What Representing Men in Divorce Taught Me About Fatherhood VIDEO
A RARE occasion when a divorce lawyer gets it right
Lawyer run SNP government funded feminist charity bragging about the WORLD'S NEW GOLD STANDARD for framing men
The freemason run CROWN has turned domestic arguments into a vast plundering network of men's estates.
Vicious smear and hate campaigns by the government funded MAN hating feminist lesbian lawyers within
Womens Aid and Refuge to FRAME men and make themselves rich through divorce racketeering
Killer mother who robbed husband of his two twins by drowning them in the bath is now trying to take his house as she launches £30,000 divorce suit from psychiatric unit
Steven Ford and his murdering ex-wife Samantha Ford
This is the kind of fucking shit thousands of men face every day by deranged and malicious ex-wives
using crooked lawyers and judges to fuck up their lives and they are getting away with
it sanctioned by a rogue state who pay their legal buddies using the legal aid honeypot.
Also the feminist lunatics who run Womens Aid, Refuge and the rest are silent
and with no male group to back up this man's nightmare as they do when a female is the victim.
Killer mother who robbed husband of his two twins by drowning them in the bath is now trying to take
his house as she launches £30,000 divorce suit from psychiatric unit
* Samantha Ford, 38, drowned 23-month-olds Jake and Chloe on Boxing Day 2018
* Jailed for 10 years at Old Bailey for manslaughter by diminished responsibility
*Ex-husband Steven, 36, says she is now pushing for a divorce settlement
* Case could cost £30,000 in legal fees and force Mr Ford to sell his house
A grieving father whose twins were killed by their mum could lose the home he shared with them after she launched a divorce bid from a psychiatric unit.
Samantha Ford, 38, was jailed last year for drowning 23-month-old Jake and Chloe in the bath at her home in Kent on Boxing Day 2018.
Her actions were described as a twisted act of vengeance against her estranged husband, Steven, during a trial at the Old Bailey.
The mum was sentenced to 10 years - to be served at a psychiatric unit until she is deemed fit for prison - after entering a guilty plea of manslaughter by diminished responsibility.
But in a new blow to the children's grieving father, he has now been told Ford is pushing for divorce, which he says could potentially see him lose his house - the home he shared with Jake and Chloe - in Charing, near Ashford.
In an email to Mr Ford from the Trevor Gibbens Unit in Maidstone, where his estranged wife is being held, NHS officials confirm she wants to pursue divorce proceedings and explore the option of selling the house.
Mr Ford said: 'I've been advised that it will cost around £30,000 in legal fees for me to get divorced.
'I can't afford it - I'm not even close - but I have no choice.
'A straight forward divorce costs much less, but it's the settlement part that's costing the money as it's likely to go to court.
'I do not want to lose my home.'
Mr Ford had been going down the route of filing for divorce, but says her bid will make it more complicated and expensive.
He said: 'I don't know what grounds she could possibly have, but it's clear she wants to punish me as much as possible and ruin my life.
'She has destroyed me financially, professionally and mentally.
'It's frightening to think I could lose my home after everything I've had to deal with.
'I worked very hard to build a life for me and my family and my home is all that's left.
'To lose that too would finish me.'
During the hearing at the Old Bailey last year, the court heard how Ford had Googled how to drown someone in the weeks leading up to the twins' deaths and one psychologist stated she was a 'narcissist' who was 'trying to appear more severely ill than she is'.
It was also heard the 'materialistic' mother had become obsessed with losing her 'perfect life' in Qatar after the family moved back to Kent.
She left a suicide note before attempting to take her own life by driving into a lorry hours after killing her children.
A full inquest into the children's deaths was due to be held last September, but instead was delayed due to Ford's legal team pushing for a wider investigation into the support she received before they died.
A decision was then made by the coroner to hold an Article 2 hearing, an enhanced inquest held in cases where 'the State or its agents have failed to protect the deceased against a human threat or other risk'.
Law society behind the global domestic violence hysteria
Coronavirus has made DV hysteria much worse as the legal mafia and feminists go on the rampage
by making it much more likely innocent men will face homelessness and isolation while trying to avoid a pandemic
False Statistics by Feminist Groups Lead to Hysteria, Misandry
The leading cause of death for women is heart disease, followed by cancer, not domestic violence, says male advocate and Petaluma resident Joe Manthey.
In your April 17 With Three Domestic Violence Murders in Three Years, Advocates Say Problem Not Going Away article you quoted Jacque Reid, a navigator at the Family Justice Center in Santa Rosa, who claimed that “domestic violence is the number one cause of injury for women in the United States and it crosses all cultural and economic lines.” But according to University of Pennsylvania domestic violence researcher Richard Gelles, “as good a sound bite as it is, the statement is simply not true.”
Sure enough, according to Department of Health and Human Services, the leading cause of injury for women in the United States is falls, followed by motor vehicle accident and overexertion. In fact, domestic violence doesn’t even appear on the list of leading causes of injury for women.
The actual research behind this factoid is based on a survey of one emergency room. The facts, as reported in a U.S. Department of Justice study, are that all violence is responsible for about 3 percent of women’s injury-related visits to emergency rooms with domestic violence accounting for about 1 percent of such. By comparison, Centers for Disease and Control numbers show that more than twice as many women visit emergency rooms due to being injured by an animal than by a male partner.
But what if you broke the numbers down by race, as Attorney General of the U.S. Eric Holder did in 2010? “The facts are clear,” said Holder. “Intimate partner homicide is the leading cause of death for African-American women ages 15 to 45.”
Yet, according to the CDC and the Justice Department’s own Bureau of Justice Statistics, the leading causes of death for African-American women between the ages 15–45 are cancer, heart disease, unintentional injuries such as car accidents, and HIV disease. Homicide comes in fifth — and includes murders by strangers. In 2006 (the latest year for which full statistics are available), several hundred African-American women died from intimate partner homicide — each one a tragedy, but far fewer than the approximately 6,800 African-American women who died of the other leading causes.
Unfortunately, misinformation spread by battered women advocates, government officials and unquestioning journalists leads to hysteria, not to mention misandry.
Joe Manthey is a Petaluma resident and male advocate.
Coronavirus: Heterosexual men at high risk of being evicted from their homes
The domestic abuse propagators are at it again especially via the femi/homo BBC run by lawyers for lawyers and their other feminist man hating arms Women's Aid and Refuge. ALL of them bigoted smear campaigners that have been set up to destroy men for and on behalf of the biggest terrorists on the planet the Law Society acting on behalf of the royals CROWN and orders from their top freemason lackey the Dukey Kent. Grooming ex-wives and golddiggers to provide the allegations that helps line the pockets of the legal mafia and the Crown with men's hard earned cash.
No sooner has the threat posed by coronovirus started than the lawyers mouthpiece the BBC are running endless articles about domestic abuse and violence. ALL of those men accused of such DON'T have juries just freemason judges dishing out extreme court orders that strip men of their right to live in their homes and to see their children. Made much worse when the world is in lock down and puts innocent men at high risk of having a restraining order made against them which is the legal mafia's way of shutting down men who dare to stand up against their tyranny.
Few men are fully aware of the powers of secret family courts and the effect that has on men's future and presently they are ratcheting up the assault on men to give lawyers the excuse to get them kicked out on the street with bumped up charges and with hearsay allegations heard before one of the Queens hand picked judicial lackeys. Men need to be aware that if their relationship is floundering it is a simple matter for a bitter and twisted ex-wife to provide abuse allegations to a crooked lawyer who will start the ball rolling to remove you from your home and that ex-wife can very quickly move any new boyfriend into YOUR home and the HOME that YOU have to continue paying for.
We have spent decades warning men about the vicious and malicious attacks on them via a legal system that is getting away with murder. Paul McCartney, Brad Pitt and Johnny Depp only some of the high profile celebrities that have faced attacks by vicious ex's determined to get maximum advantage during separation. Men need to be fully aware of the repercussions of these extreme moves at this most difficult time. See below some of the articles circulating in their gutter rags that are sending out the signals that this is going to increase in intensity and that men and men alone will be blamed for any issues that arise from being locked up at home while this quarantine period is being enforced.
We also provide just one recent example of the extremes females / lesbians will go to to steal from men when a man is murdered and his fingers amputated to access his bank and a recent inheritance he came by. Never underestimate the lengths women will go to strip men bare and with the total support of a crooked legal system controlled by freemason's behind the present decision to lock men at home without any work . There is method in their madness and it is FUCK ALL to do with men's well being.
There's something far more dangerous to men than coronavirus
As the world is thrown into lockdown over a medical emergency being blamed on a new coronavirus
with claims of it starting in China, behind the scenes most of the orders being dictated to the masses come directly or indirectly
from the global freemasons embedded in every major area of law and politics. It is claimed around
five million of these dimwits are elevated far beyond their station into key positions of power and
ultimately under the command of the British royals loyal lord lieutenant the Dukey Kent their head godfather.
Now we have been reporting about the loss of men globally after being stitched up and framed by the
freemason godfathers most powerful weapon the judicial mafia the vast bulk of who are hand picked
freemasons who do their dirty work. Yet hardly a gutter rag mentions the many thousands of men
in Britain and globally that are psychologically and financially tortured into early graves.
Suicide is rampant among men globally and something we take very seriously as we ourselves have personal
experience of being dragged through their torture chambers and stripped bare leaving many men
weakened mentally to the point suicide is their only option.
That figure is miles higher than any so far who have died from the coronavirus threat many who are
frail and aged and with serious medical conditions that even the common flu would potentially
have enough strength to end their lives. But the thousands of men pushed into early graves are
of all ages young and old and who face a far more sinister threat at the hands of the silent destroyers
hell bent on weakening any man not part of their satanic oath swearing cult.
The biggest threat to men globally by far is the freemason virus that, while the world is distracted by
endless disasters, many concocted for the very purpose of pointing the sheeple away from what is staring
them in their faces, while the brutal persecution of men and their families goes on behind closed doors
and now with a population that is being confined to their homes while the plundering continues unabated.
Whatever comes of this latest threat, whether we are receiving accurate or fabricated bullshit, the one
thing men can be certain of is that they have far more chance of losing their lives when dragged into their
dens of iniquity than any claims of this latest apparent threat. When lives of men are being lost
on a daily basis, and going back decades with hardly a word in their controlled gutter rags, and then suddenly
a glut of reports of deaths over a virus we have to ask why all those lives lost are not worthy of being reported
about as if they are of far less importance or of little importance.
Also claims by those who control the ability of men to go about their business is being severely
curtailed potentially to the detriment of their families, homes and children, you can be sure one group of
dimwits will be laughing all the way to the bank and wont suffer the same extreme hardship that may be coming
very soon to the men caught up in this latest debacle.
The health and welfare of heterosexual men around the globe wont be served by the scum and filth
dictating the orders that could lead to those men and their families being made far more vulnerable to attack with those orders.
House theft will be the top of the agenda when the bills can no longer be paid thanks to the severe curtailment
of freedoms that may or may not stop this latest medical emergency.
Family lawyer exposes the domestic violence racket corrupting our courts VIDEO
The Problems with Family Court: Power of the judge VIDEO
Father: my 14-year-old daughter was destroyed by court-ordered trans hormones VIDEO
Listen to how the law society terrorists utterly abuse judicial powers to brush aside the
biological fathers protection of his young child.
Connecting divorce, domestic abuse allegations and elite paedophilia
There is hardly a day goes by that the gutter rags are not ranting obsessively about domestic abuse. No more so than the BBC and Gayrdian that is despite the fact the BBC harboured a known paedophile for decades and allowed him to abuse children on their premises, their top nonce Jimmy Savile. The Gayrdian meanwhile is being controlled by a feminist / lesbian / lawyer and part of the law society control mechanism over every aspect of family life.
The BBC and the Gayrdian have NOTHING good to say about heterosexual men unless they murder for the state or work for law enforcement then they become heroes.
We have the royals, via their godfather freemason the Dukey Kent, hand picking masonic judges that are deliberately separating children from their biological fathers protection and in many cases into the hands of neurotic mothers primed by crooked masonic lawyers to make up endless allegations that sees fathers firstly removed, then those mothers losing the children into care homes and into the hands of the hand picked paedo procurers that run British childrens care homes .
There is a DIRECT link between self appointed elite paedo rings and the judicial and political mafia's that ARRANGE for the transfer of children, and most especially young boys, into the hands of the homopaedo's all part of the high level satanic rings and with a gutter press only to happy to aid and abet the grand theft of children while the fathers end up on the streets broken, homeless and penniless unaware their children have been captured into a sordid den of inquity.
Any British gutter rag promoting this is part of the satanic cult prepared to go to any lengths to thieve children away from good parents whose only crime was to be caught up in their secret courts run by secret society's for their own elitist paedo rings. Jeffrey Epstein's death in America and Jimmy Savile's exposures in Britain, while previously BOTH rubbing shoulders with the royals, makes it all the more obvious just how they operate and the judicial mafia are a major cog in their satanic wheel that ensures a steady supply of prepubescent children into the hands of the monsters running society for their own perverted ends.
The Dunblane massacre was used to cover up the elite paedo ring operating there and gave the excuse for the British establishment to strip the peasants of any right to defend themselves. Meanwhile the Queen and her lackeys have vast arsenals to ensure they can continue the massive raid on mens estates through the Crown's use of the courts to strip men bare and steal their children for their satanic rings.
Freemason controlled courts and the framing of non members of their satanic cult
There is a global war going on that is centuries old and despite ALL the distractions the scumbags running the world presently throw up in our faces it cannot and must not distract from the evil that passes for some sort of global law and order.
Epstein, Weinstein, Prince Andrew and Savile exposures have made it crystal clear that when you sign up to the devil that devil protects your nasty fucking arse no matter how sick and sinister your deviousness's are. In Britain the centre of the global tyranny that stretches right across the globe and centred on the royal parasites and their head honcho the Dukey Kent maybe responsible for more male non cult members deaths and destruction than all the wars put together and goes right under the radar of the gutter rags that pass as some sort of news authority. That news being manipulated to hide the enormity of the damage being done to non cult men and their families hopes, dreams and especially their finances.
When you are able to pull the strings of virtually every media outlet on the planet the sheeple that listen and read can be led down the masonic path not realising they are heading for the chopping block anytime soon. Only the rise of technology has finally given platforms and exposures to the victims of the sinister goings on that masquerade as some sort of force for good and how those at the centre of this evil coven are held up as saviours of the people. See the royal headlines pumped out daily and en masse by their gutter rags.
Spending years even decades in and out of their masonic hell holes you can easily build up a picture of how they manufacture the law to line their pockets while stripping their victims bare and again a gutter press only to happy to rig the news to always report that justice is being seen to be done instead of the massive stitch up of everyone dragged through their satanic covens. Read the regular quotes from their hand picked judges as they send another wee scamp down to the cells whose crimes massively pale next to those very judicial decisions that are a multi trillion dollar fraud on their non cult victims.
Britain has just seen how the judeo masonic mafia can manipulate the sheeple to vote for mass murderers and see them lining the streets expressing their gratitude that another long line of victims face the same horrible and twisted nightmare of political machinations that push ever more non cult men into vast deprivation and homelessness and for many poor souls suicide.
We do not know how this will end as despite all the efforts of so many across the internet there seems to be a hardened core of numbnuts happy to go along with their evil plans of destruction while being swayed to believe these fucking monsters have their best interests at heart only until they themselves become victims to this massive and corrupt bunch of gangsters acting in every key position of power.
Stupidity maybe the single biggest block to having this monstrous mechanism, behind every major global incident, eradicated from the lives of the millions touched by the evil hand of the judeo / masonic filth that pollute the world with their twisted and sinister agenda. Remaining optimistic and the reality that their lodge buddies are slowly but surely finally getting the spotlight shone on their depravity despite a resistant global media who have protected their arses for way to long.
Daughters abducted by their mother forcibly returned to Italian home VIDEO
Fathers regularly smeared and framed for allegations of abuse and violence across the globe in family courts by evil ex-wives
aided and abetted by CROOKED masonic crown lawyers and judges leading to them losing everything unless
they fight for their children's return.
It is the biggest international child abduction case in living memory. An Australian mother kidnaps
her four daughters from their father in Italy, claiming he is an ABUSIVE MONSTER. The Australian Embassy in Rome
illegally assists in smuggling the girls to Australia. Two years later the four sisters are dragged kicking and
screaming back to their father in Italy.
They were hysterical and confronting scenes we wouldn’t forget easily. 60 Minutes first exposed the mother’s con,
the father’s heartache and our embassy’s unforgivable role in 2012. Now, for the first time in an exclusive interview
with Tara Brown, the girls have their say.
Court rules father has equal say as mother wants child’s sex changed VIDEO
When freemason run courts have undermined fathers ultimate right to protect his children you end up with this lunacy
Framing men as abusers in divorce VIDEO
Erin Pizzey video that destroys feminists multi-billion dollar domestic abuse racket and lies
DNA testing exposes how common fathers are NOT the real fathers of their children VIDEO
Family court judges bleating about possible assaults exposes massive injustice against fathers
Evil Womens Aid propaganda who get £millions in government grants and Lottery money
and run by lawyers milking the legal aid board for £millions to produce vile lies and
deceit destroying innocent heterosexual men in the process. Many who later commit suicide.
Family court judges fear they are at growing risk of knife attacks and assaults from parents who are angry at losing their children
Senior judges warned yesterday of a growing risk of knife attacks and violence by parents in the family courts.
They believe that judges are increasingly vulnerable to assault or stabbing in cases in which parents are told they
must lose their children.
Their 'considerable concern' about the safety of judges comes at a time of rising tension in the family courts which
decide on where children should live when their parents divorce or break up and on when children should be taken away
from parents who are thought to be violent or inadequate.
Family courts - often staged in small rooms with little security - rule in over 50,000 cases a year involving children,
and allegations of abuse or violence against at least one parent are made in 30,000 of them.
Security checks at the Central Family Court in London resulted in the confiscation of nearly 500 knives with blades
over three inches long from people attending hearings in the first four months of this year.
The chief family judge, President of the Family Division Sir Andrew McFarlane and two senior colleagues
spoke of their worries as they published plans to cut the fast-rising number of children's cases in the
courts and to avoid delays to cases because of red tape and repetition.
High Court family judge Sir Stephen Cobb said: 'We have concern about judicial security in these cases. Judges
are supervising cases for someone for whom the case is clearly one of the most important matters in their life,
and security comes into question.
'There are many examples of judges who have faced security issues in dealing with cases which are of very considerable concern to us.'
Sir Stephen said that worries were centred on risks to judges in the courtroom rather than the possibility
that aggrieved parents might follow and attack a judge outside court.
'There have been cases where individuals have been taken to court for harassing a judge but we are concerned
about managing the hearing in the room.'
Sir Andrew McFarlane said that fears centred on judges in smaller-scale local courts.
'It tends to be district judges and magistrates in very small rooms for whom we are concerned,' he said.
He added: 'We don't think people in London have been bringing knives for use in court but there are knives being brought
to court. That is how life is in London.'
Around four out of every 10 parents who divorce or break up now take their arguments over who should care
for and see the children to court.
Cases in which abuse is alleged are increasing in number, partly because
parents who claim they have been abused have a good chance of winning legal aid and a lawyer to represent them.
Parents accused of abuse - often fathers - do not get legal aid and have to represent themselves in court.
Judges hope to cut numbers of cases in court by persuading more parents to accept mediation or find other ways of agreeing how to care for their children. They called for a National Family Solutions service - to be made up at first of local advice groups - to help parents break up without going before a judge.
They are asking local council social workers to think harder before bringing cases about taking children into care to court. Judges hope to reduce numbers of cases in which children are ordered to be taken from their families, then returned, and then removed again, with each incident requiring a court case.
Judeo masons control divorce courts yet they themselves don't suffer the same consequences
In Jewish Law it is the husband who has the right to decide whether he will give
his wife a divorce (the “Get”). If he refuses her, the wife may be sentenced to years
of living in a dead marriage. She cannot remarry and any child she has from a new
relationship is considered illegitimate.
Marry where you like but men will be forced into masonic run courts to strip them bare when it's over
Their media push the marriage utopia but for millions of men ends in a nightmare
Tax men use divorce as excuse to spy on men's wealth using bitter ex-wives as their little helpers
Twisted ex-wives and their crooked lawyers have been using this ploy for far to long now exposed
in the gutter rags after our own decades long exposures of this nasty illegal practice.
Heterosexual men have been pushed over the edge in another intrusion into
their lives thanks to the divorce industrial complex.
Vengeful ex-spouses are being secretly paid thousands of pounds by HM Revenue and Customs to identify their counterparts as tax-dodgers
HM Revenue and Customs handed over more than £2.2 million for information
Wasn't declared in annual accounts, despite handouts coming from taxpayers
Ex-spouses and embittered business partners have been secretly paid thousands of pounds by revenue authorities to identify their counterparts as tax-dodgers, it was reported yesterday.
HM Revenue and Customs handed over more than £2.2 million for information to help their investigations.
But none of this spending was declared in their annual accounts, despite the handouts coming from taxpayer money.
One former employee told The Times the scheme is 'totally lacking in transparency'.
They said it had been used in the past to allow ex-partners or former employees to carry out personal vendettas and sell them out to the authorities for cash.
Adam Craggs, a partner at the law firm Reynolds Porter Chamberlain, worked at HMRC for 16 years.
He agreed that the system was not transparent and potentially open to abuse.
He said: 'You would get a disillusioned spouse who said that they were upset with their husband and could give details to HMRC.
'They knew where the bodies were buried, as it were.
'It is not a transparent process and it is, to a certain extent, open to abuse for those with vested interests.
'Public money is being paid to informers - your money and my money.' The huge tip offs were revealed by Sir Aymas Morse, head of the National Audit Office which is the public spending watchdog.
The payments are managed by officers from HMRC's risk and intelligence service to examine tax avoidance, evasion and fraud.
Hundreds of thousands of pounds each year are doled out.
In 2014 - 15, £604,800 was paid to secret sources.
According to HMRC, pay-outs only happen if the information provided is 'exceptionally helpful'.
Payments for less than £5,000 can be signed by a senior office in the intelligence service, but for those up to £10,000 a high grade civil servant must approve.
For exceptional tip-offs, a deputy director can approve a payment of over £100,000, and a director can approve those up to £250,000.
A source told The Times that to earn more than £250,000 'it would have to be enough to close down a company or something. ' A spokesman for HMRC said the 'vast majority' of tipsters did not get a reward but that it would be at the discretion of the tax authority to give them out.
They added that all payments are tax free.
Is it time to hold these murdering bastards to account? VIDEO
Murdoch rag takes credit for more changes to divorce
Beggars belief that MURDOCH can claim to control what goes on in family courts.
Despite all the positive spin the establishment use divorce to strip men and their families
no matter how hard they work to improve their finances. Those running the courts are intent
on ensuring NO MAN that operates outside their masonic cult gets to accumulate wealth
that would undermine their power and control. The ease with which masonic judges can strip men
bare is the BIGGEST corrupt racket on earth.
Only one of millions of men fucked over by devious wives
Every last one of them should be jailed for FRAUD but the legal mafia rely on their phony allegations to bleed
fathers dry, but the freemason scum and filth controlling divorce courts let them get away with it,
and how men not part of their satanic cult are financially BROKEN while freemasons gain access to
men's property, businesses, bank accounts and children.
The divorce was finalised in early 2008 and, in the financial settlement a year later, Kate’s £4 million lump
sum included the boys’ private school fees in advance.
Richard complied with Child Support Agency (later the Child Maintenance Service) assessments for maintenance,
which amounted to nearly £3,000 a month in the early years following their divorce.
But according to him, that was never enough for Kate.
‘She hounded me for years, employing consultants to investigate my financial affairs and tried to make me pay more,’
he said, his surprisingly youthful features contorted with suppressed rage. ‘Meanwhile, as far as I know, the biological
father of the boys has never paid a penny for their upkeep.’
Joy Division's Peter Hook talks about his depression triggered by divorce VIDEO
Divorce law: Ministers plan overhaul to cut 'antagonism'
WHAT UTTER BULLSHIT. You can be sure ANY changes will be to line the pockets of the legal crooks quicker while
men get screwed even faster. BEST advice NEVER get married as the marriage contract is NOT written down when signing
a marriage certificate so it is WHOLLY illegal as men are not aware of the appalling circumstances they are
left in after divorce and the monumental financial burdens of massive legal bills and all the continued payments
to someone who you are no longer married to. A contract like no other in history.
Marriage / divorce a licence for the legal crooks to drag you into their courts for decades.
Criminals spend less time in courts than divorcing men. The diabolical system has been planned to provide maximum employment for crooked lawyers and judges milking the very lifeblood from men who do not realise marriage is a means for the legal mafia to thrive on men driven to the verge of insanity by the games they play that masquerade as the law.
None of it is justice it is a massive scam.
Divorce laws in England and Wales are set to be overhauled under government plans seeking to allow couples to split up more quickly and with less acrimony.
Justice Secretary David Gauke, who has said the system creates "unnecessary antagonism", is to begin a consultation on introducing "no-fault" divorces.
Campaigners said it could be a "landmark moment" for divorce law.
In July, a woman's appeal for divorce was rejected by the Supreme Court due to her husband's refusal to split.
Tini Owens, 68, from Worcestershire, wanted to divorce her husband of 40 years on the grounds she is unhappy.
Her husband Hugh has refused the split and the Supreme Court unanimously rejected the appeal, meaning she must remain married until 2020.
Under the current law in England and Wales, unless people can prove their marriage has broken down due to adultery, unreasonable behaviour or desertion, the only way to obtain a divorce without a spouse's consent is to live apart for five years.
The government's proposals - first reported by Buzzfeed - could see the concept of fault, or blame, removed from the process. Spouses could lose the right to contest a divorce, as part of the reform.
Pressure has been building for decades for a system of no-fault divorce. The Law Commission recommended it in 1990 and many senior judges favour it.
The reason? Many believe that when divorcing couples are being torn apart emotionally and financially, and trying to make living arrangements for their children, assigning blame to one party can only exacerbate an already stressful process.
No-fault divorce would have been introduced in a 1996 Act of Parliament requiring spouses to attend "information meetings" to encourage reconciliation, but following pilot schemes, the government decided it was unworkable.
The Ministry of Justice will seek to end the right of spouses to contest a divorce, and also consult on how long the parties need to wait before becoming entitled to one, suggesting a minimum of six months.
Essentially, the government is proposing a notification system where, after a defined period, if one spouse still maintains the marriage has broken down irretrievably, they become entitled to a divorce.
There will be some who fear such a system will undermine marriage, but many believe it could remove a layer of stress and anxiety from one of life's most traumatic experiences.
Speaking in the House of Lords, Baroness Vere of Norbiton said the call for reform after recent judgements had been noted and the lord chancellor was "sympathetic" to the argument for reform.
"We are looking at ways to reduce conflict in a divorce, whether that can be no-fault, whether that can be under financial provisions, whether that can be for enforceable nuptial agreements," she added.
Nigel Shepherd, chairman of the national family lawyer's organisation Resolution, said that couples had been forced "into needless acrimony and conflict" under the current system, "to satisfy an outdated legal requirement".
"Today's news has the potential to be a landmark moment for divorce law in England and Wales," he said.
"The government appears to have heeded our calls to make our divorce system fit for the modern age, and we will continue to push for this much-needed, overdue reform to be implemented as soon as possible."
However, shadow justice secretary Richard Burgon said: "Instead of yet another consultation, the Conservatives should get on with changing our divorce laws so that they are fit for the 21st century."
Labour was "fully committed" to introducing no-fault divorce proceedings, he added.
Jenny from Kent got divorced five years ago. Her husband divorced her on the grounds of unreasonable behaviour because it was quicker than waiting for a no-fault divorce.
"I would have been quite happy to wait for the two years so that we could have had a no-fault divorce," she told Radio 5 live.
"The people that got caught in the middle of this were my two children because they went from seeing their parents talking and being quite amenable to each other to having real arguments and being quite nasty to each other - purely because of the process."
Law Society president Christina Blacklaws said it was time to bring divorce law "into the 21st century".
In Scotland, a simplified divorce procedure is available (to couples without children of the marriage under 16) where people can prove their marriage is broken down with one year's separation - with consent of both partners - or two years separation without consent.
In Northern Ireland, the grounds for divorce are the same as the current requirements for England and Wales.
Grounds for divorce in England and Wales:
When you apply for a divorce you must prove your marriage has broken down and give one of the following five reasons:
You have lived apart for more than two years and both agree to the divorce
You have lived apart for at least five years, even if your husband or wife disagrees
The war on marriage? It is all about controlling YOUR children
Why does our new power elite hate lifelong marriage so much? Why does the legal arm of that elite, the Supreme Court, hand out what is left of the privileges of marriage to those who won’t get married, as it did with the widowed parents’ allowance on Thursday?
Why does the propaganda arm of our ruling class, the BBC, promote a drama called Wanderlust with publicity which, in the BBC’s own words, ‘asks whether lifelong monogamy is possible – or even desirable’. You know as well as I do that they’re not really asking.
They are saying, amid countless wearisome and embarrassing bedroom scenes, that it is neither possible nor desirable. This is a lie, as millions of honest, generous and kind men and women proved in the better generations which came before this one.
Our modern upper crust hate marriage because it is a fortress of private life. They hate it above all because they can’t control it, because it is the place where the next generation learn how to be distinct, thinking individuals instead of conformist robots.
It is where they discover the truth about the past, the lore of the tribe, the traditions and beliefs that make us who we are. It is where they become capable of being free.
But our new rulers don’t want that. They don’t want fully formed people who know who they are and where they come from. They want obedient, placid consumers, slumped open-mouthed in front of screens, drugged into flaccid apathy (legally or illegally, the Government don’t care which), slaving all hours in the dreary low-wage, high-tax economy they are so busily creating.
Much better if they’ve never heard of the great golden drama of our national history and literature, so they don’t know what they’re missing and don’t care.
They would prefer the young to be brought up in a sort of moral car park, knowing nothing except what they are told by authority and the advertising industry. In this brave new world, sex is a spectacle and a sport, solemn oaths are worthless, and duty is a joke.
In this, they are much like the Soviet Communists, who deliberately made divorce as easy as crossing the road, and made absolutely sure that hardly any parents could afford to stay at home to raise their own children.
They have not yet gone quite as far as them – Soviet children were encouraged to worship, as a martyr, a semi-mythical figure called Pavlik Morozov, who was supposedly killed by his grandfather after informing on his own parents to the secret police. Russian friends of mine brought up in this vicious cult shuddered at the memory. But if you look carefully, you will see a ghostly shadow of this culture of denunciation growing up in our midst. And, as we forget all our long history of freedom and justice, it will become easier for such things to happen.
After all, we have long been used to the sight, on TV, of police officers smashing down front doors, or conducting dawn raids – and of being expected to approve of it.
An Englishman’s home is not his castle. And his life is not his own. That is what all this means, and will mean.
Amid the grunts and the creaking of bedsprings, and the pompous phrases of the judges, listen hard and you can hear them weaving Britain’s winding sheet.
Jilted husband awarded nearly $9M from wife's lover VIDEO
Britain's Apartheid state where laws are being manufactured exclusively for one gender 'FEMINISTS'
Jeremy Corbyn arrested over apartheid protest yet seems happy to allow gender apartheid to flourish in Britain as Labour
has been taken over by feminists.
The masonic mafia who have taken charge of the law, by giving power to women lets them lord over non mason men's estates
UK police chiefs urged to adopt harassment of women as hate crime
Campaigners advocate rolling out policy across England, Wales and Northern Ireland
Police chiefs are being urged to recognise public harassment of women as a gender hate crime across the UK, as
research(WHO'S DOING THE RESEARCH THE GAYRDIAN?) finds overwhelming public support for the policy after a two-year pilot scheme in Nottingham.
(FROM WHO FEMINISTS????)
Campaigners believe the National Police Chiefs’ Council should be more open to the strategy as part of the shift
in approach kick-started by the #MeToo movement. The NPCC will discuss the case for adopting the policy across England,
Wales and Northern Ireland on Wednesday.
Despite being initially trivialised in the media as “arrests for wolf-whistling”, the first comprehensive analysis
of the Nottinghamshire police pilot scheme finds that the vast majority of local people interviewed want the policy to continue.
Using focus groups and surveys with nearly 700 residents, researchers from Nottingham and Nottingham Trent universities found harassment of women and girls in public spaces remains endemic. Nine out of 10 (93.7%) of respondents had either experienced or witnessed street harassment, with women from black and minority ethic groups feeling doubly vulnerable to attack on the basis of gender and race.
In May 2016, Nottinghamshire police, in partnership with Nottingham Women’s Centre, became the first force in the UK to record public harassment of women – such as groping, using explicit language, or taking unwanted photographs – as well as more serious offences such as assault as a misogyny hate crime.
The basic hate crime definition is not provided by statute, and police forces are encouraged to include types of hate crime identified as a priority in their areas. The Nottingham classification means people can report incidents that may not typically be considered a crime, allowing the police to investigate and offer the victim support. It would require legislative change for the misogyny marker to have any impact on sentencing, as racial aggravation does.
From the beginning of the pilot scheme until the start of June 2018, Nottinghamshire police received 181 reports of misogyny hate crimes, including verbal abuse, threats of violence, assault and unwanted physical contact. Seventy-four of these were recorded as crimes and dealt with accordingly, leading to four arrests and one charge, while the remaining 107 were recorded as hate incidents.
Helen Voce, the chief executive of Nottingham Women’s Centre, said: “There’s a lot of focus on the number of prosecutions but that was not what this was about. The primary objective of the policy change was not to see hundreds of prosecutions, it was to let people know that this behaviour isn’t acceptable and will not be tolerated in Nottinghamshire.”
Supt Mark Khan, the lead on hate crime for North Yorkshire police, said: “It’s about catching behaviour at an early stage. Today’s flasher is tomorrow’s rapist.”
While support at national level would be welcome, for Khan a change in law was also needed, like that under consideration in Scotland. “It would be significant if big forces like the Met and Police Scotland step forward. For a small force where resources are strapped a change in legislation does concentrate the mind. We need more awareness-raising and training for police as well as public. Hate crime across the service is under-reported.”
Khan acknowledged that the change would be controversial, saying: “It will cause a lot of questions, mainly from a hardcore of men who feel its not fair. But the current momentum around offences against women and the way they are treated needs to be reflected in the way we approach hate crime.”
Thousands of WOMEN and their lawyer pals misusing domestic abuse orders to get legal aid
There is no more a draconian law than the domestic violence scam that sees men treated like criminals so that the legal mafia
can separate them from their homes, children and assets. This BBC report massively underestimates the enormity of manufactured
legal thuggery that allows draconian orders to destroy men's lives many that have led to suicide.
This can tie up men's lives for decades
especially if their children are young and also allows lawyers to totally fuck up men's stability leading to homelessness and deprivation,
something we have spent decades exposing and investigating through interviewing many men caught in that trap. Pure evil that is going on in every courtroom the length and breadth of Britain with freemason
judges and lawyers instigating these orders to weaken men not part of their satanic cult.
Devious golddigging bitches also go on POWER TRIPS when they find out how much they can fuck up their ex-husbands lives with these orders
especially when he gets a new younger better looking girlfriend.
They also fail to mention the restraining orders that are attached to these orders that stop a man going anywhere near his children and
the immediate arrest if they do. Many millions of men who have never had a criminal record suddenly find the ease with which the legal
mafia can turn them into criminals with HEAR SAY evidence and with no jury present.
Notice also the BBC still allow the devious and dangerous Womens Aid to comment but that NEVER happens in reverse when they are raising
these matters endlessly in all their corporate rag platforms. A group run by lesbians and lawyers being paid millions by a government and Lottery money
to destroy heterosexual mens lives, unheard of throughout history. A sick and sinister hellhole young men need to be made fully aware of.
Thousands of EX_WIVES falsely claim domestic abuse in order to access legal aid and stop estranged partners from seeing their children, a shared parenting charity claims.
Families Need Fathers says parents are being encouraged by some solicitors to file for non-molestation orders - injunctions used in urgent abuse cases.
New figures show a 30% rise in orders made after legal aid was axed in everything but abuse cases in family courts in 2012.
Some 25,700 were made in England and Wales in 2017, and 6,699 in the first quarter of 2018.
The changes to legal aid qualification in England and Wales were designed to reduce the number of cases in family courts, with separating couples being encouraged to attend mediation sessions instead, and to cut the legal aid bill.
But charity case workers say they are seeing "thousands" of parents, mainly fathers, who have been made subject to these orders for things that they do not consider to be domestic abuse.
These could be angry comments thrown in the midst of the break-up or dealing with child access arrangements or unpleasant text messages, they say.
The charity suspects that solicitors' firms are talking parents into seeking such orders because it enables them to qualify for legal aid, from which both the legal profession and the complainant could benefit.
A spokesman for the charity said: "We're getting a lot of people coming to us talking about false allegations, whether it's grossly exaggerating events or even completely fabricating them.
"And yet the impact of the order can take a parent down a path that can be very difficult to return from."
Jerry Karlin, chairman of Families Need Fathers, said the result of the government's "well-intended but ill-conceived changes" to the family courts system was a 30% increase in non-molestation orders (NMOs) to 25,000 a year.
There had also a been 20% rise in private family court applications over the last two years, he added.
"These (NMOs) are used in allegations of abuse and they don't have to be true to obtain access to legal aid."
"Non-molestation orders have gone up by several hundred per cent since the legal aid changes in some districts," he added.
NMOs work like injunctions and are designed to protect domestic abuse victims from further harm in emergency situations.
The charity stresses that they are useful in genuine cases of abuse, but is concerned that the way they are administered leaves them open to exploitation. For example
They are often granted in the absence of the person being accused of abuse (the respondent) and without accusations of domestic abuse being proven
The making of an order then also enables the complainant to draw on thousands of pounds in legal aid which can also be used in any subsequent family law cases
The respondent would not be automatically entitled to legal aid, however, and often has to represent themselves
The level of evidence required is fairly low and can relate to claims about verbal abuse, unwanted text messages or emails
In some regions of England and Wales the increase has been as much as 900%. In others there has been a 150% rise, according to information obtained by Families Need Fathers.
Once an order is made, there is a brief "return" hearing two weeks later but the case is then usually adjourned for about six months.
During this time every agency related to the the respondent and his family, such as the police, school and local council, is notified.
This can lead not only to the parent being physically separated from their children but being ostracised by the agencies involved with them.
After about six months, usually, a fact-finding hearing is held at which the evidence of the applicant's claim is meant to be heard.
But quite often, just as the initial order is made in the absence of the respondent, the fact-finding hearing is held in their absence as well.
A judgement is then made on whether the order should continue.
At this point it can be used to restrict a parent from spending time with his or her child and to delay the process of arranging contact.
The outgoing president of the High Court's family division, Sir James Munby, described false allegations as a "vice in the system".
He also said that the judiciary had recently realised that "a wrongly granted without notice order sets the tone of proceedings thereafter".
He tried to crack down on the use of such orders, reminding courts that it was for the applicant to prove their claims rather than for the respondent to disprove them.
His successor, Sir Andrew McFarlane, who is taking over the role in July, appeared to back some of the charity's claims on the harmful effects of such orders in a recent speech.
He called for the facts of a case to be established much more quickly than happens at present.
Whether there are serious domestic abuse allegations or not, it does not help either parent or the children for the hearing of the contested factual issues to be adjourned again and again, he said.
And Sir Andrew cited a case in which a father was subject to a continuing non-molestation injunction preventing him from having any contact with his children for a period of years.
"That injunction had been based upon the untested and contested factual allegations which were never tried," he said.
"Until the factual context is clarified and determined by the court, the arrangements for the children cannot move on and develop in a way which reflects the risk or lack of risk, arising from the facts as they are found to be," he added.
A spokesman for the Ministry of Justice said there may be various reasons for an increase in the issuing of such orders - including greater awareness of domestic abuse and of how it can be addressed.
He added: "Non-molestation orders are an important means of protecting individuals in abusive situations.
"When deciding whether to grant a non-molestation order, the judge will consider all the circumstances, including the need to secure the health, safety and wellbeing of the applicant and any children."
The court has the power to discharge an order if the respondent makes an application and this is found to be justified.
Domestic abuse charity Women's Aid said the rise in NMOs needed to be put in the context of statistics showing record numbers of domestic-abuse related incidents.
The number rose from 796,935 in 2011-12 to 1.1 million in 2016-17 in England and Wales.
Their spokeswoman said: "We know that the police often recommend to victims that they seek civil orders to keep them safe while their case may be going to the CPS [Crown Prosecution Service]
"Or if the victim does not want to proceed with a criminal justice case, you would expect to see more of an increase if the police are seeing an increase in domestic abuse-related incidents."
Why marriage has become a hostile environment for men VIDEO
The BBC's dire attempt at understanding the complexities of divorce that is killing men in droves
The lawyer controlled BBC of late has been doing various articles on divorce, most of the time written from the perspective
of law society lackeys, who make £billions bleeding men dry and the grand theft of their estates and children. Noticeable one of the main
comments made within the piece is "And during the period of separation, it's often difficult for couples to sort out their
finances - selling the family home, for example".
The main criteria of wealth redistribution in Britain, thanks to a corrupt CROWN and its legal mafia, is the absolute speed
that a mans estate is taking over and into the hands of the biggest terror group on earth who cause more misery
and potential life threatening abuse than all other pseudo terror reporting on the planet.
Some of the above graphs they have included in their report, no doubt gained from the law society itself, show how most men
who have garnered substantial assets over a lifetime are then left potentially homeless, penniless and childless at some of
the most crucial times in their life.
The average duration of marriages in England and Wales is now about 12 years. If you then calculate the huge cost of buying a home
and paying a mortgage for 12 years, and the biggest cost any man usually bears in his lifetime, that is rapidly eaten up
in divorce with huge legal fees, either through initial interaction with lawyers, or through an ex-wife's lawyer
obtaining endless legal aid using malicious means leaving a legal bill ultimately paid by an ex-husband. Most unsuspecting
married men do not realise the enormous repercussions and financial ruin brought on by the state agitators who will go to any length
to strip men bare even if jail time or suicide will ensure an easier route to stripping a man of his life's work.
policies are a great way to encourage the crooks to push a man into an early grave and payouts made on a doctors NATURAL causes
report usually also paid from legal aid. The legal mafia and medical mafia are in this together see Dr Harold Shipman's history
for more details as to how they strip victims after mass murder.
The average age of a man divorcing is now 45 and most men find the enforced removal of their home during divorce leaves them in
dire circumstances financially as they will never get another mortgage and will be forced into the private sector with a damaged
credit rating thanks to the legal machinations of the divorce and will leave landlords nervous about letting a home to a divorcing
male. They are already aware of the enormous repercussions to any man at that crucial time.
This is one of the main reasons many men end up on the streets or suicidal trying to recover from the most horrendous intrusions
into their lives by a monstrous evil system of control and grand larceny. Under any other circumstances a crime perpetrated by
the very bastards who have given themselves a monopoly over who is jailed for criminality. Crooked lawyers and judges thanks
to this monopoly getting away with total murder and the destruction of millions of men's lives and their children's.
The ease with which the BBC makes assumptions in their report and the neglect to inform the young men moving up into a marital
system hell bent on fleecing men en masse is directly related to how freemasonry controls the inner workings of the
crown court scams. A structure that ensures any man not part of their vile satanic network is reduced to living on a pittance
that parasitically feeds off of men enduring hardships indescribable until you actually experience living in the ongoing hell
they create for their victims. Until masonic judges and lawyers are excised from this abominable regime men will continue to face
that living hell that the BBC have only scratched the surface off with little mention of the nightmare existence many men are enduring
for decades thanks to the crimes that emanate from a closed secretive network of unbelievable power and grotesque punishment regime.
That we as former victims will continue to do and expose the hypocrisy of the gutter rags who seem to relish in ever more
outrageous rewards dished out to the gold diggers who aid and abet these utter dregs of the earth.
Thug raises his hand a £20 fine. Father raises his voice loses his life
The psychopaths manufacturing laws and enforcing them prove the law is a fucking ass.
The endless stream of domestic violence scams reported in a lawyer controlled media ensures they have the excuse to remove men's lifetime of work on the back of malicious smear campaigns and corruption in every court right across the world that answers to the Inns of court in London. The legal mafia have an illegal global monopoly that cannot be challenged while they are the sole enforcers of the laws that they themselves create but with little or no recourse when they thieve on the grandest of scales.
Make no mistake ALL the terrorist bullshit they feed the sheeple is an enormous smokescreen for the bastards who are controlled via the royals Dukey Kent who uses freemason judges and lawyers to steal vast sums from the unsuspecting men duped into marrying without understanding the repercussions of their actions ie NO SMALL PRINT.
Judicial mafia call for overhaul of marriage law saying it’s risible that men must pay ex-wives for life
In the same breath he wants to give cohabitees the same rights as a marriage contract. Never trust a judge or lawyer
interfering in marriage and relationships as its ONLY ever to line the legal mafia's bank accounts.
He was speaking to lawyers in Edinburgh home to the most vile and corrupt arm of Britain's legal mafia.
Scotland's law society and its lackeys have a long history of corruption and theft. If you have made NO
contract with anybody you have NO obligation no matter what these evil bastards claim.
Many men sign
a marriage contract with NO detail or small print and only find out the repercussions when divorce
provides the outrageous and ridiculous responsibilities the legal system claims you owe to someone who
now acts like a total stranger. A total and utter corrupt con job making it the biggest swindle on the planet.
* Sir James Munby called called for equality for divorcees paying maintenance
*He also argued co-habitees should have the same status as married couples
*The 69-year-old was accused of meddling in politics and told to quit early
Britain's most senior family judge called for an overhaul of marriage law yesterday, saying people would one day laugh at the idea that a man had to support his ex-wife for life.
Sir James Munby called for equality for divorcees when maintenance payments are settled by the courts, highlighting ‘absurd’ divorce settlements that are unfairly biased against men.
Sir James, who is president of the family division of the High Court, also said cohabitees should have the same status as married couples, and fault-free divorces should be introduced.
He said it had taken too long to rid the law of the Victorian notion that men were in charge in a marriage, and the law was marked by ‘hypocrisy and lack of intellectual honesty’.
Sweeping reforms were ‘necessary and inevitable’, he claimed, and the lack of a law governing the rights of couples who live together left women ‘condemned to injustice’.
But marriage campaigners said the head of the family courts was trying to abolish marriage.
Sir James, who is 69 and due to retire this summer, was also accused of meddling in politics and was urged to quit now.
In a speech to lawyers in Edinburgh, he referred to Victorian judges who regarded women as the weaker sex, adding: ‘Past judicial utterances we now find almost absurd should serve as a terrible warning of how history will, in due course, come to judge the present generation.’
Sir James said the changes of the Sixties, including the Pill, legalised abortion and the decriminalisation of homosexuality, had changed the world.
Family life has been transformed, he added, by the rise of multiculturalism and immigration, respect for same-sex unions, and IVF.
He said there had also been ‘a conscious rejection of marriage as an institution’.
Sir James added: ‘A vital concern of family law has to be to ensure the extension to transgendered people of the equal protection of the law.’
But lawyer Jill Kirby, the former head of the Centre for Policy Studies think-tank, said the reforms were ‘an agenda for the abolition of marriage’.
She added: ‘Sir James is saying anyone who supports marriage law is bigoted, intolerant and stuck in the past. He backs the usual politically correct ideas.
‘Cohabitees would be given the privileges of marriage without showing the commitment of married couples.
'He wants to remove fault from marriage break-up, which is unfair to a faithful partner. This is a highly political speech. He should step down.’
Harry Benson, of the Marriage Foundation think-tank, said: ‘Change in the law is the responsibility of Parliament, not judges.’
Sir James also called for family courts to be opened to public scrutiny and routine reporting ‘to rid ourselves of the relentless and damaging charge that we operate a system of private – some say secret – justice’.
Family courts deal with divorce, family break-up and child custody disputes, as well as cases in which children are taken from their parents, and those in which parents harm their children.
While some judgments are made public, judges can stop journalists reporting hearings.
Divorcing parents could lose children if they try to turn them against partner
The judeo masonic legal mafia have been exposed destroying families and this is a desperate attempt to rectify
how lawyers groom divorcing women to play the nasty game they have evolved to screw the family silver
Measures being trialled to prevent ‘parental alienation’ feature penalties including permanent loss of contact with child
Divorcing parents could be denied contact with their children if they try to turn them against their former partner, under a “groundbreaking” process being trialled by the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass).
The phenomenon where one parent poisons their child against the other is known as parental alienation, the ultimate aim of which is to persuade the child to permanently exclude that parent from their life.
Cafcass said it had recently realised parental alienation occured in significant numbers of the 125,000 cases it dealt with each year.
Sarah Parsons, the assistant director of Cafcass, said: “We are increasingly recognising that parental alienation is a feature in many of our cases and have realised that it’s absolutely vital that we take the initiative. Our new approach is groundbreaking.”
The new approach will initially give parents the chance to change their behaviour with the help of intense therapy. Alienating parents who do not respond will not be allowed to have their children live with them.
In addition, contact between the parent and child could be restricted or refused for a number of months. In the most extreme cases, the alienating parent will be permanently banned from any contact with their child.
Parental alienation is estimated to be present in 11%-15% of divorces involving children, a figure thought to be increasing. Other research has found that about 1% of children and adolescents in North America experience parental alienation.
UK judges are increasingly recognising the phenomenon. One wrote about a case where she was forced to transfer residence to re-establish a relationship between a child and an alienated parent. “I regard parental manipulation of children, of which I distressingly see an enormous amount, as exceptionally harmful,” she said in her summary.
Parental alienation occurs on a spectrum from mild to extreme, all of which can be extremely damaging to the children involved. Experts admit they are only now beginning to understand the range of ways it manifests itself.
Parsons said: “We have reached a much clearer position on parental alienation recently, which we want to send a very clear, strong message about.
“The current, popular view of parental alienation is highly polarised and doesn’t recognise this spectrum. We want to reclaim the centre ground and develop a more nuanced, sophisticated understanding of what’s going on.”
Parental alienation occurs almost exclusively when parents are separating or divorcing, particularly when legal action is involved. It is, however, different to the common acrimony between divorcing parents and is internationally recognised as a distinctive form of parental psychological abuse and family violence, undermining core principles of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the UN convention on the rights of the child.
In the US and Canada, “parenting coordinators” are ordered and supervised by courts to help restore relationships between parents and children identified as alienated. In Mexico and Brazil, alienating a child from a parent is a criminal act.
Until now, cases of parental alienation in the UK have relied on Cafcass caseworkers recognising incidents on a case-by-case basis. Many parents, however, say their experiences of alienation have been missed or compounded by the social work and family court system, often leading to permanent estrangement from their child.
From spring 2018, all frontline Cafcass caseworkers will be given a new set of guidelines called the high conflict pathway, which will itemise the steps social workers must take when dealing with cases of suspected alienation. The pathway will spell out exactly when children should be removed from the alienating parent and placed with the “target parent”.
The guidelines, which will also affect how cases are dealt with in family courts, were sent out at the beginning of this month to judges, lobby groups including Families Need Fathers, experts, doctors and lawyers for a three-month consultation.
Alongside the guidelines, Cafcass has developed a 12-week intense programme called positive parenting, designed to help the abusive parent put themselves in their child’s position, and give them skills to break their patterns of behaviour.
A trial of it will start shortly, with 50 high-conflict families being sought across the country. After an evaluation in spring, the programme will be rolled out nationwide.
If it does not work, psychiatrists, psychologists and mental health experts will be brought in. If the alienating parent continues to perpetuate the abuse, however, contact with their child will be limited to supervised visits.
In extreme cases, care proceedings will be initiated and the parent will lose contact with their child. “Our priority, however, is to preserve the relationship with both parents,” Parsons said.
Jerry Karlin, the chair and managing trustee of Families Need Fathers, said Cafcass’s new approach was “very welcome news”.
“The demonising of a parent has long been recognised as damaging the child not only at the time of separation, but reaching into his or her adult life,” he said. “Parental alienation is identified as the single biggest issue among those who come to FNF seeking help.”
Case study – Robert (not his real name)
“I’ve lived through and witnessed the inexorable alienation of my older daughter over the past five years, which has culminated in complete loss of contact. I will not have seen or heard from her for three years this coming January. We had a fantastic, loving relationship for the first 12 years of her life.
“I know from what my younger daughter has told me that in numerous insidious and not so insidious ways, my ex-wife put an intolerable amount of stress on my eldest daughter. It eventually became too emotionally traumatic for her to see me. She eventually sent me a short email, saying she wanted to break off all contact with me. I’ve not heard from her since.
“The pain of being subject to parental alienation as a target parent is a truly soul-destroying thing to live through. In my darkest days, I can remember being out driving at night and thinking that maybe I just wouldn’t turn the wheel when I came to the bend with the high stone wall. This is a horrible form of child abuse that is struggling to get out from under the rock of prejudice and ignorance.”
It is time to get rid of the lunatics running the court asylum's and the outlandish and outrageous
judgements destroying men and their families. They are pure evil working either for the jewish
self proclaimed elite or their freemason goyim using anti-family courts to line ALL their pockets.
Evil Mostyn is right at the very top of the rotting pile.
The men-only divorce club: Think you should always get the kids and the house when your marriage crumbles?
We do not recommend any man puts their trust in a divorce lawyer no matter how much they claim to
fight your corner. They ALL must answer to the global law society whose main objective is to strip
men and the family dry using ex-wives allegations to take control of mens wealth, homes and children.
As a divorce lawyer with 18 years’ experience, Barbara Johnson-Stern has seen her fair share of heartbreak and agony, stepping in to comfort distraught clients bullied by their partners.
But in her case these clients are men, not women. Barbara heads up the UK’s first law firm for men only and says not only do we severely underestimate the trauma suffered by men in divorce, but that settlements are too often biased in favour of women.
It’s a burgeoning industry: Barbara’s firm Cordell & Cordell has had four solicitors at its base near Chancery Lane, London, since opening in 2015, but is planning to recruit more and to expand into Cardiff, Birmingham and Manchester.
The company has more than 100 offices in the U.S., where it began 26 years ago promising American husbands: ‘We’re going to help you keep the dollars you earned.’
‘Women are often seen as the biggest losers in divorce, but that’s an outdated view — it’s almost the opposite now,’ says Barbara, 49, a softly-spoken but tenacious lawyer from Colorado, whose husband Dan is British.
She feels there’s so much support for women getting a divorce — from retreats to online clubs — that now it’s men’s turn to get specialist help. ‘Men come to us and say: “She’s told me I’m going to lose everything and I’ll never see my children again.” They feel their wives hold all the cards.’
She knows her views won’t be popular with many, but she feels women — and it’s women who instigate 65 per cent of divorces — often have a sense of entitlement. There’s an unspoken rule she’ll keep the family house, the children and also the standard of living she enjoyed when they were married.
‘They want their life to stay the same — they just don’t want their husband in it.’
Too often, she says, men are paying long-term spousal maintenance to their ex-wives even after the children have grown up, which is unfair to men and outdated.
‘Women should be expecting to work,’ she argues. ‘Someone like my grandmother did what was expected of her — she got married, had babies (eight of them) and raised the family. She wouldn’t have been able to move into the workplace after a divorce; she had a very basic education and no opportunities.
‘But it’s different now. Women come to the marriage table able to make decisions about their future and having the skills to keep them competitive in the workplace.’
Barbara agrees with Baroness Deech, who has tabled a Bill in the House of Lords to limit maintenance payments for ex-partners to three years after a divorce.
It passed its second reading in February and is in the committee stage. Baroness Deech argues that British judges are being old-fashioned and over-chivalrous in awarding women payments for 15 or 20 years when they are perfectly capable of earning their own money.
‘People wonder why, 15 years after a marriage has ended, one person has to keep paying money to another,’ she said, arguing that these kinds of settlements undermined women’s equality rather than did them a favour.
Her Bill follows intense debate over a string of high-profile cases in recent years where ex-wives were awarded what appeared to be eyebrow-raising settlements.
Earlier this year, surveyor Graham Mills was forced to increase the monthly payments he makes to his ex-wife Maria, despite the fact they divorced 15 years ago and she got a lump sum of £230,000 plus £1,100 a month maintenance.
He’d wanted to cut the payments as their son was 23 and he felt his ex-wife should be independent. ‘I feel like I’m paying for her mismanagement of her finances.
‘I don’t think it’s a good message to send to men or women,’ he said after the case.
But his ex-wife argued she’d run up debts over the years as a single mother with a history of bad health, which had prevented her from working at times.
Other cases have seen women awarded huge sums, adding to London’s reputation as the wives’ divorce capital of the world. In 2014, financier Sir Chris Hohn had to pay his ex-wife £337 million in what is thought to be Britain’s biggest divorce settlement. They had four children and were married for 17 years.
In what has become a classic case from 2006, Alan Miller was ordered to give his wife Melissa £5 million after a childless marriage lasting under three years.
And last June, millionaire entrepreneur Dale Vince had to give his ex-wife a lump sum of £300,000 even though he started his business a decade after they split up in 1992, when both were penniless peace protesters.
Barbara says it’s incredibly difficult to get women primary earners to pay their lower-earning husbands maintenance. ‘There’s hostility and resistance — they feel it’s not fair.’
She feels that for most ex-partners, three to five years of maintenance is enough while they get back into the workplace. This is separate from child maintenance, which she stresses should always be paid, because children’s interests take priority.
But doesn’t that mean the woman’s standard of living may drop if she’s taken time out from work to look after children and finds her earning power reduced, post-divorce?
Perhaps, admits Barbara, but adds: ‘A lot of women stay at home [to look after children] because they want to. They knowingly make decisions that will impact on their future, and they have to be responsible for those decisions.
‘I don’t think it’s fair that the woman expects to be looked after. I think that we should all — men and women — expect to take care of ourselves.’
And while our mothers’ generation may have reasonably expected to keep the family home after divorce, that’s simply not possible for most people now house prices are so high.
‘If you are going to stay in it you have to be able to share it — and that means refinancing to give equity to the other partner so they can have a comparable house with bedrooms for the kids to stay in.’
She says there’s an unspoken expectation the man will leave the family home, no matter who has instigated the divorce. ‘Women tend to say, right, we’re divorcing so will you please leave — and the man packs his suitcase, a bit like leaving a hotel room. That’s unfair.’
Telecoms engineer Martin Newton, 44, faced this situation when his wife Eve asked for a divorce after 13 years together. He’d paid a £200,000 deposit on their £320,000 house in Surrey using all his life savings, and had viewed it as their pension.
But when Eve announced she wanted a divorce, she demanded she keep the house for herself and their two sons aged ten and eight, plus maintenance, so she didn’t have to work for the first year or two after the divorce.
Martin agreed, and had to move in with his elderly mother while the divorce went through.
‘I felt she was the one with all the power because I didn’t want my children to suffer, so I basically traded everything for that.
‘I lost my life savings and pension pot — friends said I was mad, but I knew I would have the moral high ground, and Eve couldn’t use anything to turn the kids against me or stop me seeing them.
‘I thought in divorce things got divided 50:50, but solicitor friends told me it was more like 70:30 to the woman, usually. How is that fair?’
Martin suffered depression after his divorce in 2015, which is very common, says Barbara. We can underestimate the trauma men feel during divorce, she adds, partly because men don’t tend to share their feelings.
She’s had clients come to meetings with spreadsheets of the family finances — which can make the woman think he isn’t that upset. ‘Many men find comfort in numbers versus the emotional side. They never tell me if they’re scared or overwhelmed. But it doesn’t mean they’re not feeling these things.’
In almost every one of her firm’s cases, it’s the woman asking for the divorce. She suspects many have been planning a split for two or three years and the man’s often unaware. That’s certainly the position Clive Harrington, 48, from Sussex, found himself in. His wife Claire had an affair six years ago and the couple moved home four years ago to make a fresh start. But she told him last autumn she wanted a divorce, and wanted him out of the house.
‘She was so calm, she’d obviously been planning it for months,’ he says. ‘She’d even earmarked one-bed flats I could rent, and worked out which days I could take our youngest son to school that would fit in with her part-time job.
‘She was sitting at the kitchen table telling me all this, but I could hardly hear her.
‘I was completely pole-axed by what she was saying because as far as I was concerned things were ok — not great, but ok — between us. I’ve refused to move out for now, but living apart under the same roof creates a toxic atmosphere, especially for the children.’
He adds: ‘But I know if I move out I won’t see the kids so often and family life would essentially be over for me.’
It’s getting better for men, particularly if your children are older. But when they are very young it can be harder for the man. Even if the couple work full time and their baby is in a nursery and taking a bottle, the mother will still often get preference. I think that’s unfair.
Barbara says men should never move out of the family home until it’s been decided how and when they’ll see their children.
‘It’s getting better for men, particularly if your children are older. But when they are very young it can be harder for the man. Even if the couple work full time and their baby is in a nursery and taking a bottle, the mother will still often get preference. I think that’s unfair.’
She is aware her firm raises eyebrows in the legal profession: she’s heard people say they’re anti-women, and that it pits the sexes against each other.
‘We are not anti-women,’ she says. ‘You can want men to have the best settlement possible without thinking you want women to walk away with nothing.’
The average divorced woman has one third of the pension a divorced man has, and research shows a divorced man’s income increases by 11 per cent, while a woman’s falls by 17 per cent.
‘Men-only firms are a terrible idea,’ says Liz Cowell, principal family lawyer at Slater And Gordon, who also sits as a district judge. She worries such firms take a needlessly confrontational approach.
Barbara disagrees: ‘When I joined the firm I worried I’d be representing men who wanted to bring their wives down.
‘But you really don’t see that — they just want a fair settlement. We want men to understand they have a voice and they have rights.’
Some of the names have been changed.
Lawyers use same persecution tactics against divorcing men
Why marriage has become a hostile environment for men VIDEO
A fight for equality? No, it's a plot to wipe out marriage
The campaign to get rid of marriage has not gone away. Civil partnerships for heterosexuals were not thrown out by the Appeal Court last week, only put off till later. They will come.
In fact, after 20 years of New Labour government (some of it nominally Tory) we can now look back and survey the smoking ruins of marriage. It’s not that the New Labour radicals and their Tory imitators wrecked marriage on their own. It’s just that they have more or less finished it off.
The very words ‘husband’ and ‘wife’ have been erased from official forms and even from normal conversation. We all have partners now, whether we want to or not.
Divorce figures have fallen only because so many couples don’t get married in the first place. The marriage statistics show that more and more people simply aren’t bothering to make any sort of legal commitment at all before setting up home and starting a family.
As Lady Justice Hale, now tipped to be boss of the Supreme Court, said in 1982: ‘Family law now makes no attempt to buttress the stability of marriage or any other union,’ adding ‘the piecemeal erosion of the distinction between marriage and non-marital cohabitation may be expected to continue.’ And how.
Marriage has a strange, unique status in the courts. If you break a contract with your building society or a car leasing company, the law will come down against you.
If you break the marriage contract, the law will take your side and will eventually throw the other party out of the marital home if she or he insists on sticking to the original deal. Odd, eh? It’s amazing how many men, the usual victims of this strange arrangement, still get married at all.
I’d guess that marriage figures are artificially swollen each year by an unknown but large number of fake weddings, aimed at getting round immigration laws. Who can say? By their nature, such things aren’t always easy to detect.
Where you are most likely to see men suffering from PTSD
When the media publish articles on Post Traumatic Stress Disorder they usually associate them with soldiers,
people living in war zones, major accidents and various extreme events that lead to traumatization of the victims of such events.
However we can say with absolute certainty there are more men suffering from PTSD globally who have had PTSD DELIBERATELY
triggered by the freemason madmen embedded in the judicial, legal and police mafia's and who are intent on destroying men's lives for profit who rely on
stolen children to feed a network of satanic blackmail techniques that keeps their dimwitted goons in line.
Some of the symptoms PTSD triggers in victims are
Being easily startled
Feeling tense or “on edge”
Having difficulty sleeping
Having angry outbursts
Some factors that increase risk for PTSD include:
Living through dangerous events and traumas
Seeing another person hurt, or seeing a dead body
Feeling horror, helplessness, or extreme fear
Having little or no social support after the event
Dealing with extra stress after the event, such as loss of a loved one, pain and injury, or loss of a job or home
Having a history of mental illness or substance abuse
Not only are men facing the divorce industrial complex suffering serious PTSD symptoms but their children, seeing their father belittled and ripped from their lives, will have lifelong PTSD symptoms and may be part of the master plan to make it easier for those wishing to control to make them jump when demanded to by the state destroyers and with a fathers biological protection with little influence.
Never mind the appalling financial mess men are being left in but PTSD is driving men to their own suicidal thoughts by an evil satanic cult that uses psychological techniques to better their own wallets through leaving men unable to function. Their lives are driven out of control by the maniacs and psychopaths determined, despite growing evidence, to continue to take advantage of the failures of any oversight that ensures the few controlling the many are getting away with murder.
There are women who may also suffer and have likely been formerly married to a freemason and will endure the same harrowing experiences
as men when faced with judges who are hand picked freemasons there to protect their lodge buddies financial position. BUT NOT IF WE CAN HELP IT!!!!!!!!!!!
Britain's judeo masonic judicial mafia use flawed sexist WOMENS AID stats to block fathers from their children
More children are murdered by disturbed mothers than fathers but these massive changes take no account
Men are getting used to the feminist / homo leaning Guardian's attacks on heterosexual men using feminist
warped stats and backing up the judeo masonic mafia that has taken over decisions that juries should be
deciding on. They are producing propaganda for a government and legal mafia destroying families.
UK judges change court rules on child contact for violent fathers
Reforms aim to end presumption that a father must have contact with a child when there is evidence of domestic abuse
Senior judges are taking steps to end the presumption that a father must have contact with a child where there is evidence of domestic abuse that would put the child or mother at risk.
The reforms are to be introduced in the family courts after campaigning by the charity Women’s Aid, which identified that 19 children have been killed in the last 10 years by their violent fathers after being given contact with them by judges.
The changes include a demand from one of the most senior family court judges for all the judiciary to have further training on domestic violence and to act to ensure women and children are protected.
Mr Justice Cobb announced the changes on Friday after talks with Women’s Aid, and following concerns raised in a Guardian investigation.
Cobb said: “It is indeed most disturbing to note that for at least 12 children [in seven families], of the 19 children killed … contact with the perpetrator [the father] was arranged through the family courts.
“For six families, this contact was arranged in family court hearings [two of these were interim orders], and for one family, contact was decided as part of the arrangements for a non-molestation order and occupational order.”
Since its report on the child murders last year, Women’s Aid has identified another case in which a child was murdered by a father after being given contact via the family court. The charity is presenting their updated report to the prime minister in Downing Street on Monday.
Cobb also called for an end to the cross-examination of domestic violence victims by alleged perpetrators in court hearings, a practice banned in the criminal court. He said there needed to be “decisive action to cure this deeply unsatisfactory situation”.
Cobb’s reforms were endorsed on Friday by the President of the family division, Sir James Munby, who praised both Women’s Aid and the “hard hitting articles in the Guardian” for highlighting the issues.
The changes are contained in amendments to judicial guidance known as practice direction 12J. A key change announced by Cobb was that the presumption in the family court that there should be “contact at all costs” with both parents would be scrapped. He said it should be excluded in domestic violence cases where involvement of a parent in a child’s life would place the child or other parent at risk of harm.
He also said judges needed to be more alert to perpetrators of domestic violence using the courts as a way to continue their abuse. “Family court judges should be sure that they understand the new offence of coercion [controlling or coercive behaviour in an intimate or family relationship],” he said.
Cobb called for judges to be more alert to how violent men could use the access within the courts to assault their former partners, putting forward a proposal for courts to consider more carefully the waiting arrangements before a hearing, and arrangements for entering and exiting the court building.
Munby pointed out that austerity measures had impacted on courts’ ability to protect vulnerable witnesses. He said in his own court in the Royal Courts of Justice in London there was no safe waiting room and no video link.
“The problem, of course, is one of resources, and responsibility lies … ultimately with ministers. More, much more, needs to be done to bring the family courts up to an acceptable standard, indeed to match the facilities and ‘kit’ available in the crown court,” said Munby.
In his report on Friday, Cobb said it was essential that family court judges used the practice direction as it had been amended.
“By this report, I wish to highlight the concerns raised by Rights of Women, Women’s Aid … I hope that positive steps can now be taken to address in the family court the problem, long since addressed in the criminal court, of the alleged victims of domestic abuse being directly questioned by their unrepresented alleged abusers.”
Polly Neate, director of Women’s Aid, welcomed the changes. She said: “There should never be a presumption of contact where one parent is known to be a perpetrator of domestic abuse, as is made clear today.
“We urge the Family Procedure Rule Committee, and lord chancellor and secretary of state for justice, Liz Truss MP, to agree the new practice direction, with all of the changes set out by Mr Justice Cobb, without delay.”
The Ministry of Justice has indicated – following the articles in the Guardian and questions in parliament – that it is going to change the law to enforce a ban on direct cross-examination.
There is a great plague going on across the globe that is NOT being reported by the lawyer controlled mass media. A plague destroying men's lives and families under the guise of a continual rant to try and justify the mass plunder in the biggest heist across the planet.
'Domestic violence' is ranted like 'Weapons of Mass destruction' as the excuse to relieve a country of its oil wealth so DV helps the parasites to relieve ex-fathers of all their worldly possessions. The judeo masonic parasites have taken control of the courts, the cops, the councils and every other form of murderous thuggery used against decent fathers to virtually wipe out a whole species of men not part of their satanic cult.
Their rantings are becoming more extreme in their controlled rags as the internet has woken up so many from the masonic slumber instigated by a media that manufactures the FAKE news that allows this plague to continue unabated. But NOT if we can help it . NO distraction REPEAT NO distraction is going to stop us from continually focusing on the main threat across the globe to decent men and that is the divorce industrial complex intent on using whatever devious ploys they can to satisfy a greed and twisted lust for children stolen into care for a blackmail network that is only now being exposed in their media forced to accept their victims have alternative platforms to expose what has been covered up for so very long.
Divorce is the biggest government tax grab EVER VIDEO
Seven lawyers lost in UK's farcical child abuse inquiry VIDEO
The very bastards responsible for making children vulnerable and open to abuse expected to sit in judgement
Inside America's Billion Dollar Divorce Industry VIDEO
The legal mafia rake it in from their divorce victims misery
Restraining orders used to feed the legal perverts
Many married men are unaware of the legal scam of restraining orders and the enormity of the impact on their lives
after separation. A restraining order was originally manufactured supposedly to stop women OR MEN from being abused
but WOMEN seldom if ever get restraining orders against them as the vast bulk of MISUSED orders are against men ,
divorcing men in particular and by a long way and a misuse that sees millions of ex-husbands immediately restrained
from protecting their homes, livelihoods and most especially their children when the legal mafia come after their lives.
This should be a LAST resort not a FIRST resort that is used en masse against fathers with no criminal history.
Wicked ex-wives, goldiggers and their crooked lawyers have become expert at the dangerous misuse of restraining orders.
The most vile satanic perverts head the global law society and gain access to feed their vile perversions via court orders that stop at a stroke the protection a biological father provides for his children.
The authority of fathers is massively undermined when restraining orders allow thug cops to arrest a divorcing man on the most trumped up charges when vulnerable children become the prized possession of the perverts running the show.
Jewish lawyer and law lord Greville Janner aided and abetted Britain's legal mafia to conjure up laws that took boys into care. Meanwhile those boys in care were being abused by Janner for decades and allowed to continue with impunity as the system he helped create also protected him from any charges while the crown and police turned a blind eye to his homopaedo abuses against young boys.
Any lawyer using restraining orders to stifle a fathers RIGHT to protect his children from the judeo / masonic mafia is as criminal as the perverts like Janner and should be jailed for their part in furthering the satanists prepared to use perverse laws to get their way. Britain's masonic police and judges responsible for aiding and abetting this DIABOLICAL system of law and order that feeds the crime syndicate destroying fathers and their children's lives under the guise of protecting the poor wee downtrodden women.
ALL OF IT IS A MONSTROUS LIE AND JANNER IS ONLY ONE OF 100'S BEHIND THIS EVIL NETWORK OF POWER.
Want to know what a living hell is like? get divorced
Even with all the money in the world Brad Pitt and Johnny Depp cannot ensure a dignified end to their relationships.
Vile bitches have been allowed, thanks to the crooks running the legal system , to drag them through the smear campaigns that ultimately led them to lose not only large chunks of their wealth but to suffer the indignity of begging to see their children.
The legal mafia can use restraining orders to SHUT down a mans ability to protect his family, not only from women they use to care for who now throw the legal wolves at them, but that power men quickly find out restrains ALL their male traits that allows a corrupt system to take whatever they want from a man under the guise of law.
When men realise the enormity of what they are now biologically programmed to do is severely curtailed thanks to the biggest scum and filth on the planet they become vulnerable to suicide. It has been proven in psychological testing that the first three months after a man splits from his former wife not only is he emotionally disturbed but he is made to feel helpless by the psychological handcuffs that curtail his ability to protect his children from the rigors of a monster that suggests they can provide better protection while making millions in the process.
Only the continued exposure of the gangsters taking control of our children for the most devious and perverted reasons will men unite against the scum and filth like British jewish lawyer Greville Janner who, despite abusing young boys for decades, was allowed to create laws that leave men unable to provide the biological protection that removes vulnerable children into care homes for Janner and his ilk to access for their own devious lust for young boys. A sick and sinister satanic monster with vile judeo masonic perverts at its head.
Brad Pitt ‘Sickened’ By Angelina’s Hollywood Illuminati Rituals
Sources close to Brad Pitt claim the star was “sickened” by the Hollywood Illuminati rituals that Angelina Jolie introduced him to.
It is also claimed that the leaked video, in which a 23-year-old Angelina Jolie admits to joining the Illuminati, participating in secret rituals, and making animal sacrifices, was released by Pitt as retaliation for Jolie “attempting to destroy his career.“
The stunning footage of Jolie revealing the true inner workings of Hollywood as she describes her experiences participating in secret Illuminati rituals to close friends, was leaked and uploaded to YouTube just four days after Jolie filed for divorce from Pitt.
The divorce has already become ugly, with smears and counter-smears, and now the claim that Pitt has publicly outed Jolie as a member of the secret society is threatening to further escalate tensions.
Although Jolie cites the standard “irreconcilable differences” on her divorce papers, she or her proxies have made it known that she’s seeking sole custody of their 6 kids on the grounds that Pitt is unfit – dependent on marijuana and alcohol, and prone to violent outbursts.
A recent incident, alleged to have taken place while the family were flying back to Los Angeles on a private plane, is cited in the tabloid press as the incident that pushed Jolie to file for divorce. Apparently drunk, Pitt allegedly became physically abusive of one of their children – said to be their oldest, 15-year-old Maddox – after he intervened in his adopted parents’ argument.
Sources close to Pitt told the New York Post‘s Page Six that although the Fight Club star shouted at Maddox, “he never raised a hand to the boy.” The sources also believe that Jolie is attempting to destroy Pitt’s career.
All of which makes the timing of the leak of the video in which Jolie admits to joining the Illuminati very interesting — suggestive of an attempt by Pitt to retaliate against Jolie.
The Illuminati was always going to be a bad fit for the Fight Club star, and unlike Jolie, who embraced the cult unreservedly, Pitt always maintained a safe distance.
However it widely believed that Pitt has Illuminati connections. In early September, the Moneyball star made the Illuminati 666 hand-sign while posing for a photo taken for a recent interview
And at the Toronto International Film Festival in 2011, Pitt was asked by reporters to talk about his lean years acting in low budget flops – before his breakthrough came in A River Runs Through It and he shot straight to the top of the Hollywood A-list.
As reported by Fred Topel for StarPulse on September 19, 2011, Pitt “joked” about making a pact with Satan. Pitt said:
“I grew up in a very Christian environment, a healthy environment, a loving family. But there were just parameters and things I didn’t understand. I always questioned it and it took me to my adult years or leaving home where I could really try on something different for myself. That was Satanism. It’s working out really well. I made a pact. That’s why the movie came out so well.”
Get a job! Divorce courts curb meal ticket deals for ex-wives
We still don't believe this has been stopped
Shift comes after landmark case ordered spouse to find work seven years after her split
Ex-wives who live off maintenance payments from their husbands are increasingly being ordered to get a job instead.
No longer can they live a life of leisure and rely on a monthly slice of their former spouse’s earnings, divorce
lawyers said yesterday.
Courts are far less willing to grant them the right to be supported for life – sounding the death knell of ‘meal ticket’ divorces.
Even if a mother in her fifties has not worked for decades, to raise a family, she will be expected to retrain and find work.
The shift follows a landmark case last year in which the ex-wife of a millionaire racehorse surgeon was told she should find work.
The Appeal Court backed Tracey Wright’s ex-husband Ian Wright after he complained it was unfair that he be expected to support her indefinitely, even after his retirement, while she made ‘no effort whatsoever to seek work’.
Now other courts are following suit, imposing time limits on maintenance orders rather than making them life-long.
Holly Tootill, a family lawyer with JMW Solicitors, which handles about 300 divorces a year, said the result of the Wright case had had a ‘marked impact’ on all such cases.
She said: ‘What we’re effectively seeing is the death of the so-called “meal ticket” which maintenance had long been regarded as.
‘Indefinite awards – or “joint-lives” orders – used to be something of a norm, a means of ensuring that the financially weaker spouse was provided for, especially until a couple’s children had grown up, when the arrangement might be revised.’
But she said since the ruling, in February last year, time-limited maintenance arrangements were becoming more common.
‘That is a perceptible shift. As a result, the current expectation in divorces heard across the country appears to be that wives should only receive support for such a period of time which, it is felt, allows them to retrain, if necessary, and find work rather than remain dependent on their ex-husband into the future.
‘I’m aware of numerous examples of women who have been forced to come to terms with the prospect of providing for themselves, including cases of women who had not worked for three decades in order to raise a family, being obliged to find a job in their fifties.’
‘Wives can, of course, challenge that view but few seem willing to do so.’
The case of Ian and Tracey Wright last year went all the way to the Court of Appeal after Mrs Wright challenged the ‘harsh words’ of a family court judge who said there was no good reason why she had done no work since her divorce.
When they divorced in 2008, the couple’s £1.3million seven-bedroom home, set in 16 acres of Suffolk countryside, was sold and the proceeds divided.
Mrs Wright, 52, was left with a £450,000 mortgage-free house near Newmarket, Suffolk, plus stabling for her horse and her daughters’ ponies. Her ex-husband, 60, was ordered to pay her £75,000 a year in maintenance and school fees, including £33,200 for her personal upkeep.
But Mr Wright, who runs an equine hospital in Newmarket, carrying out life-saving surgery on racehorses worth up to tens of millions of pounds, went to the High Court to seek a cut in his payments.
Judge Lynn Roberts agreed, saying Mrs Wright, a former legal secretary, should find a new job. ‘The world of work has innumerable possibilities … vast numbers of women with children just get on with it and Mrs Wright should have done as well,’ she ruled.
The case of Ian Wright last year went all the way to the Court of Appeal after his ex-wife Tracey challenged the ‘harsh words’ of a family court judge who said there was no good reason why she did not have a job
The case of Ian Wright last year went all the way to the Court of Appeal after his ex-wife Tracey challenged the ‘harsh words’ of a family court judge who said there was no good reason why she did not have a job
‘I do not think the children will suffer if Mrs Wright has to work … [it] may well provide them with a good role model. It is possible to find work that fits in with childcare … I reject her other reasons relating to responsibilities for animals, or trees or housekeeping.’ She added: ‘Mrs Wright has made no effort whatsoever to seek work or to update her skills…on the basis that she would be supported for life. It is essential that she starts to work now.’
The couple’s youngest daughter, then aged ten, lived with her mother, while the other daughter, who was 16 at the time, was at boarding school.
The ex-wife challenged the decision to slash her future maintenance, but Lord Justice Pitchford, sitting at the Court of Appeal, rejected her claim.
He said divorcees with children over seven should work for a living.
But Mrs Wright claimed she had been ‘made to feel like a criminal … for putting my children first’.
Elizabeth Hicks, family law expert at Irwin Mitchell, said judges increasingly made it plain ‘spousal maintenance is no longer a meal ticket for life’.
Charlotte Posnansky, of law firm Charles Russell Speechlys, added: ‘The pendulum has swung heavily in favour of women when considering the financial implications upon divorce … [but it] seems to be swinging back again.’
UK divorce laws a joke after judges gave ALL man's money to his ex-wife and threatened him with jail
THE BIGGEST TERROR THREAT TO MEN'S WELFARE COMES FROM FAMILY COURTS AND THE ROGUE CORRUPT FREEMASON JUDGES
WHO OPERATE THEM FOR THE EXCLUSIVE ENTITLEMENT OF WOMEN BUT PRIMARILY THE CROOKED LEGAL MAFIA MAKING BILLIONS
FROM THE SPOILS. YET WE DON'T HEAR ANY OUTCRY FROM THE POLITICAL MAFIA WHO ARE WATCHING MEN'S LIVES BEING DESTROYED
BY DRACONIAN JUDGEMENTS.
A former millionaire software tycoon has branded Britain's divorce laws 'out of date' after winning a test case against a suspended jail sentence imposed against him for failing to keep up maintenance payments to his ex-wife.
Peter Morris, 51, said he has been left 'empty handed and homeless' since the end of his 25-year marriage to ex Jane after she was given the majority of the former couple's £560,000 wealth.
Mrs Morris, 52, was awarded £500,000 in the settlement while he received £66,000. He was later ordered to pay her £77,000 in maintenance and other 'debts' and was last year given a six-week suspended prison term for failing to pay her £2,000 per month.
But his lawyers told Court of Appeal judges jailing husbands for failing to pay maintenance violates their human rights and is a 'curious survivor' of Dickensian debtors laws which has 'no place in the modern world'.
Mr Morris is now asking for a financial 'clean break' from his ex, insisting he cannot pay her anything more as he is 'homeless, insolvent, and unable to meet his obligations.'
The couple enjoyed quarter of a century of well-heeled married life in their £1.2million four-bedroom detached house in the Chilterns.
Mrs Morris gave up her pre-marriage career as a businesswoman and 'stayed at home to look after the home and care for their children by agreement with her husband.'
He was MD of a software company with a seven-figure turnover, who earned up to £240,000-a-year, and the family enjoyed 'expensive holidays' as part of an enviable lifestyle.
Even when their marriage hit the rocks and they split in 2013, their 'extravagant' spending, particularly by Mr Morris, continued unabated.
By the time the case got to court, the money had almost dried up and Judge Glen Brasse ruled that only enough remained in the pot to meet the core needs of the wife and the couple's children.
Judge Judith Hughes QC later hit him with a suspended jail term for his failure to pay up.
Challenging the decision, Peter Duckworth, for Mr Morris, said a system which can see husbands jailed over debts to their ex-wives is a legal relic that ought to be consigned to history.
He told Lady Justice Black, Lord Justice Floyd and Mr Justice Moylan: 'The objective seems to be to force the husband into a situation from which he cannot escape...it is a very curious survivor of very old practices. Mr Morris's case raises an issue of public importance.
'Procedures are being implemented which don't comply with the obligations of the UK under the European Convention on Human Rights, consigning the husband to a prison sentence on a charge of which he was only dimly aware, at a time when he was not legally represented'.
Holding prison sentences over husband's heads was not 'in keeping with the modern view that husbands and wives approach this court on an equal footing,' added the barrister.
Following those arguments, Damien Garrido QC, for Mrs Morris, accepted that her ex-husband's suspended jail term should be overturned.
But she is hotly contesting his case that they should go their separate ways financially and that he shouldn't have to pay her any more.
Mr Morris, whose company has gone into administration, insists that his financial fortunes have continued to plummet and it is simply 'impossible' for him to pay all he owes.
And Mr Duckworth claimed that Mrs Morris is now better off in real terms than her ex-husband.
He told the court: 'There is nothing to suggest that the husband wilfully or deliberately neglected to pay maintenance.'
The barrister added: 'He was thrown out of his London flat and is living on the charity of his lady friend.
'He has been left in an impossible situation of being homeless, insolvent, and unable to meet his obligations'.
Of Mrs Morris, Mr Duckworth said: 'The indications that she can manage on the income that she has are many. She has a net income of over £23,000 a year.
'She is currently working for an estate agents as a receptionist. Her employment status is permanent. The wife moved into a mortgage-free property.
'There is also an entitlement from the estate of her late mother. This is a significant move in the wife's resources.
'The husband lacks the means to pay spousal maintenance, but the wife is secure in a new career, is backed by an inheritance and not in need of funds.
'In the current circumstances, he will be unable to go on paying anything to his former wife. Is this now a clean break case? I submit that it is.
'I believe it is time now to sever financial ties between this couple,' the barrister said.
Mr Garrido, in reply, urged the judges to uphold the maintenance order.
He complained that there was 'a complete absence of clarity' about Mr Morris's income, due to 'contradictory statements and complete lack of disclosure.'
The barrister went on to assert that Mr Morris is receiving substantially more money each month than he professes.
The judges have now reserved their decision on Mr Morris's appeal and will give their ruling at a later date.
Mr Duckworth said outside court: 'It is essentially a test case'.
Without a clean break, Mr Morris was anxious that his ex-wife could again seek to enforce the debt, putting him at risk of jail once more, he added.
The entitlement that has to STOP as Christina Estrada handed £53m by UK's masonic / zionist judicial crooks
Her list of entitlements would make any man physically sick. The scum and filth who pamper to
these golddigging demands are the enemy of any decent man who is being shafted by a totally corrupt
Ms Estrada was cross-examined in court on her needs, which she said included:
£40,000 a year for fur coats
£109,000 a year for haute couture dresses
£21,000 a year on shoes
£60m to afford a luxury London home
A £4.4m countryside home in Henley-on-Thames
£495,000 for five cars - three in London and two in the America
A former supermodel has been awarded a £53m ($69m) lump sum after a divorce battle with her billionaire ex-husband.
Berkshire-based Christina Estrada, 54, had wanted £196m from Saudi businessman Sheikh Walid Juffali, 61, to meet her "needs" - including £1m a year on clothes - the High Court was told.
The total settlement, which takes into account her own assets, is about £75m.
Her lawyers said this makes it "by more than £50m, the largest needs award ever made by an English court".
Ms Estrada, who is is currently living at the matrimonial home bordering Windsor Great Park, had rejected an offer that, when added to her own assets, would have given her £37m to live on.
The US citizen was married to Mr Juffali for 13 years and has been based in the UK since 1988.
She said: "Having grown up in a middle-class family and having enjoyed a successful career until my marriage, I am fully aware that the spectacular life Walid and I led was immensely fortunate and rarefied.
"And I fully understand how this can be perceived in the wider world.
"My focus now is to support my daughter and move forward with our lives."
She added that the process had been "bruising and distressing", explaining that her ex-husband had taken a second wife and divorced her without her knowledge, and had used diplomatic immunity to try to stop her accessing a legally binding settlement
The former Pirelli calendar model argued in the London court that she was 'ENTITLED' to a settlement that would allow her to maintain her lifestyle.
She told family judge Mrs Justice Roberts: "I was a top international model. I have lived this life. This is what I am accustomed to."
Her lawyers estimated her ex-husband is worth £8bn.
But Mr Juffali, who has been married three times, said in a written statement that was a "fantasy" figure, putting his current net worth at £113.8m.
He could not attend court because he is terminally ill with CANCER and undergoing treatment.
He said in the statement that he had left the vast majority of his wealth to his three eldest children, including his teenage daughter with Ms Estrada.
The sheikh divorced Ms Estrada in Saudi Arabia in 2014 under Islamic law, without her knowledge. He had married a 25-year-old Lebanese model in 2012 while still married to Ms Estrada.
Mr Juffali's solicitors Mishcon de Reya issued a statement after the hearing, stating that he had "shown himself to be a fair man who has been prepared to offer his ex-wife a more than comfortable lifestyle for the rest of her life, which he believes she deserves".
"The sole purpose of this case was to evaluate an appropriate financial settlement based on Ms Estrada's needs, as opposed to the extraordinary demands presented by her at the start of this case," they added.
Mrs Justice Roberts said in her ruling that Ms Estrada had described her lifestyle during the course of the marriage as "magical".
She added: "That may well be an apt description. The issue is the extent to which she should be entitled to continue with the bubble of a 'magical existence' for the foreseeable future. I am concerned with ensuring that adequate provision is made to meet her reasonable needs."
Mr Juffali has been ordered to pay Ms Estrada her lump sum by 29 July.
Though Ms Estrada's lawyers said she received the largest "needs award" ever made by an English court, larger total payouts have been made in the past.
In 2014, a court said Jamie Cooper-Hohn should receive £337m in her divorce from London financier Sir Chris Hohn.
Three years earlier, the late Russian oligarch Boris Berezovsky's former wife Galina Besharova reportedly agreed to accept between £165m and £220m as part of a settlement.
Many argue over to what degree countries have a police state in operation? In the west, where the political and legal mafia have been pushing feminist and homosexual agenda's, there is one section of society that can clearly see the depths of a police state and that is divorcing men.
It is only when you are hounded, persecuted and attacked primarily for your estate and children , thanks to the utter corruption of the west's divorce industrial complex, that you see ALL the arms of the state being used to destroy your life from a well oiled bunch of stasi like vermin only to happy to instigate the court orders that ensure men can be rounded up like sheep and pushed around for decades by the thugs who are getting away with murder.
The political scum that seek the electors vote come election time are fully aware this system is in operation and not only condone the long term harassment of heterosexual men but , at every opportunity, add additional ploys to ensure the most lucrative terror threat on the planet for men is the divorce courts.
Despite regular reports of men being found at the bottom of cliffs or high buildings, on railway tracks or next to a large bottle of pills NONE of the evil bastards that are behind the mass culling of men take any notice but instead continue to ride roughshod over every right men require to STOP the state machine rolling over them like an enormous tidal wave.
Forget the utter bullshit of their manufactured threats pumped out by a complicit media. The west truly has a massive police state operating in every area of the countries behind this monster that is only truly visible to the men facing oppression that has come from decades of evil laws manufactured by zionist / freemasons who have become ultra wealthy thanks to the draconian powers imposed on heterosexual men. These same bastards immune to the very laws they themselves manufacture.
Ex-Wife fights for share of ex's £175,000 payout for child abuse
Disgusting divorce claims have reached new depths
An estranged wife is trying to claim part of the £175,000 compensation her husband received for suffering sexual abuse as a child.
As part of her divorce settlement, Helen Tippett, 41, has applied to the courts for a share of the cash paid to Andrew Kerslake.
Mr Kerslake, 45, regarded the compensation as ‘dirty money’ and put it into a trust to be given to charity when he dies.
But Miss Tippett claims the money is a marital asset and wants her share of it. It is believed legal history will be made if the courts find in her favour.
Mr Kerslake was molested between the ages of five and ten by a family friend. After he finally went to the police in 1998 his abuser was jailed for three years.
The father-of-four was paid £175,000 by the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority – a government organisation which pays damages to victims of violent crime – in 2002.
He set up the Andrew Kerslake Trust and the fund has grown to almost £250,000 after being invested by his lawyers.
Mr Kerslake, who has waived his right to anonymity as a victim of sexual abuse, said: ‘I was given the money to compensate for what happened to me when I was a very young boy.
'I was abused over 500 times, every Monday, Wednesday, Friday and Saturday. It left me with both physical and emotional damage.
‘I didn’t apply for the money, I didn’t really want it at the time. But I’m not prepared to hand it over as part of our divorce settlement.
'It doesn’t seem right that my ex-wife should get a penny of it – it does not belong to her, she wasn’t the one who was abused.
‘It is shameless and immoral that she is even trying. I’m very disappointed in her.’
When the compensation was paid the couple were happily married. Miss Tippett was studying for a humanities degree and Mr Kerslake was a stay-at-home father.
He said: ‘My wife wanted to spend it, she wanted a beautiful house, she had all sorts of ways of spending it. But to me it was dirty money...I could not bring myself to use it.’
Devout Catholic Mr Kerslake wants the fund to be his legacy and has laid down instructions about how it should be used to help other victims of abuse.
His 19-year marriage came to an end four years ago and he has since become estranged from his children.
His wife reverted to her maiden name, and Mr Kerslake believes she is now in a relationship with a man named Jarrod Williams who is 11 years her junior.
Mr Kerslake, who walks with the aid of crutches after breaking his back in a fall, said: ‘They say they are not living together but he posts pictures of the two of them in bed on Facebook.
‘I’m concerned some of that money would end up in his pocket. That can’t be right.’
Mr Kerslake said he now suffers from a variety of health problems. His legal team say that if Miss Tippett wins the case it will be the first time compensation paid to a sex abuse victim has been part of a divorce settlement.
He said: ‘I don’t want people to think I put the money in a trust to stop Helen getting her hands on it – that is not the case.
‘I just don’t want the money myself and it is my wish it will be divided between two charities of my choice when I die.
‘It was paid to me for something that happened long before I met Helen. I still have to live with the consequences of that.’
Mr Kerslake lives alone in a housing association bungalow in Llanharan, near Bridgend in south Wales.
His estranged wife now works part-time in a church breakfast club and claims she needs the money to buy a house for herself and her two youngest children.
Miss Tippett was accompanied by Mr Williams at two preliminary hearings at the County Court in Pontypridd.
She refused to comment on her claim, which is due to be decided in September.
Why are there 70,000+ children in care homes in the UK?
Grafton Close children's home had dark secrets
According to a recent BBC report (BBC controlled by lawyers) almost 70,000 children are in care homes across England and Wales. That does NOT include Scotland on those records. The BBC report obviously leans heavily in favour of the mothers of those children when the major factor is that the mothers are suffering from mental health problems and the main reason the children are in care. Mothers with mental health problems accusing fathers of domestic violence a
common racket done through lawyers milking the system for millions.
However there is a far more devious and dangerous reason for much of this in that many of the mothers have divorced the biological fathers, who if the courts operated correctly would take care of the children, instead they REMOVE the fathers prior to using the mothers mental state to snatch the children into care.
There are a number of reasons for lawyers and judges acting in this way (never juries).
1. Public money in the form of legal aid into the millions is provided for these court cases
and making lawyers millionaires on the back of now vulnerable children, and no doubt a substantial amount of that money will end up in the judges pockets as well.
2. Social Services and local freemason run councils are paid a fortune to find accommodation for children stolen into care.
3. Many care homes are operated by paedo's left to abuse children now without mothers and fathers.
4. The system is made as corrupt as possible and leaves children open to abuse from the likes of top BBC tv presenter Jimmy Savile who regularly visited care homes to access young vulnerable children for himself and the paedo ring he operated out of BBC studios.
Also a social services overflowing with feminists, homosexuals and lesbians only to happy to hand those vulnerable children out to
be abused and well documented homopaedo's deliberately partnering to gain adoption of young boys for their own perverted ends.
5. Many sheeple would fail to understand the enormity of what is going on right under their noses and could not believe those who have charged THEMSELVES with the protection of children and who have used freemason manufactured laws to separate children from their biological fathers are the ones who need to be sectioned for their part in the most wicked
legalese that have left thousands of children in the hands of the gangsters and mobsters running the family courts for their own self enrichment and perverted ends.
War being waged against men after judicial mafia hand £300,000 to ex wife who divorced man 20 years ago
Staggering how extreme Britain's lunatic judges are now going in their vile judgements. Meanwhile
lawyers are lining their pockets over these outrageous demands
Kathleen Wyatt had originally demanded a £1.9million payout from Dale Vince, who is thought to be worth around £107million
The ex-wife of a hippy-turned multi millionaire has been handed a 'modest' £300,000 in a settlement - despite divorcing almost 20 years ago.
Dale Vince is now worth more than £100m after founding green energy firm Ecotricity , but was penniless when he and ex Kathleen Wyatt divorced in 1992, having met in 1981.
However, she later demanded a £1.9million payout from the millionaire and has now won a "modest" lump sum payment of £300,000 in final settlement.
She had not lodged a maintenance claim until more than 25 years after they had separated, and nearly 20 years after their divorce.
How much she will actually receive of her award remains uncertain, because of outstanding legal bills which have yet to be fully quantified.
Approving the terms of the settlement, High Court family judge Mr Justice Cobb, sitting in London, said: "I am perfectly satisfied that it is reasonable, and that the wife is entitled to receive a modest capital award following the breakdown of this marriage.
"The lump sum payment agreed between the parties fairly represents, in my view, a realistic and balanced appraisal of the unusual circumstances of this case."
Wyatt's initial claim was thrown out of court in March 2015, but she successfully appealed the decision.
According to Business Insider UK , the couple did not "seal off" the financial arrangements section of their divorce papers.
Mr Vince is now thought to have a net worth of about £107m while Ecotricity is worth £57 million.
He founded the company in 1995 with a single wind turbine he had used to power an old army truck he called home on a hill near Stroud in Gloucestershire.
Neither Ms Wyatt, 55, of Monmouth, nor Mr Vince, 53, of Stroud, Gloucestershire, were in court for the announcement of the settlement.
Feminazi/Guardian view of marriage (Men need to heed those warning signs) VIDEO
Petition to Congress: Stop False Allegations of Domestic Violence
The number one global racket of freemasons who control family courts, through their judicial mafia, and the laws governing them that
allows these scum to enrich their coffers from the hard work and wealth of the men that are abused inside their utter dens of iniquity
We, the undersigned, are writing in hopes of bringing to your attention a dire misjustice that is occuring in our
state as well as many others across the US. Laws inacted to protect the victims of the vile crime of domestic violence
are being misused by both citizens as well as law enforcement, and in this process innocent men's lives are being destroyed.
In most states, the burden of proof is being thrown out and the simple word of the accuser is being taken without question,
many times without the accused even being allowed to speak. True victims of domestic violence, some of whose names you
will find below, find this to be deplorable. Not only can a woman falsely accuse a man of domestic violence without fear
of consequence, but the accused man has no voice against her.
The accuser can be a mentally disturbed individual using
such laws to exact her revenge against a man who simply does not want to be in a relationship anymore,
and her word is automatically taken, even when no evidence is in place. The man in such cases is automatically
arrested, injunctions are automatically set in place, and even if he is able to prove his innocence in court
he has lost months of his life due to the fact that she cried wolf.
Worse yet are the cases of these innocent men who are poor and have no means to hire private attorneys.
Their public defenders assume they are guilty and therefore do only the bare necessities to be their legal
voice.We are not in any way asking for a revocation of the laws that protect true victims of domestic violence.
Our wish is that these laws be revisited and indications made to to allow for criminal and civil prosecution when
someone, whether male or female, has misused these laws in a vindictive and cunning way. We also would ask that
law enforcement officers, public attorneys, and judges be forced to recognize the precept that the accused is
innocent until proven guilty. Unfortunately, in the cases of domestic violence accusations, the opposite is true.
An example of this is that of a 20 year old Florida resident who made the bond that was set for him, only to be picked up the very next day without provocation.
The accuser in this case simply told the court she was afraid. He had done nothing in terms of trying to contact her or
see her, and was not without several witnesses the few short hours he was free. Something must be done to prevent those
who would lie about being a victim of domestic violence from continuing to do so.
If it is not, our prisons will be overrun with innocent men and our streets will be controlled by the women who sent them there.