar was the brainchild of Clarke — a former Tory candidate seeking to win backing to become MP.
However the campaigns days he organised were later mired in lurid allegations of sexual misconduct, drug taking and bullying.
Clark was booted out of the Tories last year over a string of bullying allegations made by Elliot Johnson, the young Tory activist who took his own life in October 2015.
But yesterday disgraced Clark was outed as a key whistleblower at the heart of the scandal.
The Electoral Commission judgement stated that the Battlebus mastermind was one of just a handful of people they had probed about the spending scandal.
It marks the ultimate revenge for the Battlebus coordinator – who was livid following his treatment by the party.
Tory insiders last night pointed the finger of blame at him for blowing open the scandal and leaking devastating documents to the elections watchdog.
Mr Clarke was last night declined to comment.
The PM said yesterday that her party had “complied fully with the Electoral Commission throughout their investigations” and would pay the fine.
But the Electoral Commission blasted Tory HQ for “unreasonable uncooperative conduct” and said they had to go to court to get their hands on evidence during their year long probe.
They found the party failed to include or misdeclared £250,000 of spending on their controversial Battlebus2015 campaign and during crunch by-elections against Ukip in 2014.
The Battlebus strategy saw Tory activists bussed around the country to key battlefield swing seats at the last election and put up in hotels while they campaigned.
The Commission ruled that some of this spending should have been included in local declarations made by MPs and candidates in areas visited by the buses rather than in the party’s national spending return.
But local spends are capped at £15,000 meaning many MPs would have actually overspent on their campaigns, breaking those strict election laws.
The Electoral Commission said the failure to properly abide the rules “cast doubt” on the accuracy of dozens of MPs local election returns, opening the door to possible criminal charges for MPs and prompting panic in Westminster.
On Monday the furious Conservative MPs confronted Theresa May over the scandal at a tense meeting as their see their careers in Westminster at risk.
The angry face to face showdown came as the PM was attending a closed doors gathering of the executive of the powerful backbench 1922 Committee.
Last night Tory high command moved to calm the growing backbench mutiny by attempting to take the the blame for the mess — but only after a year of silence.
They said on Thursday that MPs were given “no reason” to think Battlebus spending should have been included in local spending returns.
And they insisted that their candidates were “directed” by HQ that battlebus visits would count as national spending, not local spending.
But it would appear to be too late as the Election Commission dismissed the party’s claims of “human error” as “not a reasonable excuse” and called in the police.
It has referred Simon Day, who was the party’s treasurer until April 2016, to the Metropolitan Police over a potential breach of the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act.
The Crown Prosecution Service will decide by the end of May whether to bring charges against the Tory MPs.
As they nervously wait to hear their fate, blunders by Conservative HQ could yet send the Government into a tailspin.
Last night: Ukip Party Chairman Paul Oakden blasted “wealthy political parties cannot buy British politics.”
He added: “Politicians complain that politics is seen in contempt by the people of this country, they have only themselves to blame.”